Circulation. 1996;94:1809-1811
(Circulation. 1996;94:1809-1811.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Estrogen Therapy, Atherosclerosis, and Clinical Cardiovascular Events
H. Vernon Anderson, MD
the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston.
Correspondence to H. Vernon Anderson, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Health Science CenterHouston, 6431 Fannin, PO Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225.
Key Words: Editorials hormones atherosclerosis
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
In this issue of
Circulation, Nabulsi and coworkers
1 from the
Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Group report
their findings on the association of age, menopause status,
and hormone replacement therapy with a single measure of atherosclerosis:
the average carotid artery intima-media thickness determined
by B-mode ultrasound. What they discovered in the ARIC cohorts
was this: there was little or no relation between menopausal
staus and carotid thickness in women aged 45 to 54 who had never
used hormonal therapy and who had no evidence of coronary heart
disease at entry. Furthermore, for slightly older (aged 55 to
64 years) postmenopausal women, there was no relation between
the number of years since menopause and carotid thickness nor
between hormone use and carotid thickness. All of these findings
were unexpected. Data that have been accumulated over the past
few years demonstrate strong clinical benefits from estrogen
use for postmenopausal women. The ARIC investigators quite logically
hypothesized that there would be significant relations between
carotid thickness, menopause, and hormone therapy (or lack of
it) in this community-wide study, but in fact their data did
not provide support for this. The investigators speculate that
the association of estrogen replacement therapy with a reduction
in clinical cardiovascular events after menopause may not necessarily
be due to a reduction in the amount of anatomic atherosclerotic
disease or inhibition of its formation, at least during the
early years after menopause, but might instead be more attributable
to other beneficial physiological changes brought about by estrogen
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. H. Humphries and S. Gill
Risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy: The evidence speaks
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
April 15, 2003;
168(8):
1001 - 1010.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. N. Mhurchu, C. Anderson, K. Jamrozik, G. Hankey, D. Dunbabin, W.T. Longstreth Jr, and L. M. Nelson
Hormonal Factors and Risk of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage : An International Population-Based, Case-Control Study Editorial Comment : The Gender Gap in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Stroke,
March 1, 2001;
32(3):
606 - 612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|