Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:e9009-e9010

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.

(Circulation. 2001;103:e9009.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Whither Health Care Under Bush?

Ruth SoRelle, MPH, Circulation Newswriter

In his first few hours in office, President George W. Bush issued directives to suspend a host of last-minute directives from his predecessor—among them >800 pages of new guidelines that provide protections for poor individuals covered under federal and state-funded Medicaid programs. Older regulations, including patient protection regulations for Medicare patients and patients in plans regulated by ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act), remain in place, but they could be under scrutiny by Bush aides.

In his second healthcare-related action, Mr Bush reversed Mr Clinton’s overturning of rules that barred international family planning organizations from receiving US aid if they performed or promoted abortions.

Whether the Bush actions were directed against the regulations themselves or against former President Clinton, who issued a plethora of wide-ranging orders in the final days of his presidency, was as unclear as the direction in which the new president’s healthcare policy will go. Bush has billed himself as the "education president," but the effect that will have on health care is unclear. According to Washington insiders, health care and education are usually lumped into the same money basket, meaning proposals for one inevitably mean fewer funds for the other.

Even the one issue that seemed most clear—abortion—is now muddied by the statement by Attorney General nominee John Ashcroft during attorney-general confirmation hearings that he would be unlikely to seek opportunities to reverse the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal in the United States. President Bush was said to be seeking means to . . . [Full Text of this Article]