(Circulation. 2000;101:2034.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the University of North Carolina (J.E.W., C.C.P., M.L.E., H.A.T.), Chapel Hill, NC; Duke University Medical Center (I.C.S.), Durham, NC; and Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (F.J.N.).
Correspondence to Janice E. Williams, PhD, MPH, Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, 137 E Franklin St, Suite 306, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. E-mail janice.williams{at}sph.unc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThis study examined prospectively the association between trait anger and the risk of combined CHD (acute myocardial infarction [MI]/fatal CHD, silent MI, or cardiac revascularization procedures) and of "hard" events (acute MI/fatal CHD). Participants were 12 986 black and white men and women enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities study. In the entire cohort, individuals with high trait anger, compared with their low anger counterparts, were at increased risk of CHD in both event categories. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) was 1.54 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.16) for combined CHD and 1.75 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.64) for "hard" events. Heterogeneity of effect was observed by hypertensive status. Among normotensive individuals, the risk of combined CHD and of "hard" events increased monotonically with increasing levels of trait anger. The multivariate-adjusted HR of CHD for high versus low anger was 2.20 (95% CI 1.36 to 3.55) and for moderate versus low anger was 1.32 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.84). For "hard" events, the multivariate-adjusted HRs were 2.69 (95% CI 1.48 to 4.90) and 1.35 (95% CI 0.87 to 2.10), respectively. No statistically significant association between trait anger and incident CHD risk was observed among hypertensive individuals.
ConclusionsProneness to anger places normotensive middle-aged men and women at significant risk for CHD morbidity and death independent of the established biological risk factors.
Key Words: coronary disease stress epidemiology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies have linked this personality attribute to CHD risk factors. Johnson et al,7 in cross-sectional analyses, showed that trait anger was positively associated with the LDL/HDL ratio and triglyceride levels. Durel et al8 reported a positive association between trait anger and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and between trait anger and cardiovascular reactivity. In a prospective analysis, Markovitz et al9 demonstrated that increases in trait anger predicted increases in blood pressure from baseline to 3 years of follow-up. Although these studies support a positive relation between trait anger and CHD risk factors, there are no published studies of the association between trait anger and incident CHD events.
The prospective association between anger (of any type) and CHD was described initially by investigators from the Framingham Heart Study, who reported that suppressed anger independently predicted the 8-year incidence of CHD among both men and women.10 More recently, Kawachi et al5 examined whether problems controlling ones anger would predict CHD events among men in the Normative Aging Study. The investigators reported a 3-fold increase in CHD risk among individuals with the greatest difficulty controlling their anger as compared with those with the least. Additionally, they found a dose-response relation between the degree of difficulty with anger control and CHD risk and shorter CHD-free survival among participants with increasingly greater anger control problems.
The present study investigated, in a prospective design, the association of trait anger to CHD risk in a large bi-ethnic cohort of middle- to older-aged men and women enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study.11 We assessed whether there was a dose-response relation between level of anger and CHD risk, whether the probability of CHD-free survival differed depending on the level of anger, and whether the trait angerCHD association differed by hypertensive status.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 14 348 individuals examined at the second visit (a return rate of 92.9% from baseline to the second clinic visit), 13 208 were free of clinically manifest CHD (defined as having no history of MI or cardiac revascularization procedures or ECG evidence of MI). Excluded from the analyses were 38 individuals with a racial/ethnic identity other than black or white; 40 with missing data on hypertensive status; and 144 with incomplete responses on the anger questionnaire. After these sequential exclusions, a total of 12 986 participants remained for the current analyses.
Assessment of Trait Anger
During the second clinical examination, participants completed
the Health-Life Profile, which contained the 10-item Spielberger Trait
Anger Scale.6 On this scale, respondents rated their
typical experience with anger on a 4-point anchor: Almost Never=1,
Sometimes=2, Often=3, and Almost Always=4. An overall anger score was
obtained by summing each of the individual items. See the Appendix for
the questionnaire items.
Assessment of CHD Risk Factors
All physiological measurements and
laboratory assessments were made by trained technicians who used
standardized protocols. Three sitting blood pressure measurements were
taken after a 5-minute rest period with the use of a random-zero
sphygmomanometer. The average of the second and third readings was used
as the measure of blood pressure reported in this study. Hypertension
was defined as diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg,
systolic blood pressure
140 mm Hg, or use within the
past 2 weeks of medication to lower blood pressure. HDL
cholesterol was measured enzymatically after precipitation
of LDL-containing proteins using dextran-magnesium. LDL
cholesterol was calculated with the use of the Friedewald
formula. Diabetes was defined as a fasting serum glucose level
140
mg/dL and/or a history of diabetes, insulin therapy, or oral
hypoglycemic medication use. Waist-to-hip ratio was the ratio of waist
girth, abdominal circumference measured at the umbilicus, to hip girth,
measured at the maximal gluteal protrusion. Data on alcohol
consumption, cigarette smoking, and level of educational attainment
were obtained by self-report. Participants were asked to bring all
medication (prescription and over-the-counter) taken within the 2 weeks
immediately preceding the clinic visit. Each medication was coded by
trained and certified interviewers with the use of a computerized
medication classification system.
