Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:1901

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lenfant, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lenfant, C.

(Circulation. 1995;91:1901.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Integrative Physiology

Remember the Big Picture

Claude Lenfant, MD


*    Introduction
 
When resources for biomedical research are scarce, the natural competition that exists between different investigative interests often intensifies. Given the current fiscal climate, it is not surprising that one overhears much discussion in the scientific community about the respective contributions that newer versus more traditional disciplines are likely to make toward our understanding of human health and disease. Although the promise of subcellular and molecular techniques is widely appreciated, there is much debate about their relative importance in the "big picture." These new technologies have been hailed by many as the final keys to unlock nature's mysteries—the ultimate path to future advances—and because they are in their infancy, they are being nurtured vigorously. At the same time, more traditional scientists tend to be wary of reductionist approaches and to view enthusiasm for these new technologies as symptomatic of a "tunnel vision" that will ultimately set back science.

It is time to bring it all together.

The great potential of the new technologies is so fascinating, so innovative, and, yes, so glamorous (as has been said) that it is impossible to overlook. With their simple yet powerful techniques, these new approaches can provide the instructions that specify the very structure of biological molecules and help us understand where natural processes go awry and how we can correct them. The implications for a variety of interventions—from gene therapy to rational drug design to tailored risk assessment—cannot be overemphasized.

Nonetheless, the determinism of genetics, for example, has its limits. Although information encapsulated in . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. H. Hintze and E. Marban
Two AHA Councils Become One : Ringing Out the Old and Bringing in the New
Circ. Res., August 6, 1999; 85(3): 219 - 220.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. F. Vatner, B. C. Berk, T. H. Hintze, L. A. Leinwand, P. Libby, E. Marban, K. Schwartz, H. C. Strauss, and Y. Yazaki
Eight Years Behind the Masthead
Circ. Res., June 25, 1999; 84(12): 1361 - 1364.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. O'Rourke and L. Reinlib
Priorities in Heart Failure Research • Response
Circulation, January 27, 1998; 97(3): 296 - 296.
[Full Text]