| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1999;100:1400-1405.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Correspondence to Dr Stefano Taddei, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56100 Pisa, Italy. E-mail s.taddei{at}int.med.unipi.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsIn 16 healthy subjects (49.5±5.8 years;
118.6±3.5/78.9±2.9 mm Hg) and 16 patients with essential
hypertension (47.9±4.8 years; 154.6±4.5/102.9±3.2 mm Hg), we
measured modifications in forearm blood flow (strain-gauge
plethysmography) during intrabrachial infusion of bradykinin (5, 15, or
50 ng/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute) in the presence of
saline, N
-monomethyl-L-arginine
(L-NMMA; used to inhibit NO synthase; 100 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue
per minute), and ouabain (to block Na+K+/ATPase
and prevent hyperpolarization; 0.7 µg/100 mL of
forearm tissue per minute). In healthy subjects, vasodilatation to
bradykinin was significantly blunted by L-NMMA and unaffected by
ouabain. In hypertensive patients, vasodilatation to bradykinin was not
modified by L-NMMA, but it was significantly reduced by ouabain. In an
adjunctive group of 8 hypertensive patients (49.9±3.8 years;
155.9±5.5/103.7±3.9 mm Hg), the response to bradykinin was
repeated during the administration of intrabrachial vitamin C (a
scavenger for oxygen free radicals; 8 mg/100 mL of forearm tissue per
minute). In these patients, L-NMMAinduced inhibition of vasodilation
to bradykinin was restored, and ouabain was no longer effective. In a
final group of 6 normotensive controls (45.9±4.1 years;
115.1±2.9/79.3±2.1 mm Hg), vasodilation to bradykinin residual
to L-NMMA blockade was further inhibited by simultaneous
ouabain infusion.
ConclusionsVasodilation to bradykinin is impaired in essential hypertensive patients because of an NO-system alteration caused by oxidative stress, and it is mediated by an alternative pathway, possibly involving endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization.
Key Words: endothelium-derived factors hypertension nitric oxide bradykinin ouabain free radicals
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In healthy human subjects, several agonists (including acetylcholine
and bradykinin) cause vasodilation when directly injected into the
brachial or coronary circulation.10 11 12 This
vasodilation is mainly NO-mediated and, therefore,
endothelium-dependent because it can be inhibited by
specific NO synthase inhibitors, such as
N
-monomethyl-L-arginine
(L-NMMA).13 In essential hypertensive patients, the
response to endothelium-dependent agonists (mainly
acetylcholine or bradykinin) is blunted in different vascular districts
when compared with healthy controls.14 15 16 17 This diminished
relaxing response to acetylcholine or bradykinin is, moreover,
resistant to L-NMMA, indicating the presence of compromised NO
availability caused, at least for acetylcholine,18 by
oxidative stress. Therefore, some other mediator(s) accounts for the
vascular relaxing effects of these compounds in the presence of
impaired NO availability.
The aim of the present study was to explore the mechanisms responsible for the relaxing response to bradykinin in the peripheral circulation of hypertensive patients. Moreover, because converting enzyme inhibitors reduce the degradation of bradykinin and, thus, increase its vascular effect,19 this study also evaluated which mediator is responsible for the increased effectiveness of bradykinin when the enzyme is inhibited.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Subjects were defined as normal according to the absence of a familial
history of essential hypertension and blood pressure values
<140/90 mm Hg (Table
). Hypertensive patients were
recruited from among newly diagnosed cases when they reported the
presence of a positive family history of essential hypertension and if
supine arterial blood pressure (after 10 minutes of rest;
measured by mercury sphygmomanometer 3 times at 1-week intervals) was
consistently >140/90 mm Hg (Table
). Secondary
forms of hypertension were excluded by routine diagnostic
procedures. Patients were enrolled if they had never been treated
(n=18) or reported a history of discontinued or ineffective
pharmacological antihypertensive treatment (n=6).
