Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:117-122

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yazaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yazaki, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET

(Circulation. 1999;100:117-122.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Improvement of Impaired Myocardial Vasodilatation Due to Diffuse Coronary Atherosclerosis in Hypercholesterolemics After Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Ikuo Yokoyama, MD; Shin-ichi Momomura, MD; Tohru Ohtake, MD; Katsunori Yonekura, MD; Weidong Yang, MD; Naoshi Kobayakawa, MD; Teruhiko Aoyagi, MD; Seiryo Sugiura, MD; Nobuhiro Yamada, MD; Kuni Ohtomo, MD; Yasuhito Sasaki, MD; Masao Omata, MD; Yoshio Yazaki, MD

From the Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine (I.Y., S.M., K.Y., W.Y., N.K., T.A., S.S., K.O., Y.Y.), Metabolic Diseases (N.Y.), Radiology (T.O., Y.S.), and Gastroenterology (M.O.), University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Correspondence and reprint requests to Ikuo Yokoyama, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 113-8655.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Diminished myocardial vasodilatation (MVD) in hypercholesterolemics without overt coronary stenosis has been reported. However, whether the diminished MVD of angiographically normal coronary arteries in hypercholesterolemics can be reversed after lipid-lowering therapy is not known.

Methods and Results—A total of 27 hypercholesterolemics and 16 age-matched controls were studied. All patients had >1 normal coronary artery, and those segments that were perfused by anatomically normal coronary arteries were studied. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured during dipyridamole loading and at baseline using positron emission tomography and 13N-ammonia, after which MVD was calculated before and after lipid-lowering therapy. Total cholesterol was significantly higher in hypercholesterolemics (263±33.8) than in controls (195±16.6), and it normalized after lipid-lowering therapy (197±19.9). Baseline MBF (ml · min-1 · 100 g-1) was comparable among hypercholesterolemics (both before and after therapy) and controls. MBF during dipyridamole loading was significantly lower in hypercholesterolemics before therapy (189±75.4) than in controls (299±162, P<0.01). However, MBF during dipyridamole loading significantly increased after therapy (226±84.7; P<0.01). MVD significantly improved after therapy in hypercholesterolemics (2.77±1.35 after treatment [P<0.05] versus 2.02±0.68 before treatment [P<0.01]), but it remained significantly higher in controls (3.69±1.13, P<0.01). There was a significant relationship between the percent change of total cholesterol and the percent change of MVD before and after lipid-lowering therapy (r=-0.61, P<0.05).

Conclusions—Diminished MVD of anatomically normal coronary arteries in hypercholesterolemics can be reversed after lipid-lowering therapy.


Key Words: cholesterol • hyperlipidemia • lipid-lowering therapy • blood flow reserve • tomography, emission-computed


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Myocardial vasodilatation (MVD) occurring in response to hyperemic stress can decrease with the severity of coronary stenosis.1 However, recent investigations have shown that MVD can also be reduced in hyperlipidemics who do not have evidence of ischemia.2 3 4 5 6 Furthermore, reduced MVD in angiographically normal coronary arteries (ANCAs) was reported in hyperlipidemics.7 8 These results strongly suggest that decreased MVD can be an early manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis before progression to coronary artery disease (CAD). Lipid-lowering therapy has been associated with risk reduction in patients with CAD and hypercholesterolemia9 10 and with increases in the diameter of stenotic coronary arteries (proven by angiography).11 12 13 14 Recovery of altered MVD of stenotic coronary arteries has been reported in hypercholesterolemics after short- or long-term risk factor–modification therapy15 16 and in asymptomatic subjects at high risk for CAD after short-term adherence to a low-fat diet.17 However, the therapeutic effect of lipid-lowering drugs on MVD in hypercholesterolemics remains controversial. For instance, short-term lipid-lowering therapy using pravastatin influenced the recovery of endothelial function (EDF) but not that of MVD.18 Because impaired EDF and diffuse macrovascular atherosclerosis can be factors in the reduced MVD of ANCA in hypercholesterolemics, relatively long-term lipid-lowering therapy may produce a different effect on abnormal MVD than short-term therapy. Whether the altered MVD of ANCAs can be reversed after relatively long-term lipid-lowering therapy remains uncertain.

