Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;97:1427-1428

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wascher, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harken, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wascher, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harken, A. H.

(Circulation. 1998;97:1427-1428.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Mortality in Diabetes: A Class Effect?

Thomas C. Wascher, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism Unit, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

To the Editor:

In a recent issue of Circulation, Cleveland and coworkers1 provided excellent evidence that in diabetic patients, chronic inhibition of the KATP channel with oral sulfonylureas abolishes ischemic preconditioning of explanted myocardium. The authors conclude that this phenomenon might contribute to the increased cardiovascular mortality in sulfonylurea-treated diabetic patients, as found in the University Group Diabetes Programme (UGDP).2 This extension of their findings in mainly glibenclamide-treated patients (6 and 1 glipizide) to sulfonylureas as a class, however, must be seen with some limitations because neither experimental nor clinical data suggest a uniform effect of different sulfonylureas on the cardiovascular system.

In experimental animals, inhibition of the cardiac KATP channel with glibenclamide has been shown to increase ischemia-reperfusion damage,3 whereas gliclazide, a sulfonylurea with pronounced in vivo antioxidative properties,4 prevented such damage.5

In studies in the human forearm, significant interaction with the vascular KATP channel was found for glibenclamide, whereas the effect was much less pronounced for tolbutamide6 and even absent for the new drug glimepiride.7

For tolbutamide (the sulfonylurea used in the UGDP), further evidence of an increased cardiovascular morbidity in comparison to glibenclamide or gliclazide was recently reported,8 and a possible substance-specific cardiotoxicity was suggested. Tolbutamide, as a first-generation sulfonylurea, is used in the highest dose (up to 3000 mg) of all currently available sulfonylureas (for review, see Reference 9). In a recent survey from Australia, neither glibenclamide- nor gliclazide-treated patients with myocardial infarction had higher mortality rates than insulin-treated diabetic patients.10 In the same survey, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joseph C. Cleveland, Jr, MD; Daniel R. Meldrum, MD; Brian S. Cain, MD; Anirban Banerjee, PhD; ; Alden H. Harken, MD

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Department of Surgery, Denver, Colo