Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:2160-2164

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v102,p142)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O., III
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*(L)-ARGININE
*NITRIC OXIDE
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2000;101:2160.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Oral L-Arginine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease on Medical Management

Arnon Blum, MD; Londa Hathaway, RN; Rita Mincemoyer, RN; William H. Schenke, BA; Martha Kirby, BA; Gyorgy Csako, MD; Myron A. Waclawiw, PhD; Julio A. Panza, MD; Richard O. Cannon, III, MD

From the Cardiology (A.B., L.H., R.M., W.H.S., J.A.P., R.O.C.) and Hematology (M.K.) Branches and the Office of Biostatistics Research (M.A.W.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and the Clinical Pathology Department (G.C.), Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence to Richard O. Cannon III, MD, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 7B15, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1650, Bethesda, MD 20892-1650. E-mail cannonr{at}nih.gov


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Vascular nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability is reduced in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated whether oral L-arginine, the substrate for NO synthesis, improves homeostatic functions of the vascular endothelium in patients maintained on appropriate medical therapy and thus might be useful as adjunctive therapy.

Methods and Results—Thirty CAD patients (29 men; age, 67±8 years) on appropriate medical management were randomly assigned to L-arginine (9 g) or placebo daily for 1 month, with crossover to the alternate therapy after 1 month off therapy, in a double-blind study. Nitrogen oxides in serum (as an index of endothelial NO release), flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (as an index of vascular NO bioactivity), and serum cell adhesion molecules (as an index of NO-regulated markers of inflammation) were measured at the end of each treatment period. L-Arginine significantly increased arginine levels in plasma (130±53 versus 70±17 µmol/L, P<0.001) compared with placebo. However, there was no effect of L-arginine on nitrogen oxides (19.3±7.9 versus 18.6±6.7 µmol/L, P=0.546), on flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (11.9±6.3% versus 11.4±7.9%, P=0.742), or on the cell adhesion molecules E-selectin (47.8±15.2 versus 47.2±14.4 ng/mL, P=0.601), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (250±57 versus 249±57 ng/mL, P=0.862), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (567±124 versus 574±135 ng/mL, P=0.473).

Conclusions—Oral L-arginine therapy does not improve NO bioavailability in CAD patients on appropriate medical management and thus may not benefit this group of patients.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • coronary disease • endothelium • nitric oxide


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The coronary response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine is depressed in patients with coronary artery disease, as it is in patients with early atherosclerosis or even with risk factors for atherosclerosis despite normal-appearing coronary angiograms.1 2 3 4 5 Basal and acetylcholine-stimulated release of nitric oxide (NO) from the endothelium is reduced in these patients,5 which could be due either to depressed synthesis of NO or to excess degradation of NO by reactive oxygen species to biologically inert or even toxic molecules. L-Arginine is a semiessential amino acid that serves as the substrate for the enzyme NO synthase, which converts arginine to citrulline and NO.6 Normally, L-arginine is not rate limiting in this reaction; the Km for NO synthase is in the micromolar range, whereas intracellular levels of arginine are in the millimolar range. Under certain conditions, however, L-arginine administration can improve endothelium-dependent dilator responsiveness. Thus, after intracoronary infusion of L-arginine in patients with coronary artery disease, constrictor responses of epicardial arteries to acetylcholine were converted to dilator responses and flow responses to this agonist were improved.7 8 9 10 11

Practical application of L-arginine therapy over time requires oral administration, which has been shown to improve brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, an index of NO bioactivity,12 in hypercholesterolemic subjects13 and coronary blood flow responses to acetylcholine in patients without significant coronary disease.14 Furthermore, benefit of L-arginine therapy might be additive to that of appropriate medical management previously determined to improve morbidity and mortality risk of patients with coronary artery disease.15 In this regard, oral administration of L-arginine 6 g/d for 3 days improved exercise duration of 12 coronary artery disease patients on medical management, but the mechanism of therapeutic benefit was not determined.16 We therefore reasoned that oral administration of L-arginine could improve endothelium-dependent dilator responsiveness and other homeostatic properties of the vasculature potentially regulated by NO in patients with coronary artery disease who are otherwise appropriately managed with medical therapy.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Selection
Thirty-five patients (33 men; average age 67±8 years, range 48 to 78 years) with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (>70% stenosis in >=1 coronary artery at the time of diagnostic catheterization) were enrolled in this study. All patients were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II and continued taking medications throughout the study: aspirin (n=33), HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) (n=18), ß-blockers (n=18), calcium channel blockers (n=10), ACE or angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor inhibitors (n=8), nonstatin lipid-lowering agents (n=5), and chronic nitrates (n=3). All patients took sublingual nitrates as needed for angina pectoris. Three patients were taking oral hypoglycemic agents for diabetes mellitus. Ten patients had ischemic ST-segment depression during treadmill exercise. No patient had symptoms of heart failure or evidence of depressed left ventricular function (<40% ejection fraction determined by radionuclide angiography or echocardiography), recent (within 6 months) myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, or hypertension (blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg even after taking blood pressure medications). Two patients decided not to participate in the study after enrollment, 2 patients dropped out of the study during the L-arginine treatment phase because of nausea and stomach cramps, and 1 patient died suddenly after completion of the placebo phase (first phase of study). Thus, 30 patients completed the study. Their lipid profile on medications was as follows: total cholesterol 188±31 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol 115±31 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol 42±9 mg/dL, and triglycerides 146±96 mg/dL. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and all participants gave written informed consent.

