(Circulation. 1999;100:2396.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Departments of Medicine (G.G.M., S.F.D., D.B.C., P.P., X.-M.Z.), Pathology (J.B.A.), and Surgery (V.S.R., D.C.D., R.N.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tenn. Dr Zhao is now at the Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Geraldine Miller, MD, A3310 Medical Center North, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, TN 37232-2605. E-mail geraldine.miller{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsAcidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF) mRNA expression was determined in serial endomyocardial biopsies during the first year after transplantation. Patients with high levels of aFGF mRNA and elevations after the early posttransplant period had significantly more severe CAV than patients with low aFGF and no late elevations.
ConclusionsParenchymal aFGF expression varies between patients and in the same patient over time and correlates with development of CAV.
Key Words: surgery transplantation growth substances circulation genes muscle, smooth
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FGF is expressed in many adult tissues in response to injury. Our studies have shown that myocytes and small myocardial vessels overexpress FGF and FGF receptors after transplantation.4 FGFs costimulate T-cell proliferation and cytokine production and thus may potentiate immune responses to donor antigens. FGF also mediates anti-MHC antibodyinduced endothelial cell activation and proliferation.5
Despite their presence in vascular lesions, our understanding of the contribution of growth factors to vascular disease has been limited by a number of constraints. Most studies in humans have focused on tissue at single time points, often late in the disease, and therefore could not observe potential variations over time that might be important in disease development. Histological assessment is limited in its ability to provide quantitative data that might identify patients at risk or physiological events that induce growth factor overexpression. The present study was performed prospectively to address these issues for aFGF by quantifying its expression in allografts over time and the development of CAV.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RT-PCR for aFGF and GAPDH Expression
Quantitative reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) was performed as described.7 Briefly, RNA was
extracted with RNAzolB (Tel-Test) and reverse transcribed with
Superscript H (Gibco BRL). PCR was performed with primers for GAPDH and
aFGF4 and included 32P-labeled dCTP
to generate radioactively labeled PCR products for quantification.
Standard curves within the linear range of amplification for GAPDH and
aFGF were generated with known amounts of each cDNA and were run with
each set of PCRs. The concentrations (in pmol) of FGF and GAPDH cDNA in
each sample were calculated from these standard curves, and the
resulting ratios ([pmol FGF/pmol GAPDH]x100) are presented
as relative aFGF levels (Figure
). To
compare FGF transcription between patients, a mean aFGF level was
calculated for each patient as the sum of the relative aFGF levels at
each biopsy divided by the number of biopsies analyzed for that
patient. The median for all patients was 0.4. Patients with levels
above or below the median were classified as having high or low mean
FGF levels, respectively.
|
Data Analysis
Differences in cold ischemia time, ISHLT rejection
scores, and CAV severity between groups with high and low average FGF
levels were analyzed by unpaired Students t test.
A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 samples per patient.
Three patterns of aFGF mRNA transcription were observed
(Figure
Clinical data were reviewed to determine whether FGF levels at each
biopsy could be related to events potentially associated with allograft
injury, such as ISHLT rejection score, hypertension, infection, etc.
Among these, a single episode of primary CMV infection occurred in 1
patient (patient 4, Table
) and was
associated with a rise in FGF (indicated by * in Figure
, B).
This CMV-seronegative recipient received a transplant from a
CMV-seropositive donor. After an initial early postoperative increase,
FGF transcripts declined to virtually undetectable levels and then
began a second rise, which was followed within a week by clinical CMV
syndrome and seroconversion, indicating primary infection. In primary
CMV infection after transplantation, the heart itself is the source of
CMV and the initial site of viral replication. Thus, the recurrent
increase in FGF in this graft after the initial postoperative rise
probably reflects injury induced by local viral replication before
symptomatic viral dissemination. No other cases of active
CMV infection were identified.
|
FGF Transcript Levels Are Associated With Severity of CAV
To compare FGF expression with development of CAV, patients
were classified as having high or low FGF expression on the basis of
whether their mean FGF/GAPDH ratio was above or below the median value
(0.4) for all 15 patients. Two years after transplantation,
coronary angiography was used to assess the development of
vascular disease (Table
). One patient (patient 15) died 21
months after transplantation of complications resulting from grade 4
acute cellular rejection. Vascular disease assessment in this patient
was based on studies at 1 year after transplantation. Disease severity
was assigned a numerical score as described in the Methods section.
Patients with high FGF levels had significantly increased severity of
CAV (P=0.03). Consistent with this result, all of
the patients with severe or moderate CAV were included among the group
with late elevations of FGF, whose average FGF levels were generally
higher (Table
). One patient in the high-FGF group (patient 13)
was unable to undergo angiography because of renal insufficiency.
Endomyocardial biopsy was negative for acute
cellular rejection, and echocardiographic evaluation
and right heart catheterization demonstrated poor graft
function and decreased cardiac output compatible with CAV. In contrast,
patients without late rises, who generally had low levels of FGF, had
either no or mild vascular disease at 2 years after transplantation. No
other clinical variables, including rejection score, showed a
statistically significant association with FGF levels.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subsequent elevations were significantly associated with increased severity of CAV. Because patients with late elevations generally had higher mean FGF levels, we suspect that it is the total quantity and cumulative exposure rather than the temporal pattern of expression that is the major contributor to increased risk of CAV. The use of angiography, rather than the more sensitive IVUS, undoubtedly limited our detection to more severe CAV. Because IVUS studies indicate the most rapid progression of intimal hyperplasia during the first year, the results point to a relationship between FGF and this period of rapid progression. Although we focus on FGF, we believe that similar results would be observed for other growth factors, because many of the same inflammatory stimuli induce their expression, and recent data show that platelet-derived growth factor-ß and FGF receptors activate a largely overlapping set of genes.8
Finally, the finding that FGF elevation occurred at the time of CMV reactivation in the donor heart is novel and intriguing. CMV infection is associated with development of CAV.9 Initiation of viral replication requires transcription from the CMV immediate early gene promoter, and we have found that FGF enhances transcription from this promoter in vitro (G.G.M., unpublished data). Therefore, FGF expression in the graft may contribute to CMV reactivation from latency, and conversely, induction of FGF by CMV replication within the graft may be one of the mechanisms leading to increased vascular disease with CMV infection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 20, 1999; revision received September 17, 1999; accepted October 11, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Luo, A. Liu, Y. Chen, H. M. Lim, J. Marshall-Neff, J. H. Black, W. Baldwin III, R. H. Hruban, S. C. Stevenson, P. Mouton, et al. Inhibition of Accelerated Graft Arteriosclerosis by Gene Transfer of Soluble Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-1 in Rat Aortic Transplants Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2004; 24(6): 1081 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kilkenny, J. V. Rocheleau, J. Price, M. B. Reich, and G. G. Miller c-Src Regulation of Fibroblast Growth Factor-induced Proliferation in Murine Embryonic Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2003; 278(19): 17448 - 17454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Autieri, S. Kelemen, B. A. Thomas, E. D. Feller, B. I. Goldman, and H. J. Eisen Allograft Inflammatory Factor-1 Expression Correlates With Cardiac Rejection and Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Circulation, October 22, 2002; 106(17): 2218 - 2223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. X.-M. Zhao, Y. Hu, G. G. Miller, A. D. Luster, R. N. Mitchell, and P. Libby Differential Expression of the IFN-{gamma}-Inducible CXCR3-Binding Chemokines, IFN-Inducible Protein 10, Monokine Induced by IFN, and IFN-Inducible T Cell {alpha} Chemoattractant in Human Cardiac Allografts: Association with Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Acute Rejection J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1556 - 1560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-M. Zhao, Y. Hu, G. G. Miller, R. N. Mitchell, and P. Libby Association of Thrombospondin-1 and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Human Cardiac Allografts Circulation, January 30, 2001; 103(4): 525 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |