(Circulation. 1999;100:II-345.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Myocardial Protection and Vascular Biology |
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery (P.M.), Biochemistry (J.P.), and INSERM U-127 (A.O., C.M.), Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France, and Department of Physiology (E.K.), Kaunas Medical University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Correspondence to Philippe Menasché, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Lariboisière, 2, Rue Ambroise Paré, 75475 Paris 10, France.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsFifty-four isolated rat hearts were arrested with and stored in Celsior at 4°C for 10 hours before a 2-hour reperfusion. They were divided into 5 groups. Group 1 hearts served as controls. In group 2, hearts were preconditioned by two 5-minute episodes of global ischemia, each separated by 5 minutes of reperfusion before arrest. In group 3, hearts received a 15-minute infusion of the mitochondrial KATP opener diazoxide (30 µmol/L) followed by 5 minutes of washout before arrest. In groups 4 and 5, hearts underwent a protocol similar to that used in groups 2 and 3, respectively, except that the preconditioning was preceded by a 10-minute infusion of the mitochondrial KATP blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, 100 µmol/L). Both ischemic and diazoxide preconditioning provided a similar degree of cardioprotection demonstrated by a significantly better preservation of left ventricular compliance, reduced leakage of creatine kinase, and smaller degree of myocardial edema compared with control hearts. These beneficial effects were abolished by 5-HD pretreatment. Postischemic left ventricular contractility and endothelium-dependent coronary response to 5-hydroxytryptamine and acetylcholine were not different among groups. However, the endothelium-independent vasodilatory postischemic response to papaverine was better preserved after ischemic and diazoxide preconditioning than in the other groups.
ConclusionsThese data support the concept that the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning can be duplicated by a mitochondrial KATP opener and suggest that activation of these channels could be an effective means of improving the preservation of globally ischemic cold-stored hearts, as occurs during cardiac transplantation.
Key Words: ischemia reperfusion diastole systole vasodilation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Retrograde aortic perfusion was instituted at a constant pressure of 100-cm H2O with ultrafiltered (5-µm-pore filter), oxygenated (95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide), normothermic (37°C) Krebs-Henseleit solution. The solution had a pH of 7.3 to 7.4 when gassed. The pulmonary outflow tract was incised to allow drainage of the coronary effluent. A catheter was placed through the apex of the left ventricle to drain the thebesian flow. The left atrium was opened, and a latex balloon was inserted into the left ventricle. Left ventricular pressure was continuously recorded online with a pressure transducer (TSD104, BIOPAC Systems, Inc) connected via the universal interface module (UIM100A) to the actual data acquisition unit (MP100A), which converted analog into digital signals. Data were then processed with a Power Macintosh 6100/66 computer (Apple Computer) with AcqKnowledge III software. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) was measured as the difference between peak systolic pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The first derivative (dP/dt) was calculated with the software. Coronary flow was measured by timed collection of the coronary venous effluent. Left ventricular pacing was maintained at a rate of 320 bpm throughout the control and reperfusion periods.
Experimental Protocol
The hearts were initially allowed to equilibrate for 15 minutes
after being instrumented and stable recordings were
established. The left ventricular balloon was inflated to
the volume that gave an LVEDP of
8 mm Hg. After stabilization,
systolic and diastolic functions and
coronary flow were measured in triplicate under these
isovolumic conditions. In addition, the left ventricular
balloon was inflated in 0.02-mL increments to construct pressure-volume
curves. Two sets of pressure-volume measurements were generated, the
first of which was discarded because of small balloon shifts. Zero
volume was defined at the point at which LVEDP was zero. On completion
of the pressure-volume curve, the left ventricular balloon
was deflated to set the LVEDP back to its baseline value of 8
mm Hg. The endothelium-dependent coronary flow
response was then tested by a 5-minute perfusion with
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, 10-7
mol/L). Coronary flow was measured during the last 4 minutes of
5-HT administration. This was followed by a 12-minute washout perfusion
with drug-free Krebs-Henseleit solution to reestablish baseline
coronary flow. The hearts were subsequently perfused with the
endothelium-independent vasodilator papaverine
(5x10-6 mol/L) for 5 minutes, and
coronary flow was again measured over the last 4 minutes of
this perfusion.
At the end of the control period, all hearts were arrested by 50 mL of Celsior, a new heart preservation solution,15 delivered at 4°C under a pressure of 60-cm H2O. Hearts were then removed from the Langendorff column and placed in plastic containers (50 mL) filled with Celsior solution and surrounded by crushed ice. They were stored for 10 hours.
On completion of the storage interval, hearts were transferred back to
the Langendorff column, and the balloon catheter was reinserted into
the left ventricle. Balloon volume was set to the value that had given
a preischemic LVEDP of 8 mm Hg. Reperfusion was
started with normothermic (37°C) Krebs-Henseleit solution
at 50-cm H2O pressure during the first 15
minutes, and perfusion pressure was increased thereafter to 100-cm
H2O. Left ventricular pacing was
started at a constant rate of 320 bpm once a regular spontaneous heart
rhythm had resumed. Isovolumic functional measurements were taken in
triplicate at 30, 45, and 60 minutes of reperfusion. Coronary
effluent was collected for measurements of total creatine kinase
release over the first 45 minutes of reperfusion. After 60 minutes of
reperfusion, 2 sets of pressure-volume curves were generated by
incremental inflation of the left ventricular balloon in
0.02-mL aliquots, and the first set was again discarded because of
small balloon volume shifts. The endothelium-dependent
and endothelium-independent coronary vascular
responses to 5-HT and papaverine, respectively, were then tested after
adjustment of the balloon volume to set the LVEDP at
8 mm Hg
with the same protocol as that used during the preischemic
period. After 100 minutes of reperfusion, the constant-pressure heart
model was converted to a constant-flow model by use of a calibrated
roller pump (Minipuls 2, Gilson). Arterial pressure was
measured continuously by a pressure transducer (TSD104A) connected
through fluid-filled polyethylene tubing to the aortic cannula.
Coronary resistance was calculated as arterial
pressure over coronary flow. After baseline measurements at
constant flow, the coronary bed was preconstricted by
continuous perfusion with prostaglandin
F2
(10-5 mol/L), which
yields a stable level of vasoconstriction. The
endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation to acetylcholine
(10-6 mol/L) was then tested. The total duration
of reperfusion period was
2 hours.
Creatine kinase leakage was measured in the collected coronary effluent in triplicate over the initial 45 minutes of reperfusion. Total creatine kinase activity was assessed enzymatically with an automatic analyzer (Olympus). Results are expressed as international units per gram of dry weight.
At the end of reperfusion, hearts were removed from the Langendorff column, and the ventricles were weighted. Wet weights were measured after both ventricles were incised and the excess fluid was blotted. Dry weights were measured after drying for 24 hours at 80°C. Water content was computed from this formula: 100x(wet weight-dry weight)/wet weight.
Experimental Groups
The hearts were divided into 5 groups, which differed only by
the treatment administered before cardioplegic arrest. Group 1 hearts
(n=12) had no prearrest intervention and served as controls. In group 2
(n=12), hearts were preconditioned by two 5-minute episodes of total
(no-flow) global ischemia, each separated by 5 minutes of
reperfusion before arrest. In group 3 (n=12), hearts received a
15-minute infusion of the mitochondrial KATP
opener diazoxide (30 µmol/L) followed by 5 minutes of washout
buffer perfusion before arrest. In groups 4 (n=10) and 5 (n=8), hearts
underwent a protocol similar to that used in groups 2 and 3,
respectively, except that the preconditioning intervention was preceded
by a 10-minute infusion of the mitochondrial KATP
blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, 100 µmol/L).
Solutions and Drugs
The Krebs-Henseleit buffer was prepared fresh the day of use and
contained (in mmol/L) NaCl 118, KCl 4.7,
MgSO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25,
KH2PO4 1.2,
CaCl2 2.5, and glucose 11. The Celsior solution,
provided by Imtix-Sangstat, had the following composition (in
mmol/L): potassium 15, sodium 100, magnesium 13, calcium 0.26, chloride
41.5, histidine 30, glutamate 20, lactobionate 80, mannitol 60, and
reduced glutathione 3. We purchased 5-HD sodium salt, 5-HT, papaverine
hydrochloride, prostaglandin F2
Tris salt, and acetylcholine hydrochloride from Sigma Chemical Co.
Diazoxide (Hyperstat) was obtained from Schering-Plough. All drugs were
dissolved in Krebs-Henseleit solution immediately before use.
Statistical Analysis
Functional data were compared by 2-factor ANOVA with repeated
measures, with treatment as 1 factor and time as the second one.
Intergroup differences were specified by use of post hoc Students
t test with Bonferronis correction for multiple
comparisons. Left ventricular compliance curves were
assessed by linear regression analysis of LVEDP data to
calculate slope. Coronary flow and resistance, total creatine
kinase leakage, and myocardial water content were compared between
groups by unpaired 2-tailed t tests. Preischemic
and postischemic coronary flow responses to 5-HT
and papaverine within the same group were compared by paired 2-tailed
t tests. A value of P<0.05 was considered
significant. Data were reported as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In contrast, neither ischemic nor diazoxide preconditioning
improved postarrest systolic function over that of control or
5-HDpretreated hearts (Table 1
). The recovery of dP/dt grossly
paralleled that of LVDP in all groups.
Coronary Vascular Responsiveness
During the preischemic period, administration of 5-HT
significantly increased coronary flow above baseline values
(P<0.001 in all groups). During reperfusion at constant
pressure, the endothelium-dependent vasodilatory
response to 5-HT was equally lost in all groups. Likewise, in the
constant-flow experiments, the endothelium-dependent
vasodilation to acetylcholine was not significantly different among
groups (Table 2
).
|
Before storage, the endothelium-independent
vasodilation to papaverine was similar in all groups
(P<0.001 versus baseline). After storage, papaverine
significantly increased coronary flow only in
ischemically and diazoxide-preconditioned hearts
(P<0.02 and P<0.05 versus reperfusion baseline
flow, respectively). In contrast, papaverine failed to increase
coronary flow over reperfusion baseline values in control and
5-HDpretreated hearts (Figure 2
).
|
Creatine Kinase Leakage
Total creatine kinase release during the initial 45 minutes of
reperfusion was significantly lower in ischemically
preconditioned hearts (613±59 IU/g dry weight) than in controls
(1013±138 IU/g dry weight, P<0.02). Administration of 5-HD
before ischemic preconditioning blunted this protective effect
because in this group creatine kinase leakage increased to 817±76 IU/g
dry weight (P<0.05 versus ischemic
preconditioning). Diazoxide preconditioning also reduced the
postischemic creatine kinase release (782±55 IU/g dry
weight), but the difference with the control group failed to reach
statistical significance (P=0.13). Pretreatment with 5-HD
before diazoxide preconditioning increased the total creatine kinase
leakage to 996±98 IU/g dry weight, but the difference with diazoxide
preconditioning alone still remained slightly above the threshold of
statistical significance (P=0.062).
Myocardial Water Content
Percent tissue water was significantly smaller in hearts
preconditioned by ischemia (80.87±0.30%) or diazoxide
(81.86±0.27%) than in controls (83.22±0.26%, P<0.0001
and P<0.05, respectively). Pretreatment with 5-HD
significantly increased myocardial edema compared with the
corresponding 5-HDfree preconditioning group (5-HD+ischemic
preconditioning: 82.96±0.22%, P<0.0001 versus
ischemic preconditioning alone; 5-HD+diazoxide preconditioning:
83.24±0.14%, P<0.05 versus diazoxide preconditioning
alone).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cardioprotective effects of mitochondrial KATP channels have previously been established in studies that have reported that diazoxide enhanced survival of isolated ventricular myocytes in a pelleting model of ischemia,12 improved functional recovery in rat and rabbit hearts undergoing 20- to 50-minute periods of normothermic global ischemia,13 and reduced infarct size in a rabbit model of regional ischemia.14 The present results extend these conclusions to the more surgically relevant setting of prolonged hypothermic ischemic arrest, as occurs during cold storage of cardiac allografts, and consequently suggest that the "memory" of cardiac cells to diazoxide exposure is abrogated neither by lengthening of the occlusion period nor by the hypothermic conditions prevailing during this ischemic interval.
The mechanism by which diazoxide elicits cardioprotection is not yet conclusively established. It is known, however, that opening of the mitochondrial KATP channels dissipates the inner mitochondrial membrane potential created by the proton pump. Dissipation of this potential might have at least 2 major consequences12 : (1) a reduction in calcium influx and consequently mitochondrial calcium overload, which has been correlated with improved functional recovery after an ischemic insult,18 and (2) enhancement of the inhibition of mitochondrial ATP-synthase by the regulatory protein IF1 and the subsequent better sparing of ATP.19 Regardless of the precise mechanism, these hypotheses are consistent with previous observations that preconditioning delays both calcium overload and ATP depletion during the period of sustained ischemia.20 In turn, one would expect from these metabolic events a reduction in the degree of postischemic contracture, which is indeed supported by our observation of a better preservation of diastolic function in both ischemically and diazoxide-preconditioned hearts. It is also sound to hypothesize that maintenance of higher ATP levels should allow a more effective functioning of energy-driven ion pumps, among which is Na+,K+-ATPase. In fact, preservation of this enzyme activity has been shown to be required for the infarct-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning,21 and it could account for our findings of reduced myocardial edema in hearts preconditioned by either ischemia or diazoxide.
In contrast, postischemic values of developed pressure and dP/dt were not significantly different between the 5 groups. Indeed, previous studies2 have shown that ischemic preconditioning was protective primarily on the diastolic (as opposed to systolic) function of rat hearts subjected to prolonged cardioplegic and hypothermic arrest. It is noteworthy, however, that both ischemically and diazoxide-preconditioned hearts were able to yield values of systolic indexes similar to those of control or 5-HDpretreated hearts at the cost of significantly lower LVDPs, which may provide indirect evidence of a better preservation of contractility after either form of preconditioning. A greater inotropic reserve in the 2 preconditioned groups can also be marshaled from the reduced postischemic creatine kinase leakage seen in these hearts. This suggests a decrease in the amount of necrotic tissue; indeed, it is through this mechanism that ischemic preconditioning has been reported to improve postischemic function.22 However, an alternate hypothesis for explaining the failure of our preconditioning protocols to have improved systolic function could be that postischemic stunning seems to be related to decreased myofilament responsiveness to calcium rather than to shortage of energy supply.23 This could explain why the presumed ATP-sparing effect of preconditioning did not translate into better recovery of contractile function. Furthermore, a possible mechanism of this desensitization of myofilaments to calcium seems to be the production of oxygen-derived free radicals.24 In this study, all hearts were arrested with and stored in Celsior, a new preservation solution with antioxidant properties that have been directly demonstrated by electron spin resonance spectroscopy studies.25 It can thus be reasonably postulated that the limitation of oxidative damage was similar in the 5 experimental groups, which would prevent us from demonstrating free radicalmediated differences in the degree of postischemic myocardial stunning.
Likewise, both ischemic and diazoxide preconditioning failed to improve preservation of endothelium-dependent coronary responsiveness in our experiments. This result is consistent with experimental data obtained in a canine model of coronary artery occlusion,26 isolated buffer-perfused rat hearts,2 and human cell cultures27 showing that ischemic preconditioning does not preserve function of endothelial cells. With regard to endothelium-independent function, it is likely that the greater postischemic coronary flow response to papaverine in the ischemic and diazoxide preconditioning groups resulted only from the reduced postischemic myocardial contracture seen in these 2 groups.28
In conclusion, these data strongly support the possibility of pharmacologically duplicating the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning by a selective opening of mitochondrial KATP channels. The recent demonstration17 that the activity of these channels can be modulated by protein kinase C fits well within the currently accepted paradigm that attributes a central role to this protein (and other kinases) for linking the preconditioning-induced activation of various membrane receptors to the downstream effectors of the pathway, accounting for cardioprotection.29 Identification of mitochondrial KATP channels as these effectors opens interesting therapeutic perspectives, because diazoxide is a drug available for human use and might consequently find a place within our armamentarium of strategies designed to improve myocardial preservation during cardiac transplantation and, perhaps more generally, open-heart operations involving a period of global ischemia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Ogino H, Smolenski RT, Zych M, Seymour AM, Yacoub MH.
Influence of preconditioning on rat heart subjected to prolonged
cardioplegic arrest. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:469474.
3. Karck M, Rahmanian P, Haverich A. Ischemic preconditioning enhances donor heart preservation. Transplantation. 1996;62:1722.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Perrault LP, Menasché P, Bel A, Chaumaray T,
Peynet J, Mondry A, Olivero P, Emanoil-Ravier R, Moalic J-M.
Ischemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: a word of caution.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:13781386.
5. Parratt JR. Possibilities for the pharmacological exploitation of ischemic preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27:9911000.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Menasché P. New strategies in myocardial preservation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1997;12:504514.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Gross GJ, Mei DA, Schultz JJ, Mizumura T. Criteria for a mediator or effector of myocardial preconditioning: do KATP channels meet the requirements? Basic Res Cardiol. 1996;91:3134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Grover GJ, DAlonzo AJ, Dzwonczyk S, Parham CS,
Darbenzio RB. Preconditioning is not abolished by the delayed rectifier
K+ blocker dofetilide. Am J
Physiol. 1996;271:H1207H1214.
9. Grover GJ, DAlonzo AJ, Parham CS, Darbenzio RB. Cardioprotection with KATP opener cromakalim is not correlated with ischemic myocardial action potential duration. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:145152.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Liang BT. Direct preconditioning of cardiac ventricular myocytes via adenosine A1 receptor and KATP channel. Am J Physiol. 1996;40:H1769H1777.
11. Inoue I, Nagase H, Kishi K, Higuti T. ATP-sensitive K+ channel in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Nature. 1991;352:244247.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Liu Y, Sato T, ORourke B, Marban E. Mitochondrial
ATP-dependent potassium channels: novel effectors of cardioprotection?
Circulation. 1998;97:24632470.
13.
Garlid KD, Paucek P, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Murray HN,
Darbenzio RB, DAlonzo AJ, Lodge NJ, Smith MA, Grover GJ.
Cardioprotective effect of diazoxide and its interaction with
mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ channels: possible
mechanism of cardioprotection. Circ Res. 1997;81:10721082.
14. Baines CP, Liu GS, Birincioglu M, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Diazoxide, a mitochondrial KATP-channel opener, is cardioprotective in ischemic rabbit myocardium. Circulation. 1998;98(suppl I):I-343. Abstract.
15. Menasché P, Termignon J-L, Pradier F, Grousset C, Mouas C, Alberici G, Weiss M, Piwnica A, Bloch G. Experimental evaluation of Celsior, a new heart preservation solution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:207213.[Abstract]
16.
Garlid KD, Paucek P, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Sun X, Schindler
PA. The mitochondrial KATP channel as a receptor
for potassium channel openers. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:87968799.
17.
Sato T, ORourke B, Marbán E. Modulation of
mitochondrial ATP-dependent K+ channels by
protein kinase C. Circ Res. 1998;83:110114.
18.
Miyamae M, Camacho SA, Weiner MW, Figueredo VM.
Attenuation of postischemic reperfusion injury is related
to prevention of [Ca2+]m
overload in rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H2145H2153.
19.
Vuorinen K, Ylitalo K, Peuhkurinen K, Raatikainen P,
Ala-Rämi A, Hassinen IE. Mechanisms of ischemic
preconditioning in rat myocardium: roles of
adenosine, cellular energy state, and mitochondrial
F1-F0 ATPase.
Circulation. 1995;91:28102818.
20.
Steenbergen C, Perlman ME, London RE, Murphy E.
Mechanism of preconditioning: ionic alterations. Circ Res. 1993;72:112125.
21.
Nawada R, Murakami T, Iwase T, Nagai K, Morita Y,
Kouchi I, Akao M, Sasayama S. Inhibition of sarcolemmal
Na+,K+-ATPase activity
reduces the infarct size-limiting effect of preconditioning in rabbit
hearts. Circulation. 1997;96:599604.
22. Ovize M, Kloner RA, Przyklenk K. Preconditioning and myocardial contractile function. In: Przyklenk K, Kloner RA, Yellon DM, eds. Ischemic Preconditioning: The Concept of Endogenous Cardioprotection. Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994:4160.
23.
Gao WD, Atar D, Backx PH, Marban E. Relationship
between intracellular calcium and contractile force in stunned
myocardium: direct evidence for decreased myofilament
Ca2+ responsiveness and altered
diastolic function in intact ventricular
muscle. Circ Res. 1995;76:10361048.
24.
Sun JS, Kaur H, Halliwell B, Li XY, Bolli R. Use
of aromatic hydroxylation of phenylalanine to measure
production of hydroxyl radicals after myocardial
ischemia in vivo: direct evidence for a pathogenetic role of
the hydroxyl radical in myocardial stunning. Circ Res. 1993;73:534549.
25. Pietri S, Culcasi M, Albat B, Albérici G, Menasché P. Direct assessment of the antioxidant effects of a new heart preservation solution, Celsior: a hemodynamic and electron spin resonance study. Transplantation. 1994;58:740742.
26.
Bauer B, Simkhovich BZ, Kloner RA, Pryklenk K. Does
preconditioning protect the coronary vasculature from
subsequent ischemia/reperfusion injury? Circulation. 1993;88:659672.
27.
Shirai T, Rao V, Weisel RD. Preconditioning human
cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:210219.
28. Kevelaitis E, Mouas C, Menasché P. Poststorage diastolic abnormalities of heart transplants: is vascular dysfunction or myocardial contracture the culprit? J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15:461469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Downey JM, Cohen MV. Signal transduction in ischemic preconditioning. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;430:3955.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |