Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;104:e111-e116
doi: 10.1161/hc4701.100776
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. J., III

(Circulation. 2001;104:e111.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Meeting Highlights

Highlights of the XXIII Congress of the European Society of Cardiology

James J. Ferguson, III, MD

From St Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.

Reprint requests and correspondence to James J. Ferguson III, MD, Cardiology Research, MC 1-191, St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital/Texas Heart Institute, PO Box 20269, Houston, TX 77225. E-mail jferguson@heart.thi.tmc.edu

The following studies (Table) were presented at the XXIII Congress of the European Society of Cardiology, which was held in Stockholm, Sweden, on September 1 through 5, 2001.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Trial Acronyms

Interventional Cardiology

RAVEL
Presenter: Marie-Claude Maurice, MD, Hospitalier Jacque Cartier, Massy, France

The study: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial comparing a stent coated with sirolimus (an immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotic; n=120) with a similar uncoated stent (BX Velocity; n=118) in patients undergoing stent implantation. Qualifying patients had to have de novo single-vessel disease in a native coronary artery that was <18 mm in length and 2.5 to 3.5 mm in diameter. The primary end point was in-stent lumen diameter loss measured at 6-month follow-up angiography.

The results: Mean reference vessel size was 2.6 mm; mean lesion length was 9.6 mm. Late loss in the control uncoated stent was 0.80±0.53 mm; late loss with the sirolimus-coated stent was 0.01±0.33 mm (P<0.001). The binary restenosis rate was 2.6% with the uncoated stents and 0% with the coated stents. Preliminary long-term clinical follow-up (to 210 days) showed a target lesion revascularization rate of 26% in the uncoated stent group versus 0% in the coated stent group (P<0.0001). Survival free from major adverse cardiovascular events was 73% in the uncoated stent group and 97% in the coated stent group (P<0.001) when used for the treatment of discrete lesions.

Summary: Sirolimus-coated stents seem to have virtually no restenosis (at 6 months) in native vessels that are 2.5 . . . [Full Text of this Article]