This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dickhout, J. G. Articles by Austin, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dickhout, J. G. Articles by Austin, R. C. Related Collections Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology Structure Hypertrophy

(Circulation. 2006;114:1796-1798.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorial

Proteasomal Regulation of Cardiac Hypertrophy

Is Demolition Necessary for Building?

Jeffrey G. Dickhout, PhD; Richard C. Austin, PhD

From the Henderson Research Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Correspondence to Richard C Austin, PhD, Henderson Research Centre, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 1C3. E-mail raustin@thrombosis.hhscr.org

Key Words: Editorials • cardiomyopathy • hypertension • myocytes • proteins

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common adaptive response of the heart to the increased workload associated with hypertension.¹ Essential hypertension is characterized by an increase in total peripheral resistance.² Mechanical modeling of the cardiovascular system suggests that a necessary consequence of increased downstream resistance to flow is increased pressure to maintain end organ perfusion. Energetically, increased pressure generation requires greater work to be performed by the existing cardiac mass or an increase in cardiac mass to normalize workload per unit of mass. The result of LVH is to normalize wall tension and workload. According to the law of Laplace, increased wall tension is induced by the increased pressure and may also be induced by an increase in the fluid-containing volume of the left ventricle because of the partially elastic expansion of the ventricle under greater pressure loads.³ Without hypertrophy, increased workload by the existing cardiac mass would require greater perfusion of the myocardium or decreased cardiac reserve. Increased wall tension has the potential to decrease myocardial compliance, thereby limiting myocardial perfusion. In this scenario, it is not surprising that inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy in response to increased peripheral resistance is detrimental. Indeed, Meguro et al⁴ found that inhibition of LVH due to pressure overload in mice resulted in an increase in death due to heart failure. Inhibition of postinfarction cardiac hypertrophy has also been shown to cause left ventricular dilation and diminishment of cardiac function.⁵ This topic is well reviewed by Morisco et al.⁶

Article p 1821

Empirical evidence . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Willis, M. Rojas, L. Li, C. H. Selzman, R.-H. Tang, W. E. Stansfield, J. E. Rodriguez, D. J. Glass, and C. Patterson Muscle ring finger 1 mediates cardiac atrophy in vivo Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): H997 - H1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hu, J. D. Klein, J. Du, and X. H. Wang Cardiac Muscle Protein Catabolism in Diabetes Mellitus: Activation of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System by Insulin Deficiency Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5384 - 5390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]