This study aimed to clarify whether the altered MVD in hyperlipidemics can be reversed by relatively long-term lipid-lowering therapy.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
A total of 27 hypercholesterolemics (17 men, 10 women) and 16 control subjects (12 men, 4 women) were studied. Among the patients, 12 had hypercholesterolemia (fasting plasma total cholesterol [TC] >220 mg/dL) and 15 had mixed combined hypercholesterolemia (fasting total triglycerides over 14 hours >153 mg/dL and TC >220 mg/dL). Of these 27 patients, 10 had familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and 17 did not. FH was diagnosed on the basis of an Achilles tendon thickness of >=10 mm or a history of hypercholesterolemia in a first-degree relative.19 All patients had >1 normal coronary artery within the 3 major branches (diagnosed by 3 independent specialists; 0% stenosis). Of the 27 patients, 16 had CAD and 11 did not. Twenty patients had no diseased vessels: 2 were asymptomatic, 9 had atypical chest pain syndrome without CAD, 5 had undergone percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and 4 had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. Of the remaining 7 patients, 3 had single vessel disease and 4 had well-controlled 2-vessel disease. Table 1Down summarizes the results of coronary arteriography. A total of 25 patients were treated with medication and a low-cholesterol diet, and 2 were treated by diet therapy alone. Sixteen patients had well-controlled hypertension; 3 of these patients also had diabetes. There were also 2 diabetics among the normotensive subjects. Medications were not changed during the follow-up period. Medication details and relevant information for each patient are shown in Table 2Down. Thirteen normolipidemic, normoglycemic, asymptomatic subjects without a history of heart disease or long-term disease were selected as controls. Characteristics of study subjects are summarized in Table 3Down. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body weight, height, body mass index, blood pressure, amount of smoking, or hemoglobin A1c levels between the 2 groups. All study subjects were informed of the nature of the study and agreed to participate in the protocol, which was approved by the local Ethics Committee.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. CAG Findings in Study Patients


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Lipid-Lowering Therapy


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. General Characteristics of Study Subjects

Positron Emission Tomography
Regional myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml · min-1 · 100 g-1) at rest and during dipyridamole loading was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) and 13N-ammonia before and 8 to 15 months after the initiation of lipid-lowering therapy (mean duration of follow-up, 11.9±2.3 months). All patients underwent PET before therapy and were followed prospectively for more than 8 months except 1. In that 1 case, the first PET scan was done after the initiation of medication that was ineffective, and the second PET scan was performed 6 months after the addition of twice-monthly plasma LDL apheresis to the treatment. Plasma lipid fractions were measured 2 or 3 times monthly. When TC decreased to <220 mg/dL or was reduced more than 20% from the baseline and the decrease was maintained for more than 1 month, a second PET scan was performed. If TC did not reach the target value 3 months after the initiation of diet therapy, anticholesterol agents (pravastatin, simvastatin, or bezafibrate) were added. If TC did not meet the above criteria 3 to 6 months after the initiation of the first medication, additional medications, such as ethyl icosapentate, probucol, or Daisaikotou (scientifically well-established traditional Chinese medicine for hypercholesterolemia), or ethyl icosapentate in combination with either probucol or Daisaikotou, were tried. In 1 case, bezafibrate was replaced by simvastatin 3 months after the initiation of therapy. When the effectiveness of therapy was confirmed and TC remained constant, a second PET scan was performed 6 months after the administration of the second medication. During this study period, antianginal regimens were not changed.

Myocardial flow images were obtained using a Headtome IV scanner (Shimadzu Corp) with 7 imaging planes; the in-plane resolution was 4.5 mm at full width at half-maximum, and the z-axial resolution was 9.5 mm at full width at half-maximum. The effective in-plane resolution was 7 mm after using a smoothing filter. Sensitivities were 14 and 24 µCi/ml for direct and cross planes, respectively. Twenty-four hours before the PET study, all medications and caffeine intake were discontinued. No smoking was allowed the day of the PET scans.

We acquired transmission data over a period of 8 minutes to correct for photon attenuation before obtaining PET images; after that, 15 to 20 mCi of 13N-ammonia was injected. Dynamic PET scanning was performed for 2 minutes and static PET scanning for 8 minutes. A total of 55 minutes after the injection of 13N-ammonia (time chosen to allow for the decay of the radioactivity of 13N-ammonia), dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg) was administrated intravenously over a 4-minute period. Five minutes after the end of dipyridamole infusion, 15 to 20 mCi of 13N-ammonia was injected and, at exactly the same time, a second dynamic PET scan was performed for 2 minutes and a static PET scan for 8 minutes. The dynamic PET scan was performed every 15 seconds (8 times) during the 2-minute period. Dynamic data were obtained for 7 slices. Only 1-channel ECG monitoring in limb leads was done during the PET scans.

