Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:484-486

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology

(Circulation. 2000;102:484.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

What Type of ß-Blocker Should Be Used to Treat Chronic Heart Failure?

Michael R. Bristow, MD, PhD

From the Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262

Correspondence to Michael R. Bristow, MD, PhD, the Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262.


Key Words: Editorials • heart failure • receptors, adrenergic, beta • hemodynamics

The success of ß-blocking agents in treating mild to moderate heart failure has generated a debate over whether the salutary results are strictly a class effect caused by ß1-adrenergic receptor antagonism or if additional pharmacological properties of some compounds increase the efficacy inherent in all agents that block ß1-receptors. The diverse adrenergic receptor activities of ß-blocking agents that have been used successfully to treat chronic heart failure, the emerging role of the various adrenergic receptor pathways in the mediation of cardiomyopathic phenotypes in model systems (recently reviewed in Circulation1 ), and the vigor of pharmaceutical company scientific marketing all contribute to the legitimacy and decibel level of the discussion. The original, largely theoretical arguments2 3 4 have led to increasingly more rigorous tests of the hypothesis that clinically important differences exist among these agents. In this issue of Circulation, Metra et al5 report the largest of these tests to date. They provide a direct comparison of the of the ß1-adrenergic-receptor–selective, "second generation" ß-blocker metoprolol with the nonselective ß/{alpha}-blocker, "third generation" compound carvedilol.

Metra et al5 measured left ventricular (LV) functional and hemodynamic effects in 150 subjects with heart failure who were prospectively randomized 1:1 to the recommended doses of each agent. Previous, smaller studies had reported either subtle differences in favor of carvedilol4 6 or no difference7 between the 2 agents. Their data5 indicate that compared with metoprolol, carvedilol provides, as expected, a greater degree of ß-blockade. Also, as expected and as previously reported in individual clinical trials,8 9 . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
T. J. Vittorio, R. Zolty, M. E. Kasper, R. M. Khandwalla, D. S. Hirsh, C.-H. Tseng, U. P. Jorde, and K. Ahuja
Differential Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol Succinate on Plasma Norepinephrine Release and Peak Exercise Heart Rate in Subjects With Chronic Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2008; 13(1): 51 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. S. Tutor, P. Penela, and F. Mayor Jr.
Anti-{beta}1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies are potent stimulators of the ERK1/2 pathway in cardiac cells
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2007; 76(1): 51 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
K. Swedberg
Pure heart rate reduction: further perspectives in heart failure
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2007; 9(suppl_F): F20 - F24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. L. Mann and M. R. Bristow
Mechanisms and Models in Heart Failure: The Biomechanical Model and Beyond
Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2837 - 2849.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. V. Booth, E. E. Ward, K. C. Colgan, B. L. Funk, H. El-Moalem, M. P. Smith, C. Milano, P. K. Smith, M. F. Newman, and D. A. Schwinn
Metoprolol and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Does Intraoperative Metoprolol Attenuate Acute {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Desensitization During Cardiac Surgery?
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1224 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
A. Ahmed
Myocardial beta-1 adrenoceptor down-regulation in aging and heart failure: implications for beta-blocker use in older adults with heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2003; 5(6): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
K. Chakir, Y. Xiang, D. Yang, S.-J. Zhang, H. Cheng, B. K. Kobilka, and R.-P. Xiao
The Third Intracellular Loop and the Carboxyl Terminus of {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Confer Spontaneous Activity of the Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2003; 64(5): 1048 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. Pavoine, N. Behforouz, C. Gauthier, S. Le Gouvello, F. Roudot-Thoraval, C. R. Martin, A. Pawlak, C. Feral, N. Defer, R. Houel, et al.
{beta}2-Adrenergic Signaling in Human Heart: Shift from the Cyclic AMP to the Arachidonic Acid Pathway
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2003; 64(5): 1117 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Bristow
Antiadrenergic Therapy of Chronic Heart Failure: Surprises and New Opportunities
Circulation, March 4, 2003; 107(8): 1100 - 1102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. A Turner, K. E Porter, W. H.T Smith, H. L White, S. G Ball, and A. J Balmforth
Chronic {beta}2-adrenergic receptor stimulation increases proliferation of human cardiac fibroblasts via an autocrine mechanism
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2003; 57(3): 784 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Azeka, J. A. Franchini Ramires, C. Valler, and E. Alcides Bocchi
Delisting of infants and children from the heart transplantation waiting list after carvedilol treatment
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 4, 2002; 40(11): 2034 - 2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
M. L. Kukin
{beta}-Blockers in Chronic Heart Failure: Considerations for Selecting an Agent
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2002; 77(11): 1199 - 1206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. D. Lowes, E. M. Gilbert, W. T. Abraham, W. A. Minobe, P. Larrabee, D. Ferguson, E. E. Wolfel, J. Lindenfeld, T. Tsvetkova, A. D. Robertson, et al.
Myocardial Gene Expression in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Treated with Beta-Blocking Agents
N. Engl. J. Med., May 2, 2002; 346(18): 1357 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Maack, T. Elter, G. Nickenig, K. LaRosee, M. Crivaro, A. Stablein, H. Wuttke, and M. Bohm
Prospective crossover comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 939 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. D. Port and M. R. Bristow
beta -Adrenergic Receptors, Transgenic Mice, and Pharmacological Model Systems
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 629 - 631.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Engelhardt, Y. Grimmer, G.-H. Fan, and M. J. Lohse
Constitutive Activity of the Human beta 1-Adrenergic Receptor in beta 1-Receptor Transgenic Mice
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 712 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]