(Circulation. 1999;100:1697-1702.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Cardiology Section (W.G.H., M.S.T., D.M.H., D.W.K., W.C.L., K.M.L.) and Division of Radiological Sciences (W.G.H., C.A.H., T.B.S., K.M.L.), The Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Correspondence to W. Gregory Hundley, MD, Cardiology Section, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1045. E-mail ghundley{at}wfubmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsOne hundred fifty-three patients (86 men and 67 women aged 30 to 88 years) with poor acoustic windows that prevented adequate second harmonic TTE imaging were consecutively referred for MRI to diagnose inducible myocardial ischemia during intravenous dobutamine and atropine. Diagnostic studies were completed in an average of 53 minutes. No patients experienced myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, exacerbation of congestive heart failure, or death. In patients who underwent computer-assisted quantitative coronary angiography, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a >50% luminal diameter narrowing were 83% and 83%, respectively. In the 103 patients with a negative MRI examination, the cardiovascular occurrencefree survival rate was 97%.
ConclusionsFast cine cardiac MRI provides a mechanism to assess left ventricular contraction and diagnose inducible myocardial ischemia in patients not well suited for stress echocardiography.
Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging stress ischemia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cine gradient-echo MRI can be used to assess LV contraction without limitations imposed by body habitus.4 Although LV contractile abnormalities indicative of ischemia have been detected with MRI,4 5 the length of scans, perceptions of poor patient tolerance, and the lack of an accepted method to monitor patients for ischemia have hindered widespread clinical use.6 Recently, MRI visualization of LV wall motion that is suitable for use during pharmacological stress has become available.7 The purpose of the present study was to assess the safety and clinical utility of fast cine MRI stress testing for the determination of inducible ischemia in patients not suitable for stress echocardiography.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
8
and 10% had 5 to 8 of 16 endocardial segments (segment location as
defined by the American Society of
Echocardiography10 ) not visualized
with echocardiography. The study population
represented 0% to 20% of the patients referred for
dobutamine echocardiography on a given
day. Patients were ineligible for enrollment if they had a pacemaker,
intracranial metal, claustrophobia, or a known contraindication to
receiving dobutamine or atropine.
Study Protocol
Before study, a 12-lead ECG was performed outside of the magnet.
After intravenous access was established, patients were
positioned supine on the MR scanning table with a phased-array surface
coil, ECG monitoring leads, respiratory gating belt, pulse oximetry
monitor, and brachial blood pressure cuff attached. During testing, a
registered nurse and physician continuously monitored heart rate and
rhythm, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate.
At baseline, single-slice, multiphase gradient echo images were obtained in 3 apical (horizontal, vertical, and apical long axis) views, similar to the 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and long-axis views acquired during transthoracic echocardiography, and 3 short-axis (the base, middle portion, and apex) views of the LV.11 Images were acquired continuously during 5-minute intravenous dobutamine infusions of 5, 10, 20, and 40 µg · kg-1 · min-1 that were designed to achieve 85% of the maximum predicted heart rate response (MPHRR) for age. If 85% MPHRR was not achieved, atropine was administered (0.3 mg/min increments) up to 1.5 mg. End points for protocol termination were a fall in systolic blood pressure >40 mm Hg, significant ventricular arrhythmias, development of a new wall motion abnormality, or achievement of 85% MPHRR for age. Additional images were obtained after 10 minutes of recovery to confirm that LV wall motion had returned to baseline. Once the patient was removed from the magnet, a repeat 12-lead ECG was obtained.
MRI Technique
MRI was performed with a 1.5-T GE Horizon 5.5 whole-body (bore
size of 60 cm) imaging system (General Electric Medical Systems, Inc).
