(Circulation. 2000;101:e120.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
Is Acquired Activated Protein C Resistance a Cardiovascular Risk?
Hypertension Center Department of Internal Medicine, Cornell University Medical College/The New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
Research Institute National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 Top Introduction ReferencesIntroduction References |
|---|
To the Editor:
We have read the article by Kiechl et al1 demonstrating that acquired activated protein C resistance (APC) may be a risk factor for atherosclerosis and arterial thrombosis in whites. We2 previously demonstrated that acquired APC resistance is associated not only with venous thrombosis (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism) but also with arterial thrombotic disease (cerebral infarction and coronary artery disease) in the Japanese population. It is well known that no Japanese has factor V Leiden mutation because of the founder effect of this mutation.3 Thus, it is likely that in Japanese, some environmental factors might contribute to APC resistance. In addition, we demonstrated a positive association of APC sensitivity ratio with plasma levels of the activated form of factor VII (FVIIa, an activation marker of the early phase of the tissue factor pathway of coagulation4 in healthy subjects; correlation coefficient -0.38, P<0.05, n=33).2 This association was also found in subjects with a predisposing condition of thrombosis, namely, protein C deficiency (correlation coefficient -0.40, P<0.005, n=53). More recently, pregnancy-related APC resistance has also been reported5 to be associated with thrombin-antithrombin complex (an indicator of in vivo thrombin generation) (correlation coefficient with APC sensitivity ratio -0.274, P=0.01, n=128). Thus, the APC resistance may reflect the global insensitivity of APC and may provide a good method to assess the hypercoagulable state in vivo. The hypercoagulable state induced by acquired APC resistance should be given greater emphasis in clinical practice in the future.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionReferencesIntroduction References |
|---|
1. Kiechl S, Muigg A, Santer P, Mitterer M, Egger G, Oberhollenzer M, Oberhollenzer F, Mayr A, Gasperi A, Poewe W, Willeit J. Poor response to activated protein C as a prominent risk predictor of advanced atherosclerosis and arterial disease. Circulation. 1999;99:614–619.
2. Sakata T, Kario K, Katayama Y, Matsuyama T, Kato H, Miyata T. Clinical significance of activated protein C resistance as a potential marker for hypercoagulable state. Thromb Res. 1996;82:235–244.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Fujimura H, Kambayashi J, Monden M, Kato H, Miyata T. Coagulation factor V Leiden mutation may have a racial background. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74:1381–1382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kario K, Sakata T, Matsuo T, Miyata T. Factor VII in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Lancet. 1993;342:1552. Letter.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Clark P, Walker ID, Greer I. Acquired activated protein-C resistance in pregnancy and association with increased thrombin generation and fetal weight. Lancet. 1999;353:292–293.
Response
Department of Neurology, University Clinic Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionReferencesIntroduction References |
|---|
Kario et al emphasized the significance of acquired activated protein C (APC) resistance in arterial diseases and established some links to other coagulation abnormalities. This issue is relevant to a better understanding of thrombotic disorders and deserves further comment.
In the Bruneck study,R1 insensitivity to APC not caused by the Leiden mutation emerged as a strong risk predictor of advanced atherosclerosis and arterial disease. This finding was not unexpected given the well-established association between APC resistance and arterial/venous thrombosis in nonwhite populations in which factor V mutations are particularly rare or even absent.R2 Until recently, however, the condition of factor V mutation–independent APC resistance has attracted only minor attention in clinical research. In 1998, Sampram and colleaguesR3 were the first to report an increased risk of peripheral artery disease in patients with APC resistance but no gene mutation. The Bruneck studyR1 extended these findings to other types of vascular disease and atherosclerosis in general. In the past months, the issue was also settled for venous thrombosis. Two large surveysR4 R5 consistently observed an increased risk of venous thromboembolism among subjects with APC resistance but no factor V Leiden. In the Bruneck cohort, 57 subjects experienced venous thrombosis. APC resistance with and without the factor V mutation was observed in 9% of patients each, and both conditions afforded an increased risk of disease status (OR 3.8 and 3.3, P<0.05).
Prevalence of phenotypic APC resistance without detectable gene
mutation was underestimated from previous case-control studies. In the
Bruneck study,R1 which is representative of
the general community in central Europe, this condition was at least as
frequent as the Leiden mutation itself. In the population-based Vicenza
Thrombophilia Project, the factor V mutation and n-APC ratios
0.84, which conferred a significantly increased thrombosis risk,
occurred at a ratio of 1:4.R5
All studies in concert provide substantial evidence of a prominent role of an inadequate protein C pathway in all kinds of thrombotic diseases. The factor V mutation is only one facet of this association. We agree with Kario et al that the time has come to recommend the use of functional APC assays in the risk evaluation of subjects with venous/arterial thrombosis. When doing so, one should be aware of the potential influences that the acute phase reaction evoked by severe illness and infections can have on APC ratios and, if applicable, consider remeasurement at a later date for the purpose of confirmation.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionReferencesIntroduction References |
|---|
1. Kiechl S, Muigg A, Santer P, Mitterer M, Egger G, Oberhollenzer M, Oberhollenzer F, Mayr A, Gasperi A, Poewe W, Willeit J. Poor response to activated protein C as a prominent risk predictor of advanced atherosclerosis and arterial disease. Circulation. 1999;99:614–619.
2. Sakata T, Kario K, Katayama Y, Matsuyama T, Kato H, Miyata T. Clinical significance of activated protein C resistance as a potential marker for hypercoagulable state. Thromb Res. 1996;82:235–244.
3. Sampram ES, Lindblad B, Dahlback B. Activated protein C resistance in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:624–629.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
De Visser MC, Rosendaal FR, Bertina RM. A reduced
sensitivity for activated protein C in the absence of factor V
Leiden increases the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood. 1999;93:1271–1276.
5.
Rodeghiero F, Tosetto A. Activated protein C
resistance and factor V Leiden mutation are independent risk factors
for venous thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:643–650.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||