Circulation. 1999;100:II-176-II-181
(Circulation. 1999;100:II-176.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Atrial Repair of Simple Transposition With Implications for a Late Arterial Switch Strategy
David Sarkar, MRCP;
Catherine Bull, FRCP;
Robert Yates, MRCP;
David Wright, PhD;
Seamus Cullen, MRCP;
Marc Gewillig, MD;
Rebecca Clayton, ASCT;
Adelaide Tunstill, RSCN;
John Deanfield, FRCP
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University College London,
London, England (D.S.); Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Great Ormond
Street Hospital, London, England (C.B., R.Y., S.C., R.C., A.T., J.D.);
Department of Statistical Sciences, University College London, London, England
(D.W.); and Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital
Gasthuisberg, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium (M.G.).
Correspondence to Professor J. Deanfield, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WCIN 3JH England. E-mail d.sarkar{at}ucl.ac.uk
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
BackgroundWe report the
single-institution, long-term
results of 358 patients with simple
transposition of the great
arteries surviving >30 days after a Mustard
(n=226, 1965
to 1980) or Senning (n=132, 1978 to 1992)
procedure.
Methods and ResultsOutcome measures included late death,
reintervention, ECG and ambulatory ECG rhythm, new arrhythmia,
and functional status. Average follow-up was 13.4 (range 0.32 to 17.9)
years for the Senning group and 11.7 (range 0.04 to 23.9) years for the
Mustard group. The Senning group had a better survival rate at 5, 10,
and 15 years (95% versus 86%, 94% versus 82%, and 94% versus 77%,
respectively). In both groups, the majority of late deaths were sudden,
without preceding ventricular dysfunction. Survival and
survival free of reintervention were significantly better in the
Senning group (relative risk [RR] 0.34, P=0.06 versus
RR 0.39, P=0.027). Loss of sinus rhythm was comparable
and unrelated to death. After era correction, the incidence of atrial
flutter was similar and strongly associated with late death in both
groups. Clinical systemic ventricular failure was uncommon,
and at last follow-up, 92% of the Senning group and 89% of the
Mustard group were in New York Heart Association class I. In a model
exploring the implications of elective arterial switch
conversion, this would only be beneficial if the hazard late after
switch was markedly reduced and/or the hazard after the Senning
procedure increased with time.
ConclusionsLate outcomes after the Senning procedure are
superior to those after the Mustard procedure. Both groups had late
sudden deaths that were not associated with clinical systemic
ventricular failure. Good functional status after the
Senning procedure suggests that a strategy of elective switch
conversion cannot be justified for patients with isolated
transposition.
Key Words: transposition of great vessels heart defects, congenital survival death, sudden atrial flutter
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
In 1958, Senning successfully introduced an atrial switch
procedure
for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) by using
autologous
atrial tissue to construct the atrial baffle.
1
Despite excellent
early outcomes, the procedure has been largely
abandoned in
favor of the arterial switch because of
concerns about late
systemic ventricular
failure,
2 3 4 impaired exercise
performance,
5 6 arrhythmia, and sudden
death.
7 It remains unclear whether
these complications are
inevitable or whether predisposing factors
at surgery or during
follow-up may identify patients most at
risk. A surgical strategy
involving conversion to an arterial
switch has been
developed
8 and is advocated for patients with
deteriorating
late hemodynamics. The indications and
timing of this approach
will be influenced by the outcome after atrial
repair and ability
to stratify risk during long-term follow-up.
Therefore, we studied
our cohort of Senning patients to establish
survival, rhythm,
functional state, and the need for reintervention and
compared
their outcome with that previously reported for patients who
underwent
a Mustard operation at our institution between 1965 and
1980.
9 The long-term outcome data have been used to
develop a model
that examines the survival implications of elective
late arterial
switch conversion.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
A retrospective review of hospital case notes of all patients
born
in the United Kingdom who had a Senning operation at Great Ormond
Street
Hospital for Children, London, was performed. Patients with
simple
transposition were included as well as those with a small
ventricular
septal defect that did not require closure, a
persistent arterial
duct, or a left ventricular
outflow tract gradient

20 mm Hg
at initial cardiac
catheterization. Of 141 Senning operations
between
August 1978 and September 1992, there were 9 early deaths

30 days
after surgery, with the 132 late survivors constituting
the study
group.
Follow-up records were reviewed, including ECGs, 24-hour ambulatory
ECG recordings (AECGs), videotaped echocardiograms, and chest
roentgenograms. Patients not seen in the previous 18 months were asked
to come in for reassessment. The duration of follow-up was defined as
the period between the operation and their last clinic visit or
completion of the study questionnaire. The advent of atrial flutter or
nodal rhythm was diagnosed on the basis of 1 ECG, and onset was dated
to that study.
Two hundred forty-three AECG recordings were performed,
including 39 in the 56 patients who came in for reassessment, an ECG,
and an echocardiogram. We investigated patients who had died during the
study period for the circumstances of the event, and where possible,
autopsy data were obtained.
The complete consecutive series of Mustard operations in our
institution was reviewed in 1990 with the same methods and definition
of "simple" transposition.9 Two hundred forty-nine
cases were identified. The 226 >30-day survivors constituted the
comparison group; follow-up on this group was not updated.
Operative Technique
The surgical technique for the Senning operation during the
study period was standard. All operations were performed by 2 surgeons
who had considerable previous experience with the Mustard procedure.
Hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass was used with aortic and
bicaval cannulation and cold cardioplegia injection into the aortic
root every 30 minutes. Care was taken to avoid damage to the sinus
node, sinus node artery, and AV node during cannulation and surgery.
Excessive resection in the superior part of the interatrial septum was
avoided. The systemic and pulmonary venous pathways were
constructed with atrial tissue. In most patients, the atrial septum was
closed directly, although pericardium or Dacron was used in some cases.
The description of the Mustard surgical technique has been published
previously.9
Statistical Methods
Actuarial survival curves were prepared with the Kaplan-Meier
method. The Mustard and Senning operations are strongly confounded with
era (Figure 1
); if the Mustard procedure
looked inferior in comparison with the Senning procedure,
it was difficult to know whether this was attributable to the choice of
operation or other repercussions of the early years of cardiac surgery
and bypass. Therefore, each patient was given a series number based on
date of surgery. The separate effects of surgery type and series number
could then be examined in a multivariate
analysis by use of the Cox proportional hazards model. The
effects of the advent of nodal rhythm on the advent of atrial flutter
and the advent of atrial flutter on late death were examined by
entering the advent of nodal rhythm and flutter, respectively, as
time-dependent covariates.10 Patients who died without
clinical or ECG evidence of previous atrial flutter were
included in the analysis as flutter-free up to the date of
death.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Numbers of Mustard and Senning operations
performed each year between 1965 and 1992. Note crossover period from
Mustard to Senning operation between 1978 and 1980.
|
|
A model was prepared that contrasted the survival implications of
leaving the Senning repair in place with a policy of elective banding
and switch conversion of all Senning procedure patients. First, an
estimate of the hazard of late death was obtained from our own
medium-term Senning procedure survival data (10 to 20 years); this
hazard was assumed to remain constant. Survival data for the normal UK
male population (1992) was also available; the corresponding hazard
increases with age. The long-term outlook of a person who has had
Senning repair is subject to both these hazards, and combining the 2
functions provided a curve that depicts the expected late survival
pattern of Senning procedure patients left with an atrial repair under
these assumptions. This pattern could be compared with survival
estimates after switch conversion and prepared under a range of
assumptions.
 |
Results
|
|---|
The patient characteristics of the Mustard and Senning cohorts
are
shown in Table 1

.
Survival
Of the original Senning cohort of 141 consecutive patients, 9
(6.4%) died
30 days after surgery. There have been 12 late deaths
(9%) to date. For the 30-day survivors, the actuarial survival rate at
5, 10, and 15 years was 95%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. The Mustard
group consisted of 249 cases with 23 early deaths (9.2%). There have
been 50 deaths (22%) during follow-up; the actuarial survival
rate (of 30-day survivors) at 5, 10, and 15 years was 86%, 82%, and
77% (Figure 2
). Survival was
significantly better for the Senning cohort (Mustard procedure RR 2.67,
P=0.0024), and this difference remained after the surgical
series number had been taken into account (RR 2.57,
P=0.06).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Actuarial survival rate of 30-day survivors after
Senning (n=132) and Mustard (n=226) operations. Numbers refer to
patients in follow-up.
|
|
As in the Mustard cohort, the distribution of deaths in the Senning
group (Figure 3
) occurred in a bimodal
pattern, with 7 in the first 5 years, 1 at 10 years, and the remaining
4 at
15 years of follow-up.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Follow-up and late death in 30-day survivors after
a Senning operation. There is a bimodal distribution of deaths, with 7
in the first 5 years of follow-up and 4 between 14 and 15 years.
|
|
Reintervention
After the initial procedure, only 5 Senning procedure patients
(3.8%) required further surgery: 1 for baffle obstruction, 1 for a
baffle leak, 2 for relief of left ventricular outflow tract
obstruction (LVOTO), and 1 for pulmonary artery banding in a
patient with severe systemic ventricular dysfunction with a
view to switch conversion. Pacemaker insertion has also been
infrequent, with 2 systems inserted for symptomatic
tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and slow nodal rhythm.
Among the Mustard group, reinterventions have been significantly higher
(13%). There have been 3 tricuspid valve replacements and 27
procedures for venous pathway obstruction. Permanent pacing has been
required in 8 cases: 3 for slow nodal rhythm, 2 for complete
heart block, 2 for flutter with slow AV conduction, and 1 for
tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome. The curves for survival
free of reintervention (Figure 4
)
continue to diverge over the follow-up experience, with superior
outcomes for the Senning group. The relative risk of death or
reoperation in the Mustard group compared with the Senning group was
2.75 (P=0.0003) and even after correction for era was 2.58
(P=0.027).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Actuarial survival free of reintervention in
Mustard and Senning cohorts (30-day survivors). Numbers refer to
patients in follow-up.
|
|
Functional Status
At last follow-up, 110 (91%) of 121 Senning-procedure survivors
had minimal or no functional impairment. All were involved in full-time
work or study and participated in routine sports. As
anticipated, many found strenuous physical activity difficult. Eight
patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, 5 of whom
fatigued easily. Of the 2 NYHA class III patients, 1 was limited by
right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and one by LVOTO and a
severe neurological deficit sustained during a neonatal Senning
procedure. Only 7 (5.8%) patients were taking medication; 4 were
taking an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) alone, 1 ACEI with
diuretics and amiodarone, 1 atenolol alone, and 1
atenolol, digoxin, and diuretics. No patients were taking
antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. The comparable figures for
the Mustard group have been published previously.9
Rhythm
The loss of stable sinus rhythm occurred progressively and to a
similar extent after both Mustard and Senning operations. At 10 years,
nodal rhythm had been documented in 29% of the Mustard group and 35%
of the Senning group with no difference with respect to type of
operation after correction for era (RR 0.78, P=0.2).
Generally, nodal rhythm was intermittent, occurring particularly at
night. For the group as a whole, the onset of nodal rhythm increased
the risk of advent of atrial flutter (RR 2.95, P=0.002),
with the effect mainly discernible in the Mustard cohort.
In the Mustard group, atrial flutter developed in 36 cases (16%)
compared with 8 (6.1%) in the Senning group. At 5, 10, and 15 years,
freedom from flutter was 89% (Mustard) versus 98% (Senning), 75%
versus 91%, and 69% versus 88%, respectively, but the later Senning
procedure data were distorted by 3 late cases of flutter occurring in
the oldest patients (Figure 5
). There is
an element of ascertainment bias, with the late flutter dated to its
documented occurrence, whereas absence of flutter was dated to the last
routine ECG. Of the 8 Senning procedure cases with documented flutter,
2 were among the subsequent late deaths. The relationship between the
advent of late flutter and late death previously documented in the
Mustard group9 was even more evident in the Senning group.
Documented atrial flutter resulted in a 10.4-fold increase in risk of
late death (P=0.004) and a 21-fold increase in risk of late
sudden death (P=0.0005).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Actuarial survival of 30-day survivors with
freedom from atrial flutter in Senning and Mustard cohorts. Numbers
refer to patients in follow-up.
|
|
ECG and Ambulatory ECG Rhythm
In the preceding 12 months, 110 patients had a resting ECG that
showed 81% were in sinus rhythm, 16% nodal, 2% paced, and 1% low
atrial (nonsinus). Fifty-nine percent of the 243 AECGs indicated
predominant sinus rhythm and 37% nodal rhythm for
30% of the study.
The remaining 4% had paced rhythm, Mobitz type II and third-degree
heart block, nonsustained ventricular
tachycardia, and 1 recording of atrial flutter.
Echocardiographic Data
Echocardiograms were performed on 113 of the 120 current survivors
within the preceding 18 months. One hundred two (90%) had normal or
only mildly impaired RV function. Ten had moderate impairment but
despite this were in NYHA class 1. Only 1 case of severe RV dysfunction
was identified. The chest roentgenogram showed a cardiothoracic (CTR)
ratio of 53%, and the patient was clinically well, receiving medical
therapy.
Eight cases of LVOTO
30 mm Hg were found. Only 2 had recent
chest roentgenograms, with CTRs of 50% and 59%, respectively. The
latter patient was in NYHA class II. Eighteen patients had mild to
moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and all were in
NYHA class I. Only 4 cases of severe TR were identified. Three had
recent chest roentgenograms, only 1 of which showed an increased CTR,
and all 3 were in NYHA class I.
Late Deaths
There were 12 late deaths in the Senning group (Table 2
), distributed in a bimodal pattern with
7 in the first 5 years, 1 at 10 years, and a second peak of 4 deaths
after 15 years follow-up. In the first peak, 3 deaths were sudden,
presumed arrhythmic (R.G., C.W., and B.V.), and 1 had a history of
paroxysmal atrial flutter. All 3 children were previously healthy and
collapsed while playing. The remaining 4 deaths were more difficult to
categorize. All occurred within 18 months of surgery, and although
sudden, most had evidence of prior hemodynamic
problems. The death at 10 years (A.W.) was also sudden and presumed
arrhythmic, with a past history of paroxysmal flutter treated with
flecainide and digoxin and no evidence of ventricular
dysfunction on echocardiography.
Beyond 15 years follow-up, 2 of the 4 deaths were sudden and presumed
arrhythmic (T.H. and V.C.). One (T.H.) had documented nodal rhythm on
AECG monitoring with a satisfactory echocardiogram, and the other
(V.C.) failed medical follow-up during the previous 4 years but
reportedly had been free of clinical symptoms. The other 2 deaths were
the result of right middle cerebral artery occlusion (R.M.) and severe
hemoptysis secondary to multiple pulmonary arteriovenous
malformations (J.S.). In total, half the deaths occurred after an
episode of sudden collapse in children who were previously healthy, 2
with a past history of documented flutter.
A comparison of the causes of late death in the Mustard and Senning
groups is shown in Table 3
.
Surgical Model
It is possible to construct a hazard model to illustrate the
outcome of widespread implementation of an elective late switch
strategy contrasted with conservative management (Figure 6
). Such a model has many sources of
variability and only serves as a framework for rational decision
making. The hazard associated with a Senning operation is modeled as a
constant (Senning I) with our data, with the addition of the risk
associated with a normal age-matched population. Alternatively, the
Senning risk may not be constant but may increase progressively;
Senning II illustrates an increasing hazard beyond the age of 30 years
(16 years of additional survival). To model the switch conversion
strategy, we used the following assumptions: initial mortality within 1
month after surgery was estimated from previous
reports11 12 at 5% for age 0 to 4 years, 10% for 5 to 9
years, 15% for 10 to 14 years, and 20% for 15 to 19 years. The late
hazard after successful switch conversion was assumed to be half that
expected without surgery (Senning I). When Senning I is compared with
Switch, the curves never cross but converge late in follow-up,
adversely affecting survival. If the Senning hazard increases (Senning
II), there would be a benefit for the cohort at the expense of some
early surgical mortality.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Model of late survival of current cohort: normal
population (age-matched, derived from the UK Life Tables 1992). Senning
I adds this "background" risk to a late constant hazard for the
Senning operation (1.5% per year) estimated from our follow-up data.
Senning II: same as Senning I but with a late hazard that increases
with time (modeled by adopting the background risk as a "normal"
55-year-old). Switch: illustrates the consequence of switch conversion
of all patients "now"; early mortality assumptions described in the
text with a late hazard half of Senning I.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
This study reveals a superior outcome for the Senning operation
for
simple TGA compared with the Mustard operation, with an actuarial
survival
rate of 94% at 10 and 15 years. However, there have been late
deaths,
mostly sudden, which were not anticipated by symptoms, with
only
atrial flutter identified as a risk factor.
Symptomatic status
was excellent, with most patients
appearing to have good ventricular
function.
Atrial repair with the Mustard and Senning operations revolutionized
the management of babies with TGA. However, the arterial
switch operation has become the treatment of choice because of concerns
about late development of arrhythmia,7 9 baffle
problems, and, particularly, progressive right (systemic)
ventricular failure.2 3 4 In our study, the
Senning operation is superior to the Mustard operation largely because
of the lower need for reoperation for venous pathway obstruction.
Progressive loss of sinus rhythm, which has been widely reported, was
found at a similar rate after both procedures and did not have a major
clinical impact. The majority of Senning procedure patients were
healthy and did not require pacemaker insertion or medical therapy.
Although the number of Senning procedure patients who had developed
atrial flutter to date was small, it was a risk factor for both total
late death and late sudden death. The rapid heart rate presumably
exacerbates the limitation of ventricular filling that is
intrinsic to the atrial repair circulation, compromising cardiac
output. The incidence of flutter on AECG was extremely low, so that it
is unlikely that systematic routine monitoring with AECG would be
helpful in identifying patients at greater risk. Although the absolute
incidence of atrial flutter appeared lower after the Senning operation,
era correction suggests that the risk is comparable for both types of
atrial repair. The excellent survival rate after a Senning procedure
may therefore be due to superior baffle function compared with the
Mustard procedure.
The key to long-term outcome after the Mustard and Senning procedures
may be the fate of the right ventricle in the systemic circulation. It
is still difficult to quantify RV function because of a lack of a
suitable control group for comparison and the dependence on shape
assumptions and loading conditions of most of the commonly used
systolic indexes. Although RV dilatation was common, during a
follow-up of
20 years, only a few patients developed evidence of
symptomatic RV failure. Serial studies do not support an
inevitable progressive deterioration with time.4 13 14 An
early study by Graham et al3 indicated that in patients
with postoperative RV dysfunction, preoperative abnormalities had
already been identified. In a recent large study in which radionuclide
indexes were used, systolic RV function did not deteriorate
over an 8-year interval. Conversely, diastolic function was
impaired in the majority.13 Because abnormal
ventricular filling may be due in part to flow limitation
by the atrial baffle, the prophylactic use of ACEIs may be
counterproductive. These findings are important when one considers
indications for late conversion to the arterial switch.
Restoration of the morphological left ventricle to the systemic
circuit and reversal of the atrial repair has obvious attractions. When
ventricular retraining by pulmonary artery banding
with subsequent arterial switch was performed for patients
with systemic ventricular failure,11 12 the
results were considerably better in younger patients, with age a major
risk factor for operative death. However, most younger patients are
well, without clinical RV failure, and there is no evidence that
ventricular function will necessarily deteriorate. Thus,
early arterial switch conversion may only be indicated for
the small number of patients with early symptomatic RV
failure. For older patients in this category, the higher surgical risk
with this approach must be considered relative to the risks of cardiac
transplantation.
A late switch conversion could be considered if it improved systemic
ventricular function and reduced the late arrhythmic
hazard. Our model demonstrates that with current levels of operative
risk, life expectancy would only improve if the late hazard after the
switch was very low in relation to the continuing Senning procedure
risk. However, reversal of the atrial repair and reseptation involves
considerable atrial disruption and may not reduce the risk of flutter,
although this may be better tolerated with removal of the baffles.
There are also uncertainties about long-term ventricular
remodeling and coronary adaptation in adolescence. The decision
also depends crucially on the magnitude and shape of the late Senning
hazard curve, making continued collection of follow-up data
essential.
Alternative lower-risk treatment options are available for isolated
atrial flutter. Antitachycardia pacing has been effective
in some cases but at the risk of accelerating atrial
tachycardia into atrial fibrillation.15
Electrophysiological techniques may be a means of
predicting which persons are most at risk of future
flutter.16 Identification of protected zones of slow
conduction critical for the maintenance of
tachycardia has allowed targeting of radiofrequency
ablation in symptomatic patients.17 AV
node ablation is a last resort for the treatment of intractable
flutter. The impact of these strategies on the incidence of sudden
death is unknown.
The limitations of this retrospective study must be recognized.
Although we have introduced a statistical correction for the major
confounding influence of era, this cannot preclude other influences.
Routine follow-up was not standardized for investigations such as AECG,
although the very low incidence of atrial flutter in the available
studies suggests that routine testing is unlikely to be of value. The
assessment of functional status was not exercise based. The reporting
of symptoms is influenced by patient expectations and not necessarily
representative of the maximum exercise capacity. As
discussed, RV function is perhaps the most difficult factor to
quantify, but what our data do show is that most patients enjoy a good
quality of life with no obvious RV failure but predictable RV
dilatation.
Conclusions
The majority of patients with simple TGA treated by a Senning
operation remain functionally well during adolescence and early adult
life. A comparison of survival and the need for reintervention shows
superior outcomes with the Senning procedure over the Mustard
procedure, even after adjustment for differences in surgical era.
However, in both groups there has been an appreciable incidence of
sudden death, with atrial flutter identified as a risk factor. Although
in principle there may be a role for switch conversion for
symptomatic patients, in well patients with atrial repair,
ventricular retraining and switch surgery are not justified
in view of the high operative risk and the uncertainty about the
long-term postsurgical hazard.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Dr Sarkar is supported by a British Heart Foundation
Clinical
Fellowship.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Senning A. Surgical correction of transposition of
the great vessels. Surgery. 1959;45:966980.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Graham TP Jr. Hemodynamic residua and
sequelae following intraatrial repair of transposition of the great
arteries: a review. Pediatr Cardiol. 1982;2:203213.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Graham TP Jr, Burger J, Bender HW, Hammon JW, Boucek
RJ, Appleton S. Improved right ventricular function after
intra-atrial repair of transposition of the great arteries.
Circulation. 1985;72(suppl II):II-45II-51.
-
Wong KY, Venables AW, Kelly MJ, Kalff V. Longitudinal
studies of ventricular function after the mustard operation
for transposition of the great arteries: a longterm follow up. Br
Heart J. 1988;60:316322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matthys D, De Wolf D, Verhaaren H. Lack of increase in
stroke volume during exercise in asymptomatic adolescents
in sinus rhythm after intraatrial repair for simple transposition of
the great arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:595596.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Page E, Perrault H, Flore P, Rossignol AM, Pironneau
S, Rocca C, Aguilaniu B. Cardiac output evaluation during exercise in
children treated with atrial surgery for transposition of great
vessels. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996;89:593598.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Deanfield J, Camm J, Macartney F, Cartwright T,
Douglas J, Drew J, de Leval M, Stark J. Arrhythmia and late
mortality after Mustard and Senning operation for transposition of the
great arteries: an eight-year prospective study. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:569576.[Abstract]
-
Mee RB. Severe right ventricular failure
after Mustard or Senning operation: two-stage repair: pulmonary
artery banding and switch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1986;92(3 pt 1):385390.
-
Gewillig M, Cullen S, Mertens B, Lesaffre E, Deanfield
J. Risk factors for arrhythmia and death after Mustard
operation for simple transposition of the great arteries.
Circulation. 1991;84(suppl III):III-187III-192.
-
Bull K, Spiegelhalter D. Tutorial in biostatistics
survival analysis in observational studies. Stat
Med. 1997;16:10411074.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cochrane AD, Karl TR, Mee RBB. Staged conversion to
arterial switch for late failure of the systemic right
ventricle. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:854862.[Abstract]
-
Helvind MH, McCarthy JF, Imamura M, Prieto L,
Sarris GE, Drummond-Webb JJ, Mee RBB. Ventriculo-arterial
discordance: switching the morphologically left ventricle in to the
systemic circulation after 3 months of age. Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:173178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reich O, Voriskova M, Ruth C, Krejcir M, Marek J,
Skovranek J, Hucin B, Samanek M. Long term ventricular
performance after intra-atrial correction of transposition:
left ventricular filling is the major limitation.
Heart. 1997;78:376381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hochreiter C, Snyder M, Borer JS, Engle MA. Right and
left ventricular performance 10 years after Mustard
repair of transposition of the great arteries. Am J
Cardiol. 1994;74:478482.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fukushige J, Porter CBJ, Hayes DL, McGoon MD, Osborn
MJ, Vlietstra RE. Antitachycardia pacemaker treatment of
postoperative arrhythmias in pediatric patients. Pacing
Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14:546556.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vetter VL, Tanner CS, Horowitz LN. Inducible atrial
flutter after the Mustard repair of complete transposition of the great
arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:428435.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Van Hare GF, Lesh MD, Ross BA, Perry JC, Dorostkar PC.
Mapping and radiofrequency ablation of intraatrial reentrant
tachycardia after the Senning or Mustard procedure for
transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:985991.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]