This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mack, M. Articles by Carpentier, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mack, M. Articles by Carpentier, A.

(Circulation. 1999;99:1404-1406.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorials

Inertia of Success

A Response to Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass: A Dissenting Opinion

Michael Mack, MD; Ralph Damiano, MD; Robert Matheny, MD; Hermann Reichenspurner, MD; Alain Carpentier, MD, PhD

From the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas (M.M); Penn State Geisinger Health System, Hershey, Pa (R.D.); private practice, Indianapolis, Ind (R.M.); University Hospital Grosshadern, Munich, Germany (H.R.); and Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France (A.C.).

Correspondence to Michael Mack, MD, Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute, 7777 Forest Lane, C742, Dallas, TX 75230.

Key Words: Editorials • bypass • surgery

"To exist is to change, to change is to mature, to mature is to go on creating oneself endlessly."

Henri Bergson

In a recent editorial, Bonchek and Ullyot¹ raised concerns regarding minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery. Their purpose was to "stimulate discussion and debate," and to that end, we wish to challenge several of their assertions. While we totally agree that unbridled enthusiasm with a blind eye toward critical analysis is dangerous, equally precarious is taking the stance that we have a perfect operation that cannot or should not be made better. We believe that we are at a strategic inflection point in cardiac surgery and are in danger of becoming obsolete. In the history of information systems, the typewriter made a valuable contribution; however, it subsequently was made obsolete by computers. Although there is no question that coronary artery bypass surgery has changed the management of coronary artery disease dramatically, we need to realize that we are in the field of coronary revascularization and not just coronary artery surgery. Incremental progress, carefully measured, documented, and reported, should be encouraged rather than always accepting the status quo.

The authors begin by limiting the obvious successes of minimally invasive surgery to technically simple operations that require "a minimum of precision and almost no sewing." Our colleagues in general surgery would most likely disagree that their successes in laparoscopic Nissen procedures and inguinal hernia repairs were not precise and did not requiring sewing. Although cardiac operations are technically more complex, this does . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. W Sutton, M. A Duncan, V. A Chase, B. L Hamman, and E. H Cheung Perfusion-assisted beating heart support with a miniature extracorporeal circuit and leukocyte filtration: a 58-year-old patient with severe COPD Perfusion, December 1, 2004; 19(6): 369 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. P. Nierich, J. Diephuis, E. W.L. Jansen, C. Borst, and J. T.A. Knape Heart displacement during off-pump CABG: how well is it tolerated? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 466 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ricci, H. L. Karamanoukian, G. D'Ancona, J. DeLaRosa, R. L. Karamanoukian, S. Choi, J. Bergsland, and T. A. Salerno Survey of resident training in beating heart operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 479 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. R. Kshettry, T. F. Flavin, R. W. Emery, D. M. Nicoloff, K. V. Arom, and R. J. Petersen Does multivessel, off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce postoperative morbidity? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1725 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Mack Is there a future for minimally invasive cardiac surgery? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 16(suppl_2): S119 - S125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. I Bonchek Some Thoughts on Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 1999; 7(2): 82 - 83. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. N. Olinger Informed advice Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1545 - 1546. [Full Text] [PDF]