Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:e9010
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000017941.11682.5F
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.

(Circulation. 2002;106:e9010.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cardiovascular News

Ruth SoRelle, MPH

Circulation Newswriter


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Rosiglitazone (Avandia) Affects More Than Insulin Resistance

Six months of treatment with rosiglitazone (Avandia) appears to have lowered some inflammatory markers of cardiovascular disease and/or myocardial infarction risk, according to researchers from the University of Texas at San Antonio, Tufts-New England Medical Center in Boston, Mass, and GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Avandia, who published their research in this week’s issue of Circulation (Circulation. 2002;106:679–684).

The researchers noted that after 26 weeks of treatment with rosiglitazone, patients’ serum showed a statistically significant reduction of the mean levels of C-reactive protein, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (which has been implicated in plaque rupture), and white blood cells. Reduction of interleukin-6, another marker considered, was small and not much different from placebo groups. The researchers, led by Steven M. Haffner, MD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, concluded that rosiglitazone has an overall beneficial effect on the risk of cardiovascular disease because it reduces blood levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and C-reactive protein—both markers for heart disease risk.

Coronary Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction Has Prognostic Value
Impaired vascular endothelial function appears to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, such as death from heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unstable angina, according to researchers from the Cardiology Branch and the Office of Biostatistics Research at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in a report in this week’s issue of Circulation (Circulation. 2002;106:653–658).

The scientists, led by Julian P.J. Halcox, MA, MRCP, measured changes in coronary vascular resistance, epicardial diameter, endothelium-dependent function, and endothelium-independent vascular function in 308 patients who were . . . [Full Text of this Article]