(Circulation. 1999;100:e140.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
Hôpital Cardio-vasculaire et Pneumologique, Lyon, France
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We would like to compliment Zipes and Wellens on their excellent article about sudden cardiac death, which was recently published in Circulation.1 We think, however, that calcium channel blockers deserve a mention in this review as a potential treatment for patients who are resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Isolated coronary spasm without associated coronary obstruction can occasionally trigger lethal ventricular arrhythmias. It has, therefore, been recommended that the ergonovine test be performed in any patient who has been resuscitated from cardiac arrest in whom no structural heart disease can be found.2 In a few reports, treatment with calcium blockers, with or without nitrates, seems to give a good prognosis.3 4 For instance, in a study by Myerburg et al,3 treatment with calcium-channel blockers was successful in preventing ventricular arrhythmias in patients with previous cardiac arrest and a positive ergonovine test.
We recently reviewed our experience with 7 patients who suffered an arrhythmic cardiac arrest due to coronary artery spasm that was not associated with significant coronary artery narrowing.5 All patients underwent an ergonovine provocation test, and the dose of their treatment with calcium-channel blockers was determined by titrating the dose until a negative test result was obtained. After a mean follow-up period of 58 months, 6 patients remained symptom-free; 1 patient who had not stopped smoking had another cardiac arrest, despite treatment for coronary spasm. Without this strategy, our patients would have unnecessarily had an automatic defibrillator implanted. This topic also clearly demonstrates how patients who have a cardiac arrest and who have apparently normal hearts need careful evaluation. We, therefore, believe that ergonovine testing and individually-adapted calcium blocker therapy are options that should be discussed in the management of patients who have been resuscitated from cardiac arrest but have no structural heart disease. Furthermore, more research is needed to explain the interaction between myocardial ischemia and ventricular arrhythmias.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with
apparently normal heart: need for definition and standardized clinical
evaluation: consensus statement of the joint committees of the
Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Registry of Europe and of the Idiopathic
Ventricular Fibrillation Registry of the United States.
Circulation.. 1997;95:265272.
3. Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Mallon SM, Cox MM, De Marchena E, Interian A, Castellanos A. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with silent myocardial ischemia due to coronary artery spasm. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:14511455.[Abstract]
4. Fellows CL, Weaver WD, Green HL. Cardiac arrest associated with coronary artery spasm. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:13971399.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Chevalier P, Dacosta A, Defaye P, Thierry Chalvidan,
Bonnefoy E, Kirkorian G, Isaaz K, Denis B, Touboul P. Arrhythmic
cardiac arrest due to isolated coronary spasm: long term
outcome of seven resuscitated patients. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1998;31:5761.
Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |