Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;94:1809-1811

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, H. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, H. V.

(Circulation. 1996;94:1809-1811.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Estrogen Therapy, Atherosclerosis, and Clinical Cardiovascular Events

H. Vernon Anderson, MD

the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston.

Correspondence to H. Vernon Anderson, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Health Science Center–Houston, 6431 Fannin, PO Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225.


Key Words: Editorials • hormones • atherosclerosis


*    Introduction
 
In this issue of Circulation, Nabulsi and coworkers1 from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Group report their findings on the association of age, menopause status, and hormone replacement therapy with a single measure of atherosclerosis: the average carotid artery intima-media thickness determined by B-mode ultrasound. What they discovered in the ARIC cohorts was this: there was little or no relation between menopausal staus and carotid thickness in women aged 45 to 54 who had never used hormonal therapy and who had no evidence of coronary heart disease at entry. Furthermore, for slightly older (aged 55 to 64 years) postmenopausal women, there was no relation between the number of years since menopause and carotid thickness nor between hormone use and carotid thickness. All of these findings were unexpected. Data that have been accumulated over the past few years demonstrate strong clinical benefits from estrogen use for postmenopausal women. The ARIC investigators quite logically hypothesized that there would be significant relations between carotid thickness, menopause, and hormone therapy (or lack of it) in this community-wide study, but in fact their data did not provide support for this. The investigators speculate that the association of estrogen replacement therapy with a reduction in clinical cardiovascular events after menopause may not necessarily be due to a reduction in the amount of anatomic atherosclerotic disease or inhibition of its formation, at least during the early years after menopause, but might instead be more attributable to other beneficial physiological changes brought about by estrogen . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
K. H. Humphries and S. Gill
Risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy: The evidence speaks
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 15, 2003; 168(8): 1001 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. N. Mhurchu, C. Anderson, K. Jamrozik, G. Hankey, D. Dunbabin, W.T. Longstreth Jr, and L. M. Nelson
Hormonal Factors and Risk of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage : An International Population-Based, Case-Control Study Editorial Comment : The Gender Gap in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 606 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]