(Circulation. 2000;101:1165.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (L.L., Y.X., G.G.S.), Denver, Colo, and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California (P.Z.), San Francisco, Calif.
Correspondence to Gregory Schwartz, MD, PhD, Cardiology Section (111B), VA Medical Center, 1055 Clermont St, Denver, CO 80220. E-mail Gregory.Schwartz{at}med.va.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsJuvenile pigs (n=6) were treated with troglitazone (75 mg · kg-1 · d-1 PO) for 8 weeks. Untreated pigs (n=8) served as controls. Under anesthetized, open-chest conditions, pigs underwent 90 minutes of moderate regional LV ischemia and 90 minutes of reperfusion. Regional LV function was assessed with subendocardial sonomicrometry crystals. Fasting plasma insulin and free fatty acid levels were lower in troglitazone-treated pigs than in untreated pigs, whereas blood glucose did not differ between groups. These findings suggest that treatment enhanced systemic insulin sensitivity. Baseline hemodynamics and regional LV function did not differ between groups. After ischemia and reperfusion, systolic function (external work) of the ischemic region recovered to 44±6% of baseline in troglitazone-treated pigs versus 18±6% of baseline in untreated pigs (P<0.05). Regional diastolic function (maximum rate of wall expansion) recovered to 78±7% of baseline in treated pigs versus 52±7% of baseline in untreated pigs (P<0.05). Recovery of global LV systolic and diastolic function was also significantly greater in treated pigs. Myocardial glucose uptake did not differ between groups under any condition; however, net myocardial lactate uptake after reperfusion was 7 times greater in troglitazone-treated pigs than in untreated pigs, suggesting that treatment enhanced myocardial carbohydrate oxidation after reperfusion.
ConclusionsIn nondiabetic pigs, chronic troglitazone treatment improves recovery of LV systolic and diastolic function after acute ischemia.
Key Words: metabolism drugs ischemia myocardial contraction diastole
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Troglitazone is a thiazolidinedione drug that is used clinically to treat type II diabetes mellitus. In diabetic patients, thiazolidinediones act as insulin sensitizers, increasing insulin-mediated glucose disposal without increasing insulin release4 and reducing circulating free fatty acid (FFA) levels.5 However, it is unclear whether thiazolidinediones exert similar effects in normal (nondiabetic) animals.6 7 Furthermore, effects of thiazolidinediones on myocardial substrate metabolism, mechanical function, and response to ischemia and reperfusion have not been investigated in vivo.
The present study determined whether chronic treatment of normal (nondiabetic) pigs with troglitazone improves recovery of left ventricular (LV) function after acute ischemia and reperfusion, and if so, whether such effects are associated with changes in myocardial substrate metabolism.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical Preparation, Instrumentation, and
Hemodynamic Data Acquisition
Pigs were anesthetized with
-chloralose and
mechanically ventilated as described in previous
communications.8 9 Indomethacin (25 mg IV)
was given to prevent subsequent hemodynamic response to
the injection of fluorescent microspheres suspended in
dilute Tween solution. Propanolol (1 mg/kg IV) and atropine (0.2 mg/kg
IV) were given to prevent activation of autonomic reflexes.
Instrumentation of the heart is illustrated in Figure 1
. Through a median sternotomy,
fluid-filled catheters were placed in the aortic arch and left atrium,
and a micromanometer catheter was placed in the LV.
An adjustable hydraulic occluder (In Vivo Metric) and ultrasonic flow
probe (Transonic Systems) were placed around the left anterior
descending coronary artery (LAD) distal to the first diagonal
branch to produce and monitor graded ischemia of the anterior
LV. A catheter was inserted in the anterior
interventricular vein at a site distal to the LAD occluder
to sample coronary venous blood from the ischemic
region. An array of 4 subendocardial sonomicrometry crystals (2
orthogonal pairs) was implanted in the center of the ischemic
region; a similar array was implanted in the posterior LV
(nonischemic region). Each crystal array measured regional
myocardial wall area (the instantaneous product of 2 orthogonal
segment lengths). Hemodynamic data were recorded
and digitized during brief suspension of ventilation under steady-state
hemodynamic conditions and during brief occlusion of
the venae cavae. The latter data were used to derive regional
preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) relations. At least 5 sets of
data were collected and averaged under each experimental condition.
Regional transmural myocardial blood flow was measured with
fluorescent microspheres, as previously
described.8
|
Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Uptake
Paired arterial and coronary venous blood
samples were withdrawn for measurement of oxygen, glucose, lactate, and
FFA content, as previously described.9 Uptake of these
substances by the anterior LV free wall was calculated as the
product of mean transmural blood flow and coronary
arteriovenous concentration difference. Circulating insulin was
measured by radioimmunoassay.
Ischemic Protocol
After 30 minutes of stabilization, baseline measurements of
hemodynamics, regional LV function, myocardial blood
flow, substrate uptake, and circulating insulin were obtained.
Ischemia was then induced by gradual inflation of the LAD
occluder until LAD flow rate (monitored by the flowmeter) was reduced
to 50% of baseline. This degree of flow reduction was maintained for
90 minutes. Ischemia of this severity and duration in this
model does not cause myocardial infarction.10 A second set
of measurements was made during the final 15 minutes of the
ischemic period. The LAD constriction was then released, and a
third set of measurements was made between 75 and 90 minutes of
reperfusion.
After euthanasia, myocardium from the central ischemic and nonischemic regions was excised for analysis of regional blood flow by the microsphere method. In addition, a transmural section from center of the ischemic region was incubated in 1% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride for 20 minutes and examined for evidence of nonstaining, which is indicative of myocardial infarction.
Analysis of Systolic Function
LV pressure versus wall-area loops were analyzed in both
ischemic and nonischemic regions. Steady-state regional
external work was calculated as the average area of loops recorded
without occlusion of the venae cavae. Regional PRSW relations were
determined during brief occlusion of the venae cavae by plotting the
area of each LV pressure versus wall-area loop against its
corresponding end-diastolic wall area. End
diastole was defined by the initial upstroke of a regional
intramyocardial electrogram. Because regional wall area depends in part
on how far apart each pair of crystals is implanted (ie, a source of
experimental rather than physiological
variability), external work and PRSW data were normalized to baseline
values in each experiment. An additional measure of regional
systolic function, fractional systolic wall-area
reduction (FAR), was calculated as FAR=(EDA-ESA)/EDA, where EDA and
ESA are end-diastolic and end-systolic wall area,
respectively. FAR is a 2D analog to 1-dimensional fractional
systolic segment shortening. Global LV
contractility was assessed by peak positive LV dP/dt
(+dP/dtmax).
Analysis of Diastolic Function
Regional diastolic function was assessed by the
maximum rate of wall-area expansion (+dA/dtmax),
a regional analog to global LV peak filling rate.
+dA/dtmax was also normalized to its baseline
value in each experiment. Global LV relaxation was assessed by peak
negative LV dP/dt (-dP/dtmax).
Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean±SEM. To determine the significance
of a difference between groups in the response of a variable during
the ischemic protocol, 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used,
followed by unpaired t tests to compare the 2 groups under
specific experimental conditions. To determine the significance of
changes in a variable between baseline and subsequent conditions
within the same group, a 1-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used,
followed by Dunnetts procedure. If data were not normally
distributed, the Friedman repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks and
Mann-Whitney test were substituted.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Effects of Ischemia/Reperfusion
All 6 troglitazone-treated pigs completed the
ischemic protocol. Two of 10 pigs in the control group
sustained ventricular fibrillation during ischemia;
results are reported for 8 pigs that survived the complete protocol.
Regional myocardial blood flow did not differ between control and
troglitazone groups under any experimental condition (Table 3
). In particular, the severity of
ischemia was nearly equal in both groups. Examination of
myocardium after staining with triphenyl tetrazolium
chloride revealed no evidence of infarction in any pig.
|
LV Systolic Function
At baseline, there were no significant differences in
hemodynamics (Table 4
) or
regional LV function (Table 5
) between
groups. During ischemia, regional systolic function
(external work and FAR) of the anterior ischemic region
diminished in both groups, but FAR remained greater in
troglitazone-treated pigs. After reperfusion, troglitazone-treated pigs
demonstrated greater recovery of both FAR and external work (Figure 2
and Table 5
). For example, the
latter variable recovered to 0.44±0.06 times baseline in
troglitazone-treated pigs but to only 0.18±0.06 times baseline in
control pigs (P<0.05). PRSW slope, an index of
contractility, recovered to a significantly greater
extent in treated pigs. Treatment effect could not be attributed to a
difference in loading conditions, because neither
end-diastolic wall area (regional preload) nor LV
systolic pressure differed between groups under any condition.
Regional function of the posterior (nonischemic) region did not
differ between groups under any condition, indicating that the effect
of troglitazone was limited to the ischemic region. Thus,
troglitazone treatment caused a load-independent improvement in
regional systolic function during ischemia and after
reperfusion. This improvement was paralleled by better preservation
of global LV systolic function, manifest by greater LV
+dP/dtmax in treated pigs
(P<0.01).
|
|
|
LV Diastolic Function
Troglitazone treatment also preserved regional
diastolic function during ischemia and reperfusion
(Figure 3
, Tables 4
and 5
).
After reperfusion, the maximum rate of diastolic wall area
expansion (+dA/dtmax) recovered to 78±7% of
baseline in treated pigs compared with 52±7% in untreated pigs
(P<0.05). Recovery of global LV relaxation (LV
-dP/dtmax) was also improved in
troglitazone-treated pigs (P<0.01). Treatment effect could
not be attributed to a difference in left atrial pressure between
groups, nor was there evidence for a direct lusitropic effect of
troglitazone, because LV -dP/dtmax did not
differ between groups at baseline.
|
Myocardial Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Uptake
Myocardial oxygen consumption did not differ between groups under
any condition. Circulating insulin levels were lower in the
troglitazone group under each condition (P<0.05), but
arterial blood glucose and myocardial glucose uptake did
not differ between groups under any condition (Table 6
). Thus, the beneficial effects of
troglitazone treatment on LV function were not due to increased
myocardial glucose uptake.
|
Myocardial lactate uptake did not differ between groups under baseline conditions. During ischemia, both groups demonstrated a shift from net lactate uptake to net lactate release, consistent with an increase in anaerobic glycolytic metabolism. However, during reperfusion, myocardial lactate uptake was substantially greater in troglitazone-treated pigs than in untreated control pigs (0.40 versus 0.06 µmol · g-1 · min-1; P<0.01).
Arterial FFA concentrations were lower in the troglitazone group than in the control group, and this difference achieved statistical significance during reperfusion. These differences were paralleled by a trend to lower myocardial FFA uptake in the troglitazone group under all 3 experimental conditions.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although a positive inotropic effect of troglitazone has been observed in isolated rat hearts11 and increased cardiac output has been observed in diabetic patients treated with the drug,12 a direct of effect of troglitazone on LV function is unlikely in the present experiments because there were no differences between groups in preischemic values of any hemodynamic variable. Furthermore, there were no differences in myocardial blood flow or oxygen consumption between groups under any condition.
Shimabukuro et al13 observed that chronic troglitazone treatment improved recovery of LV function after ischemia in isolated hearts of diabetic rats; however, no benefit of treatment was observed in hearts of nondiabetic rats. The present study is the first to examine effects of a thiazolidinedione compound on recovery of LV function after ischemia in vivo and the first to demonstrate a salutary effect of treatment in nondiabetic animals.
Effects of Troglitazone on Myocardial Substrate Metabolism
Bähr et al14 showed that when cultured
cardiomyocytes from normal rats were exposed to
troglitazone in vitro, content of glucose transporter proteins and
uptake of glucose increased. These findings suggest that troglitazone
may have the potential to affect myocardial glucose
metabolism in nondiabetic animals. However, we found that
the protective effect of troglitazone in vivo was not associated with
increased myocardial glucose uptake.
In the present study, the most striking effect of troglitazone on
myocardial substrate metabolism was an increase in net
lactate uptake after reperfusion (Figure 4
), to a level 7 times greater than that
in untreated pigs, despite similar glucose uptake in both groups. The
difference in lactate uptake cannot be explained by the modest
difference in arterial lactate concentration between
groups. Rather, this observation suggests that troglitazone treatment
increased carbohydrate (glucose and lactate) oxidation in reperfused
myocardium. The basis for this explanation is as follows:
Net myocardial lactate uptake is the sum of uptake of exogenous lactate
and release of intracellular lactate formed by anaerobic
glycolysis. These processes occur
simultaneously.15 In untreated control pigs
after reperfusion, net myocardial lactate uptake was depressed, whereas
glucose uptake remained robust. This pattern of substrate uptake is
consistent with depressed myocardial carbohydrate oxidation, as
previously described in reperfused
myocardium.16 Under such conditions, an
increased fraction of myocardial glucose undergoes
anaerobic metabolism to lactate, resulting in
increased lactate release and decreased net myocardial lactate uptake.
In contrast, the pattern of substrate uptake observed after reperfusion
in troglitazone-treated pigs is consistent with a stimulatory
effect of treatment on myocardial carbohydrate oxidation, resulting in
decreased lactate release from anaerobic glycolysis,
increased oxidation of exogenous lactate, and increased net myocardial
lactate uptake. Increased oxidation of carbohydrate substrates may have
been offset by decreased oxidation of FFA, resulting in no net
difference in myocardial oxygen consumption between groups. The
mechanism by which troglitazone may have stimulated myocardial
carbohydrate oxidation is unclear. One possibility is that lower
myocardial FFA uptake during ischemia and reperfusion treatment
allowed greater activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in
troglitazone-treated pigs.17 An increase in myocardial
carbohydrate oxidation after reperfusion may be a mechanism for
improved recovery of contractile function, because other agents that
activate pyruvate dehydrogenase, such as dichloroacetate, also
improve postischemic contractile
function.2 3
|
Alternatively, the benefit of troglitazone treatment may have been unrelated to effects on myocardial substrate metabolism. In particular, thiazolidinediones may exert antioxidant effects18 and calcium channel antagonism,19 both actions that may be protective during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.
Effect of Chronic Troglitazone Treatment on Systemic Insulin
Sensitivity
Although troglitazone and other thiazolidinedione drugs enhance
insulin sensitivity in diabetic animals and patients,4 5
effects on insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic animals have been less
clear.6 7 To the best of our knowledge, the current
findings of normal fasting blood glucose in the face of diminished
insulin levels and reduced circulating FFA constitute the first
evidence that troglitazone may enhance insulin sensitivity in a large
animal without preexisting insulin resistance.
We chose an 8-week duration of treatment because this is the approximate length of time required to observe maximal insulin-sensitizing and FFA-lowering effects of troglitazone in diabetic patients.20 21 We chose a troglitazone dose of 75 mg · kg-1 · d-1 because this lies within the range of doses that have been studied in intact animals without adverse effects,7 but it is within 1 order of magnitude of clinical doses.
Significance
Pharmacological agents that alter myocardial energy substrate
metabolism have the potential to mitigate the adverse
effects of ischemia and reperfusion on myocardial function. To
date, however, such strategies have had limited clinical application,
in part owing to lack of suitable agents for chronic, oral
administration. Troglitazone is a drug that is already in widespread
clinical use for treatment of diabetes. The present data indicate
that it can also attenuate the severity of postischemic
dysfunction of the nondiabetic heart in vivo. Therefore, troglitazone
may be a potential new tool in the management of ischemic heart
disease in both nondiabetic and diabetic patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 25, 1999; revision received September 22, 1999; accepted October 6, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Okuda K, Nohara R, Fujita M, Tamaki N, Konishi J, Sasayama S. Improvement in myocardial ischemic dysfunction with dichloroacetic acid: experimental study by repeated ischemia in dogs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:990999.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Lewandowski ED, White LT. Pyruvate dehydrogenase
influences postischemic heart function.
Circulation. 1995;91:20712079.
4. Sparano N, Seaton TL. Troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18:539548.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Komers R, Vrana A. Thiazolidinediones: tools for the research of metabolic syndrome X. Physiol Res. 1998;47:215225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Lee MK, Olefsky JM. Acute effects of troglitazone on in vivo insulin action in normal rats. Metab Clin Exp. 1995;44:11661169.
7. Yagi N, Takasu N, Higa S, Ishikawa K, Murakami K, Mimura G. Effect of troglitazone, a new oral antidiabetic agent, on fructose-induced insulin resistance. Horm Metab Res. 1995;27:439441.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Schwartz GG, Xu Y, Greyson C, Cohen J, Lu L. Low-dose
inotropic stimulation during left ventricular ischaemia
does not worsen post-ischaemic dysfunction. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32:10241037.
9.
Schwartz GG, Greyson CR, Wisneski JA, Garcia J,
Steinman S. Relation among regional O2
consumption, high-energy phosphates, and substrate uptake in porcine
right ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H521H530.
10. Lu L, Xu Y, Greyson CR, Ursell PC, Schwartz GG. Non-elastic deformation of myocardium in low-flow ischemia and reperfusion: ultrastructure-function relations. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:11571169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Shimoyama M, Ogino K, Tanaka Y, Ikeda T, Hisatome I. Hemodynamic basis for the acute cardiac effects of troglitazone in isolated perfused rat hearts. Diabetes. 1999;48:609615.[Abstract]
12. Ghazzi MN, Perez JE, Antonucci TK, Driscoll JH, Saling MH, Faja BW, Whitcomb RW, the Troglitazone Study Group. Cardiac and glycemic benefits of troglitazone treatment in NIDDM. Diabetes. 1997;46:433439.[Abstract]
13. Shimabukuro M, Higa S, Shinzato T, Nagamine F, Komiya I, Takasu N. Cardioprotective effects of troglitazone in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Metabolism. 1996;45:11681173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Bähr M, Spelleken M, Bock M, von Holtey M, Kiehn R, Eckel J. Acute and chronic effects of troglitazone (CS-045) on isolated rat ventricular cardiocytes. Diabetologia. 1996;39:766774.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Wisneski JA, Gertz EW, Neese RA, Gruenke LD, Morris LD, Craig JC. Metabolic fate of extracted glucose in normal human myocardium. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:18191827.
16.
Lopaschuk GD, Stanley WC. Glucose
metabolism in the ischemic heart.
Circulation. 1997;95:313315.
17. Randle PJ. Regulation of glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation in cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1976;38(suppl I):I8I15.
18. Inoue I, Katayama S, Takahashi K, Negishi K, Miyazaki T, Sonoda M, Komoda T. Troglitazone has a scavenging effect on reactive oxygen species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;235:113116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Nakamura Y, Ohya Y, Onaka U, Fujii K, Abe I, Fujishima M. Inhibitory action of insulin-sensitizing agents on calcium channels in smooth muscle cells from resistance arteries of guinea-pig. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123:675682.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Schwartz S, Raskin P, Fonseca V, Graveline JF,
Troglitazone and Exogenous Insulin Study Group. Effect of troglitazone
in insulin-treated patients with type II diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med. 1998;338:861866.
21.
Inzucchi SE, Maggs DG, Spollett GR, Page SL, Rife FS,
Walton V, Shulman GI. Efficacy and metabolic effects of
metformin and troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. N
Engl J Med. 1998;338:867872.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H Kaneda, T Shiono, Y Miyashita, S Takahashi, Y Taketani, H Domae, J Matsumi, S Mizuno, Y Minami, K Sugitatsu, et al. Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary stent implantation Heart, July 1, 2009; 95(13): 1079 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Hausman, S. P. Poulos, T. D. Pringle, and M. J. Azain The influence of thiazolidinediones on adipogenesis in vitro and in vivo: Potential modifiers of intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in meat animals J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E236 - E243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Taniguchi, T. Ooie, N. Takahashi, T. Shinohara, M. Nakagawa, H. Yonemochi, M. Hara, H. Yoshimatsu, and T. Saikawa Pioglitazone but not glibenclamide improves cardiac expression of heat shock protein 72 and tolerance against ischemia/reperfusion injury in the heredity insulin-resistant rat. Diabetes, August 1, 2006; 55(8): 2371 - 2378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Molavi, J. Chen, and J. L. Mehta Cardioprotective effects of rosiglitazone are associated with selective overexpression of type 2 angiotensin receptors and inhibition of p42/44 MAPK Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H687 - H693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rocic, B. Rezk, and P. A. Lucchesi PPAR-{gamma} agonists decrease hyperhomcysteinemia and cardiac dysfunction: new hope for ailing diabetic hearts? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H26 - H28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Verreth, J. Ganame, A. Mertens, H. Bernar, M.-C. Herregods, and P. Holvoet Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha},{gamma}-Agonist Improves Insulin Sensitivity and Prevents Loss of Left Ventricular Function in Obese Dyslipidemic Mice Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2006; 26(4): 922 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Berg, B. O. Christensen, S. Aagaard, T. B.N. Christensen, D. A. Steinbruchel, and J. M. Hasenkam Ischaemic preconditioning causes increased myocardial vascular resistance but no myocardial contractility changes in pigs after OPCAB Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2005; 4(3): 207 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abdelrahman, A. Sivarajah, and C. Thiemermann Beneficial effects of PPAR-{gamma} ligands in ischemia-reperfusion injury, inflammation and shock Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2005; 65(4): 772 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Schiffrin Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and cardiovascular remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1037 - H1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xu, M. Gen, L. Lu, J. Fox, S. O. Weiss, R. D. Brown, D. Perlov, H. Ahmad, P. Zhu, C. Greyson, et al. PPAR-{gamma} activation fails to provide myocardial protection in ischemia and reperfusion in pigs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1314 - H1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Masoudi, S. E. Inzucchi, Y. Wang, E. P. Havranek, J. M. Foody, and H. M. Krumholz Thiazolidinediones, Metformin, and Outcomes in Older Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: An Observational Study Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 583 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-L. Yue, W. Bao, J.-L. Gu, J. Cui, L. Tao, X.-L. Ma, E. H. Ohlstein, and B. M. Jucker Rosiglitazone Treatment in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats Is Associated With Ameliorated Cardiac Insulin Resistance and Protection From Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Myocardial Injury Diabetes, February 1, 2005; 54(2): 554 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-M. Lee and T.-F. Chou Troglitazone administration limits infarct size by reduced phosphorylation of canine myocardial connexin43 proteins Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1650 - H1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Schiffrin, F. Amiri, K. Benkirane, M. Iglarz, and Q. N. Diep Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors: Vascular and Cardiac Effects in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 664 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xu, L. Lu, C. Greyson, J. Lee, M. Gen, K. Kinugawa, C. S. Long, and G. G. Schwartz Deleterious Effects of Acute Treatment With a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Activator in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion in Pigs Diabetes, May 1, 2003; 52(5): 1187 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Kelly PPARs of the Heart: Three Is a Crowd Circ. Res., March 21, 2003; 92(5): 482 - 484. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Aasum, A. D. Hafstad, D. L. Severson, and T. S. Larsen Age-Dependent Changes in Metabolism, Contractile Function, and Ischemic Sensitivity in Hearts From db/db Mice Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 434 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Khandoudi, P. Delerive, I. Berrebi-Bertrand, R. E. Buckingham, B. Staels, and A. Bril Rosiglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma}, Inhibits the Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase/Activating Protein 1 Pathway and Protects the Heart From Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1507 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Sidell, M. A. Cole, N. J. Draper, M. Desrois, R. E. Buckingham, and K. Clarke Thiazolidinedione Treatment Normalizes Insulin Resistance and Ischemic Injury in the Zucker Fatty Rat Heart Diabetes, April 1, 2002; 51(4): 1110 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Molavi, N. Rasouli, and J. L. Mehta Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Ligands as Antiatherogenic Agents: Panacea or Another Pandora's Box? Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2002; 7(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-l. Yue, J. Chen, W. Bao, P. K. Narayanan, A. Bril, W. Jiang, P. G. Lysko, J.-L. Gu, R. Boyce, D. M. Zimmerman, et al. In Vivo Myocardial Protection From Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist Rosiglitazone Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2588 - 2594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Taegtmeyer Metabolism--the lost child of cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1386 - 1388. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |