(Circulation. 2000;102:940.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
From the Division of Cardiology and Sealy Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Correspondence to Marschall S. Runge, MD, PhD, University of Texas Medical Branch, Division of Cardiology, 9.138 Medical Research Building, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-1064. E-mail mrunge@utmb.edu
Key Words: Editorials imaging gene therapy angiogenesis growth substances
Amid the criticisms levied at gene therapy researchers recently, the positive (yet preliminary) advances in therapies designed to elicit angiogenesis for the treatment of ischemic vascular disease, such as the current report by Vale and colleagues,1 are a breath of fresh air for cardiovascular specialists and their patients. Although therapeutic angiogenesis is still in its nascent stages (and its benefits unproven), the contrarian tactics employed by this group are reaping dividends. Whereas the standard approach of gene therapists has been to use viral-based vectors to treat otherwise lethal diseases, the scientists attempting to evoke therapeutic angiogenesis in this report chose to treat patients in whom the benefits may be primarily symptomatic, and they used a relatively low-tech, nonviral-based delivery system.
The notion that collateral circulation can protect ischemic tissues is not new; it dates back to the observations of early angiographers, who discovered that patients with severe coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular function frequently formed networks of collateral vessels. However, the ability to augment collateral vessel formation awaited the discovery of specific angiogenic factors. Several groups embraced the idea that angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), could be harnessed to improve the perfusion of ischemic tissues. Indeed, early animal studies were promising, demonstrating that recombinant VEGF administered intravenously enhanced collateral formation in ischemic tissues.2 3
Demonstrating that a single injection of VEGF was effective provided a
proof-of-principle experiment. However, it was unclear whether this
strategy would be translatable to humans given the differences in the
pharmacodynamics and
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Fujii, Z. Sun, S.-H. Li, J. Wu, S. Fazel, R. D. Weisel, H. Rakowski, J. Lindner, and R.-K. Li Ultrasound-Targeted Gene Delivery Induces Angiogenesis After a Myocardial Infarction in Mice J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 869 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ruixing, Y. Dezhai, W. Hai, H. Kai, W. Xianghong, and C. Yuming Intramyocardial injection of vascular endothelial growth factor gene improves cardiac performance and inhibits cardiomyocyte apoptosis Eur J Heart Fail, April 1, 2007; 9(4): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lenfant Cardiovascular Research : A Look Into Tomorrow Circ. Res., February 16, 2001; 88(3): 253 - 255. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |