(Circulation. 2000;101:2160.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Cardiology (A.B., L.H., R.M., W.H.S., J.A.P., R.O.C.) and Hematology (M.K.) Branches and the Office of Biostatistics Research (M.A.W.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and the Clinical Pathology Department (G.C.), Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Correspondence to Richard O. Cannon III, MD, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 7B15, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1650, Bethesda, MD 20892-1650. E-mail cannonr{at}nih.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThirty CAD patients (29 men; age, 67±8 years) on appropriate medical management were randomly assigned to L-arginine (9 g) or placebo daily for 1 month, with crossover to the alternate therapy after 1 month off therapy, in a double-blind study. Nitrogen oxides in serum (as an index of endothelial NO release), flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (as an index of vascular NO bioactivity), and serum cell adhesion molecules (as an index of NO-regulated markers of inflammation) were measured at the end of each treatment period. L-Arginine significantly increased arginine levels in plasma (130±53 versus 70±17 µmol/L, P<0.001) compared with placebo. However, there was no effect of L-arginine on nitrogen oxides (19.3±7.9 versus 18.6±6.7 µmol/L, P=0.546), on flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (11.9±6.3% versus 11.4±7.9%, P=0.742), or on the cell adhesion molecules E-selectin (47.8±15.2 versus 47.2±14.4 ng/mL, P=0.601), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (250±57 versus 249±57 ng/mL, P=0.862), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (567±124 versus 574±135 ng/mL, P=0.473).
ConclusionsOral L-arginine therapy does not improve NO bioavailability in CAD patients on appropriate medical management and thus may not benefit this group of patients.
Key Words: atherosclerosis coronary disease endothelium nitric oxide
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Practical application of L-arginine therapy over time requires oral administration, which has been shown to improve brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, an index of NO bioactivity,12 in hypercholesterolemic subjects13 and coronary blood flow responses to acetylcholine in patients without significant coronary disease.14 Furthermore, benefit of L-arginine therapy might be additive to that of appropriate medical management previously determined to improve morbidity and mortality risk of patients with coronary artery disease.15 In this regard, oral administration of L-arginine 6 g/d for 3 days improved exercise duration of 12 coronary artery disease patients on medical management, but the mechanism of therapeutic benefit was not determined.16 We therefore reasoned that oral administration of L-arginine could improve endothelium-dependent dilator responsiveness and other homeostatic properties of the vasculature potentially regulated by NO in patients with coronary artery disease who are otherwise appropriately managed with medical therapy.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 coronary artery at the
time of diagnostic catheterization) were
enrolled in this study. All patients were in Canadian
Cardiovascular Society class I or II and continued
taking medications throughout the study: aspirin (n=33), HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors (statins) (n=18), ß-blockers
(n=18), calcium channel blockers (n=10), ACE or angiotensin
type 1 (AT1) receptor inhibitors
(n=8), nonstatin lipid-lowering agents (n=5), and chronic nitrates
(n=3). All patients took sublingual nitrates as needed for angina
pectoris. Three patients were taking oral hypoglycemic agents for
diabetes mellitus. Ten patients had ischemic ST-segment
depression during treadmill exercise. No patient had symptoms of heart
failure or evidence of depressed left ventricular function
(<40% ejection fraction determined by radionuclide angiography or
echocardiography), recent (within 6 months)
myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy,
valvular heart disease, or hypertension (blood pressure
>160/100 mm Hg even after taking blood pressure medications).
Two patients decided not to participate in the study after enrollment,
2 patients dropped out of the study during the L-arginine
treatment phase because of nausea and stomach cramps, and 1 patient
died suddenly after completion of the placebo phase (first phase of
study). Thus, 30 patients completed the study. Their lipid profile on
medications was as follows: total cholesterol 188±31
mg/dL, LDL cholesterol 115±31 mg/dL, HDL
cholesterol 42±9 mg/dL, and triglycerides
146±96 mg/dL. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board
of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and all participants
gave written informed consent.
