Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:e209

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stafford, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Opie, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stafford, R. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other Treatment

(Circulation. 2000;101:e209.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulation Electronic Pages

Trends in Antihypertensive Drug Treatment

Lionel H. Opie

Cape Heart Center Cape Town, South Africa


*    Introduction
 
To the Editor:

It is disappointing to read once again that "ß-blockers and thiazide diuretics are the only antihypertensive agents that have been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality."1 In these days of evidence-based medicine, we must ask: where is the evidence for this statement? The basic data referenced by Wang et al1 are those of the meta-analysis of Psaty et al,2 which are also shown in the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Yet, Figure 6 in the report shows very clearly that cardiovascular and total mortality are not reduced by ß-blockade; the confidence intervals in both cases clearly overlap unity and are therefore not significant. Likewise, coronary heart disease is also not reduced by ß-blockade, although stroke and congestive heart failure are. In contrast, all these end points are clearly reduced by low-dose diuretics. In another meta-analysis that focused on the elderly, diuretics but not ß-blockers reduced cardiovascular mortality.3 It is difficult to understand why Wang et al included the Metoprolol Atherosclerosis Prevention in Hypertension (MAPHY) study as evidence for the benefits of ß-blockade. This was an open-label, unblinded study without placebo control.

A further implication of the article by Wang et al is that calcium-channel blockers do not reduce cardiovascular mortality. However, in the Systolic Hypertension in Elderly in Europe (SYST-EUR) study of elderly patients with systolic hypertension, the dihydropyridine nitrendipine was particularity efficacious in diabetic patients, in whom cardiovascular mortality was strikingly reduced (odds ratio, 0.24; . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Thomas J. Wang, MD; John C. Ausiello, BA; Randall S. Stafford, MD, PhD

Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass