Circulation. 1999;100:e144
(Circulation. 1999;100:e144.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
Can We Predict Complete Heart Block After Alcohol Ablation For Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?
Balram Bhargava, MD, DM;
Rajiv Agarwal, MD, DM
Department of Cardiology,
Cardiothoracic Sciences Center,
All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi, India
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
To the Editor:
Lakkis et al1 obtained excellent results in their series
of 33 patients who had echocardiographically guided
septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy. However, they required permanent
pacemaker implantation in a third of their patients. Their possible
explanation for the high incidence of this complication is the presence
of more conduction abnormalities at baseline.
On the basis of clinical experience, the most common
arrhythmia reported with septal alcohol injection is right
bundle-branch block, which occurs in 52% to 85% of
patients.2 3 Complete heart block reportedly occurs in
60% to 65% of patients, with only 20% requiring permanent pacemaker
implantation when the condition persists for >2 weeks.2
In addition, using the 108 patients reported in several major
studies,1 2 4 5 ventricular
tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation occurred
in 5% of the patients, and 3% of the patients died.
Lakkis et al1 think that by modifying their technique by
using contrast echocardiography and injecting
alcohol at a slower rate, they had less complete heart block. However,
contrast echocardiography only helps to delineate
the hypertrophied area during the procedure. Kuhn et al3
reported no conduction defects in 35 minutes of induced
ischemia without alcohol injection, which may be an important
method of screening patients suitable for this procedure. However,
Seggeweis et al5 reported that the predictability of this
transitory occlusion (in regards to acute hemodynamic
results) was not very high due to the presence of several small septal
branches.
Therefore, complete heart block in septal alcohol ablation is
unpredictable. Presumably, the procedure should be avoided in patients
with preexisting left bundle blocks because right bundle-branch block
occurs in as many as two-thirds of the patients. Complete heart block
should be considered a sequelae of alcohol ablation. Moreover, Lakkis
et al1 did not find that dual-chamber pacing conferred any
additional therapeutic effects to ethanol septal reduction. Therefore,
alcohol ablation should be tried only when the dual chamber pacemaker
has failed to show clinical and hemodynamic
benefit.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Lakkis NM, Sherif F, Kleiman NS, Killip D, He ZX,
Verani MS, Roberts R, Spencer WH.
Echocardiography-guided ethanol septal reduction
for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Circulation.. 1998;98:17501755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Knight C, Kurbaan AS, Seggewiss H, Henein M, Gunning
M, Harrington D, Fassbender D, Gleichmann U, Sigwart U. Nonsurgical
septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy: outcome in the first series of
patients. Circulation.. 1997;95:20752081.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuhn H, Gietzen F, Leuner C, Gerenkamp T. Conduction
blocks following transcatheter septal ablation for
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart
J.. 1997;18:20112012.[Free Full Text]
-
Gietzen F, Kuhn H, Leuner C, Gerenkamp T, Hegselmann
J, Raute-Kreinsen U. Acute and long-term results after
transcoronary ablation of septum hypertrophy in
hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Eur
Heart J.. 1997;18:468A.
-
Seggewiss H, Gleichmann U, Faber L, Fassbender D,
Schmidt HK, Strick S. Percutaneous transluminal septal
myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy: acute results and 3-month follow-up
in 25 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1998;31:25258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]