Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;104:e9053-e9055
doi: 10.1161/hc4701.102877
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.

(Circulation. 2001;104:e9053.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cardiovascular News

Ruth SoRelle, MPH

Circulation Newswriter

ALIVE Trial

The Azimilide Post-Infarct Survival Evaluation (ALIVE) demonstrated that azimilide had neither beneficial nor adverse effects on reducing all-cause mortality in patients who had had a recent myocardial infarction, according to A. John Camm, MD, of St George’s Hospital Medical School in London, UK. He noted, however, that further study needs to be directed toward the drug’s primary use as an antiarrhythmia medication. Dr Camm presented the study on November 14, 2001, at the 2001 Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association in Anaheim, Calif.Down


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
A. John Camm, MD (photo by Paul C. SoRelle)

The study enrolled 3381 patients who had had a myocardial infarction in the previous 5 to 21 days and randomized them to either azimilide at 100 mg per day or placebo, in addition to the medications regularly given after a heart attack. Patients had a low left ventricular ejection fraction (15% to 35%) and were defined to be at risk for sudden death. A subpopulation of 1264 patients with low heart rate variability were defined to be at very high risk of sudden death and were studied separately.

The trial, conducted in 26 countries with 483 institutions, involved 3717 patients. A total of 336 patients randomized to 75 mg azimilide were not part of the overall analysis, although they were continued in safety studies. Baseline characteristics of both groups of patients were the same. There were 1690 patients in the placebo group and 1691 in the 100-mg azimilide group. There were 642 patients in the high-risk subgroup . . . [Full Text of this Article]