Determination of MBF
Regional MBF was calculated according to the 2-compartment 13N-ammonia tracer kinetic model.20 21 Only segments that were perfused by ANCAs were used; segments perfused by coronary artery bypass grafts were excluded because diminished MVD in such segments has been reported.22 Segments pefused by coronary arteries after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were also excluded. The time activity curve of the left ventricular cavity was used as an input function. Tracer spillover was corrected by least-square nonlinear regression analysis to calculate MBF with the assumption that both myocardial and left ventricular radioactivity were influenced by each other. Details are provided in our previous publications.2 7

All data were corrected for dead-time effects to reduce error to less than 1%. To avoid the influence of the partial volume effect associated with the object's size, recovery coefficients obtained from experimental phantom studies in our laboratory were used. The recovery coefficient was 0.8 when myocardial wall thickness was 10 mm. To correct the partial volume effect, wall thickness was measured with 2D echocardiography by specialists in our hospital. The recovery coefficient was taken into consideration when measuring MBF.

As we reported previously, regions of interest were placed at the septum, anterior wall, lateral wall, and inferoposterior wall on transaxial images. To obtain input function, these regions were placed on the left ventricular cavity of each slice. We then determined the MVD as follows:

Statistical Analysis
Baseline MBF, MBF during dipyridamole administration, MVD, body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), height, body mass index, and lipid parameters in the 2 groups were compared using ANOVA. Individual data were analyzed by the 2-tailed Student's t test. Values are expressed as mean±SD. P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamic and ECG Responses to Dipyridamole Infusion
SBP at rest and during dipyridamole loading and the rate-pressure product (RPP) did not differ significantly between controls and hypercholesterolemics before therapy (Table 3Up). However, baseline SBP in hypercholesterolemics was significantly reduced after therapy (P<0.01), as were baseline DBP (P<0.01) and baseline RPP (P<0.05) (Table 3Up). SBP during dipyridamole administration after therapy was significantly reduced compared with levels before therapy (P<0.05), as was DBP during dipyridamole administration (P<0.01, Table 3Up). However, RPP during dipyridamole administration was comparable between the 2 groups (Table 3Up). During dipyridamole loading, typical chest pain or chest oppression was observed in all hyperlipidemic subjects before therapy. After therapy, chest pain disappeared in 7 patients. Because of difficulties in recording ECG in the precordial leads in the PET study, a detailed description of ECG response to dipyridamole was not possible.

Plasma Lipid Fractions Before and After Lipid-Lowering Therapy
The mean TC in hypercholesterolemics was significantly reduced after lipid-lowering therapy to levels comparable to those in controls; plasma LDL cholesterol levels were also significantly reduced (P<0.01). Total plasma triglyceride levels were significantly reduced to the levels of controls, but plasma HDL cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemics did not change after therapy.

Myocardial Blood Flow at Rest and During Dipyridamole Loading
Baseline MBF (ml · min-1 · 100 g-1) in hyperlipidemics did not differ before and after therapy (88.8±14.9 versus 83.1±11.6), nor did it differ from that in controls (79.9±33.6). MBF during dipyridamole loading in hypercholesterolemics significantly increased after therapy (226±84.7 versus 189±75.4; P<0.01), but it was statistically comparable with that in controls (299±162; P=0.09).

Myocardial Vasodilatation
MVD in hypercholesterolemics before therapy (202±0.68) was significantly lower than in controls (3.69±1.13; P<0.001). It increased significantly after therapy (2.77±1.33), although it still remained significantly lower than in controls (P<0.05). When data on hypertensive patients were excluded, MVD in hypercholesterolemics improved significantly after therapy (3.27±1.69 after therapy versus 2.25±0.777 before therapy; P<0.01) to a level comparable to that in controls. Furthermore, when data on the 5 diabetics were excluded, improvement of MVD after lipid-lowering therapy was also more apparent (2.14±0.67 before treatment versus 3.22±1.78 after treatment). The percent change of MVD in patients treated with pravastatin (n=10, 52.0±34.2%) was comparable to that of those treated with simvastatin (n=13, 39.0±54.4%). The percent change of MVD in patients with (n=16, 44.3±48.8%) and without CAD (n=11, 36.9±51.1%) was comparable.

There was a significant relationship between percent change of TC and percent change of MVD before and after lipid-lowering therapy (r=-0.61, P<0.01; Figure 1Down). This relationship was observed in both patients with (r=-0.69, P<0.01; Figure 2Down) and without FH (r=-0.56, P<0.05; Figure 3Down). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient test showed a significant relationship between percent change of MVD and percent change of TC (r=-0.625, P<0.01), as did the Kendall rank correlation coefficient test ({tau}=-0.447, P<0.01).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Significant relationship between % change of plasma TC and % change of MVD (r=-0.61; P<0.01).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Significant relationship between % change of TC and % change of MVD in patients with FH (r=-0.69; P<0.05).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Significant relationship between % change of TC and % change of MVD in patients without FH (r=-0.56, P<0.05).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowConclusions
down arrowReferences
 
MVD in Hypercholesterolemics
Our results showed that impaired MVD in ANCAs can be reversed after long-term lipid-lowering therapy in hyperlipidemics. Because both impaired EDF in hypercholesterolemics23 24 25 and an indirect effect of dipyridamole on endothelium-dependent vasodilatation26 have been reported, the improvement of EDF by lipid-lowering therapy may be a factor in MVD improvement. However, because short-term (6 months) lipid-lowering therapy using pravastatin improved only EDF but not MVD,18 the improvement in MVD found in our study cannot be solely attributed to improved EDF. Recently it was reported that angiographically undetectable, diffuse, balanced, macrovascular coronary atherosclerosis played a large role in reduced MVD in hypercholesterolemics.27 In addition, because MVD is altered by several complex factors (including endothelial-dependent and independent vasodilatory function, diffuse atherosclerosis due to arterial wall fibrosis, and/or atheromatous plaque and abnormal smooth muscle cell proliferation), the presence and degree of severity of any of these factors might delay the recovery of MVD after lipid-lowering therapy. Furthermore, in the study by Egashira et al,18 pravastatin was used and the effect of simvastatin on MVD remained undetermined. In another study, however, MVD also improved after simvastatin therapy.28

Hemodynamic Effects and MVD Improvement
Our results showed that MVD improvement was associated with hemodynamic changes, such as DBP, SBP, and decreased RPP, after lipid-lowering therapy. Baseline MBF tended to be reduced after therapy. These results suggest that lipid-lowering therapy can alter coronary vascular tone and systemic vascular tone. Slightly reduced baseline MBF can be a factor in the improvement of MVD. Our results were consistent with those reported by Gould et al.15 16

Influence of Hypertension and Diabetes
MVD after lipid-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemics did not reach the level of that in controls. The study group included 16 patients with hypertension and 5 with diabetes. It has been reported that essential hypertension or diabetes can alter MVD29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ; they may also influence the effect of therapy on MVD. In fact, when such hypertensive patients or diabetics were excluded, MVD after therapy was comparable with that in controls. Therefore, inclusion of those with hypertension or diabetes may account for the observed variation in reactivity to the therapy or the lack of normalization of MVD. Thus, when such patients were excluded, results indicated that the reduced MVD in ANCAs of patients with only hypercholesterolemia can be normalized by lipid-lowering therapy.

Clinical Implications
Previously we reported impaired MVD in ANCAs in hypercholesterolemics, suggesting that such ANCAs are not normal in hypercholesterolemics.7 Therefore, we assessed these arteries by PET perfusion imaging and studied the effects of lipid-lowering therapy on such arteries. Our findings suggested that lipid-lowering therapy could successfully reverse impaired MVD in hyperlipidemics. Moreover, a significant relationship was observed between the percent of change in MVD and the percent of change in TC in both patients with and without FH. These results indicate that even in patients with ANCAs and hypercholesterolemia, there is the potential for abnormalities, such as diffuse coronary atherosclerosis, abnormal EDF, or both. However, nonuniform response to the therapy was noted, perhaps because the patient population was nonuniform. First, including patients both with and without CAD would alter MBF response to dipyridamole. Second, including patients who do or do not have FH might account for a nonuniform responsive to lipid-lowering therapy. Also, patients with FH have a more severe, longer-lasting hypercholesterolemic state than patients without FH, which might alter their response to therapy. Furthermore, the coexistence of coronary risk factors other than hypercholesterolemia should be considered because they might alter therapeutic results.


*    Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Impaired MVD in ANCAs in hypercholesterolemics can be reversed by lipid-lowering therapy. Our results also indicate that in hypercholesterolemics, ANCAs are not normal but have diffuse atherosclerosis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a Research Grant for Cardiovascular Disease (8A-5) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Japan.

Received August 7, 1998; revision received April 12, 1999; accepted April 22, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowConclusions
*References
 

  1. Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:48–54.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Murakami T, Momomura S, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Reduced coronary flow reserve in familial hypercholesterolemia. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1937–1942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dayanikli F, Grambow D, Muzil O, Mosca L, Rubenfire M, Schwaiger M. Early detection of abnormal coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic men at high risk for coronary artery disease using positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994;90:808–817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pitkanen OP, Raitakari OT, Ninikoshi H, Nuutila P, Iida H, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Haerkoenen R, Wegelius U, Roennemaa T, Viikari J, Kunuuti J. Coronary flow reserve is impaired in young men with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1705–1711.[Abstract]
  5. Raitakari OT, Pitkanen OP, Lehtimaki T, Lahdenpera S, Iida H, Yla-Herttuala S, Luoma J, Mattila K, Nikkari T, Taskinen MR, Viikari JS, Knuuti J. In vivo low density lipoprotein oxidation relates to coronary reactivity in young men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:97–102.[Abstract]
  6. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Yonekura K, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Impaired myocardial vasodilation during hyperemic stress with dipyridamole in hypertriglyceridemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1568–1574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Reduced coronary flow reserve in hypercholesterolemic patients without overt coronary stenosis. Circulation. 1996;94:3232–3238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Yonekura K, Kobayakawa N, Aoyagi T, Sugiura S, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Altered myocardial vasodilatation in patients with hypertriglyceridemia in anatomically normal coronary arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:294–299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease. Lancet.. 1993;344:1383–1389.
  10. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, Mckillop JH, Packard CJ. Prevention of coronary artery disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med.. 1995;333:1301–1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Blankenhorn DH, Nessim SA, Johnson RL, Sanmarco ME, Azen SP, Cashin-Hemphill L. Beneficial effects of combined colestipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts. JAMA. 1987;257:3233–3240.[Abstract]
  12. Ornish DM, Brown SE, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, Armstrong WT, Ports TA, McLanhan SM, Krirkeeide RL, Brand RJ, Gould KL. Can lifestyle changes reverse atherosclerosis? Lancet. 1990;336:129–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kane JP, Malloy MJ, Ports TA, Phillips NR, Diehl JC, Havel RJ. Regression of coronary atherosclerosis during treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia with combined drug regimens. JAMA. 1990;264:3007–3012.[Abstract]
  14. Gould KL, Ornish D, Kirkeeide R, Brown S, Stuart Y, Buchi M, Billings JH, Armstrong W, Ports T, Scherwitz L. Improved stenosis geometry by quantitative coronary arteriography after vigorous risk factor modification. Am J Cardiol.. 1992;69:845–853.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gould KL, Martucci JP, Goldberg DI, Hess MJ, Edens RP, Latifi R, Dudick SJ. Short-term cholesterol lowering decreases size and severity of perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease: a potential noninvasive marker of healing coronary endothelium. Circulation. 1994;89:1530–1538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gould KL, Ornish D, Scherwitz L, Shirley B, Patterson E, Hess MJ, Mullani N, Bolomey L, Dobbs F, Armstrong WT, Merritt T, Ports T, Sparler S, Billings J. Changes in myocardial perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after long term, intense risk factor modification. JAMA. 1995;274:894–901.[Abstract]
  17. Czernin J, Barnard RJ, Sun KT, Krivokapitch J, Nitzsche E, Dorsey D, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of short term cardiovascular conditioning and low-fat diet on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1995;92:197–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Egashira K, Hirooka Y, Kai H, Sugimachi M, Suzuki S, Inou T, Takeshita A. Reduction in serum cholesterol with pravastatin improves endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1994;89:2519–2524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Mabuchi H, Koizumi J, Shimizu M, Takeda R, Hokuriku FH, for the CHD Study Group. Development of coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1989;89:225–232.
  20. Krivokapitch J, Smith GT, Huang SC, Hoffmen EJ, Raitib O, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. 13N-ammonia myocardial imaging at rest and with exercise in normal volunteers. Circulation. 1989;80:1328–1337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang SC, Buxton DB, Gambhir SS, Hansen H, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1992;86:1004–1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Campisi R, Czernin J, Karpman HL, Schelbert HR. Coronary vasodilatory capacity and flow reserve in normal myocardium supplied by bypass grafts late after surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:27–31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sellke FW, Armstrong ML, Harrison DG. Endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation is abnormal in the coronary microcirculation of atherosclerotic patients. Circulation. 1990;81:1586–1593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschlaeger H, Just H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans: progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1991;83:391–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Drexler H, Zeiher AM. Endothelial function in human coronary arteries in vivo: focus on hypercholesterolemia. Hypertension. 1991;18:II-90–II-99.
  26. Bult H, Fret HRL, Jordeans FH, Herman AG. Dipyridamole potentiates the anti-aggregating and vasodilator activity of nitric oxide. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;199:1–8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Raitakari OT, Toikka J, Pitakanen OP, Laine H, Viikari JSA, Nuutila P, Knuuti J. Influence of subclinical atherosclerosis on coronary flow reserve in young men. Circulation. 1998;98(suppl I):I-94. Abstract.
  28. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Yonekura K, Fujita H, Kobayakawa N, Aoyagi T, Sugiura S, Ohtomo K. Improvement of myocardial flow reserve in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes after successful treatment of chronic hyperglycemia. Circulation. 1998;98(suppl 1):I-95. Abstract.
  29. Nitenberg A, Valensi P, Sachs R, Dalim M, Aptecar E, Attali JR. Impairment of coronary vascular reserve and Ach-induced coronary vasodilation in diabetic patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and normal ventricular systolic function. Diabetes. 1993;32:1017–1023.[Abstract]
  30. Nahser PJ Jr, Brown RE, Oskarsson H, Winnifold MD, Rossen JD. Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation.. 1995;91:635–640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Yonekura K, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Reduced myocardial flow reserve in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1472–1477.[Abstract]
  32. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Yonekura K, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Hyperglycemia rather than insulin resistance is related to coronary flow reserve in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1998;47:119–124.[Abstract]
  33. Pitkanen OP, Nuutila P, Raitakari OT, Ronnemaa T, Koskinen PJ, Iida H, Lehtimaki TJ, Laine HK, Takala T, Viikari JS, Knuuti J. Coronary flow reserve is reduced in young men with IDDM. Diabetes. 1998;47:248–54.[Abstract]
  34. Motz W, Strauer BE. Improvement of coronary flow reserve after long term therapy with enalapril. Hypertension. 1996;27:1031–1038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Laine H, Raitakari OT, Niinikoski H, Pitkanen OP, Iida H, Viikari J, Nuutila P, Knuuti J. Early impairment of coronary flow reserve in young men with borderline hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:147–153.Using 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography, we investigated whether the reduced myocardial vasodilatation (MVD) of anatomically normal coronary arteries in hypercholesterolemics can be reversed by lipid-lowering therapy. MVD in segments perfused by normal coronary arteries was significantly decreased in hypercholesterolemics, both before and after therapy, when compared with controls, although there was no significant difference in baseline myocardial blood flow between the 2 groups. The reduced MVD of anatomically normal coronary arteries in hypercholesterolemics was significantly reversed after lipid-lowering therapy, indicating the value of lipid-lowering therapy in such patients.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
J Knuuti and F M Bengel
Positron emission tomography and molecular imaging
Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 360 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
I. Yokoyama, Y. Inoue, T. Moritan, K. Ohtomo, and R. Nagai
Impaired myocardial vasodilatation during hyperaemic stress is improved by simvastatin but not by pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2004; 25(8): 671 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A.H Liem, A.J van Boven, N.J.G.M Veeger, A.J Withagen, R.M Robles de Medina, J.G.P Tijssen, and D.J van Veldhuisen
Effect of fluvastatin on ischaemia following acute myocardial infarction: a randomized trial
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2002; 23(24): 1931 - 1937.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. Fagret, C. Ghezzi, and G. Vanzetto
99mTc-N-NOET Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion: Can It Offer More Than We Already Have?
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2001; 42(9): 1395 - 1396.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yazaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yazaki, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET