Circulation. 1999;100:1250-1252
(Circulation. 1999;100:1250-1252.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Misdiagnosis of New Bifascicular Block
John E. Madias, MD
Cardiology Division Elmhurst Hospital Center,
Elmhurst, NY
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
To the Editor:
I enjoyed the contribution of Kaji et al1 in the "Images
in Cardiovascular Medicine" section of the journal. I
have found an error, and because I believe that this part of
Circulation is very popular and is read by a large number of
physicians, it would be an opportunity to call attention to a
frequently committed misdiagnosis. I am referring to the
characterization of the ECG made by the authors as showing "a new
bifascicular block." Apparently the authors made this diagnosis on
the basis of the widened QRS complex in lead V1
(which they interpreted as a right bundle-branch block) and the
leftward shift of the frontal QRS axis well depicted in leads aVL and
aVF (which they attributed to left anterior hemiblock).
However, the ECG features noted in their case and the precipitating
clinical circumstances are typical of the "giant R waves syndrome"
noted in the hyperacute phase of transmural ischemic
injury.2 3 4 5 6 ECG patterns identical to the one depicted in
the case under discussion are seen in the setting of the very early
phase of transmural myocardial infarction and coronary
vasospasm (Prinzmetal's angina) and immediately after acute
coronary occlusion in the animal
laboratory.2 3 4 5 6
The diagnostic particulars of the ECG include an increase
in the R amplitude of waves and the decrease or disappearance of S
waves (vide leads aVL, V2, and
V3 of the authors case), ST-segment elevation
merging with the R waves (V2), and widening of
the QRS complex (
VL, 3,
VF, V2), often
indistinguishable from ventricular tachycardia,
in which the P waves are obscured and the rate is fast.
The mechanism of this ECG syndrome has nothing to do with a compromise
of conduction at 1 or more sites of the conduction system and is
believed to constitute a "focal" block or delay in conduction in an
area of severe transmural ischemic injury. In such a territory,
late slow conduction produces delayed enhanced (due to lack of
opposition) depolarization vectors, pointing toward the ECG leads
reflecting the particular region involved (vide, positive potentials in
aVL, V2, and V3 and
negative in 3 and aVF in this case).1 2 3 4 5
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Kaji EH, Bednarz J, Spencer KT, Lang RM. Left main
coronary artery disease: cardiac arrest following stress
echocardiography. Circulation. 1998;98:1038.[Free Full Text]
-
Madias JE. The earliest electrocardiographic sign of
acute transmural myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 1977;10:193196.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Madias JE, Krikelis EN. Transient giant R waves in the
early phase of acute myocardial infarction: association with
ventricular fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 1981;4:339349.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Madias JE. The "giant R waves" ECG pattern of
hyperacute phase of myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 1993;26:7782.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ekmekci A, Toyoshima H, Kwoczynski JK, Nagaya T,
Prinzmetal M. Angina pectoris, V: giant R and receding S wave in
myocardial ischemia and certain nonischemic conditions.
Am J Cardiol. 1961;7:521532.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Prinzmetal M, Ekmekci A, Kennamer R, Kwoczynski JK,
Shubin H, Toyoshima H.. Variant form of angina pectoris: previously
undelineated syndrome. JAMA. 1960;174:17941800.