(Circulation. 2008;117:2573-2576.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Correspondence to Professor T. Marwick, Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, University of Queensland Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. E-mail t.marwick@uq.edu.au
Key Words: Editorials echocardiography pacing myocardium
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language, and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one anothers speech.— —The story of the Tower of Babel, from Genesis 11.
Initially, the rationale behind the use of echocardiography to assess mechanical synchrony seemed straightforward. Not all patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB) have mechanical dyssynchrony, and this entity could be identified by measuring the contraction delay between different cardiac walls. It was hoped that better selection with echocardiography would minimize the nonresponder rate of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Articles p 2608 and p 2617
Then matters started to get complicated. In addition to a variety of measurements of the onset, peak, and offset of contraction, many individual centers have reported a dozen or more permutations of these measurements with different imaging modalities that could be used to predict responsiveness to CRT.1 This Tower of Babel of markers of mechanical dyssynchrony was compounded by the use of a variety of definitions of procedural success, including clinical evaluation (composite scores, New York Heart Association class, and quality-of-life scores), exercise capacity (10% improvement), and indices of left ventricular (LV) function (>15% reduction of LV volumes, >5% increase in LV ejection fraction, decrease in Tei index, and reduction of mitral regurgitation). To the astute observer, the fecundity of this field should ring alarm bells: A truly effective modality is unlikely to
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C.T. Ng, D. T. Tran, C. Allman, J. Vidaic, and D. Y. Leung Prognostic implications of left ventricular dyssynchrony early after non-ST elevation myocardial infarction without congestive heart failure Eur. Heart J., November 18, 2009; (2009) ehp488v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Muellerleile, L. Baholli, M. Groth, A. A. Barmeyer, K. Koopmann, R. Ventura, R. Koester, G. Adam, S. Willems, and G. K. Lund Interventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony: Quantification with Velocity-encoded MR Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 364 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Marcus, E. Keung, and M. M. Scheinman The year in review of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 25, 2009; 54(9): 777 - 787. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Weyman The year in echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1558 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lim, A. Buakhamsri, Z. B. Popovic, N. L. Greenberg, D. Patel, J. D. Thomas, and R. A. Grimm Longitudinal Strain Delay Index by Speckle Tracking Imaging: A New Marker of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Circulation, September 9, 2008; 118(11): 1130 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |