Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;113:2169-2172
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621649
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, B. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2006;113:2169-2172.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Timing of Surgical Intervention in Chronic Mitral Regurgitation

Is Vigilance Enough?

Brian P. Griffin, MD

From the Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Brian P. Griffin, MD, F-15 Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail griffib@ccf.org


Key Words: Editorials • echocardiography • mitral valve • regurgitation


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Timing of surgical intervention in chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) is a complex problem that has been studied extensively. Surgical technique in the treatment of MR has improved considerably over the last decades. Our knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms whereby MR exerts its deleterious effects on survival has also increased. Early reports in the literature and newer prospective studies suggest that severe MR is not a benign condition and that, left untreated, it has a high morbidity and eventually mortality. It therefore makes sense to periodically reexamine the rationale and safety of existing practice guidelines. The article by Rosenhek and colleagues1 in this issue of Circulation provides an interesting and important insight into the long-term outcomes when asymptomatic degenerative MR is managed in accordance with the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.2 However, it is important in employing these guidelines to first understand the pathophysiological construct and studies that have led to their generation.

Article p 2238


*    Pathophysiological Effects of MR
 
MR produces volume overload of the left ventricle and left atrium. The left ventricle develops eccentric hypertrophy whereby the sarcomeres elongate. Preload increases and the left ventricle dilates in order to maintain a normal forward flow. The increase in afterload resulting from left ventricular dilatation is offset by the fact that the ventricle is pumping much of its volume (regurgitant volume) into a low-impedance circuit (the left atrium). Therefore, afterload may be variably reduced initially in MR and typically only becomes elevated in later stages of the disease as left ventricular size . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. I. Fann, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller
Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Disease
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 973 - 1012.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
For Asymptomatic Severe MR, Watch and Wait?
Journal Watch Cardiology, June 28, 2006; 2006(628): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]