All MR scans used prospective ECG gating. Acquisition
parameters included a repetition time (TR) of 10 to 14 ms,
an echo time (TE) of 5 ms, a flip angle of 30°, a receiver bandwidth
of 31.5 kHz, a 32- to 48-cm field of view, and a slice thickness of
8 mm. Eight- to 12-second breathhold scans were performed with a
fast gradient-echo sequence with k-space segmentation (views per
segment) and view sharing.12 As shown in Table 1
, the views per segment and view
sharing were adjusted throughout the procedure to increase the temporal
resolution (50 to 14 ms) to identify the LV endocardium at end systole
as the heart rate and velocity of endocardial thickening increased
during stress. Because the k-space segmentation decreased (increasing
scan time) as the heart rate increased (reducing scan time), the
duration of the breathhold remained relatively constant throughout the
procedure.
|
During stress testing, custom display software written in IDL
(Interactive Data Language, Research Systems) permitted viewing of LV
regional wall motion in an 8-panel display format on an adjacent Sun
Microsystems workstation (Figure 1
). The
reconstruction, transfer, and display of images were overlapped in time
to visualize each slice within 20 to 30 seconds after acquisition.
|
Data Analysis
MRI data were interpreted at the time of examination by 1 of 2
investigators (W.G.H. or K.M.L.) without knowledge of any other
cardiovascular study. During each study, 18 LV segments
(apical, middle, and basal, from the 3 apical and short-axis views)
were continuously assessed by a 4-point scoring system in which 1 was
normal, 2 was hypokinetic, 3 was akinetic, and 4 was dyskinetic.
Myocardial segments were identified as ischemic if the score
incremented by 1 during infusion or a hypokinetic segment at rest
failed to improve contractility or elicited a biphasic
response.13
Computer-assisted, quantitative coronary angiography14 was performed without knowledge of patient characteristics or MRI results in all patients who underwent angiography within 6 months of MRI without an intervening cardiac event (myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death) or occurrence (exacerbation of congestive heart failure or unstable angina). The sensitivity and specificity of fast cine MRI and display for the determination of coronary arterial luminal narrowings of >50% and of >70% were determined. Patients with a negative MRI examination were contacted (by M.S.T.) to assess vital status and to determine whether they had experienced a cardiovascular event or occurrence.
All data were expressed as mean±SD; a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Baseline and peak stress heart rates were 72±13 bpm (range 45 to 118
bpm) and 123±18 bpm (range 90 to 158 bpm), respectively. Baseline and
peak blood pressures were 141/80 mm Hg (range 94/45 to
224/131 mm Hg), and 146/78 mm Hg (range 78/42 to
220/129 mm Hg), respectively. Forty-two subjects (27%) received
atropine. The reasons for stress test termination are displayed
in Table 3
. Thirty-six patients had
evidence of inducible myocardial ischemia, and 103 patients did
not (examinations for 4 patients were terminated prematurely).
Twenty-nine patients (19%) developed chest discomfort during the
examination, but only 8% developed new wall motion abnormalities
concomitant with their discomfort. Images from a positive and negative
examination are shown in Figure 2
.
|
|
Forty-one patients who received dobutamine underwent
contrast coronary angiography without a coronary event
or occurrence within 6 months (8 owing to the results of noninvasive
testing [4 MRI, 4 owing to results of another test], and 33 on the
basis of clinical characteristics). In 22, 13, and 6 patients, the time
between MRI and catheterization was <1 month, from 1
to 3 months, and from 3 to 6 months, respectively. The average time
from MRI to catheterization was 35 days. The
sensitivity and specificity for detecting a coronary
arterial luminal narrowing >50% are shown in Table 4
. The sensitivity of detecting an
epicardial luminal narrowing >70% was 82% (1 vessel), 88% (2
vessel), and 100% (for 3 vessels or left main), respectively. The
specificity of detecting a >70% narrowing was 58% (7 patients had a
positive MRI scan and a luminal narrowing >60% but <70%).
|
One hundred three patients had no evidence of inducible
ischemia with MRI. All living patients were contacted an
average of 228 (range 75 to 442) days after MRI. The
cardiovascular event and occurrence-free survival rates
for these patients are displayed in Figure 3
. Two patients experienced
noncardiovascular deaths (1 of disseminated
intravascular coagulation that occurred during surgery and 1 of
pneumonia).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Routine clinical performance of cardiac stress testing with MRI requires detection of malignant arrhythmia and inducible ischemia.16 Because the magnetic field alters the appearance of ST segments when patients are within the bore of the MR scanner,17 the ECG is used to monitor heart rate and rhythm and not to diagnose ischemia. To detect ischemia, we used fast cine imaging and display to assess LV endocardial thickening throughout the stress test. This strategy is similar to that implemented with real-time echocardiography and follows the reasoning of Aroesty et al,18 who have demonstrated in pacing-induced myocardial ischemia that abnormalities of LV systolic dysfunction precede the onset of ST-segment depression on the ECG. Importantly, in 153 consecutively referred patients who could not undergo a stress echocardiogram, our results (inducible ischemia in 36 subjects and none with infarction, ventricular fibrillation, heart failure, or death) substantiate the safety profile of fast MR imaging and display during pharmacological stress.
Fast imaging/display enhances the clinical utility of MR stress testing
in several respects. First, the synchronized cine display format
(Figure 1
) can be used to assess LV endocardial thickening
throughout a pharmacological stress test. In stress
echocardiography studies, the physician's
diagnostic accuracy is significantly higher when images are
reviewed throughout the course of testing rather than at baseline and
peak stress.19 Second, inducible ischemia can be
detected when patients develop chest discomfort. In prior
dobutamine MRI stress studies, the protocol was terminated
once subjects experienced chest pain.5 6 20 Premature test
termination reduces the diagnostic accuracy of stress
testing with dobutamine. In 28 stress
echocardiography studies involving 2246
patients,3 20% of patients developed angina during
dobutamine infusion, but only 2% to 4% of subjects
developed wall motion abnormalities consistent with myocardial
ischemia. Our results were consistent with these
findings. Third, LV endocardial thickening can be visualized (Table 1
) through modification of k-space segmentation
parameters at 85% MPHRR for age (up to 158 bpm in our
study). Achieving a target heart rate response of 85% MPHRR for age
has been shown to improve the detection of myocardial ischemia
with other forms of noninvasive testing.21 Finally,
results are interpreted and reported immediately. This feature is
particularly important for facilitating rapid patient management, such
as same-day preoperative risk assessment.
Our results with fast MRI indicate the sensitivity and specificity for
detecting a significant coronary stenosis are similar
to that shown with echocardiography and
radionuclide scintigraphy.1 22 Previous
dobutamine MRI studies have reported a sensitivity of 50%
to 92% and a specificity of 75% to 100% for detecting
coronary arterial narrowings4 5 6 7 ; our
results were similar (Table 4
). Although the negative predictive
value of a test is heavily influenced by the prevalence of disease in a
population (which can vary widely between studies), the predictive
value of a negative examination with fast MR imaging and display
(Figure 3
) is similar to that reported with
echocardiography.23 24
Fast cine MRI/display provides physicians with an alternative
method to diagnose inducible ischemia in patients with
inadequate echocardiograms. Our echocardiography
laboratory uses personnel highly trained in the administration of
microbubble contrast and is equipped with recently released ultrasound
machines. All patients had very poor acoustic windows, even with second
harmonic imaging (90% had
8 of 16 segments not visualized), and many
were markedly obese (41% of subjects with ideal body weight
>150%) and short in stature (height averaged 170 cm) and had prior
bypass grafting (32%) or obstructive airway disease (21%).
Ninety-seven of our patients had multiple LV wall motion abnormalities
at rest (a patient population in which prior
echocardiographic studies25 have
documented difficulty in assessment of endocardial thickening during
stress testing), and 31% had a positive result in the apex of the
posterolateral wall (an area not visualized well during
transthoracic echocardiography [Figure 2
]). Additional studies are needed to determine how stress MRI
compares with echocardiography for diagnosis of
inducible ischemia in these patient subgroups.
A potential alternative noninvasive stress test for patients with poor echocardiograms includes single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).26 MRI differs from nuclear scintigraphy in several respects. First, radioisotopes expose patients and workers to ionizing radiation; MRI does not. Second, the images generated with MRI can provide information regarding other structures within the chest that may influence patient management. In the present study, images of the aorta, LV, and valves changed the course of therapy for 6 (4%) of 153 patients. Third, our methodology was used to assess LV contraction, not perfusion. In general, techniques that are used to assess LV regional wall motion versus perfusion exhibit a lower sensitivity but higher specificity for detecting inducible ischemia,27 28 and in patients with LV dysfunction at rest, they are more accurate for predicting recovery of myocardial thickening after coronary arterial revascularization.29 30 Finally, MRI may be useful for patients not well suited for an intravenous vasodilator (owing to asthma) or with uncorrectable attenuation artifacts.31 32
Fourteen percent of our patients exhibited findings or symptoms
that required immediate medical attention before the administration of
dobutamine (aortic dissection [n=1], mobile LV thrombus
[n=2], large LV aneurysm [n=1], marked hypertension
[n=2]) or during infusion (nausea/vomiting [n=6], severe
hypertension [n=2], marked ventricular ectopy [n=4],
ventricular tachycardia [n=2], rapid atrial
fibrillation [n=1], and marked hypotension with systolic
anterior motion of the mitral valve and mitral
regurgitation [n=1]) (Table 3
). The incidence
of these complications and the hemodynamic responses of
our patients were similar to data reported from other large trials of
stress echocardiography.3 33 A trained
team of individuals (technologists, physicians, and nurses) was
essential for management of the patients during testing.
Our study has limitations. First, many of our patients were in
sinus rhythm. Few had frequent ventricular ectopy (3%) or
atrial fibrillation (2%). We are uncertain whether this technique
provides reliable results in subjects with irregular rhythms. Second,
because coronary angiography was not performed on all subjects,
our sensitivity and specificity data for detecting coronary
arterial luminal narrowings could be influenced by referral
bias. Third, our patients possessed a relatively high pretest
probability of coronary artery disease (Table 2
).
Application of our findings is appropriate for similar patients.
Fourth, our specificity data are based on 6 patients; thus, an
erroneous result in 1 patient would change the specificity by 17%.
Fifth, total procedure time (114 minutes) was relatively long. Because
our technique is new, it is likely that this time can be reduced with
protocol streamlining. Finally, our images were analyzed
qualitatively; quantitative wall motion analyses may yield
improved results.33
In conclusion, fast MRI pharmacological stress testing can be used to diagnose inducible ischemia in patients unable to undergo stress echocardiography. The safety profile and clinical utility of dobutamine/atropine MRI compare favorably with other widely accepted noninvasive imaging modalities.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 6, 1999; revision received June 17, 1999; accepted June 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Sawada SG, Segar DS, Ryan T, Brown SE, Dohan AM,
Williams R, Fineberg NS, Armstrong WF, Feigenbaum H.
Echocardiographic detection of coronary artery
disease during dobutamine infusion. Circulation. 1991;83:16051614.
3. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JRTC. Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:595606.[Abstract]
4.
VanRugge FP, van der Wall EE, Spanjersberg SJ, deRoos
A, Matheijssen NAA, Zwinderman AH, van Dijkman PRM, Reiber JHC,
Bruschke AVG. Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine
stress for detection and localization of coronary artery
disease: quantitative wall motion analysis using a modification
of the centerline method. Circulation. 1994;90:127138.
5. Sayad DE, Willett DL, Hundley WG, Grayburn PG, Peshock RM. Dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging predicts recovery of function following revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:11491151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Pennell DJ, Underwood SR, Manzara CC, Swanton H, Walker JM, Ell PJ, Longmore DB. Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:3440.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, Klein C, Vogel
U, Frantz E, Ellmer A, Dreyse S, Fleck E. Noninvasive diagnosis of
ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of
high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with
dobutamine stress echocardiography.
Circulation. 1999;99:763770.
8. Porter TR, Li S, Kricsfeld D, Armbruster RW. Detection of myocardial perfusion in multiple echocardiographic windows with one intravenous injection of microbubbles using transient response second harmonic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:791799.[Abstract]
9.
Kaul S. Myocardial contrast
echocardiography: 15 years of research and
development. Circulation. 1997;96:37453760.
10. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reicheck N, Sahn D, Schilger I. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Sayad DE, Willett DL, Bridges WH, Chwialkowski M, McColl R, Payne J, Peshock RM. Noninvasive quantitation of left ventricular wall thickening using cine magnetic resonance imaging with myocardial tagging. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:985989.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Foo TKF, Bernstein MA, Aisen AM, Hernandez RJ, Collick
BD, Bernstein T. Improved ejection fraction and flow velocity estimates
with use of view sharing and uniform repeating time excitation with
fast cardiac techniques. Radiology. 1995;195:471478.
13.
Chen C, Li L, Chen LL, Prada JV, Chen MH, Fallon JT,
Weyman AE, Waters D, Gillam L. Incremental doses of
dobutamine induce a biphasic response in dysfunctional left
ventricular regions subtending coronary
stenoses. Circulation. 1995;92:756766.
14. Leung WH, Sanders W, Alderman EL. Coronary artery quantitation and data management system for paired cineangiograms. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1991;24:121134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Obesity in America, Guidelines for Body Weight. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service; 1979. National Institutes of Health publication 79359.
16.
Zoghbi WA, Barasch E. Dobutamine MRI: a
serious contender in pharmacological stress imaging?
Circulation. 1999;99:730732.
17. Weikl A, Moshage W, Hentschel D, Schittenhelm R, Bachmann K. ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Tesla. Z Kardiol. 1989;78:578586.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Aroesty JM, McKay RG, Heller GV, Royal HD, Als AV,
Grossman W. Simultaneous assessment of left
ventricular systolic and diastolic
dysfunction during pacing-induced ischemia.
Circulation. 1985;71:889900.
19. Attenhofer CH, Pellika PA, Oh JK, Roger VL, McCully RB, Shub C, Seward JB. Is review of videotape necessary after review of digitized cine-loop images in stress echocardiography? A prospective study in 306 patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:179184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Baer FM, Voth E, Theisen P, Schneider CA, Schicha H,
Sechtem U. Coronary artery disease: findings with GRE MR
imaging and Tc-99 m-methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile SPECT during
simultaneous dobutamine stress.
Radiology. 1994;193:203209.
21. McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM, El-Said ESM, Salustri A, Forster T, Roelandt JRTC. Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:4146.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Mazeika PK, Nadazdin A, Oakley CM. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for detection and assessment of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:12031211.[Abstract]
23.
Chuah SC, Pellika PA, Roger VL, McCully RB, Seward JB.
Role of dobutamine stress
echocardiography in predicting outcome in 860
patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Circulation. 1998;97:14741480.
24. Afridi I, Quinones MA, Zoghbi WA, Cheirif JB. Dobutamine stress echocardiography: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for future cardiac events. Am Heart J. 1994;127:15101515.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ranier H, Lethen H, Marwick T, Arnese M, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, Picano E, Buck T, Erbel R, Flachskampf FA, Hanrath P. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:330336.[Abstract]
26. Iskandrian AS, Heo J, Nguyen T, Beer S, Cave V, Cassel D, Iskandrian BB. Tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m teboroxime during adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia: correlation with thallium-201 imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:307312.[Abstract]
27. Simek CL, Watson DD, Smith WH, Vinson E, Kaul S. Dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging versus dobutamine echocardiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:12571262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Marwick T, D'Hondt AM, Baudhuin T, Willemart B, Wijns W, Detry JM, Melin J. Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:158167.
29.
Qureshi U, Nagueh SF, Afridi I, Vaduganathan P,
Blaustein A, Verani MS, Winters WL Jr, Zoghbi WA.
Dobutamine echocardiography and
quantitative rest-redistribution 201Tl tomography
in myocardial hibernation: relation of contractile reserve to
201Tl uptake and comparative prediction of
recovery of function. Circulation. 1997;95:626635.
30. Bax JJ, Wijns W, Cornel JH, Visser FC, Boersma E, Fioretti PM. Accuracy of currently available techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of pooled data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:14511460.[Abstract]
31. Parodi O, Marcassa C, Casucci R, Sambuceti G, Verna E, Galli M, Ingelese E, Marzullo P, Pirelli S, Bisi G. Accuracy and safety of technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxy-isobutyl isonitrile (sestamibi) myocardial scintigraphy with high dose dipyridamole test in patients with effort angina pectoris: a multicenter study: Italian Group of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:14391444.[Abstract]
32.
Wallis JW, Miller TR, Koppel P. Attenuation
correction in cardiac SPECT without a transmission measurement.
J Nucl Med. 1995;36:506512.
33. Power TP, Kramer CM, Shaffer AL, Theobold TM, Petrulo S, Reichek N, Rogers WJ. Breath-hold dobutamine magnetic resonance myocardial tagging: normal left ventricular response. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:12031207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. D. Karamitsos, J. M. Francis, S. Myerson, J. B. Selvanayagam, and S. Neubauer The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2009; 54(15): 1407 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Wallace, T. M. Morgan, T. F. Walsh, E. Dall'Armellina, W. Ntim, C. A. Hamilton, and W. G. Hundley Dobutamine cardiac magnetic resonance results predict cardiac prognosis in women with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 299 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W P Bandettini and A E Arai Advances in clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1485 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gebker, C. Jahnke, R. Manka, A. Hamdan, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch Additional Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging During Dobutamine Stress Magnetic Resonance for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, September 1, 2008; 1(2): 122 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dall'Armellina, T. M. Morgan, S. Mandapaka, W. Ntim, J. J. Carr, C. A. Hamilton, J. Hoyle, H. Clark, P. Clark, K. M. Link, et al. Prediction of Cardiac Events in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With Dobutamine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Wall Motion Score Index J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 22, 2008; 52(4): 279 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Stangl, V. Witzel, G. Baumann, and K. Stangl Current diagnostic concepts to detect coronary artery disease in women Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 707 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Merkle, J. Wohrle, O. Grebe, T. Nusser, M. Kunze, H. A Kestler, M. Kochs, and V. Hombach Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steady-state, free-precession magnetic resonance first-pass imaging Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1381 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Nandalur, B. A. Dwamena, A. F. Choudhri, M. R. Nandalur, and R. C. Carlos Diagnostic Performance of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1343 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jahnke, E. Nagel, R. Gebker, T. Kokocinski, S. Kelle, R. Manka, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Tests: Adenosine Stress Perfusion and Dobutamine Stress Wall Motion Imaging Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1769 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, R. Gebker, A. Bornstedt, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Accelerated 4D Dobutamine Stress MR Imaging with k-t BLAST: Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance Radiology, October 25, 2006; (2006) 2413051522. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, C. Jahnke, V. A. Ferrari, F. E. Rademakers, P. A. Pellikka, W. G. Hundley, D. Poldermans, J. J. Bax, K. Wegscheider, E. Fleck, et al. Determination of interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2006; 27(12): 1459 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Kramer When Two Tests Are Better Than One: Adding Late Gadolinium Enhancement to First-Pass Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1639 - 1640. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, C. Jahnke, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Current clinical applications of stress wall motion analysis with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2005; 6(5): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster and R. J. Kim Frontiers in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Circulation, July 5, 2005; 112(1): 135 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, D. Foll, A. Kaluza, R. Luechinger, M. Stuber, A. Bornstedt, A. Wahl, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Magnetic resonance stress tagging in ischemic heart disease Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): H2708 - H2714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Mieres, L. J. Shaw, A. Arai, M. J. Budoff, S. D. Flamm, W. G. Hundley, T. H. Marwick, L. Mosca, A. R. Patel, M. A. Quinones, et al. Role of Noninvasive Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus Statement From the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 682 