Study Design
Patients were randomized to L-arginine 9 g (3 g 3 times a day with meals) or identical placebo capsules 3 times a day with meals, each for 1 month with 1 month off therapy before crossover to the alternate treatment. All patients were placed on a nitrate-restricted diet for 72 hours before each study to reduce the contribution of dietary nitrates to serum nitrogen oxides.17 After an overnight fast (except for water), patients returned to the clinical center for blood drawing and vascular studies at the end of each treatment period.

Laboratory Assays
Blood samples were coded so that investigators performing assays were blinded to patient identity and study sequence. Plasma and serum were separated by centrifugation and stored at -80°C until analysis. Arginine was measured in plasma by ion-exchange chromatography (Mayo Medical Laboratories). Growth hormone was determined in serum by a 2-site chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay (Immulite, DPC). Insulin was measured in serum with a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx, Abbott Laboratories). Nitrogen oxide levels were measured in serum by a chemiluminescent technique (Sievers Instruments, Inc). C-reactive protein (2-site chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay; sensitivity 0.01 mg/dL; Immulite, DPC), interleukin-6 (sandwich enzyme immunoassay, R&D Systems, Inc), tissue factor (enzyme-linked immunoassay, American Diagnostica, Inc), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (sandwich enzyme-linked immunoassay, Biopool) were measured as markers of vascular inflammation. The cell adhesion molecules E-selectin, P-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassays (R&D Systems, Inc) as markers of inflammation that are modulated in tissue culture experiments by NO.18

To further detect an effect of L-arginine on inflammation, blood samples for flow cytometry were processed to prepare leukocytes for immunofluorescence measurements with the Coulter Q-Prep workstation (Beckman Coulter Corp). Expression of the following integrin adhesion molecules was measured on monocytes, lymphocytes, and granulocytes: LFA-1 (DC11a), Mac-1 (CD11b), and VLA-4 (CD49d), as well as the selectin adhesion molecule L-selectin (CD62L).19 All monoclonal antibodies to cell-surface adhesion molecules were directly conjugated to FITC and were obtained from Immunotech (Beckman Coulter Corp). Flow cytometry was performed with the EPICS XL-MCL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Corp) equipped with a 15-mW, 488-nm argon ion laser. A total of >=50 000 events per sample were analyzed. The lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes were electronically isolated by a collection of a dual-parameter histogram of size and granularity (forward-angle light scatter versus log 90° light scatter). Fluorescence intensity of the measured adhesion molecule was expressed as mean channel units. Relative FITC log fluorescence was calculated with the histogram data. Flow cytometry settings remained constant for all data generated, and standard beads were used to calibrate the instrument.

Vascular Studies
Imaging studies of the left brachial artery were performed with a high-resolution ultrasound Hewlett-Packard 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer after 30 minutes of rest, based on the technique reported by Celermajer et al.20 After the clearest view of the brachial artery was found, the skin was marked and the arm kept in the same position throughout the study. Baseline measurements included brachial artery diameter and flow velocity measured by pulsed Doppler, with the range gate (1.5 mm) in the center of the artery. The system permitted a direct assessment of the angle between the bloodstream and the intersecting ultrasound beam, which was then used to calculate blood flow velocity. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by measurement of the change in diameter of the brachial artery during reactive hyperemia created by an inflated cuff (250 mm Hg for 5 minutes) on the forearm. After cuff deflation, flow velocity was measured for the first 15 seconds, and arterial diameter was recorded continually for the next 60 seconds. Fifteen minutes later, repeat baseline diameter and flow velocity measurements were made, followed by nitroglycerin spray (0.4 mg) under the tongue to assess endothelium-independent vasodilation. Three minutes later, arterial diameter and flow velocity measurements were recorded. Arterial diameter was measured in millimeters from the artery-blood interface on both the anterior and posterior walls, coincident with the R waves on the ECG, at 2 sites along the artery for the 3 cardiac cycles, with these 6 measurements averaged. During hyperemia, 6 measurements of arterial diameter were averaged during maximum dilation between 50 and 70 seconds after cuff deflation. We calculated blood flow by multiplying the velocity-time integral of the Doppler flow signal by the heart rate and the cross-sectional area of the vessel.

Reproducibility of Study Parameters
In a recently published study21 of 28 healthy postmenopausal women who underwent studies while not taking any hormone or other therapies on 3 occasions, each separated by 12 weeks, we computed coefficients of variation for study parameters as the square root of the pooled within-subject variance divided by the mean of the averages over all subjects for each parameter: flow-mediated brachial artery dilation 0.623; nitrogen oxides 0.365; E-selectin 0.226;, ICAM-1 0.159; and VCAM-1 0.178.

Statistical Analysis
Measurements are expressed as mean±SD. The 2-sided paired Student’s t test was used to compare changes in vascular responses and laboratory values between L-arginine and placebo treatments, with P<0.05 an indicator of statistical significance. The primary study comparison predefined in advance of data collection was flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery with L-arginine treatment compared with placebo. All other comparisons were regarded as secondary, and no adjustments to probability value for multiple comparisons were performed.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effects of L-Arginine on Vasomotor Function
L-arginine therapy nearly doubled arginine levels in plasma (130±53 versus 70±17 µmol/L, P<0.001) compared with placebo. Evidence of a pharmacological response to L-arginine was shown by trends toward increases in serum levels of growth hormone (0.68±1.30 versus 0.44±0.79 mg/L, P=0.193) and insulin (14.1±8.5 versus 11.5±6.6 µU/mL, P=0.140). However, there were no significant differences in serum nitrogen oxides (19.3±7.9 versus 18.6±6.7 µmol/L, P=0.546), and there was no effect of L-arginine treatment on brachial artery diameters, flow-mediated dilation, or nitroglycerin-induced dilation (Table 1Down). In our study of 30 patients, we could detect as statistically significant a true treatment difference in flow-mediated dilation of >=4.2% between L-arginine and placebo treatment with a 2-sided paired t test at {alpha}=0.05 and 80% power.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of L-Arginine on Brachial Artery Endothelial Function

Effects of L-Arginine on Markers of Inflammation
There was no effect of L-arginine on serum levels of the cell adhesion molecules E-selectin (47.8±15.2 versus 47.2±14.4 ng/mL, P=0.601), P-selectin (98.2±30.5 versus 94.6±28.8 ng/mL, P=0.193), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1; 250±57 versus 249±57 ng/mL, P=0.86), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1; 567±124 versus 574±135 ng/mL, P=0.26) compared with placebo. Other markers of inflammation were likewise unaltered by L-arginine therapy: interleukin-6 (4.41 versus 4.76 pg/mL, P=0.588), C-reactive protein (0.40±0.34 versus 0.36±0.27 mg/dL, P=0.579), tissue factor antigen (232.6±135.6 versus 252.9±175.9 pg/mL, P=0.228), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen (27.2±16.6 versus 30.7±18.6 ng/mL, P=0.194). There was no effect of L-arginine on the expression of cell adhesion molecules on circulating inflammatory cells (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effects of L-Arginine on Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression on Leukocytes


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In our study, oral L-arginine treatment (9 g/d for 1 month) of patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease significantly increased plasma arginine levels. However, there was no significant effect of L-arginine on brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, an in vivo bioassay for endothelial NO release.12 Because of the variance of our measurements, possibly due to the confounding effects of medical therapy, we could have missed a small improvement in this response with L-arginine therapy. However, there was no effect of L-arginine on 2 other measures of NO bioactivity, serum nitrogen oxides and cell adhesion molecules reduced by NO in cell culture experiments.18 Furthermore, there was no effect of L-arginine on other soluble and cell-based markers of inflammation. Stimulatory effects of L-arginine on insulin, although marginal in our study population, could be of atherogenic concern in larger populations of coronary artery disease patients.

