Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;111:2154-2156
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000165266.57397.B2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Block, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Block, P. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2005;111:2154-2156.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

Are They Changing the Guard?

Peter C. Block, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga.

Correspondence to Dr Peter C. Block, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Rd, F606, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail Peter_block@emoryhealthcare.org


Key Words: Editorials • mitral regurgitation • surgery • trials • echocardiography


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Treatment strategies for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) are changing. Current guidelines suggest that patients with symptoms, atrial arrhythmias (especially atrial fibrillation), pulmonary hypertension, or left ventricular (LV) decompensation heralded by changes in LV ejection fraction should undergo mitral valve surgery.1 In addition, for patients in whom valvular repair is likely, the guidelines also suggest that an asymptomatic patient with severe MR and normal LV function might undergo mitral valve repair to prevent the sequelae of chronic MR. Earlier and earlier treatment and mitral valve repair are now the surgical norm. In one sense, the guard is already changing.2

See p 2183

Repair of the mitral valve is associated with an at least equivalent late survival rate compared with replacement, and perhaps lower operative risk.3,4 A reduced risk of endocarditis, fewer thromboembolic complications, and better preservation of LV function5,6 make repair an attractive strategy; however, successful mitral valve surgery is dependent on individual valve pathology. In rheumatic mitral regurgitation, the distorted leaflet anatomy, associated subvalvular fibrosis, and calcification rarely allow valve repair. Patients with ischemic or congestive heart disease, LV remodeling, annular dilation, alteration of the subvalvular apparatus, and distorted leaflet coaptation present special challenges. Most surgeons attempt a complete repair, combining direct valvular restoration with an annuloplasty device. If the guard is to change successfully as we move toward percutaneous transcatheter repair, then valuable lessons learned during many years of surgical experience must not be forgotten. The challenges are magnified severalfold in percutaneous approaches.

The wind of change is . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair for Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Study in an Ovine Model
Masao Daimon, Takahiro Shiota, A. Marc Gillinov, Motoya Hayase, Marc Ruel, William E. Cohn, Steven J. Blacker, and John R. Liddicoat
Circulation 2005 111: 2183-2189. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Plass, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, P. Kaufmann, H. Alkadhi, G. Zund, J. Grunenfelder, and M. Genoni
Assessment of coronary sinus anatomy between normal and insufficient mitral valves by multi-slice computertomography for mitral annuloplasty device implantation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Choure, M. J. Garcia, B. Hesse, M. Sevensma, G. Maly, N. L. Greenberg, L. Borzi, S. Ellis, E. M. Tuzcu, and S. R. Kapadia
In Vivo Analysis of the Anatomical Relationship of Coronary Sinus to Mitral Annulus and Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Using Cardiac Multidetector Computed Tomography: Implications for Percutaneous Coronary Sinus Mitral Annuloplasty
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1938 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. G. Webb, J. Harnek, B. I. Munt, P. O. Kimblad, M. Chandavimol, C. R. Thompson, J. R. Mayo, and J. O. Solem
Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty: Initial Human Experience With Device Implantation in the Coronary Sinus
Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 851 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Percutaneous Annuloplasty Reduces MR in Sheep
Journal Watch Cardiology, July 8, 2005; 2005(708): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]