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wahl, I. Paetsch, S. Roethemeyer, C. Klein, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel High-Dose Dobutamine-Atropine Stress Cardiovascular MR Imaging after Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Wall Motion Abnormalities at Rest Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, C. Jahnke, A. Wahl, R. Gebker, M. Neuss, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Comparison of Dobutamine Stress Magnetic Resonance, Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance, and Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Circulation, August 17, 2004; 110(7): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Arai and G. A. Hirsch Q-wave and non-q-wave myocardial infarctions through the eyes of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 561 - 563. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D Flamm High-dose dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging - has its time come? Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2004; 25(14): 1183 - 1184. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wahl, I. Paetsch, A. Gollesch, S. Roethemeyer, D. Foell, R. Gebker, H. Langreck, C. Klein, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2004; 25(14): 1230 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.R. Underwood, J. J Bax, J. v. Dahl, M. Y Henein, A. C van Rossum, E. R Schwarz, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, E. E.v. d. Wall, and W. Wijns Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation: Report of a Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2004; 25(10): 815 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kim, W. D. Gilson, C. M. Kramer, and F. H. Epstein Myocardial Tissue Tracking with Two-dimensional Cine Displacement-encoded MR Imaging: Development and Initial Evaluation Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 862 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Lee, D. Resnick, S. S. Tiu, J. J. Sanger, C. A. Nazzaro, G. M. Israel, and O. P. Simonetti MR Imaging Evaluation of Myocardial Viability in the Setting of Equivocal SPECT Results with 99mTc Sestamibi Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Kraitchman, S. Sampath, E. Castillo, J. A. Derbyshire, R. C. Boston, D. A. Bluemke, B. L. Gerber, J. L. Prince, and N. F. Osman Quantitative Ischemia Detection During Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Testing by Use of FastHARP Circulation, April 22, 2003; 107(15): 2025 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kuijpers, K. Y. J.A.M. Ho, P. R.M. van Dijkman, R. Vliegenthart, and M. Oudkerk Dobutamine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia With the Use of Myocardial Tagging Circulation, April 1, 2003; 107(12): 1592 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Weiss, A. H. Aletras, J. F. London, J. L. Taylor, F. H. Epstein, R. Wassmuth, R. S. Balaban, and A. E. Arai Stunned, Infarcted, and Normal Myocardium in Dogs: Simultaneous Differentiation by Using Gadolinium-enhanced Cine MR Imaging with Magnetization Transfer Contrast Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 723 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Y. Kwong, A. E. Schussheim, S. Rekhraj, A. H. Aletras, N. Geller, J. Davis, T. F. Christian, R. S. Balaban, and A. E. Arai Detecting Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, February 4, 2003; 107(4): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Orlic, J. M. Hill, and A. E. Arai Stem Cells for Myocardial Regeneration Circ. Res., December 13, 2002; 91(12): 1092 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Hundley, T. M. Morgan, C. M. Neagle, C. A. Hamilton, P. Rerkpattanapipat, and K. M. Link Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determination of Cardiac Prognosis Circulation, October 29, 2002; 106(18): 2328 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schalla, C. Klein, I. Paetsch, H. Lehmkuhl, A. Bornstedt, B. Schnackenburg, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Real-Time MR Image Acquisition during High-Dose Dobutamine Hydrochloride Stress for Detecting Left Ventricular Wall-Motion Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Arterial Disease Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 845 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Salton, M. L. Chuang, C. J. O'Donnell, M. J. Kupka, M. G. Larson, K. V. Kissinger, R. R. Edelman, D. Levy, and W. J. Manning Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2002; 39(6): 1055 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J de Feyter, K Nieman, P van Ooijen, and M Oudkerk IMAGING TECHNIQUES: Non-invasive coronary artery imaging with electron beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging Heart, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 442 - 448. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rajappan, N. G. Bellenger, L. Anderson, and D. J. Pennell The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2000; 2(3): 241 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Dobutamine Stress Testing with MRI a Reality Journal Watch Cardiology, November 12, 1999; 1999(1112): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Pohost and R. W. W. Biederman The Role of Cardiac MRI Stress Testing : "Make a Better Mouse Trap ... " Circulation, October 19, 1999; 100(16): 1676 - 1679. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |