(Circulation. 2000;101:27.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (B.S.C., K.S.P., C.B.G., R.M.C.); Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tiqva, Israel (Y.B.); Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (D.C.M.); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (N.S.K.); Hospital Tenon, Paris, France (A.V.); and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (E.J.T.).
Correspondence to Christopher B. Granger, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715. E-mail grang001{at}mc.duke.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe compared enrollment characteristics, angiographic patterns, and outcomes (30-day and 1-year mortality) of patients enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial with and without a confirmed diagnosis of VSD. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess relations between enrollment factors and the development of VSD. In all, 84 of the 41 021 patients (0.2%) developed VSD, a smaller percentage than reported in the prethrombolytic era. The median time from symptom onset to VSD diagnosis was 1 day. Enrollment factors most associated with this complication were advanced age, anterior infarction, female sex, and no previous smoking. The infarct artery was more often the left anterior descending and more likely to be totally occluded in patients who developed VSD. Mortality at 30 days was higher in patients with VSDs than in those without this complication (73.8% versus 6.8%, P<0.001). Patients with VSDs selected for surgical repair (n=34) had better outcomes than patients treated medically (n=35; 30-day mortality, 47% versus 94%).
ConclusionsCompared with historical control subjects, patients who undergo thrombolysis within 6 hours of infarction onset may have a reduced risk of later VSD. If patients develop this mechanical complication, however, it typically occurs sooner than described in the prethrombolytic era. Despite improvements in medical therapy and percutaneous and surgical techniques, mortality with this complication remains extremely high.
Key Words: defects thrombolysis myocardial infarction prognosis mortality
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1% to 2%.1 2
It typically occurs in the first week after infarction, with a mean
time from symptom onset of 3 to 5 days.1 3 4 Previous
investigations have found age and female sex to be risk factors for its
development5 6 ; such patients also commonly have no prior
angina or MI.1 7 8 Angiographically, patients with VSD
have been noted to have total occlusion of the infarct-related artery
with minimal collaterals.6 9 10
In the prethrombolytic era, outcomes after the
development of VSD were extremely poor, with an in-hospital mortality
of
45% in surgically treated patients and
90% in those managed
medically.1 2 11 12 13 Poor prognostic factors in this
patient population included the development of cardiogenic shock, right
ventricular dysfunction, and inferior infarct
location.4 5 14 15
Postinfarction VSD has not been well studied in the thrombolytic era, and most prior studies have been relatively small. The large patient population from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial41 021 patients enrolled at 1081 institutions in 15 countriesprovides a unique opportunity to explore this topic more fully.16 17 The goals of the present study were to establish the incidence of VSD after acute MI in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy and to identify the enrollment characteristics and angiographic patterns associated with its occurrence. The association of this complication with patient outcomes also was to be evaluated. Finally, we wanted to identify enrollment characteristics associated with increased mortality in patients who develop VSD.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 minutes and accompanied by
0.1-mV ST-segment elevation in
2
limb leads or
0.2 mV in
2 contiguous precordial leads.
Exclusion criteria included previous stroke, active bleeding, and
recent trauma or major surgery. Informed consent was obtained before
enrollment.
Patients were randomized to receive streptokinase with subcutaneous
heparin, streptokinase with intravenous heparin,
accelerated alteplase with intravenous heparin, or the
combination of alteplase and streptokinase with intravenous
heparin.16 Subcutaneous heparin (12 500 U twice daily)
was continued for 7 days or until discharge; intravenous
heparin (5000-U bolus, 1000 U/h, adjusted to maintain an
activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 85 seconds) was
given for 48 hours or longer at the investigators discretion.
Chewable aspirin (
160 mg) was given as soon as possible and daily
thereafter (160 to 325 mg/d). Patients without contraindication to
ß-blockers were treated with atenolol (10 mg IV given in 2 doses),
followed by 50 to 100 mg orally daily. All other medications (including
calcium channel antagonists, nitrates, ACE
inhibitors, and antiarrhythmics) and procedures (including
coronary angiography, angioplasty, and bypass surgery) were at
the discretion of the attending physician.
Identification of Patients With VSD
Patients with VSDs were first identified by review of case
report form data (check box for VSD). Ancillary questionnaires were
then distributed to sites with potential VSD patients to obtain further
information on their diagnosis and treatment. These forms, along with
all available source documents, were then reviewed. VSD typically was
diagnosed by echocardiography (disrupted
ventricular septum with evidence of left-to-right shunt by
color Doppler), cardiac catheterization (evidence
of left-to-right shunt by ventriculography), and/or pulmonary
artery catheterization (increase in oxygen saturation
from the right atrium to the right ventricle, quantification of which
was unavailable for most patients). Patients thought to possibly have
VSDs on the basis of cardiac arrest or pulseless electrical activity
were excluded. Data for the development of VSD were complete for all
41 021 patients. For the purposes of this article, patients were
divided into 2 groups: those with confirmed VSDs and those without VSD
confirmation.
Angiography
In patients not randomized to the angiographic substudy,
angiography was performed per institutional protocols. Patients
enrolled in the angiographic substudy underwent angiography as
described.17 Ejection fractions were calculated by the
area-length method.18
End Points
The primary end point of this study was diagnosis of VSD as
defined earlier. Of primary interest were the relations of enrollment
clinical factors to the occurrence of this outcome. Also considered
were the relations between angiographic factors and VSD. Second, we
investigated the effect of VSD on other prospectively defined,
in-hospital clinical outcomes: reinfarction, shock, stroke,
ischemia, and congestive heart failure or pulmonary
edema. Mortality 30 days and 1 year after randomization also was
assessed.
Statistical Analyses
Each categorical factor is described as the number and
percentage of patients with that characteristic. Continuous factors are
described as medians with 25th and 75th percentiles. With only 84
events, it was necessary to diminish as much as possible the chance of
finding spurious results. All formal statistical analyses were
therefore reserved for the prospectively specified analysis of
baseline (enrollment) predictors of VSD. The enrollment factors
identified as having potential prognostic significance were age, sex,
infarct location, smoking history, previous MI, heart rate, current
smoking, hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood
pressures, Killip class, previous bypass surgery, and time from symptom
onset to treatment. Other factors, including the angiographic results,
are presented for descriptive purposes only.
Logistic regression modeling was used for the predictive analysis. Spline transformations of each continuous factor versus outcome were evaluated to determine the appropriateness of the linearity assumption. Linear splines were applied to systolic and diastolic blood pressures.
A full model containing all the potential predictors was first fitted.
Then, the relative significance of each factor in the full model was
plotted as the Wald
2 for each factor minus
the corresponding degrees of freedom. A reduced model was determined by
use of stepwise variable-reduction techniques. This model contains
factors that are all multivariably significant at P<0.05.
The predictive ability of the model was expressed by inclusion of a C
index, the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve.
The 1-year event rates for patients with and without VSDs and for VSD patients who did and did not undergo surgical repair were calculated by use of Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Log-rank statistics were computed to determine the significance of the differences in the 1-year curves.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Patients who developed VSDs were more likely to be older, female,
and hypertensive; have no history of smoking; and have anterior
infarction, an increased heart rate, and a worse Killip class at
admission (Table 2
). The relations
between enrollment systolic and diastolic blood
pressures and VSD also was significant but not linear. The likelihood
of VSD decreased with increasing systolic pressure up to
130 mm Hg. Beyond 130 mm Hg, the likelihood of VSD
increased with increasing systolic pressure. Similarly, the
likelihood of VSD decreased with increasing diastolic blood
pressure to
75 mm Hg and then increased with increasing
diastolic pressure >75 mm Hg. The time from symptom
onset to thrombolytic administration did not differ
between groups.
|
Angiographic Characteristics
Angiographic data were available for 50 of 84 patients (60%)
diagnosed with VSDs (Table 3
). These
patients underwent first angiography at a median of 21 hours after
onset of the index infarction, in contrast to the median of 95 hours
for GUSTO-I patients who did not develop VSDs. Patients with VSDs were
more likely to have TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow at first angiography, and
57% had total occlusion of the infarct artery. The infarct-related
artery was more often the left anterior descending in patients with
VSDs than in patients with no VSDs. More than 50% of the patients with
VSDs had 2- or 3-vessel coronary disease. The median ejection
fraction was lower in patients with VSDs.
|
Univariable and Multivariable Modeling
The complete set of variables included in the model to predict
VSD and their relative importance are shown in Table 4
and the Figure
. Increasing age,
anterior infarction, and female sex were the most important
multivariable predictors of VSD. Current smoking and prior MI also
were significant in being associated with not developing this
complication. A reduced version of the model (containing only the
significant multivariable predictors) is shown in Table 5
. The reduced model performed well with
a C index of 0.774.
|
|
|
In-Hospital Procedures and 30-Day and 1-Year Outcomes
Patients who developed VSDs showed a much greater use of
in-hospital procedures than those who did not; they also were more
likely to develop shock and congestive heart failure (Table 6
). Patients with VSDs also had
significantly higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Data regarding
treatment of VSD were available for 69 of the 84 patients. In all, 34
underwent surgical repair a median of 3.5 days (95% CI, 1 to 7) after
MI symptom onset, including 3 (10%) who underwent repair between 30
days and 1 year after enrollment. Patients who underwent surgical
repair had lower mortality at 30 days and 1 year than the 35 patients
who were treated medically: 47% versus 94% at 30 days
(P<0.001) and 53% versus 97% at 1 year
(P<0.001).
|
Patients who developed VSDs and died within 30 days were more likely to
be female and to have an inferior infarction than those who
survived (Table 7
). All VSD patients who
had pulmonary congestion (Killip class III or IV) at admission
died within 30 days; the mortality rate was 27% among VSD patients who
were in Killip class I or II.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean time from infarction to development of VSD was found to be 1 day, shorter than the 3 to 5 days reported from the prethrombolytic era.1 3 4 Becker and colleagues,20 21 who reported a time similar to that of the present study, postulated that this may be due to different pathophysiological mechanisms. Thrombolytic therapy may prevent extensive transmural necrosis, a prerequisite for cardiac rupture in the prethrombolytic era. However, thrombolysis also may cause myocardial hemorrhage during the "lytic state," so that if VSD occurs, its time course would be accelerated.
Advanced age, anterior infarct location, female sex, and no current
smoking were found to be the most important predictors of VSD. Unlike
previous studies, hypertension21 and no previous MI or
angina7 were found to be less helpful when all other
variables were considered. There was a bidirectional association of
systolic and diastolic blood pressures at
enrollment with the incidence of VSD. The positive correlations
(increase in the incidence of VSD as systolic blood pressure
increased to >130 mm Hg and the diastolic blood
pressure to >75 mm Hg) reflect the association between
hypertension and VSD. Extensive MI and right ventricular
involvement, both known risk factors for VSD, may cause hypotension and
cardiogenic shock on admission. The negative correlations between
enrollment systolic (
130 mm Hg) and
diastolic (
75 mm Hg) blood pressures with the
incidence of VSD probably reflect the incidence of
hemodynamic compromise associated with extensive MI or
right ventricular infarction.
Our angiographic data, consistent with previous studies, show that patients who develop VSDs after acute MI are more likely to have total occlusion of the infarct artery.6 10 22 This suggests that the pathophysiology of acute VSD involves sudden, severe ischemia, leading to extensive myocardial necrosis, and that patients who do not reperfuse with thrombolysis are at increased risk of mechanical complications. We also found that this patient population had extensive coronary artery disease (51% with 2- or 3-vessel disease) and poor left ventricular function.
Mortality with this complication remains extremely high in the thrombolytic era, despite improvements in medical therapy and percutaneous and surgical techniques. However, the mortality rates for all patients with VSDs were similar at 30 days and 1 year (74% and 78%). This suggests that if the patient survives the initial admission, the long-term prognosis is relatively good.
Although this is the largest study of VSD in a prospective trial of thrombolysis, the number of patients with VSDs was insufficient to fully determine enrollment characteristics associated with survival. However, it appeared that patients with inferior infarcts and VSDs tended to have a worse outcome than those with anterior infarcts. This is most likely related to factors previously noted by Edwards and colleagues.3 In their necropsy study, inferior infarcts were more likely to be associated with complex VSDs (multiple, irregular, and/or variable interventricular connections) located in the inferobasal portion of the septum and therefore were more difficult to approach surgically. Anterior infarcts were more commonly associated with simple, through-and-through defects in the apical septum, which tend to be more easily repaired. Right ventricular infarction and dysfunction, more commonly associated with inferior infarcts, also have been shown to be poor prognostic factors in patients with VSD.4 9 14 15 All patients in our study with Killip class III or IV at presentation died. Nonsurvivors also were older and more likely to have reduced blood pressure at enrollment.
Patients with VSDs in GUSTO-I selected for surgical repair had better outcomes than those treated medically. However, those who did not undergo surgical repair may have been more critically ill; these patients had a worse Killip class, tended to be slightly older, and had a lower enrollment blood pressure, all of which have been shown to correlate with mortality.23 It is worth noting that the 30-day mortality of patients not having surgical repair was 94%.
The relation of cardiac rupture to timing of thrombolytic administration is controversial. Some studies have shown an increased risk with late therapy (ie, >12 hours after symptom onset),18 but more recent evidence does not support this finding.21 We did not find a significant difference in the timing of thrombolytic administration between those who developed VSD and those who did not (3.1 versus 2.8 hours). However, enrollment criteria for GUSTO-I included a 6-hour limit from symptom onset; therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility of increased risk with thrombolytic administration after that period.16
The number of patients in the present study, although 1 of the largest series reported, is still relatively small with limited statistical power. Additionally, the diagnosis of VSD was not made according to prospective criteria but rather at each investigators discretion. Thus, some patients may have been misclassified as either having or not having VSDs. However, after review of source documents and ancillary questionnaires, it was clear that most patients had been diagnosed with standard cardiac catheterization, pulmonary artery catheterization, or echocardiography. Although there was a mortality difference between patients with VSDs treated surgically and those treated medically, this may have been due at least partly to confounding factors. We could not explore this further because of the small VSD sample.
