Circulation. 2007;115:677
(Circulation. 2007;115:677.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Issue Highlights
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
|
 |
IMPACT OF PATIENT AND TARGET-VESSEL CHARACTERISTICS ON ARTERIAL AND VENOUS BYPASS GRAFT PATENCY: INSIGHT FROM A RANDOMIZED TRIAL, by Desai et al.
|
|---|
The excellent long-term patency rates for the left internal
thoracic artery have made it the bypass conduit gold standard.
The radial artery has emerged as an alternative coronary bypass
conduit to the saphenous vein in an attempt to achieve arterial
revascularization. Desai and colleagues report the results of
a multicenter randomized clinical trial to determine the impact
of patient and target-vessel characteristics on coronary bypass
graft patency. Angiographic data on 440 radial artery and 440
saphenous vein grafts were analyzed. Multivariable models were
constructed to determine predictors of graft occlusion. Radial
artery use was strongly protective against graft occlusion at
1 year, with a larger protective effect seen in women. Among
all grafts, diabetes and small target-vessel diameter were associated
with an increased risk of graft occlusion. Grafting to a target
vessel with more severe proximal stenosis was associated with
a decreased risk of graft occlusion. The authors concluded that
patients benefit from radial artery coronary artery bypass conduits
as opposed to saphenous vein conduits, and this effect is especially
strong in women. See p 684.
 |
RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF A HIGH CLOPIDOGREL MAINTENANCE DOSE IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS AND CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: RESULTS OF THE OPTIMIZING ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN DIABETES MELLITUS (OPTIMUS) STUDY, by Angiolillo et al.
|
|---|
Platelet inhibition has been shown to reduce cardiovascular
events in high-risk patients. Inhibition of the P2Y12 platelet
receptor with clopidogrel has been shown to be variable, and
in some studies, a suboptimal response is associated with increased
risk. Inadequate dosing has been suggested as one of the reasons
for a suboptimal response. The study by Angiolillo et al was
a randomized trial conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus and in whom
. . . [Full Text of this Article]