| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2000;101:e9025.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cardiovascular News |
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
halted one part of the large ALLHAT high blood pressure study because
one of the drugs, an
-adrenergic blocker, was found to be less
effective than the traditional diuretic in reducing some forms
of heart disease
(http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/new/press/mar08-00.htm).
The ALLHAT study was designed to have 2 parts. One compared newer drug treatments for high blood pressure with more conventional and less costly treatment. The other compared treatments for high cholesterol.
The
-adrenergic blocker was doxazosin, and the diuretic was
chlorthalidone. In the study, those who took doxazosin had 25% more
cardiovascular events and were twice as likely to be
hospitalized for congestive heart failure as those who used
chlorthalidone. The drugs had similar rates of effectiveness in
preventing heart attacks and in reducing the risk of deaths from all
causes.
The federal agency took the action only after an independent data review by a committee specifically set up to do such monitoring was completed. Patients who were taking doxazosin were offered an alternative medication in consultation with their personal physicians.
"This finding adds important information to our understanding of antihypertensive drugs," said NHLBI Director Dr Claude Lenfant, MD. "No large-scale blood pressure treatment study had ever compared these 2 classes of drugs. Earlier studies were small and could not, for example, detect an increase in patients risk of congestive heart failure."
The other part of the ALLHAT study dealing with high
cholesterol will continue until 2002, the time when the
study was expected
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |