Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:3
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134308.18456.81
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loscalzo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Loscalzo, J.

(Circulation. 2004;110:3.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

The Eagle’s View, or How to Use This Journal

Joseph Loscalzo, MD, PhD

From Boston University School of Medicine, Mass.

Correspondence to Joseph Loscalzo, MD, PhD, Boston University School of Medicine, Circulation Editorial Office, 560 Harrison Ave, Suite 502, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail circ@bu.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Circulation has always held a special place in my continuing education. For me and for many of us, it is the venue to which we turn for the most cutting-edge observations to inform our clinical practice and guide our research efforts. As the practice of cardiology has grown more fragmented and its research underpinnings grown more complex, however, the breadth of information has expanded to overwhelm the capacity of most of us. In addition, with this expanding universe of cardiovascular knowledge, Circulation has adapted to an ever-wider audience. These changes have been challenging to address for a journal that prides itself on being all things to everyone in cardiovascular medicine and research.

When I began my career, cardiology was a specialty that one could understand broadly, and cardiologists were often, if not always, excellent generalists in both internal medicine and the subspecialty. Moreover, cardiovascular investigators were also broadly competent in, or at least understood, the essential techniques and experimental approaches of cardiovascular research. Like eagles, cardiologists and cardiovascular investigators soared above the landscape, scanning it for what was relevant to their needs as well as what stimulated their curiosity.

Subspecialization is a natural, if not inevitable, consequence of the evolution of scientific fields that incorporate increasingly complex technologies. Learning and maintaining proficiency in these technical skills require time and commitment, whether it be in the field of echocardiography or in proteomics. Since the founding of Circulation, the rate at which new knowledge is being generated and disseminated has become . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Verdu, A Maestre, P Lopez, V Gil, A Martin-Hidalgo, and J A Castano
Clinical pathways as a healthcare tool: design, implementation and assessment of a clinical pathway for lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]