Experimental Model
Vascular reactivity was assessed by the perfused forearm
technique. Briefly, the brachial artery was cannulated for drug
infusion at systemically ineffective rates; intraarterial
blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. Forearm blood flow (FBF)
was measured in both forearms (experimental and contralateral forearm)
by strain-gauge venous plethysmography.20 Circulation to
the hand was excluded 1 minute before FBF measurement by inflating a
pediatric cuff around the wrist at a suprasystolic blood
pressure. Forearm volume was measured according to the water
displacement method. Details concerning the method as performed in our
laboratory, including sensitivity and reproducibility, have already
been published.16
Study Design
In 8 normotensive subjects and 8 essential hypertensive
patients, endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilatation
was evaluated by obtaining a dose-response curve to
intraarterial bradykinin (cumulative increase in infusion
rates: 5, 15, and 50 ng/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute for 5
minutes for each dose). Endothelium-independent
vasodilatation was assessed with sodium nitroprusside (1, 2, and 4
µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute for 5 minutes for each dose),
which acts directly on the smooth muscle cells.21
To identify the mediator responsible for bradykinin-induced vasodilation, the dose-response curve to the peptide was repeated in the presence of intraarterial L-NMMA (100 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; it is an inhibitor of NO synthase) and intraarterial ouabain (0.7 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; it blocks Na+K+/ATPase and, thereby, prevents endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) effects on smooth muscle).6 8 22 In essential hypertensive patients, the response to sodium nitroprusside was also repeated in the presence of ouabain.
Moreover, in 8 additional patients with hypertension, bradykinin and sodium nitroprusside infusions were performed under basal conditions (saline infusion at 0.2 mL/min) and after the short-term administration of 20 mg of lisinopril (at the peak drug effect, 6 to 8 hours after dosing). To avoid 2 arterial punctures on the same day, the cannula was kept patent by the infusion of heparinized saline (6 µL/min) through a portable minipump (Microject Bolus 2, Miles, Cavenago). Bradykinin administration was repeated under both conditions during the administration of intrabrachial L-NMMA or ouabain.
To evaluate the effectiveness of lisinopril, blood pressure values, heart rate, and plasma renin activity (ng of angiotensin I · mL-1 · hr-1) were measured by radioimmunoassay,23 and serum converting enzyme activity (nmol · min-1 · mL-1) was measured by a radioenzymatic method.24
To assess whether oxygen free radical production impairs NO-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilation and, thereby, activates a compensatory pathway, the dose-response curve to bradykinin was determined in 8 normotensive subjects and 8 hypertensive patients during saline infusion (0.2 mL/min) or in the presence of L-NMMA (100 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute) or ouabain (0.7 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute). These 3 infusions were then repeated during the intraarterial administration of vitamin C (8 mg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute), an antioxidant.25
Finally, to further assess the possibility that in the presence of reduced NO availability, a NO-independent compensatory pathway is activated, bradykinin was infused in 6 normotensive subjects during saline administration (0.2 mL/min), in the presence of L-NMMA (100 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute) or ouabain (0.7 µg/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute), and in the presence of both L-NMMA and ouabain.
L-NMMA, ouabain, and vitamin C infusion began 10 minutes before bradykinin administration and continued throughout. The sequence of L-NMMA and ouabain infusion was randomized. A 30-minute washout period was allowed between each dose-response curve, but a 60-minute period was allowed when L-NMMA was infused. These periods of time were validated in adjunctive studies. Thus, in 4 normotensive subjects and 4 hypertensive patients, we observed that the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA or ouabain on vasodilation to bradykinin remained unchanged when the antagonists were retested after the above-described washout period (data not shown).
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed in terms of changes in FBF. Because
arterial blood pressure did not change significantly during
the FBF study, increments in FBF were taken as evidence of local
vasodilation. Results are expressed as mean±SD, except in the figures,
where they are mean+SEM. Differences between 2 means were compared by
Student's t test for paired or unpaired observations, as
appropriate. Responses to bradykinin and sodium nitroprusside were
analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures, and Scheffè's
test was applied for multiple comparison testing. Differences were
considered to be statistically significant ar P<0.05.
