This Article Free upon publication Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Handley, A. J. Articles by Montgomery, W. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Handley, A. J. Articles by Montgomery, W. H.

(Circulation. 1997;95:2174-2179.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Single-Rescuer Adult Basic Life Support

An Advisory Statement From the Basic Life Support Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

Anthony J. Handley, MD, FRCP³; Lance B. Becker, MD²; Mervyn Allen, MD, FRACA⁴; Ank van Drenth, MD³; Efraim B. Kramer, MD¹; William H. Montgomery, MD²

Key Words: AHA Medical/Scientific Statements • defibrillation • cardiopulmonary resuscitation

	Introduction

 
This document presents the consensus view of the Basic Life Support (BLS) Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), which represents the world's major resuscitation organizations (including the American Heart Association [AHA], the Australian Resuscitation Council, the European Resuscitation Council [ERC], the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa). These advisory statements have evolved during 10 meetings of ILCOR from 1991 to the present.

The scientific basis for the treatment of cardiac arrest has an active international literature.¹ The purpose of creating these advisory statements is to take full advantage of international perspective and experience in the basic management of cardiac arrest. It is hoped that the "Sequence of Action" can be used as a template by individual national resuscitation organizations. This template should not, however, be considered a rigid standard. It is intended primarily to remove the many minor international differences in BLS education that have developed over the last 30 years, often without any basis in science. For example, if the current BLS guidelines of the ERC and the AHA are compared, most of the differences exist without any particular rationale and are based simply on quirks of historical practice. It is hoped that by removing these, BLS training can become as uniform as possible throughout the world.

The process for the development of the advisory statements involved

1. Identification of major and minor differences between existing BLS guidelines.^{2 3} Minor differences mostly involved the use of words rather than . . . [Full Text of this Article]