It is possible that an effect of oral L-arginine on these markers of NO bioactivity might have been detected in study participants had we stopped aspirin and vasoactive and lipid-lowering medications during the study. However, we chose this study design because we felt that discontinuation of appropriate medical therapy for 3 months was medically unwise in these patients (10 patients had inducible ischemia by treadmill exercise testing) and that demonstration of a positive effect of L-arginine on NO bioactivity and vascular homeostasis in patients on medical therapy previously shown to reduce cardiovascular risk would be of greater clinical relevance in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.

It is possible that had a more hypercholesterolemic population of patients with coronary disease been recruited for our study, an effect of L-arginine on NO bioactivity would have been detected. In this regard, chronic administration of L-arginine to hypercholesterolemic rabbits and humans improved endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation.13 22 Oral administration of L-arginine to hypercholesterolemic rabbits reduced vascular release of superoxide and ions and restored NO production and endothelial function,23 in addition to reducing monocyte adherence to vascular surfaces,24 consistent with an anti-inflammatory effect of this therapy. However, current guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program dictate aggressive cholesterol reduction in patients with coronary artery disease, which is supported by reductions in morbidity and mortality reported in 3 secondary prevention trials using statin therapy.25 26 27 In the present study, most patients were taking statin lipid-lowering therapy, with an average LDL cholesterol level of 115 mg/dL for the group. Thus, the robust flow-mediated dilation seen in our patients may reflect relatively normalized endothelium-dependent vasodilator responsiveness previously demonstrated with statin lipid-lowering therapy.28 29 30 31

In addition to the confounding effects of medical therapy, a potential explanation for failure to demonstrate vascular effects of L-arginine in the present study is that the dose used (9 g/d) was insufficient. However, higher doses have been associated with side effects of nausea, stomach cramps, and diarrhea.13 Indeed, in the present study, 2 patients dropped out of the study during the L-arginine treatment phase because of nausea and stomach cramps. Furthermore, in a study of hypercholesterolemic subjects,13 administration of L-arginine 21 g/d for 1 month caused the same relative increase in serum L-arginine levels as was seen in our study group treated with 9 g/d for the same duration of administration. Another potential limitation of our study is that levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) were not measured in the plasma of our participants. Elevated levels of this competitive inhibitor of NO synthase have been reported in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis.32 Thus, it is possible that had levels of ADMA been found to be low in our patients, improvement in endothelial function with L-arginine would not have been expected. Nevertheless, given the current interest in L-arginine as a therapeutic supplement to prevent atherosclerosis, the present study suggests that L-arginine may not benefit the general population of patients with coronary artery disease on appropriate medical management.

In conclusion, we did not find evidence that L-arginine, when administered for 1 month to patients with coronary artery disease on appropriate medical management, augments endothelial NO bioavailability or reduces markers of inflammation associated with coronary artery disease. Thus, L-arginine may not be of general benefit to patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease on appropriate medical management in the protection from progression or clinical expression of atherosclerosis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Maureen Leser, RD, for preparing the nitrate-restricted diet, Rene Costello, MT, for his excellent technical assistance, and Karen Schwartz and Toni Julia for typing the manuscript.

Received July 13, 1999; revision received November 18, 1999; accepted December 10, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Ludmer PL, Selwyn AP, Shook TL, Wayne RR, Mudge GH, Alexander RW, Ganz P. Paradoxical vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine in atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1046–1051.[Abstract]
  2. Vita JA, Treasure CB, Nabel EG, McLenachan JM, Fish RD, Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1990;81:491–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschlager H, Just H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans: progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1991;83:391–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Egashira K, Inou T, Hirooka Y, Yamada A, Maruoka Y, Kai N, Suzuki S, Takeshita A. Impaired coronary blood flow response to acetylcholine in patients with coronary risk factors and proximal atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:29–37.
  5. Quyyumi AA, Dakak N, Andrew NP, Husain S, Arora S, Gilligan DM, Panza JA, Cannon RO III. Nitric oxide activity in the human coronary circulation: impact of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1747–1755.
  6. Palmer RMJ, Ashton DS, Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature. 1988;333:664–666.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Dubois-Rande JL, Zelinsky R, Roudot F, Chabrier PE, Castaigne A, Geschwind H, Adnot S. Effects of infusion of L-arginine into the left anterior descending coronary artery on acetylcholine-induced vasoconstriction of human atheromatous coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1269–1275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Egashira K, Hirooka Y, Kuga T, Mohri M, Takeshita A. Effects of L-arginine supplementation on endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1996;94:130–134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Quyyumi AA, Dakak N, Diodati JG, Gilligan DM, Panza JA, Cannon RO III. Effect of L-arginine on human coronary endothelium-dependent and physiologic vasodilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1220–1227.[Abstract]
  10. Tousoulis D, Davies GJ, Tentolouris C, Crake T, Toutouzas P. Coronary stenosis dilation induced by L-arginine. Lancet. 1997;349:1812–1813.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Tousoulis D, Davies GJ, Tentolouris C, Crake T, Katsimaglis G, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P. Effects of changing the availability of the substrate for nitric oxide synthase by L-arginine administration on coronary vasomotor tone in angina patients with angiographically narrowed and in patients with normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1110–1113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Joannides R, Haefeli WE, Linder L, Richard V, Bakkali EH, Thuillez C, Luscher TF. Nitric oxide is responsible for flow-dependent dilatation of human peripheral conduit arteries in vivo. Circulation. 1995;91:1314–1319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Clarkson P, Adams MR, Powe AJ, Donald AE, McCredie R, Robinson J, McCarthy SN, Keech A, Celermajer DS, Deanfield JE. Oral L-arginine improves endothelium-dependent dilation in hypercholesterolemic young adults. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1989–1994.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Lerman A, Burnett JC Jr, Higano ST, McKinley LJ, Holmes DR Jr. Long-term L-arginine supplementation improves small-vessel coronary endothelial function in humans. Circulation. 1998;97:2123–2128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for management of patients with chronic stable angina: executive summary and recommendations. Circulation. 1999;99:2829–2848.[Free Full Text]
  16. Ceremuzynski L, Chamiec T, Herbaczynska-Cedro K. Effect of supplemental oral L-arginine on exercise capacity in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:331–333.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. White JW Jr. Relative significance of dietary sources of nitrate and nitrite. J Agric Food Chem. 1975;23:886–891.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. De Caterina R, Libby P, Peng HB, Thannickal VJ, Rajavashisth TB, Gimbrone MA Jr, Shin WS, Liao JK. Nitric oxide decreases cytokine-induced endothelial activation: nitric oxide selectivity reduces endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:60–68.
  19. Shapiro HM. Practical Flow Cytometry. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 1995.
  20. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Millcheck OT, Sullivan ID, Lloyd JK, Deanfield JE. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340:1111–1115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Koh KK, Cardillo C, Bui MN, Hathaway L, Csako G, Waclawiw MA, Panza JA, Cannon RO III. Vascular effects of estrogen and cholesterol-lowering therapies in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1999;99:354–360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cooke JP, Singer AH, Tsao P, Zera P, Rowan RA, Billingham ME. Antiatherogenic effects of L-arginine in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1168–1172.
  23. Boger RH, Bode-Boger SM, Mugge A, Kienke S, Brandes R, Dwenger A, Frolich JC. Supplementation of hypercholesterolaemic rabbits with L-arginine reduces the vascular release of superoxide anions and restores NO production. Atherosclerosis. 1995;117:273–284.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Tsao PS, McEvoy LM, Drexler H, Butcher EC, Cooke JP. Enhanced endothelial adhesiveness in hypercholesterolemia is attenuated by L-arginine. Circulation. 1994;89:2176–2182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349–1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, Brown L, Warnica JW, Arnold JMO, Wun C-C, Davis BR, Braunwald E, for the Cholesterol And Recurrent Events Trial Investigators The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001–1009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Leung W-H, Lau C-P, Wong C-K. Beneficial effect of cholesterol-lowering therapy on coronary endothelium-dependent relaxation in hypercholesterolaemic patients. Lancet. 1993;341:1496–1500.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Egashira K, Hirooka Y, Kai H, Sugimachi M, Suzuki S, Inou T, Takeshita A. Reduction in serum cholesterol with pravastatin improves endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1994;89:2519–2524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Treasure CB, Klein JL, Weintraub WS, Talley JD, Stillabower ME, Kosinski AS, Zhang J, Boccuzzi SJ, Cedarholm JC, Alexander RW. Beneficial effects of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the coronary endothelium in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:481–487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Anderson TJ, Meredith IT, Yeung AC, Frei B, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. The effect of cholesterol-lowering and antioxidant therapy on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:488–493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Miyazaki H, Matsuoka H, Cooke JP, Usiu M, Ueda S, Okuda S, Imaizumi T. Endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor: a novel marker of atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1999;99:1141–1146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. H. Boger
The Pharmacodynamics of L-Arginine
J. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 137(6): 1650S - 1655S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
Z. Yang and X.-F. Ming
Recent advances in understanding endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis.
Clin. Med. Res., March 1, 2006; 4(1): 53 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. J. Rabelink and T. F. Luscher
Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase: Host Defense Enzyme of the Endothelium?
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(2): 267 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. P. Schulman, L. C. Becker, D. A. Kass, H. C. Champion, M. L. Terrin, S. Forman, K. V. Ernst, M. D. Kelemen, S. N. Townsend, A. Capriotti, et al.
L-Arginine Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Vascular Interaction With Age in Myocardial Infarction (VINTAGE MI) Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA, January 4, 2006; 295(1): 58 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. G. Herman and S. Moncada
Therapeutic potential of nitric oxide donors in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1945 - 1955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. H.K. Vogel, S. F. Bolling, R. B. Costello, E. M. Guarneri, M. W. Krucoff, J. C. Longhurst, B. Olshansky, K. R. Pelletier, C. M. Tracy, R. A. Vogel, et al.
Integrating Complementary Medicine Into Cardiovascular Medicine: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Writing Committee to Develop an Expert Consensus Document on Complementary and Integrative Medicine)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 184 - 221.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Loscalzo
L-Arginine and Atherothrombosis
J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2798S - 2800S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. L. Gornik and M. A. Creager
Arginine and Endothelial and Vascular Health
J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2880S - 2887S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. P. Cooke, K. Sydow, J. Chen, and P. Huang
A Peculiar Result and a Fanciful Hypothesis Regarding L-Arginine *
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 1128 - 1128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
S. M Bode-Boger, J. Muke, A. Surdacki, G. Brabant, R. H Boger, and J. C Frolich
Oral L-arginine improves endothelial function in healthy individuals older than 70 years
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2003; 8(2): 77 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. de Nigris, L. O. Lerman, S. W. Ignarro, G. Sica, A. Lerman, W. Palinski, L. J. Ignarro, and C. Napoli
From the Cover: Beneficial effects of antioxidants and L-arginine on oxidation-sensitive gene expression and endothelial NO synthase activity at sites of disturbed shear stress
PNAS, February 4, 2003; 100(3): 1420 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Piatti, G. Fragasso, L. D. Monti, E. Setola, P. Lucotti, I. Fermo, R. Paroni, E. Galluccio, G. Pozza, S. Chierchia, et al.
Acute Intravenous l-Arginine Infusion Decreases Endothelin-1 Levels and Improves Endothelial Function in Patients With Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Arteriograms: Correlation With Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Levels
Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 429 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. Loscalzo
L-Arginine in Atherosclerosis: Consequences of Methylation Stress in a Complex Catabolism?
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 3 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. B. Sorensen, P. Collins, P. J.L. Ong, C. M. Webb, C. S. Hayward, E. A. Asbury, P. D. Gatehouse, A. G. Elkington, G. Z. Yang, A. Kubba, et al.
Long-Term Use of Contraceptive Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Young Women Impairs Arterial Endothelial Function Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(13): 1646 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
D. Tousoulis, C. Antoniades, C. Tentolouris, G. Goumas, C. Stefanadis, and P. Toutouzas
L-Arginine in cardiovascular disease: dream or reality?
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2002; 7(3): 203 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Maxwell, M. P. Zapien, G. L. Pearce, G. MacCallum, and P. H. Stone
Randomized trial of a medical food for the dietary management of chronic, stable angina
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 37 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Cannon III
Oral L-arginine (and other active ingredients) for ischemic heart disease?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 46 - 48.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. T. Kuvin, A. R. Patel, K. A. Sliney, N. G. Pandian, W. M. Rand, J. E. Udelson, and R. H. Karas
Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1843 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. A. Walker, E. McGing, I. Fisher, R. H. Boger, S. M. Bode-Boger, G. Jackson, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is independent of the plasma L-arginine/ADMA ratio in men with stable angina: Lack of effect of oral l-arginine on endothelial function, oxidative stress and exercise performance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 499 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. A Brown and F. B Hu
Dietary modulation of endothelial function: implications for cardiovascular disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2001; 73(4): 673 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Gielen, G. Schuler, and R. Hambrecht
Exercise Training in Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Vasomotion
Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103 (1): e1 - e6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. Wu and C. J. Meininger
Arginine Nutrition and Cardiovascular Function
J. Nutr., November 1, 2000; 130(11): 2626 - 2629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Loscalzo
What We Know and Don't Know About L-Arginine and NO
Circulation, May 9, 2000; 101(18): 2126 - 2129.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v102,p142)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content