In conclusion, the incidence of VSD after acute MI appears to have
declined in the thrombolytic era, most likely because
of improved reperfusion and myocardial salvage. Although VSD is
occurring with decreased frequency, the timing appears to be
accelerated in the thrombolytic era, possibly related
to intramyocardial hemorrhage. Advanced age, anterior location
of infarction, female sex, and no history of smoking are the most
important predictors of this complication. After VSD has developed,
advanced age and inferior location of infarction may be the
most important prognostic factors in this patient population. Outcome
remains extremely poor, with a mortality rate of
50% in patients
undergoing surgical repair and
95% in those treated medically. More
effective ways to predict, prevent, and treat this devastating
complication are needed.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 27, 1999; revision received August 3, 1999; accepted August 5, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R Sajja, G. C Mannam, R. S Gutti, N. R Goli, S. Sompalli, and R. R Penumatsa Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Defect: Patch Repair with Infarct Exclusion Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2008; 16(3): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Poulsen, M. Praestholm, K. Munk, P. Wierup, H. Egeblad, and J. E. Nielsen-Kudsk Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: clinical characteristics and contemporary outcome. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1591 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pujol, M. Morales, J. R.T.C. Roelandt, M. J. Perez, R. Masia, J. Sala, and M. L. Geleijnse Partial ventricular septal defect (Pacman(R) Heart) Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 316 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Sommer, Z. M. Hijazi, and J. F. Rhodes Jr Pathophysiology of Congenital Heart Disease in the Adult: Part I: Shunt Lesions Circulation, February 26, 2008; 117(8): 1090 - 1099. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Sai-Sudhakar, M. S. Firstenberg, and B. Sun Biventricular mechanical assist for complex, acute post-infarction ventricular septal defect. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1238 - 1239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Pasotti, F Prati, and E Arbustini The pathology of myocardial infarction in the pre- and post-interventional era Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1552 - 1556. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Deville, L. Labrousse, E. Choukroun, and F. Madonna Surgery for post-infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD): double patch and glue technique for early repair MMCTS, April 25, 2005; 2005(0425): 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care, Authors/Task Force Members, M. S. Nieminen, M. Bohm, M. R. Cowie, H. Drexler, G. S. Filippatos, G. Jondeau, Y. Hasin, J. Lopez-Sendon, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 384 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jeppsson, H. Liden, P. Johnsson, M. Hartford, and K. Radegran Surgical repair of post infarction ventricular septal defects: a national experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 216 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Alter, B. Maisch, and R. Moosdorf Long-Term Survival With Acquired Ventricular Septal Defect After Myocardial Infarction Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2178 - 2180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-Y. Fang, K.-T. Tsai, H.-W. Chang, K.-H. Yeh, M. Fu, and C.-J. Wu The Potential Impact of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1622 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.A. Barker, I.R. Ramnarine, E.B. Woo, A.D. Grayson, J. Au, B.M. Fabri, B. Bridgewater, and G.J. Grotte Repair of post-infarct ventricular septal defect with or without coronary artery bypass grafting in the northwest of England: a 5-year multi-institutional experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 940 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zogno, A. Maizza, E. Tappainer, N. Pederzolli, V. Fiorani, and A. Nocchi Transatrial approach of acquired posterior ventricular septal rupture and double orifice technique in tricuspid valve repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 622 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, H.-W. Chang, C.-P. Wang, C.-I Cheng, S. Chua, and M.-C. Chen Cardiac Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reperfusion Era Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 565 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nappi, L. Salvatore De Santo, M. Torella, and M. Cotrufo Postinfarction ventricular septal defect in a patient without coronary lesions Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1315 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Szkutnik, J. Bialkowski, J. Kusa, P. Banaszak, J. Baranowski, M. Gasior, P. Chodor, and M. Zembala Postinfarction ventricular septal defect closure with Amplatzer occluders Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 23(3): 323 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Menon and J. S Hochman MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(5): 531 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Birnbaum, M. C. Fishbein, C. Blanche, and R. J. Siegel Ventricular Septal Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., October 31, 2002; 347(18): 1426 - 1432. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Baker Jr Thrombolytic Therapy Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, October 1, 2002; 8(4): 291 - 314. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Faber, P. M. McCarthy, N. G. Smedira, J. B. Young, R. C. Starling, and K. J. Hoercher Implantable left ventricular assist device for patients with postinfarction ventricular septal defect J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2002; 124(2): 400 - 401. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G R Rhydwen, S Charman, and P M Schofield Influence of thrombolytic therapy on the patterns of ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2002; 78(921): 408 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Labrousse, E. Choukroun, J.M. Chevalier, F. Madonna, F. Robertie, F. Merlico, P. Coste, and C. Deville Surgery for post infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD): risk factors for hospital death and long term results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 725 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Tio and T. Ebels Ventricular septal rupture caused by myocardial bridging Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 72(4): 1369 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||