Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:1154-1160

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronenberg, F.
Right arrow Articles by Willeit, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronenberg, F.
Right arrow Articles by Willeit, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors

(Circulation. 1999;100:1154-1160.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Role of Lipoprotein(a) and Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotype in Atherogenesis

Prospective Results From the Bruneck Study

Florian Kronenberg, MD; Martina F. Kronenberg, MD; Stefan Kiechl, MD; Evi Trenkwalder, PhD; Peter Santer, MD; Friedrich Oberhollenzer, MD; Georg Egger, MD; Gerd Utermann, MD; Johann Willeit, MD

From the Institute of Medical Biology and Human Genetics, University of Innsbruck (F.K., E.T., G.U.), and Innsbruck University Hospital, Department of Neurology (M.F.K., S.K., J.W.), Austria, and Bruneck Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Italy (P.S., F.O., G.E.).

Correspondence to Dr Florian Kronenberg, Institute of Medical Biology and Human Genetics, Schöpfstraße 41, A-6020 Innsbruck. E-mail florian.kronenberg{at}uibk.ac.at


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Experimental studies have suggested both atherogenic and thrombogenic properties of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], depending on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and varying antifibrinolytic capacity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Epidemiological studies may contribute to assessment of the relevance of these findings in the general population.

Methods and Results—This study prospectively investigated the association between Lp(a) plasma concentrations, apo(a) phenotypes, and the 5-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution duplex ultrasound in a random sample population of 826 individuals. We differentiated early atherogenesis (incident nonstenotic atherosclerosis) from advanced (stenotic) stages in atherosclerosis that originate mainly from atherothrombotic mechanisms. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels above the population median (3.3 mmol/L). Apo(a) phenotypes were distributed similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. In contrast, apo(a) phenotypes of low molecular weight emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14.9).

Conclusions—Lp(a) is one of the few risk factors capable of promoting both early and advanced stages of atherogenesis. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis synergistically with high LDL cholesterol. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes with a putatively high antifibrinolytic capacity in turn emerged as one of the leading risk conditions of advanced stenotic stages of atherosclerosis.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • apolipoproteins • lipoproteins • genetics • carotid arteries


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consists of 2 components, an LDL particle and an attached apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. The complex structure may explain its atherogenic and thrombogenic properties.1 Lp(a) is believed to contribute to lipid-induced atherogenesis similarly to LDL particles.2 Compared with LDL, however, it contains lower amounts of antioxidants and exhibits a high affinity to extracellular matrix and fibrin(ogen),3 4 5 which prolongs residence time in the subintima. Both properties of Lp(a) facilitate its oxidative modification and may enhance its capacity to cause injury.

Effects on coagulation in turn derive from a high sequence homology of apo(a) with plasminogen.6 Lp(a) competes with plasminogen for binding to plasminogen receptors, fibrinogen, and fibrin,4 5 as well as other cellular binding sites,7 8 but lacks plasmin-like activity. Furthermore, it interferes with plasminogen activation by inhibition of the tissue plasminogen activator9 and by itself enhances the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1.10 In vitro studies on the thrombogenic nature of Lp(a) suggested that this property is defined primarily by the particle size of apo(a) and only secondarily by the Lp(a) concentration.11 12 13 In other words, the same Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with a markedly different atherothrombotic risk, depending on the apo(a) isoform.

Epidemiological studies may help to assess the relevance of these in vitro findings in vivo and for the general population. The current prospective population study attempts to clarify the complex association between Lp(a) and carotid atherosclerosis, with special attention directed to possible differential effects of the apo(a) components of various sizes on different stages of atherosclerotic disease. Interpretation of most previous surveys on this issue is complicated by highly selected study populations, cross-sectional study design, and/or lack of consideration of apo(a) phenotypes.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The study design and survey area have been described in detail previously.14 At study entry (year 1990), the study population was composed of an age- and sex-stratified random sample of all inhabitants of Bruneck (Bolzano Province, Italy) 40 to 79 years old (125 women and 125 men in each of the fifth to the eighth decades). There was a participation of 93.6% among individuals invited and complete data assessment in 919 subjects. During the 5-year follow-up period between summer 1990 and summer 1995, 62 individuals died and 1 subject moved away and could not be traced. Follow-up rate was 99.9% with regard to clinical end points (n=918) and 96.5% for sonographic reassessment of survivors (n=826). All participants gave informed consent before enrollment in the study.

Scanning Protocol and Definition of Ultrasound End Points
The internal (bulbous and distal segments) and common (proximal and distal segments) carotid arteries were scanned by ultrasound on either side with a 10-MHz imaging probe and a 5-MHz Doppler probe.14 Atherosclerotic lesions were identified by 2 ultrasound criteria: (1) wall surface (protrusion into the lumen or roughness of the arterial boundary) and (2) wall texture (echogenicity). The maximum radial diameter of plaques was assessed in each of the 8 vessel segments, with the ultrasound beam directed through the center of the vessel (for details see References 15 through 1915 16 17 18 19 ). Scanning was performed twice, namely in 1990 and 1995, by the same experienced sonographer, who was blinded to the subjects' clinical and laboratory characteristics. On the basis of the follow-up evaluation, 2 epidemiologically and etiologically different stages of atherogenesis were differentiated: (1) early atherogenesis was defined by the occurrence of new plaques in previously normal segments, and (2) advanced atherogenesis was assumed whenever the relative increase in the maximum plaque diameter between 1990 and 1995 exceeded the double measurement error of the method (distal internal carotid artery, 35%; bulbous, 30%; common carotid artery, 20%) and a narrowing of the lumen (stenosis) >40% occurred. As detailed elsewhere,18 19 the cutoff of 40% appeared to be a biological threshold in our population, at which marked changes in the growth kinetics of plaques, in the risk profiles, and in the vascular remodeling process occurred.

Our ultrasound progression model (person-based approach) was developed and validated before the present study was carried out.18 19

Clinical Evaluation and End Points
All participants underwent a complete clinical examination, with cardiological and neurological priorities described recently in detail.14 Cardiovascular disease (CVD) end points during follow-up were fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction according to the World Health Organization criteria for definite disease status20 and ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack according to the criteria of the National Survey of Stroke.21 Self-reported data were verified from hospital records, death certificates, and information from general practitioners and supplemented by a thorough screening of the regional hospital database for diseases of interest.

Laboratory Measurements
At the 1990 baseline investigation, blood samples were taken from the antecubital vein after subjects had fasted and abstained from smoking for >=12 hours. Lp(a) was measured by a double-antibody ELISA (Immuno) using a polyclonal anti-apo(a) for capture and a monovalent anti-apo(a) Fab fragment coupled with peroxidase for detection. The interassay coefficients of variation were 3.5%, 4.6%, and 6.3% for Lp(a) concentrations of 5, 16, and 54 mg/dL, respectively.

Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–agarose gel electrophoresis (SDS agarose)22 under reducing conditions, as previously outlined.23 Laboratory investigators were unaware of patient histories and outcomes.

As for most of the Lp(a) assays, we cannot rule out that the assay we used measured apo(a) isoform-dependently. To test whether this could have influenced our major findings, we repeated the same calculations as presented in the Results section simulating "corrected" Lp(a) levels. Because we used as a reference standard a plasma sample with the same apo(a) isoform as a recent study comparing an isoform-dependent with an isoform-independent assay,24 we were justified in correcting the Lp(a) level of each subject by dividing it by the ratio of these 2 assays (see Reference 2424 ) for each single apo(a) isoform group. In the case of subjects expressing 2 apo(a) isoforms, we first estimated the relation of the 2 isoforms in the SDS agarose electrophoresis and calculated the corresponding amount of Lp(a) for each isoform. These 2 concentrations were divided by the published ratios24 and then finally added again.

LDL cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald formula, correcting for the contribution of Lp(a) cholesterol.25

Statistical Procedures
Strength and type of association between Lp(a) plasma concentration/apo(a) phenotype and progression of atherosclerosis were assessed by logistic regression analysis. To assess distinct effects of Lp(a) on various stages in atherogenesis, separate equations were fitted for subjects without carotid atherosclerosis at the 1990 baseline (no atherosclerosis versus incident atherosclerosis during follow-up) and in those with preexisting lesions (no change versus incidence of stenotic atherosclerosis). Multivariate regression models were built with a forward stepwise selection procedure that allowed for all variables listed in Table 1Down. On the basis of experiences from previous cross-sectional analyses in this cohort,25 Lp(a) concentrations were dichotomized [Lp(a) <=32 versus >32 mg/dL] or treated as a continuous variable. Likewise, apo(a) phenotypes were divided into 2 subgroups a priori according to the molecular weight of the smaller apo(a) isoforms. In analogy to all of our own and some other previous work,26 27 28 29 the low-molecular-weight (LMW) group included subjects with >=1 apo(a) isoform with 11 to 22 kringle (K)-IV repeats,23 and the high-molecular-weight (HMW) group comprised all subjects who had only isoforms with >22 K-IV repeats. In an attempt to confirm the appropriateness of these preselected categorizations, separate analyses were fitted with 6 equally sized categories of Lp(a) concentrations (range, 8 mg/dL each) or K-IV repeats (steps, 3 repeats each) (scale fitting). Separate equations that excluded subjects receiving aspirin, anticoagulation, or antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapy (in all, n=280) or adjusted for lifestyle variables confirmed the results of the original analysis (data not presented). Statistical interaction between Lp(a) and other variables (eg, LDL cholesterol) was assessed by comparing the relation between Lp(a) and atherosclerosis progression at different levels of exposure to the variable of interest. Finally, crude and adjusted hazard ratios of incident CVD were calculated by Cox models. The proportional hazard assumptions were satisfied.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Age- and Sex-Adjusted Characteristics of the Study Population According to 5-Year Changes of Carotid Atherosclerosis


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The median Lp(a) level in this white population was 8.8 mg/dL (range, 0.1 to 143.2 mg/dL). Plasma concentrations were similar in men and women except for a slight divergence in the postmenopausal period. Lp(a) plasma concentration emerged as independent of all other vascular risk factors and lifestyle variables.25

Early Atherogenesis
Five hundred individuals were free of carotid atherosclerosis at the 1990 baseline examination. A quarter of these individuals (n=125) developed atherosclerotic lesions during the 5-year follow-up period. These patients with incident atherosclerosis (early atherogenesis) were older, more often male, hypertensive, smokers, and heavy drinkers and had higher ferritin and total and LDL cholesterol concentrations than those who remained free of atherosclerosis (Table 1Up).

Lp(a) plasma concentrations were higher in subjects who developed new atherosclerotic lesions (Table 1Up). After adjustment for other vascular risk factors and potential confounders, Lp(a) was significantly associated with early atherogenesis in subjects with LDL cholesterol concentrations above the median of 3.3 mmol/L (Table 2Down) but not in the low-LDL-cholesterol group (P<0.05 for effect modification). The risk of early atherogenesis in the high-LDL-cholesterol group increased gradually with increasing Lp(a) concentration (dose-response relation, Figure 1Down). In contrast, apo(a) phenotype expressed as the absolute number of K-IV repeats did not show a significant association with early atherogenesis, nor did predefined categories of LMW and HMW apo(a) types. This finding applied to subjects with LDL cholesterol concentrations >=3.3 mmol/L and <3.3 mmol/L (Figure 1Down and Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Association of Lp(a) Plasma Concentrations and Apo(a) Phenotypes With Early Atherogenesis (Incident Atherosclerosis)



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Risk of incident atherosclerosis (early atherogenesis) according to categories of Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) phenotypes in subjects without atherosclerosis at 1990 baseline and LDL cholesterol levels >=3.3 mmol/L (n=248). Graph demonstrates a linear-type association for Lp(a) concentrations (P=0.01 for linear trend), whereas apo(a) phenotypes were unrelated to risk of incident atherosclerosis. ORs were derived from multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted for covariates age, ferritin, LDL, hypertension, smoking, and alcohol consumption). n indicates number of subjects in each category.

Exclusion of patients with a neoplasm, renal failure, or manifest CVD yielded results almost identical to those of the original analysis. Use of Lp(a) levels corrected for a simulated apo(a) isoform–dependent measurement of Lp(a) revealed nearly the same odds ratios as described in Table 2Up.

Advanced Atherogenesis
Of 326 subjects with preexisting carotid artery disease at the 1990 baseline examination, 92 (28.2%) developed carotid stenosis >40% (advanced atherogenesis) during follow-up. These subjects were more often diabetic, smokers, and carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation and had higher fibrinogen and lower antithrombin III than those who remained free of advanced atherosclerosis (Table 1Up). Lp(a) plasma concentrations were significantly elevated in those with advanced atherogenesis (Table 1Up), and LMW apo(a) phenotypes were markedly overrepresented (50% versus 32.9%, P<0.01; Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Apo(a) Size Polymorphism of the Study Population According to the 5-Year Incidence of the Carotid Stenosis >40% (Advanced Atherogenesis)

Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed a binary-type association between advanced atherogenesis and high Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Analogous results were obtained for LMW apo(a) phenotypes (Figure 2Down). These associations were not modified by LDL cholesterol levels. When both Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) phenotype were considered in a single regression equation, excess risk of stenosis was confined to the LMW apo(a) phenotype and was most pronounced in those with both LMW apo(a) phenotype and high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14.9; Figure 3Down and Table 4Down). The risk profile of advanced atherogenesis further included diabetes, smoking, low antithrombin III, high fibrinogen level, factor V mutation, alcohol consumption, and age. Again, the above results remained virtually unchanged after subjects with neoplasms, renal failure, and CVDs had been excluded. Using Lp(a) levels corrected for a simulated apo(a) isoform–dependent measurement resulted in only minor changes of the odds ratios without changing the quintessence.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Risk of advanced atherogenesis (incident stenosis >40%) according to categories of Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) phenotypes. Graph demonstrates a binary type of association with a clear cutoff at 32 mg/dL of Lp(a) concentration and 22 K-IV repeats. This analysis focused on subjects with preexisting atherosclerosis (n=326). ORs were derived from multivariate logistic regression analysis (covariates age, antithrombin III, fibrinogen, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption, and factor V Leiden mutation). n indicates number of subjects in each category.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Risk of advanced atherogenesis (incident stenosis >40%) according to 4 categories built by low and high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (cutoff, 32 mg/dL) with HMW and LMW apo(a) phenotypes (cutoff, 22 K-IV repeats). ORs were derived from multivariate logistic regression analysis (covariates age, antithrombin III, fibrinogen, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption, and factor V Leiden mutation). n indicates number of subjects in each category.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Association of Lp(a) Plasma Concentration and Apo(a) Phenotype With Advanced Atherogenesis and CVD

Cardiovascular Disease
What has been described for advanced carotid atherosclerosis applied equally to clinical CVD (n=64). Lp(a) concentrations conferred an increased risk of fatal and nonfatal CVD only in subjects with LMW apo(a) phenotypes. Within this group, the risk for incident CVD increased further when Lp(a) concentration exceeded the cutoff of 32 mg/dL (Table 4Up).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present population study may well be the first to systematically and prospectively investigate the influence of Lp(a) plasma concentrations and apo(a) phenotypes on carotid atherosclerosis. The study design permits us to differentiate early from advanced (stenotic) stages of atherogenesis. Notably, the latter process did not rely on conventional risk factors but emerged as a domain of procoagulant risk attributes and most likely arises from plaque thrombosis.18 19 This 2-stage hypothesis is substantiated by pathoanatomic and epidemiological observations.18 19 30

Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels >=3.3 mmol/L (median). Apo(a) phenotype, in contrast, distributes similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. A cross-sectional evaluation of the ARIC study yielded analogous results in that Lp(a) was significantly elevated in subjects with high intima-media thickness, without any differences observed in the apo(a) phenotype distribution.31 Synergistic effects of different lipoproteins [LDL and Lp(a)] have been observed previously in studies aimed at investigating risk profiles of coronary artery disease:Armstrong and colleagues32 reported that the combination of high Lp(a) plasma concentrations and LDL cholesterol levels above the group median amplified the risk of coronary artery disease 6-fold. Therapeutic lowering of LDL cholesterol by >=10% was found to dilute the predictive value of high Lp(a) for coronary artery disease.33 Finally, a recent study revealed high Lp(a) plasma concentrations to increase the risk of familial coronary artery disease only if the total/HDL cholesterol ratio was elevated.34 Apparently, the interaction of Lp(a) with other lipoproteins triggers or enhances its atherosclerotic properties.

In addition to the lipid pathway, several other mechanisms have been proposed by which Lp(a) may promote early atherosclerosis. High Lp(a) impairs activation of transforming growth factor-ß by downregulation of plasmin generation, thereby contributing to smooth muscle cell proliferation.35 These in vitro findings were confirmed in apo(a) transgenic mouse experiments36 and found an in vivo equivalent in markedly depressed serum concentration of active transforming growth factor-ß in advanced human atherosclerosis.37 Two recent studies demonstrated that Lp(a) induces chemotactic activity to human monocytes in a dose-dependent fashion.38 39 Lp(a) enhances the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1.40 Because Lp(a) accumulates in the subendothelial space of the vessel wall, it may act as a potent chemoattractant for monocytes in human atherosclerosis. Preliminary data suggest this property to be independent of apo(a) size.39

Previous cross-sectional reports on effects of Lp(a) on advanced stages of atherosclerosis are sparse, and most of these did not consider apo(a) phenotypes. In our study, the apo(a) phenotype emerged as a particularly strong risk predictor of incident carotid stenosis >40% (advanced atherogenesis). Notably, excess risk of advanced atherogenesis was confined to LMW apo(a) phenotypes, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (Figure 3Up). This finding is consistent with the theory that plaque-induced thrombosis probably reflects the main pathogenic mechanism of advanced atherogenesis; consequently, attenuated fibrinolysis is crucial in stabilizing atheroma-attached fibrin thrombi. Hervio and colleagues11 12 observed that the apo(a) size polymorphism influences the effect of Lp(a) on fibrinolysis in that only LMW apo(a) isoforms showed high-affinity binding to fibrin surfaces, thereby acting as a prominent competitive antagonist to plasminogen. These in vitro findings suggest that high concentrations of Lp(a) of LMW size should have the most pronounced influence on fibrinolysis, which is in close agreement with our results.

Cross-sectional27 41 and prospective28 29 42 studies revealed strong associations between the apo(a) size polymorphism and CVD.29 A higher frequency of LMW apo(a) phenotypes was observed in men but not in women who experienced incident myocardial infarction or coronary death in the Stanford Five-City Project.28 Two further prospective studies found that LMW apo(a) phenotypes were significantly associated with CVD in men <60 years old29 and in hemodialysis patients.42 In analogy to advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, the risk for incident fatal and nonfatal CVD in our survey was markedly elevated in subjects with LMW apo(a) phenotypes combined with high Lp(a) concentrations.

Conclusions
In this exclusively white study cohort, Lp(a) appears to be involved in both early and advanced stages of atherosclerosis, although in distinct ways. On the one hand, plasma concentration of Lp(a) dose-dependently predicted early atherosclerosis in subjects with high LDL cholesterol levels. This effect was independent of the apo(a) size polymorphism. Conversely, apo(a) polymorphism emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis. Only LMW apo(a) phenotypes with high antifibrinolytic capacity appeared to be involved in this clinically relevant stage of arterial disease.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grants from the Österreichischer Herzfonds and the Austrian Nationalbank (P-5553) to Dr Kronenberg and from the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung to Dr Utermann (P-11695-MED). Dr Kronenberg was supported by the APART program of the Austrian Academy of Science.

