Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:1358-1360
Published online before print March 10, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.758748
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/11/1358    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.758748v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, J. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical

(Circulation. 2008;117:1358-1360.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology Trial

A Controversial Trial of Migraine and Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

John D. Carroll, MD

From the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.

Correspondence to John D. Carroll, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Leprino Office Bldg, B132, 12401 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045. E-mail john.carroll@uchsc.edu


Key Words: Editorials • heart defects, congenital • migraine • patent foramen ovale • trials


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Recent epidemiological data suggest that up to 18% of women and 6% of men worldwide have suffered a migraine headache.1,2 Despite its common occurrence, our understanding of both migraine pathophysiology and the optimal means by which to control or abate symptoms remains severely limited.1 For many years, the care of patients with migraines was left in the capable hands of general practitioners and neurologists. As information surfaced on the potential link between migraines and patent foramen ovale (PFO), however, some cardiologists became involved in the care of patients with migraines and were quickly humbled by the often debilitating nature of the disease process. Personally witnessing such intense suffering, the inconsistent effect of rescue medications, and the subsequent reliance on powerful intravenous narcotic agents to achieve some means of comfort until the storm subsides has been a sobering experience. With the development of implantable devices used to close potentially enabling PFOs, however, came a newfound hope in our ability to help these suffering people.

Article p 1397

The potential causative link between migraines and PFO became apparent between 2000 and 2004, during which period many single-center reports demonstrated precipitous improvements in migraine frequency in patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closures for nonmigraine indications.3–5 When these preliminary reports surfaced, professional and media interest in this potential association escalated rapidly. This awareness established the groundwork for the Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial, which, by incorporating important elements in trial design (eg, prospective, double-blinded, inclusion of a sham procedure), was viewed as an . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
M. Reisman and C. J. Fuller
Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine?: Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Migraine
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 468 - 474.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
J. D. Carroll and E. P. Carroll
Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine?: PFO Closure Is Not Indicated for Migraine: "Don't Shoot First, Ask Questions Later"
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 475 - 481.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
C. Vigna, N. Marchese, V. Inchingolo, G. M. Giannatempo, M. A. Pacilli, P. Di Viesti, M. Impagliatelli, R. Natali, A. Russo, R. Fanelli, et al.
Improvement of Migraine After Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure in Patients With Subclinical Brain Lesions: A Case-Control Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Kurth, C. Tzourio, and M.-G. Bousser
Migraine: A Matter of the Heart?
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14): 1405 - 1407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Migraine Relief: A Study Headache
Journal Watch Cardiology, March 26, 2008; 2008(326): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]