CHD Events
Incident CHD events reported in this study occurred in the
follow-up period from the participants clinic visit in 1990 to 1992
through December 31, 1995, for a median of 53 months (maximum 72). An
incident CHD event was defined as one of the following: acute MI/fatal
CHD, silent MI, or cardiac revascularization
procedure. Hospital CHD events were identified and validated through
abstraction of death certificates and hospital discharge summaries.
Data gathered on in-hospital events included presenting symptoms,
ECG readings, cardiac enzyme levels, and other supportive
diagnostic indicators. A maximum of three 12-lead ECG
tracings were read by the University of Minnesota ECG Reading Center,
with the use of the Minnesota code. The criteria for MI were based on a
combination of chest pain, cardiac enzymes, ECG changes, and autopsy
findings. Diagnoses were made with the use of a computerized algorithm
and physician review system. Additional information was gathered on
out-of-hospital deaths from the decedents next of kin and appropriate
physicians and/or the coroners or medical examiners report. The
CHD diagnostic classification was assigned by 2 physicians
on the ARIC morbidity and mortality classification committee;
discrepancies in the diagnostic classification were
adjudicated by a third panel member. A more detailed description of the
quality control procedures used in the ascertainment of CHD events has
been reported previously.12
Statistical Analyses
The overall anger score (a numeric score of 10 to 40) was coded
as a 3-level categoric variable in which scores of 22 to 40 defined
high trait anger, 15 to 21 moderate anger, and 10 to 14 low anger. The
cut-points were comparable to those used in previously published work
with the Spielberger scale.13 14 The main regression
analyses were fit by the use of 3 different methods of handling
missing values on the anger scale to determine the most appropriate
strategy: (1) deleting all observations with missing values, (2)
imputing a value of 1 for all missing values, and (3) imputing the
average for a participants nonmissing responses. Because the results
from all 3 methods were similar, the analyses were restricted
to observations with complete trait anger protocols. The association
between trait anger and incident CHD was determined with the use of Cox
proportional hazards regression, in which anger was entered into the
model as an indicator variable. Heterogeneity of
effect was examined by each of 11 covariates: age, race/ethnicity, sex,
educational level, HDL cholesterol level, LDL
cholesterol level, hypertensive status, diabetes status,
smoking status, and alcohol drinking status; only interaction with
hypertensive status was statistically significant
(
2(2 df)=5.91,
P=0.05). The regression analyses were stratified by
hypertensive status to test the hypothesis that persons with
hypertension would be less likely to demonstrate an association between
trait anger and incident CHD. The models were fit separately for
combined CHD and for "hard" events, adjusting first for age, and
second for the additional covariates. To assess the presence of a
linear trend in CHD risk, anger was entered into each regression
equation as a continuous variable. Crude probabilities of CHD
event-free survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier
product-limit method. When building the survival curves, deaths
from all other causes were censored at the date of death.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In the entire cohort, the age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of CHD (95% CI) was 1.73 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.40) for high versus low trait anger and 1.12 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.38) for moderate versus low anger. The corresponding multivariate-adjusted HRs were 1.54 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.16) and 1.10 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.36). Similarly, the age-adjusted HR for "hard" events was 1.75 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.64) for high versus low trait anger and 1.04 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.35) for moderate versus low anger. The corresponding multivariate-adjusted HRs were 1.63 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.48) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.43).
No racial/ethnic differences were found in the risk of incident CHD as the result of trait anger when this association was adjusted for the traditional CHD risk factors. Among whites, the age-adjusted relative hazard for combined CHD and for "hard" events was statistically significant, but when adjusted for the additional covariates, these results did not remain significant [1.51 (95% CI 0.88 to 2.59) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.23)]. Among blacks, neither the age- nor the multivariate-adjusted results were significant.
In contrast to the racial/ethnic comparisons, there were statistically
significant differences in the hazard ratios for the association of
trait anger and incident CHD among normotensive and hypertensive cohort
members. Results of the proportional hazards regression models for both
groups are presented in Table 2
.
Among normotensive individuals, the risk of combined CHD and of
"hard" events increased monotonically as a function of trait anger.
For combined CHD, the age-adjusted HR indicated that high anger scorers
were 2.61 times more likely to have an event than low anger scorers. In
addition, a 40% greater risk was observed among moderate compared with
low anger scorers (probability value for linear trend 0.0006), although
this HR was marginally significant. The relative risks were attenuated
slightly after multivariate adjustment, but the
patterns of risk and significance levels remained strong. The
age-adjusted relative risk of high versus low anger for "hard"
events was higher than that for combined CHD and similar for moderate
versus low anger (probability value for linear trend 0.01). Again, the
multivariate-adjusted point estimates for this subgroup
were attenuated but remained significant (probability value for linear
trend 0.02). These results indicate that the risk of "hard" events
among high anger normotensive individuals, excluding those with only
revascularization or silent myocardial infarction
(MI), was nearly 3 times that of their low anger counterparts. Among
hypertensive individuals, none of the HRs was statistically
significant. In both CHD event categories, the pattern of risk for the
age- and multivariate-adjusted models was similar.
|
The probability of CHD event-free survival was significantly lower
among hypertensive than normotensive individuals
(
2(1 df)=71.6,
P<0.0001). Among normotensives, the results of the log
likelihood ratio tests indicated that CHD event-free survival differed
significantly among high, moderate, and low anger scorers
(
2(2 df)=13.7,
P=0.001) (Figure 1
). The
probability of CHD event-free survival was significantly lower among
individuals reporting high trait anger compared with those reporting
low anger (
2(1
df)=15.2, P=0.0001) and compared with
those reporting moderate anger (
2(1
df)=8.0, P=0.005). Moderate anger
scorers were marginally different from low scorers
(
2(1 df)=3.5,
P=0.06). High, moderate, and low anger scorers among
hypertensive individuals did not differ significantly in their
probability of CHD event-free survival (
2(2 df)=0.8, P=0.66)
(Figure 2
).
|
|
Because of heterogeneity of effect by hypertensive
status, additional analyses were conducted to better understand
the possible impact of medication use and blood pressure levels on the
results obtained. As expected,
2
analyses indicated that significantly more hypertensive than
normotensive individuals used ß-adrenergic antagonists
(ß-blockers), calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors,
diuretics, and other antihypertensive medication
(P=0.001). Hypertensive individuals were examined to
determine whether medication use was related to trait anger status or
to the incidence of CHD. High, moderate, and low anger scorers were
significantly different from one another in their use of antianxiety
(P<0.01) and antidepressant (P=0.033) medication
but not in their use of antihypertensive agents (probability value
range 0.16 to 0.78). A similar pattern was observed among normotensive
individuals. Further, the association between medication use and the
incidence of CHD among hypertensive individuals was statistically
significant for calcium channel blockers [HR=1.84 (95% CI 1.36 to
2.50)] and ACE inhibitors [1.58 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.15)]
but not for ß-blockers [1.29 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.73], aspirin [0.88
(95% CI 0.65 to 1.19)], diuretics [0.97 (95% CI 0.74 to
1.26)], other antihypertensives [0.93 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.32),
antianxiety agents [0.72 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.27)] or antidepressants
[1.38 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.29)]. Entering medication use in the
multivariate-adjusted regression model did not
substantially affect the HRs [0.99 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.67) and 0.87
(95% CI 0.64 to 1.19)] for high and moderate trait anger,
respectively. Medication data were complete for 87.9% of the study
participants.
The anger-CHD relation was examined among participants who were not
taking antihypertensive medication but in whom high blood pressure
levels (systolic blood pressure
140 or diastolic
blood pressure
90) were observed (n=1094). The
multivariate-adjusted HR comparing high to low anger
scorers was 0.65 (95% CI 0.22 to 1.93), indicating no significant
association between CHD and trait anger. In contrast, a significant
anger-CHD association was observed among normotensive individuals who
were not taking antihypertensive medications [2.35 (95% CI 1.43 to
3.86)].
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The precise biological mechanism and process by which anger influences CHD is yet to be clarified. One hypothesis is that the heightened sympathetic arousal and catecholamine secretion induced by anger are damaging to the heart and its vasculature and also play a role in the development of atherosclerotic lesions. Excessive circulating catecholamines (eg, epinephrine and norepinephrine) are known to cause direct damage to the endothelium and heart muscle15 16 and to disrupt the electrical rhythm of the heart.17 Further, studies have confirmed that the presence of catecholamines is associated with increased platelet adhesion and aggregation,18 lipid mobilization,19 and activation of macrophages,20 each of which has been implicated in the complex process of atherogenesis, stemming from endothelial injury and ending in the formation of atherosclerotic lesions.21
Evidence supports a direct relation between the rupture of atherosclerotic plaque, occlusive thrombosis, and the onset of acute MI.22 23 Increased attention is being paid to possible triggers of the sequence of events leading to MI because it has been demonstrated that these acute coronary syndromes do not occur randomly.24 25 Anger has been examined and found to be one such trigger.1 26 The relation is underestood from the framework of the triggering hypothesis in which anger can be viewed as a trigger of "acute risk factors" that in turn disrupt vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques.27 Acute risk factors are the physiological responses (eg, vasoconstriction, increased arterial pressure, increased platelet adhesion and aggregability, increased plasma coagulation, and fibrinolysis) that occur in close temporal proximity to an event and are responsible for the disruption of atherosclerotic plaque and the formation of an occlusive thrombus.27 When the disruption causes injury to the intimal and medial layers of the artery (type III lesion), occlusive thrombosis results and, within a brief period of time, acute MI or sudden death.27 28
The observed lack of association between anger and CHD risk among hypertensive individuals might have been due to the cardioprotective effects of medications that lower CHD morbidity and mortality rates. As expected, hypertensive individuals were found to use significantly more ß-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and other antihypertensive agents than normotensive individuals. These medications, by preventing physiological responses such as vasoconstriction, thrombus formation, cardiac arrhythmias, and plaque disruption, might have forestalled a CHD event in hypertensive individuals who took them regularly. Two previous studies of the anger-CHD relation examined possible effect modification by the use of ß-blockers and obtained contradictory results.1 5 One study found a lower risk of CHD among regular users and the second did not. Effect modification by aspirin use was also examined in those studies. In both, CHD risk was lower among aspirin users than among nonusers. Though we did not assess effect modification of CHD risk by aspirin use, the groups of hypertensive individuals and normotensive individuals in our study had similar proportions of individuals who took aspirin regularly.
We examined participants who were not taking antihypertensive medication but in whom blood pressure levels were high. Among them, we found no significant CHD risk associated with anger. Therefore, an alternative explanation for the lack of an observed anger-CHD association among hypertensive individuals may be that proneness to anger confers little or no additional CHD risk among individuals with high blood pressure, despite their medication use.
A strength of the present study is its prospective design. Because participants were free of clinically manifest CHD at baseline, the temporal ambiguity in the anger-CHD relation was virtually eliminated. Another strength of this study is that it is population-based, consisting of both black and white participants. To our knowledge, this is the first bi-ethnic, prospective study of the relation of anger to CHD, and in our study no racial/ethnic differences were observed. In addition, a relatively large number of events occurred in the observation period, and these events were validated according to standardized criteria. The classification of disease was based on data abstraction from medical records and discharge summaries, which, admittedly, is a process subject to error depending on the completeness and accuracy of data contained in the records. Another potential weakness of this study is the relatively marginal probability value of the hypertension interaction (P=0.05) in reference to the multiple stratifications that were conducted. However, this interaction is rather strong (despite the marginal probability value), as indicated by the nearly 3-fold increase in incident CHD risk in normotensives, while the association is entirely absent in individuals with hypertension.
In conclusion, these findings suggest that in addition to any adverse personal and social consequences that may accrue from having frequent and intense anger, there may be unfavorable cardiovascular-related outcomes as well. Anger proneness as a personality trait may place normotensive middle-aged men and women at significant risk for CHD morbidity and death independent of the established biological risk factors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(2) I have a fiery temper.
(3) I am a hotheaded person.
(4) I get angry when I am slowed down by others mistakes.
(5) I feel annoyed when I am not given recognition for doing good work.
(6) I fly off the handle.
(7) When I get angry, I say nasty things.
(8) It makes me furious when I am criticized in front of others.
(9) When I get frustrated, I feel like hitting someone.
(10) I feel infuriated when I do a good job and get a poor evaluation.
Received August 18, 1999; revision received November 20, 1999; accepted December 1, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ohira, A. V. D. Roux, R. J. Prineas, M. A. Kizilbash, M. R. Carnethon, and A. R. Folsom Associations of Psychosocial Factors With Heart Rate and Its Short-Term Variability: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Psychosom Med, February 1, 2008; 70(2): 141 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Player, D. E. King, A. G. Mainous III, and M. E. Geesey Psychosocial Factors and Progression From Prehypertension to Hypertension or Coronary Heart Disease Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2007; 5(5): 403 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Williams, D. J. Couper, R. Din-Dzietham, F. J. Nieto, and A. R. Folsom Race-Gender Differences in the Association of Trait Anger with Subclinical Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 165(11): 1296 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Golden, S. Malhotra, G. S. Wand, F. L. Brancati, D. Ford, and K. Horton Adrenal Gland Volume and Dexamethasone-Suppressed Cortisol Correlate with Total Daily Salivary Cortisol in African-American Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 1358 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Rebollo and D. I. Boomsma Genetic and Environmental Influences on Type A Behavior Pattern: Evidence From Twins and Their Parents in The Netherlands Twin Register Psychosom Med, May 1, 2006; 68(3): 437 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wattanakit, J. E Williams, P. J Schreiner, A. T Hirsch, and A. R Folsom Association of anger proneness, depression and low social support with peripheral arterial disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2005; 10(3): 199 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Vale Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular diseases Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2005; 81(957): 429 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Kubzansky, K. W. Davidson, and A. Rozanski The Clinical Impact of Negative Psychological States: Expanding the Spectrum of Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Psychosom Med, May 1, 2005; 67(Supplement_1): S10 - S14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rauschhuber, J. Lowry, A. Etnyre, I. Gilliland, R. Sethness, J. Sorensen, L. Leos, J. Cook, and M. E. Jones Hispanic and Female College Students: Evidence for Increased Risk for Cardiac Disease Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, January 1, 2005; 4(1): 34 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, R. Trivedi, F. Treiber, and H. Snieder Genetic and Environmental Influences on Anger Expression, John Henryism, and Stressful Life Events: The Georgia Cardiovascular Twin Study Psychosom Med, January 1, 2005; 67(1): 16 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Denollet DS14: Standard Assessment of Negative Affectivity, Social Inhibition, and Type D Personality Psychosom Med, January 1, 2005; 67(1): 89 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Raikkonen, K. A. Matthews, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, and L. H. Kuller Trait Anger and the Metabolic Syndrome Predict Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Healthy Middle-Aged Women Psychosom Med, November 1, 2004; 66(6): 903 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Peters, S. von Klot, M. Heier, I. Trentinaglia, A. Hormann, H. E. Wichmann, H. Lowel, and the Cooperative Health Research in the Region of A Exposure to Traffic and the Onset of Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., October 21, 2004; 351(17): 1721 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dong, W. H. Giles, V. J. Felitti, S. R. Dube, J. E. Williams, D. P. Chapman, and R. F. Anda Insights Into Causal Pathways for Ischemic Heart Disease: Adverse Childhood Experiences Study Circulation, September 28, 2004; 110(13): 1761 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Bleil, J. M. McCaffery, M. F. Muldoon, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, and S. B. Manuck Anger-Related Personality Traits and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis in Untreated Hypertensive Men Psychosom Med, September 1, 2004; 66(5): 633 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Eaker, L. M. Sullivan, M. Kelly-Hayes, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, and E. J. Benjamin Anger and Hostility Predict the Development of Atrial Fibrillation in Men in the Framingham Offspring Study Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1267 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Llabre, S. Spitzer, S. Siegel, P. G. Saab, and N. Schneiderman Applying Latent Growth Curve Modeling to the Investigation of Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Recovery From Stress Psychosom Med, January 1, 2004; 66(1): 29 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. M. H. Strik, J. Denollet, R. Lousberg, and A. Honig Comparing symptoms of depression and anxiety as predictors of cardiac events and increased health care consumption after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1801 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P McCarron, D Gunnell, G L Harrison, M Okasha, and G Davey Smith Temperament in young adulthood and later mortality: prospective observational study J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2003; 57(11): 888 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Williams, J. C. Barefoot, and N. Schneiderman Psychosocial Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: More Than One Culprit at Work JAMA, October 22, 2003; 290(16): 2190 - 2192. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Magai, M.-D. Kerns, M. Gillespie, and B. Huang Anger Experience and Anger Inhibition in Sub-Populations of African American and European American Older Adults and Relation to Circulatory Disease J Health Psychol, July 1, 2003; 8(4): 413 - 432. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Eng, G. Fitzmaurice, L. D. Kubzansky, E. B. Rimm, and I. Kawachi Anger Expression and Risk of Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease Among Male Health Professionals Psychosom Med, January 1, 2003; 65(1): 100 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Markovitz Resolved: Psychosocial Interventions Can Improve Clinical Outcomes in Organic Disease--Moderator Introduction Psychosom Med, July 1, 2002; 64(4): 549 - 551. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Williams and N. Schneiderman Resolved: Psychosocial Interventions Can Improve Clinical Outcomes in Organic Disease (Pro) Psychosom Med, July 1, 2002; 64(4): 552 - 557. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|