(Circulation. 2005;112:3212-3214.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (F.G.K.), and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass (E.M.A.).
Correspondence to Elliott M. Antman, MD, Professor of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Cardiovascular Division, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail eantman@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Key Words: Editorials myocardial infarction anticoagulants fibrillation
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is estimated to occur in up to 20% of patients, depending on the population studied.13 The development of AF during hospitalization for STEMI is associated with a significant increase in both in-hospital and short-term mortality (odds ratio, 1.4 to 1.98).3 Predictors of developing AF include increased age, magnitude of creatine kinase elevation, Killip class, anterior location of infarction, left ventricular dysfunction, and both hypertension and hypotension. Those patients who develop AF during their hospitalization have a worse prognosis than those who present with AF on admission.1 Even in the fibrinolytic era, stroke rates are increased in STEMI patients with AF.4
Article p 3225
Clinical trials have addressed the efficacy of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with AF but without STEMI,5 and other studies have addressed the efficacy of OAC in post-STEMI patients. There are, however, no randomized controlled trials of OAC with or without antiplatelet therapy specifically in the cohort that includes patients with both STEMI and AF. In the Warfarin, Aspirin, Reinfarction Study (WARIS II) of 3630 MI patients, high-intensity warfarin (international normalized ratio [INR], 2.8 to 4.2) was compared with medium-intensity warfarin (INR, 2 to 2.5) plus aspirin (ASA) 75 mg and with ASA 160 mg alone in patients <75 years of age.6 There was a 29% reduction in the rate of the composite end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or thromboembolic stroke in the combined group and a 19% reduction in the high-intensity group versus
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. MADHWAL, A. M. LINCOFF, and D. D.K. ROLSTON Q: Should patients on long-term warfarin take aspirin for heart disease? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, March 1, 2008; 75(3): 206 - 208. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Anderson, C. D. Adams, E. M. Antman, C. R. Bridges, R. M. Califf, D. E. Casey Jr, W. E. Chavey II, F. M. Fesmire, J. S. Hochman, T. N. Levin, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 14, 2007; 50(7): e1 - e157. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |