Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:9-10

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pohost, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pohost, G. M.

(Circulation. 1995;92:9-10.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Is 31P-NMR Spectroscopic Imaging a Viable Approach to Assess Myocardial Viability?

Gerald M. Pohost, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, the Center for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Research and Development, and the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Correspondence to Dr Pohost, 311-THT, UAB Station, Birmingham, AL 35294-0006.


Key Words: Editorials • spectroscopy • imaging


*    Introduction
 
Thallium-201 imaging in its various forms (initial followed by 2- to 4-hour or 24-hour delayed imaging, initial followed by imaging after reinjection, or a "hybrid" approach using 201Tl initially and 99mTc-sestamibi later) is a reasonable clinical approach for assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability.1 2 3 4 However, other approaches that examine change in regional myocardial function during dobutamine infusion and evaluate metabolic myocardial integrity with exogenous administration of radioactive tracers also have been reported.5 6 7 Accordingly, one may justifiably wonder how nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic imaging, another expensive, high-tech approach, might ever be used as a clinical tool for assessing myocardial viability, especially in this era of healthcare reform, managed care, and capitation.

Yabe et al8 report a new clinical approach for evaluating myocardial viability. The method uses 31P-NMR spectroscopic imaging (SI) to quantify the high-energy phosphates ATP and phosphocreatine (PCr). The use of ATP concentration as a standard for assessing myocardial viability is not new.9 What is new is the ability to estimate ATP and PCr concentrations clinically and noninvasively in asynergic segments of myocardium.

Wall motion abnormalities associated with ischemic heart disease may be related to myocardial scar in patients with previous myocardial infarction, an irreversible situation, or to transient ischemic dysfunction ("stunning")10 or persistent ischemic dysfunction ("hibernation").11 Reversible or irreversible dysfunction can suggest the appropriate therapeutic strategy. With viable but dysfunctional myocardium, bypass graft surgery or catheterization laboratory intervention can lead to improved function and symptomatic state of the patient—or even extension of longevity. With nonviable myocardium, there is . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. Saeed
New Concepts in Characterization of Ischemically Injured Myocardium by MRI
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2001; 226(5): 367 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. A. Bottomley and R. G. Weiss
Noninvasive Localized MR Quantification of Creatine Kinase Metabolites in Normal and Infarcted Canine Myocardium
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 411 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. M. Pohost and R. W. W. Biederman
The Role of Cardiac MRI Stress Testing : "Make a Better Mouse Trap ... "
Circulation, October 19, 1999; 100(16): 1676 - 1679.
[Full Text] [PDF]