Drugs
Bradykinin HCl (Clinalfa AG),
N
-monomethyl-L-arginine
(Clinalfa AG), ouabain (Ouabaine Arnaud), vitamin C (Bracco), and
sodium nitroprusside (Malesci) were obtained from commercially
available sources and freshly diluted to the desired concentrations by
adding normal saline. Sodium nitroprusside was dissolved in a
glucosate solution and protected from light by aluminum
foil.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Response to Bradykinin and Sodium Nitroprusside
The FBF increase induced by bradykinin was significantly reduced
in hypertensive patients (from 3.0±0.3 to a maximum of 14.6±2.9
mL · 100 mL-1 ·
min-1) compared with normotensive
subjects (from 3.1±0.3 to a maximum of 22.3±3.7 mL · 100
mL-1 · min-1)
(Figure 1
). In contrast, vasodilatation
to sodium nitroprusside was similar in normotensive subjects (from
3.1±0.3 to 21.4±4.8 mL · 100 mL-1
· min-1) and hypertensive patients (from
3.1±0.3 to 21.9±4.9 mL · 100 mL-1
· min-1) (Figure 1
).
|
Effect of L-NMMA and Ouabain on Vasodilation to Bradykinin
In normotensive subjects, the L-NMMA infusion decreased basal FBF
(from 3.3±0.4 to 2.0±0.2 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute) and
significantly (P<0.01) blunted the vasodilator effect of
bradykinin (from 2.0±0.2 to 7.0±1.8 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per
minute; 250% increase), whereas ouabain decreased basal FBF (from
3.4±0.4 to 2.4±0.2 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute) but did
not change the response to the agonist (from 2.4±0.2 to 16.8±1.8
mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; 605% increase) (Figure 2
). In hypertensive patients, L-NMMA
caused a lesser decrease in FBF (from 3.2±0.5 to 2.4±0.2 mL/100 mL of
forearm tissue per minute) compared with controls (40% versus 25%
decrease, respectively; P<0.01) and did not change the
response to bradykinin (from 2.4±0.2 to 12.3±2.9 mL/100 mL of forearm
tissue per minute; 412±46% increase) (Figure 2
). In contrast,
ouabain caused a FBF decrease comparable to L-NMMA (from 3.0±0.4 to
2.2±0.2 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute) and significantly
(P<0.01) blunted the response to bradykinin (from 2.2±0.3
to 8.3±1.6 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; 277±37% increase)
(Figure 2
). Ouabain did not alter the response to sodium
nitroprusside (data not shown).
|
In a second group of hypertensive patients, short-term (6 to 8
hours after dosing) administration of 20 mg of lisinopril
significantly (P
0.01) inhibited the serum-converting
enzyme (from 74.3±26.4 to 5.9±3.6 nmol ·
mL-1 · min-1),
increased plasma renin activity (from 0.84±0.8 to 1.98±1.3 ng of
angiotensin I · mL-1 ·
hr-1), and reduced blood pressure (from
152.6±6.1/101.3±3.6 to 133.2±5.1/88.1±3.2 mm Hg), without
changes in heart rate (from 72.6±4.3 to 73.4±4.6 beats/min).
Lisinopril significantly increased the response to
bradykinin (saline: from 3.0±0.4 to a maximum of 14.9±3.1 mL ·
100 mL-1 · min-1;
lisinopril: from 2.8±0.3 to a maximum of 18.1±4.1 mL
· 100 mL-1 ·
min-1; 396±53% and 546±71% increase,
respectively; P<0.01) (Figure 3
) but not to sodium nitroprusside
(saline: from 3.3±0.4 to 21.1±4.8 mL · 100
mL-1 · min-1;
lisinopril: from 3.2±0.3 to 21.8±5.1 mL · 100
mL-1 · min-1).
L-NMMA did not change the response to bradykinin, either before (from
2.2±0.4 to a maximum of 10.8±3.1 mL · 100
mL-1 · min-1) or
after (from 2.3±0.4 to a maximum of 11.1±2.9 mL · 100
mL-1 · min-1) the
administration of lisinopril (391±47 and 382±41%
increase, respectively) (Figure 3
). In contrast, ouabain blunted
the vasodilatation to bradykinin (from 2.3±0.4 to a maximum of
8.7±1.9 mL · 100 mL-1 ·
min-1; 278±36% increase) and prevented the
facilitating effect of lisinopril (from 2.2±0.4 to a
maximum of 7.4±1.5 mL · 100 mL-1
· min-1; 236±31% increase) (Figure 3
).
|
Effect of Vitamin C on L-NMMA- and Ouabain-Induced Inhibition of
Vasodilation to Bradykinin
In the second group of normotensive subjects, L-NMMA blunted
the vasodilating effect of bradykinin (saline: from 3.6±0.5 to
22.7±3.7 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; L-NMMA: from 2.2±0.2
to 9.0±1.8 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; 531±58% and
309±38% increase, respectively; P<0.01 versus bradykinin
alone), but ouabain was ineffective. Vitamin C infusion did not alter
basal FBF, change the response to bradykinin with saline (from
3.7±0.5 to 23.1±3.2 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute), or
change the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on vasodilation to bradykinin
(from 2.2±1.0 to 10.9±2.1 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute).
Under vitamin C, again ouabain did not alter vasodilation to
bradykinin. In the final group of hypertensive patients, L-NMMA did not
change the response to bradykinin (saline: from 3.0±0.5 to 11.9±2.3
mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; L-NMMA: from 2.3±0.2 to
9.1±2.2 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; 298±50% and
302±45% increase, respectively) (Figure 4
). In contrast, ouabain inhibited the
response to the endothelial agonist (from 2.1±0.2 to
5.9±0.9 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; 183±31% increase;
P<0.05 versus saline) (Figure 4
). Vitamin C
increased the response to bradykinin (from 3.2±0.4 to 21.5±4.6 mL/100
mL of forearm tissue per minute; 578±79% increase; P<0.01
versus bradykinin during saline) (Figure 4
). Moreover, when
retested under vitamin C, L-NMMA blunted the vasodilating effect of
bradykinin (from 2.2±0.2 to 7.1±0.8 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per
minute; 220±37% increase; P<0.01 versus bradykinin in the
presence of vitamin C) (Figure 4
), whereas ouabain no longer
inhibited the response to the agonist (from 2.1±0.2 to 12.9±2.8
mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute; 512±69% increase;
P<0.01 versus bradykinin in the presence of vitamin C)
(Figure 4
).
|
Effect of Simultaneous L-NMMA and Ouabain
Administration in Normotensive Subjects
As in the previous series of experiments, in normotensive
subjects, ouabain did not change the response to bradykinin (saline:
from 2.8±0.4 to 18.5±2.1 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per minute;
561±41% increase; ouabain: from 1.9±0.1 to 12.5±1.6 mL/100 mL of
forearm tissue per minute; 559±37% increase), whereas L-NMMA infusion
significantly (P<0.01) blunted the vasodilator effect of
the agonist (from 1.7±0.2 to 5.6±0.9 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue per
minute; 231±21% increase) (Figure 5
).
However, when bradykinin administration was repeated in the presence of
simultaneous ouabain and L-NMMA, vasodilation to bradykinin
was inhibited (from 1.3±0.2 to 2.8±0.4 mL/100 mL of forearm tissue
per minute; 118±13% increase) (Figure 5
); this inhibition was
significantly greater (P<0.01) than that observed with
L-NMMA alone.
|
In both normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension, contralateral FBF did not significantly change throughout the study (data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In healthy subjects, the vasodilator response to bradykinin was blunted by L-NMMA, an inhibitor of NO-synthase, which confirms earlier observations.17 This finding indicates that the relaxing activity of this agonist must be predominantly mediated by activation of the L-arginineNO pathway. This interpretation is supported by the present evidence that in normotensive subjects, ouabain (a Na+K+/ATPase inhibitor) did not change the response to bradykinin. In contrast, in hypertensive patients, the vasodilation to bradykinin was resistant to L-NMMA, indicating the presence of an alteration in the L-arginineNO pathway, leading to impaired NO availability. However, the response to bradykinin was reduced by ouabain at a dose that did not change the vasodilator effect of sodium nitroprusside. Taken together, these results indicate that although endothelium-dependent vasodilatation to bradykinin seems to be mainly dependent on NO production under normal conditions, in patients with essential hypertension, it is not dependent on the NO system. Instead, it is related to the activation of a ouabain-sensitive pathway.
This possibility was reinforced by our study using the converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril. Because converting enzyme is responsible for the breakdown of bradykinin, lisinopril increases the local concentration of bradykinin and, as a consequence, its vascular effects. In hypertensive patients, lisinopril significantly potentiated the vasodilator response to bradykinin.26 The present study demonstrated that this facilitating effect was not altered by L-NMMA, but it was prevented by ouabain. Therefore, in patients with essential hypertension, vasodilatation to bradykinin, even when potentiated by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, seems to be independent of NO availability and mediated by an ouabain-sensitive pathway.
Finally, when the response to bradykinin was tested in the presence of vitamin C, which probably blocks oxidative stress by a scavenger activity,25 vasodilation to the endothelial agonist and the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA were not changed in normotensive subjects, indicating that oxidative stress plays no major role in affecting endothelial responses in normal conditions.18 In contrast, in essential hypertensive patients, the response to bradykinin was significantly increased, suggesting that, in line with the results observed with acetylcholine,18 27 oxidative stress may be the main mechanism leading to impaired vasodilation to bradykinin in essential hypertension. Whether cyclooxygenase activity could be the source of oxidative stress in these experimental conditions, as observed with acetylcholine,28 is still to be established. However, the relevant finding is that during vitamin C administration, inhibition to L-NMMA was restored, whereas ouabain was no longer effective in blunting the response to bradykinin. These results seem to indicate that in hypertensive patients, vasodilation to bradykinin is mainly dependent on an ouabain-dependent pathway when NO activity is impaired because of the presence of oxidative stress.
This possibility was further reinforced by our examination of the effect of ouabain on vasodilation to bradykinin residual to L-NMMA blockade in healthy subjects. In this experimental condition of decreased NO availability, ouabain, although ineffective when tested in control conditions, produced a further decrease in the response to bradykinin. Therefore, this series of observations suggests that in peripheral human circulation, an ouabain-sensitive pathway may operate as a rapid compensatory mechanism for decreased NO activity.
Although the present study does not allow identification of the exact nature of the ouabain-sensitive pathway, the following line of evidence points to the hypothesis that this compensatory pathway could be related to hyperpolarization. Thus, in isolated blood vessels and the intact circulation of different animal species,6 when the action of endothelium-dependent vasodilators is, at least in part, resistant to NO-synthase inhibitors6 (as was the case in our hypertensive study population), hyperpolarization accounts for endothelium-dependent relaxation.29 Moreover, bradykinin-dependent EDHF production, which can be potentiated by converting enzyme inhibition, has been demonstrated in human coronary arteries from transplanted hearts.30 Finally, in vitro studies suggest that NO can inhibit the bradykinin-evoked EDHF release/effect,31 a finding that seems to agree with our present results in humans indicating that the ouabain-sensitive pathway can be detected in both normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients only when the NO system is not active.
Ouabain acts by blocking Na+K+/ATPase,21 but although in some vessels EDHF acts through activation of the pump,6 most of the evidence suggests that EDHF does not act through Na+K+/ATPase.6 It is more likely that ouabain, simply by depolarizing the membrane, nonspecifically inhibits a response initiated by a mechanism that is the target of EDHF in smooth muscles.6 8 In this regard, available evidence seems to indicate that the most likely candidate to be identified as EDHF is K+.8
Finally, the present results only partially agree with a similar study evaluating the effect of ouabain on vasodilation to acetylcholine.32 In patients with essential hypertension, vasodilation to acetylcholine, which is resistant to L-NMMA, cannot be inhibited by ouabain. However, when vasodilation to acetylcholine is potentiated by concomitant insulin infusion, this facilitating effect can be inhibited by ouabain. Thus, at least in certain experimental conditions, an ouabain-sensitive mechanism accounts for the vasodilating effect of acetylcholine. Again, this is a compensatory mechanism for decreased NO activity; in healthy controls, the potentiating effect of insulin on acetylcholine-induced vasodilation can be prevented by L-NMMA.
In conclusion, the present study indicates that in human peripheral microcirculation, vasodilation to bradykinin is mainly mediated by NO activity because it can be blocked by L-NMMA. In hypertensive patients, NO availability is impaired because vasodilation to bradykinin is resistant to L-NMMA. In these patients, an alternative compensatory pathway sensitive to ouabain is acutely activated. The possibility exists that this compensatory mechanism could be related to EDHF production. However, the nature and clinical relevance of EDHF in essential hypertension must still be investigated.
Received April 13, 1999; revision received June 10, 1999; accepted June 22, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Giannarelli, A. Virdis, F. De Negri, E. Duranti, A. Magagna, L. Ghiadoni, A. Salvetti, and S. Taddei Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Release in Healthy Subjects and Hypertensive Patients: Relationship With {beta}-Adrenergic Receptors and the Nitric Oxide Pathway Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 314 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. T. Aggarwal, K. M. Gauthier, and W. B. Campbell 15-Lipoxygenase metabolites contribute to age-related reduction in acetylcholine-induced hypotension in rabbits Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H89 - H96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Fitzgerald, H. Bashari, J. A. Cox, H. C. Parkington, and R. G. Evans Contributions of endothelium-derived relaxing factors to control of hindlimb blood flow in the mouse in vivo Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1072 - H1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Barac, U. Campia, and J. A. Panza Methods for Evaluating Endothelial Function in Humans Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 748 - 760. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Giannarelli, F. De Negri, A. Virdis, L. Ghiadoni, A. Cipriano, A. Magagna, S. Taddei, and A. Salvetti Nitric Oxide Modulates Tissue Plasminogen Activator Release in Normotensive Subjects and Hypertensive Patients Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 878 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Quyyumi and M. Ozkor Vasodilation by Hyperpolarization: Beyond NO Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1023 - 1025. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Oliver, V. P. Melville, and D. J. Webb Effect of Regular Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibition in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 622 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Taddei and L. Ghiadoni Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibition to Treat Essential Hypertension: Is This the Beginning of the Story? Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 546 - 548. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Feletou and P. M. Vanhoutte Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture) Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H985 - H1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Taddei, D. Versari, A. Cipriano, L. Ghiadoni, F. Galetta, F. Franzoni, A. Magagna, A. Virdis, and A. Salvetti Identification of a Cytochrome P450 2C9-Derived Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor in Essential Hypertensive Patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 508 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. James, J. Tullett, A. G. Hemsley, and A. C. Shore Effects of Aging and Hypertension on the Microcirculation Hypertension, May 1, 2006; 47(5): 968 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bellien, R. Joannides, M. Iacob, P. Arnaud, and C. Thuillez Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels and NO Regulate Human Peripheral Conduit Artery Mechanics Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Passauer, F. Pistrosch, E. Bussemaker, G. Lassig, K. Herbrig, and P. Gross Reduced Agonist-Induced Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Uremia Is Attributable to an Impairment of Vascular Nitric Oxide J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dwivedi, S. Saha, P.J. Chowienczyk, and J.M. Ritter Block of Inward Rectifying K+ Channels (KIR) Inhibits Bradykinin-Induced Vasodilatation in Human Forearm Resistance Vasculature Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(2): e7 - e9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Clapp, A. D. Hingorani, R. K. Kharbanda, V. Mohamed-Ali, J. W. Stephens, P. Vallance, and R. J. MacAllister Inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction involves reduced nitric oxide bioavailability and increased oxidant stress Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2004; 64(1): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ghiadoni, A. Magagna, D. Versari, I. Kardasz, Y. Huang, S. Taddei, and A. Salvetti Different Effect of Antihypertensive Drugs on Conduit Artery Endothelial Function Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1281 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Taddei, A. Virdis, L. Ghiadoni, D. Versari, G. Salvetti, A. Magagna, and A. Salvetti Calcium Antagonist Treatment by Lercanidipine Prevents Hyperpolarization in Essential Hypertension Hypertension, April 1, 2003; 41(4): 950 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Rossi, S. Taddei, A. Virdis, M. Cavallin, L. Ghiadoni, S. Favilla, D. Versari, I. Sudano, A. C. Pessina, and A. Salvetti The T-786C and Glu298Asp polymorphisms of the endothelial nitric oxide gene affect the forearm blood flow responses of Caucasian hypertensive patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 938 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Rossoni, M. Salaices, M. Miguel, A. M. Briones, L. A. Barker, D. V. Vassallo, and M. J. Alonso Ouabain-induced hypertension is accompanied by increases in endothelial vasodilator factors Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): H2110 - H2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Molnar, M. J. M. Nijland, D. C. Howe, and P. W. Nathanielsz Evidence for microvascular dysfunction after prenatal dexamethasone at 0.7, 0.75, and 0.8 gestation in sheep Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): R561 - R567. [Abstract] [Full Text] |