Received April 7, 1999; revision received June 1, 1999; accepted June 14, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Utermann G. Lipoprotein(a). In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1995:1887–1912.
  2. Kronenberg F, Steinmetz A, Kostner GM, Dieplinger H. Lipoprotein(a) in health and disease. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1996;33:495–543.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Pillarisetti S, Paka L, Obunike JC, Berglund L, Goldberg IJ. Subendothelial retention of lipoprotein (a): evidence that reduced heparan sulfate promotes lipoprotein binding to subendothelial matrix. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:867–874.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Harpel PC, Gordon BR, Parker TS. Plasmin catalyzes binding of lipoprotein(a) to immobilized fibrinogen and fibrin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:3847–3851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Loscalzo J, Weinfeld M, Fless GM, Scanu AM. Lipoprotein(a), fibrin binding, and plasminogen activation. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:240–245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McLean JW, Tomlinson JE, Kuang W-J, Eaton DL, Chen EY, Fless GM, Scanu AM, Lawn RM. cDNA sequence of human apolipoprotein(a) is homologous to plasminogen. Nature. 1987;330:132–137.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hajjar KA, Gavish D, Breslow JL, Nachman RL. Lipoprotein(a) modulation of endothelial cell surface fibrinolysis and its potential role in atherosclerosis. Nature. 1989;339:303–305.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Miles LA, Fless GM, Levin EG, Scanu AM, Plow EF. A potential basis for the thrombotic risks associated with lipoprotein(a). Nature. 1989;339:301–303.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Edelberg JM, Gonzalez-Gronow M, Pizzo SV. Lipoprotein(a) inhibition of plasminogen activation by tissue-type plasminogen activator. Thromb Res. 1990;57:155–162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Etingin OR, Hajjar DP, Hajjar KA, Harpel PC, Nachman RL. Lipoprotein (a) regulates plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in endothelial cells: a potential mechanism in thrombogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:2459–2465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hervio L, Chapman MJ, Thillet J, Loyau S, Anglés-Cano E. Does apolipoprotein(a) heterogeneity influence lipoprotein(a) effects on fibrinolysis. Blood. 1993;82:392–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hervio L, Girard-Globa A, Durlach V, Anglés-Cano E. The antifibrinolytic effect of lipoprotein(a) in heterozygous subjects is modulated by the relative concentration of each of the apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and their affinity for fibrin. Eur J Clin Invest. 1996;26:411–417.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Leerink CB, Duif PFCCM, Verhoeven N, Hackeng CM, Leus FR, Prins J, Bouma BN, Vanrijn HJM. Apolipoprotein(a) isoform size influences binding of lipoprotein(a) to plasmin-modified des-AA-fibrinogen. Fibrinolysis. 1994;8:214–220.
  14. Willeit J, Kiechl S. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis: a population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:661–668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Crouse JR, Harpold GH, Kahl FR, Toole JF, McKinney WM. Evaluation of a scoring system for extracranial carotid atherosclerosis extent with B-mode ultrasound. Stroke. 1986;17:270–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Wolfson SKJ, Bond MG, Bommer W, Sheth S, Psaty BM, Sharrett AR, Manolio TA, CHS Collaborative Research Group. Use of sonography to evaluate carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1991;22:1155–1163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Ogawa S, Fukunaga R, Yoneda S, Kimura K, Kamada T. Ultrasonic evaluation of early carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke. 1990;21:1567–1572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kiechl S, Willeit J, for the Bruneck Study Group. The natural course of atherosclerosis, Part I: incidence and progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:1484–1490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kiechl S, Willeit J, for the Bruneck Study Group. The natural course of atherosclerosis. Part II: vascular remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:1491–1498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. IHD Register. Report on the Fifth Working Group. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe: 1971.
  21. Walker A, Robins M, Weinfeld F. The National Survey of Stroke: clinical findings. Stroke. 1981;12(suppl I):I-13–I-49.
  22. Kamboh MI, Ferrell RE, Kottke BA. Expressed hypervariable polymorphism of apolipoprotein (a). Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49:1063–1074.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Kraft HG, Lingenhel A, Bader G, Kostner GM, Utermann G. The relative electrophoretic mobility of apo(a) isoforms depends on the gel system: proposal of a nomenclature for apo(a) phenotypes. Atherosclerosis. 1996;125:53–61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Marcovina SM, Albers JJ, Gabel B, Koschinsky ML, Gaur VP. Effect of the number of apolipoprotein(a) kringle 4 domains on immunochemical measurements of lipoprotein(a). Clin Chem. 1995;41:246–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Willeit J, Kiechl S, Santer P, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Jarosch E, Mair A. Lipoprotein(a) and asymptomatic carotid artery disease: evidence of a prominent role in the evolution of advanced carotid plaques: the Bruneck Study. Stroke. 1995;26:1582–1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kronenberg F, Kathrein H, König P, Neyer U, Sturm W, Lhotta K, Gröchenig E, Utermann G, Dieplinger H. Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes predict the risk for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1405–1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sandholzer C, Saha N, Kark JD, Rees A, Jaross W, Dieplinger H, Hoppichler F, Boerwinkle E, Utermann G. Apo(a) isoforms predict risk for coronary heart disease: a study in six populations. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1214–1226.[Abstract]
  28. Wild SH, Fortmann SP, Marcovina SM. A prospective case-control study of lipoprotein(a) levels and apo(a) size and risk of coronary heart disease in Stanford Five-City Project participants. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:239–245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Klausen IC, Sjol A, Hansen PS, Gerdes LU, Moller L, Lemming L, Schroll M, Faergeman O. Apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and coronary heart disease in men: a nested case-control study. Atherosclerosis. 1997;132:77–84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Badimon JJ, Fuster V, Chesebro JH, Badimon L. Coronary atherosclerosis: a multifactorial disease. Circulation. 1993;87(suppl II):II-3–II-16.
  31. Brown SA, Morrisett JD, Boerwinkle E, Hutchinson R, Patsch W. The relation of lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with asymptomatic atherosclerosis in subjects of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1558–1566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Armstrong VW, Cremer P, Eberle E, Manke A, Schulze F, Wieland H, Kreuzer H, Seidel D. The association between serum Lp(a) concentrations and angiographically assessed coronary atherosclerosis: dependence on serum LDL levels. Atherosclerosis. 1986;62:249–257.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Maher VMG, Brown BG, Marcovina SM, Hillger LA, Zhao XQ, Albers JJ. Effects of lowering elevated LDL cholesterol on the cardiovascular risk of lipoprotein(a). JAMA. 1995;274:1771–1774.[Abstract]
  34. Hopkins PN, Wu LL, Hunt SC, James BC, Vincent GM, Williams RR. Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and nonlipid risk factors in early familial coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2783–2792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Grainger DJ, Kirschenlohr HL, Metcalfe JC, Weissberg PL, Wade DP, Lawn RM. Proliferation of human smooth muscle cells promoted by lipoprotein(a). Science. 1993;260:1655–1658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Grainger DJ, Kemp PR, Liu AC, Lawn RM, Metcalfe JC. Activation of transforming growth factor-ß is inhibited in transgenic apolipoprotein(a) mice. Nature. 1994;370:460–462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Grainger DJ, Kemp PR, Metcalfe JC, Liu AC, Lawn RM, Williams NR, Grace AA, Schofield PM, Chauhan A. The serum concentration of active transforming growth factor-ß is severely depressed in advanced atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 1995;1:74–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Syrovets T, Thillet J, Chapman MJ, Simmet T. Lipoprotein(a) is a potent chemoattractant for human peripheral monocytes. Blood. 1997;90:2027–2036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Poon M, Zhang XX, Dunsky KG, Taubman MB, Harpel PC. Apolipoprotein(a) induces monocyte chemotactic activity in human vascular endothelial cells. Circulation. 1997;96:2514–2519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Takami S, Yamashita S, Kihara S, Ishigami M, Takemura K, Kume N, Kita T, Matsuzawa Y. Lipoprotein(a) enhances the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Circulation. 1998;97:721–728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Gazzaruso C, Geroldi D, Garzaniti A, Falcone C, Fratino P, Finardi G, Buscaglia P. Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes as genetic markers of coronary atherosclerosis severity. Int J Cardiol. 1998;64:277–284.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Kronenberg F, Neyer U, Lhotta K, Trenkwalder E, Auinger M, Pribasnig A, Meisl T, König P, Dieplinger H. The low molecular weight apo(a) phenotype is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients: a prospective follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:1027–1036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Berglund and E. Anuurad
Role of Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Disease: Current and Future Perspectives
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 8, 2008; 52(2): 132 - 134.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. F. Arenillas, J. Alvarez-Sabin, C. A. Molina, P. Chacon, I. Fernandez-Cadenas, M. Ribo, P. Delgado, M. Rubiera, A. Penalba, A. Rovira, et al.
Progression of Symptomatic Intracranial Large Artery Atherosclerosis Is Associated With a Proinflammatory State and Impaired Fibrinolysis
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1456 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Bennet, E. Di Angelantonio, S. Erqou, G. Eiriksdottir, G. Sigurdsson, M. Woodward, A. Rumley, G. D. O. Lowe, J. Danesh, and V. Gudnason
Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Risk of Future Coronary Heart Disease: Large-Scale Prospective Data
Arch Intern Med, March 24, 2008; 168(6): 598 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. M. Luke, J. P. Kane, D. M. Liu, C. M. Rowland, D. Shiffman, J. Cassano, J. J. Catanese, C. R. Pullinger, D. U. Leong, A. R. Arellano, et al.
A Polymorphism in the Protease-Like Domain of Apolipoprotein(a) Is Associated With Severe Coronary Artery Disease
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(9): 2030 - 2036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Kiechl, J. Willeit, M. Mayr, B. Viehweider, M. Oberhollenzer, F. Kronenberg, C. J. Wiedermann, S. Oberthaler, Q. Xu, J. L. Witztum, et al.
Oxidized Phospholipids, Lipoprotein(a), Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity, and 10-Year Cardiovascular Outcomes: Prospective Results From the Bruneck Study
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1788 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Dieplinger, A. Lingenhel, N. Baumgartner, W. Poelz, H. Dieplinger, M. Haltmayer, F. Kronenberg, and T. Mueller
Increased Serum Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations and Low Molecular Weight Phenotypes of Apolipoprotein(a) Are Associated with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1298 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Suk Danik, N. Rifai, J. E. Buring, and P. M Ridker
Lipoprotein(a), measured with an assay independent of apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, and risk of future cardiovascular events among initially healthy women.
JAMA, September 20, 2006; 296(11): 1363 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al.
Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.
Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): e873 - e923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Tsimikas, S. Kiechl, J. Willeit, M. Mayr, E. R. Miller, F. Kronenberg, Q. Xu, C. Bergmark, S. Weger, F. Oberhollenzer, et al.
Oxidized Phospholipids Predict the Presence and Progression of Carotid and Femoral Atherosclerosis and Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease: Five-Year Prospective Results From the Bruneck Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2219 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al.
Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.
Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1583 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. Rubin, H. J. Kim, T. A. Pearson, S. Holleran, R. Ramakrishnan, and L. Berglund
Apo[a] size and PNR explain African American-Caucasian differences in allele-specific apo[a] levels for small but not large apo[a]
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 982 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
European Physical Education ReviewHome page
N.-E. Thomas, S.-M. Cooper, S. P. Williams, J. S. Baker, and B. Davies
Coronary heart disease risk factors in young people of differing socio-economic status
European Physical Education Review, June 1, 2005; 11(2): 171 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. C. Longenecker, M. J. Klag, S. M. Marcovina, Y.-M. Liu, B. G. Jaar, N. R. Powe, N. E. Fink, A. S. Levey, and J. Coresh
High Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Small Apolipoprotein(a) Size Prospectively Predict Cardiovascular Events in Dialysis Patients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 1794 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Schneider, J. L. Witztum, S. G. Young, E. H. Ludwig, E. R. Miller, S. Tsimikas, L. K. Curtiss, S. M. Marcovina, J. M. Taylor, R. M. Lawn, et al.
High-level lipoprotein [a] expression in transgenic mice: evidence for oxidized phospholipids in lipoprotein [a] but not in low density lipoproteins
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 769 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Guerra, Z. Yu, S. Marcovina, R. Peshock, J. C. Cohen, and H. H. Hobbs
Lipoprotein(a) and Apolipoprotein(a) Isoforms: No Association With Coronary Artery Calcification in The Dallas Heart Study
Circulation, March 29, 2005; 111(12): 1471 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. Berglund and R. Ramakrishnan
Lipoprotein(a): An Elusive Cardiovascular Risk Factor
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(12): 2219 - 2226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. T. Schroeder, L. Zheng, M. D. Ong, C. Martinez, C. Flores, Y. Stewart, C. Azen, and F. R. Sattler
Effects of Androgen Therapy on Adipose Tissue and Metabolism in Older Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 4863 - 4872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
N. Rifai, J. Ma, F. M. Sacks, P. M. Ridker, W. J. L. Hernandez, M. J. Stampfer, and S. M. Marcovina
Apolipoprotein(a) Size and Lipoprotein(a) Concentration and Future Risk of Angina Pectoris with Evidence of Severe Coronary Atherosclerosis in Men: The Physicians' Health Study
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2004; 50(8): 1364 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M Ridker, N. J. Brown, D. E. Vaughan, D. G. Harrison, and J. L. Mehta
Established and Emerging Plasma Biomarkers in the Prediction of First Atherothrombotic Events
Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25_suppl_1): IV-6 - IV-19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
F Hartgens, G Rietjens, H A Keizer, H Kuipers, and B H R Wolffenbuttel
Effects of androgenic-anabolic steroids on apolipoproteins and lipoprotein (a)
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2004; 38(3): 253 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. D. Wu, L. Berglund, C. Dimayuga, J. Jones, R. R. Sciacca, M. R. Di Tullio, and S. Homma
High lipoprotein(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) sizes are associated with endothelial dysfunction in a multiethnic cohort
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1828 - 1833