Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:104-106
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000135581.79161.35
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Circulation. 2004;110:104-106.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Acute Coronary Syndrome Biomarkers

The Need for More Adequate Reporting

Allan S. Jaffe, MD; Hugo Katus, MD

From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (A.S.J.), and University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (H.K.).

Correspondence to Allan S. Jaffe, MD, Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, 200 First St SW, 16th Floor, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail jaffe.allan@mayo.edu


Key Words: Editorials • coronary disease • troponin


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Improvements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have led to an "explosion" in the development of assays of blood biomarkers to characterize these processes and to predict prognosis. These research assays are performed in a single-center research setting and often use plasma specimens collected in highly selected study populations on which a multitude of biomarkers has been tested in the past. All of these novel markers seem to add prognostic information to established risk indices of ACS. How can so many different analytes all be so predictive?

One reason may be that the diagnostic tools under investigation are optimized with respect to their characteristics and discriminator limits to gain optimal predictive power in the very specific study cohort. Should these tools and their decision limits be applied to a chest pain population with different characteristics, however, specificity may become a significant problem markedly affecting accuracy. Furthermore, application of these tools in a routine setting not allowing such careful sample preparation or optimization procedures may markedly reduce sensitivity.

Another reason, and we shall concentrate on this point here, is that the presently available markers are used in a less than optimal manner. However, if the lack of optimal use of the present makers is not made explicit, it may distort both the importance of the new marker and how to use established markers. Many recent reports have, in our estimation, done this but have failed to acknowledge it overtly in the manuscript, perhaps leading . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. P. McConnell and A. S. Jaffe
The Spin Stops Here: Inhibition of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2-- A Promising Target but a Negative Initial Trial?
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2009; 55(1): 21 - 23.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. S. Jaffe
Key Issues in the Developing Synergism between Cardiovascular Imaging and Biomarkers
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1432 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, D. A. Morrow, C. P. Cannon, R. L. Jesse, L. K. Newby, J. Ravkilde, A. B. Storrow, A. H.B. Wu, and R. H. Christenson
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): e356 - e375.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, D. A. Morrow, C. P. Cannon, R. L. Jesse, L. K. Newby, J. Ravkilde, A. B. Storrow, A. H.B. Wu, R. H. Christenson, NACB COMMITTEE MEMBERS, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 552 - 574.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. L. Roger, J. M. Killian, S. A. Weston, A. S. Jaffe, J. Kors, P. J. Santrach, H. Tunstall-Pedoe, and S. J. Jacobsen
Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Evaluation in the Community
Circulation, August 22, 2006; 114(8): 790 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. S. Jaffe, L. Babuin, and F. S. Apple
Biomarkers in Acute Cardiac Disease: The Present and the Future
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Giannitsis and H. A. Katus
Markers of myocardial ischaemia: reply
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2006; 27(6): 759 - 759.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. S. Apple, A. H.B. Wu, J. Mair, J. Ravkilde, M. Panteghini, J. Tate, F. Pagani, R. H. Christenson, M. Mockel, O. Danne, et al.
Future Biomarkers for Detection of Ischemia and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 810 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
V. L. Roger
Invited Commentary: Will Heart Attacks Be "Gone with the Century"?
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2004; 160(12): 1147 - 1149.
[Full Text] [PDF]