Study Design
Patients were randomized to L-arginine 9 g (3 g
3 times a day with meals) or identical placebo capsules 3 times a day
with meals, each for 1 month with 1 month off therapy before crossover
to the alternate treatment. All patients were placed on a
nitrate-restricted diet for 72 hours before each study to reduce the
contribution of dietary nitrates to serum nitrogen
oxides.17 After an overnight fast (except for water),
patients returned to the clinical center for blood drawing and vascular
studies at the end of each treatment period.
Laboratory Assays
Blood samples were coded so that investigators performing assays
were blinded to patient identity and study sequence. Plasma and serum
were separated by centrifugation and stored at -80°C
until analysis. Arginine was measured in plasma by ion-exchange
chromatography (Mayo Medical Laboratories). Growth
hormone was determined in serum by a 2-site chemiluminescent enzyme
immunometric assay (Immulite, DPC). Insulin was measured in serum with
a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx, Abbott Laboratories). Nitrogen
oxide levels were measured in serum by a chemiluminescent technique
(Sievers Instruments, Inc). C-reactive protein (2-site chemiluminescent
enzyme immunometric assay; sensitivity 0.01 mg/dL; Immulite, DPC),
interleukin-6 (sandwich enzyme immunoassay, R&D Systems, Inc), tissue
factor (enzyme-linked immunoassay, American Diagnostica,
Inc), and plasminogen activator
inhibitor-1 (sandwich enzyme-linked immunoassay, Biopool)
were measured as markers of vascular inflammation. The cell adhesion
molecules E-selectin, P-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by
enzyme-linked immunoassays (R&D Systems, Inc) as markers of
inflammation that are modulated in tissue culture experiments by
NO.18
To further detect an effect of L-arginine on inflammation,
blood samples for flow cytometry were processed to prepare leukocytes
for immunofluorescence measurements with the
Coulter Q-Prep workstation (Beckman Coulter Corp). Expression of the
following integrin adhesion molecules was measured on monocytes,
lymphocytes, and granulocytes: LFA-1 (DC11a), Mac-1 (CD11b), and VLA-4
(CD49d), as well as the selectin adhesion molecule L-selectin
(CD62L).19 All monoclonal antibodies to cell-surface
adhesion molecules were directly conjugated to FITC and were obtained
from Immunotech (Beckman Coulter Corp). Flow cytometry was performed
with the EPICS XL-MCL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Corp) equipped
with a 15-mW, 488-nm argon ion laser. A total of
50 000 events per
sample were analyzed. The lymphocytes, monocytes, and
granulocytes were electronically isolated by a collection of a
dual-parameter histogram of size and granularity
(forward-angle light scatter versus log 90° light scatter).
Fluorescence intensity of the measured adhesion molecule was
expressed as mean channel units. Relative FITC log fluorescence
was calculated with the histogram data. Flow cytometry settings
remained constant for all data generated, and standard beads were used
to calibrate the instrument.
Vascular Studies
Imaging studies of the left brachial artery were performed with
a high-resolution ultrasound Hewlett-Packard 7.5-MHz linear-array
transducer after 30 minutes of rest, based on the technique reported by
Celermajer et al.20 After the clearest view of the
brachial artery was found, the skin was marked and the arm kept in the
same position throughout the study. Baseline measurements included
brachial artery diameter and flow velocity measured by pulsed
Doppler, with the range gate (1.5 mm) in the center of the
artery. The system permitted a direct assessment of the angle between
the bloodstream and the intersecting ultrasound beam, which was then
used to calculate blood flow velocity.
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by
measurement of the change in diameter of the brachial artery during
reactive hyperemia created by an inflated cuff (250 mm Hg
for 5 minutes) on the forearm. After cuff deflation, flow velocity was
measured for the first 15 seconds, and arterial diameter
was recorded continually for the next 60 seconds. Fifteen minutes
later, repeat baseline diameter and flow velocity measurements were
made, followed by nitroglycerin spray (0.4 mg) under
the tongue to assess endothelium-independent
vasodilation. Three minutes later, arterial diameter and
flow velocity measurements were recorded. Arterial
diameter was measured in millimeters from the artery-blood interface on
both the anterior and posterior walls, coincident with the R waves on
the ECG, at 2 sites along the artery for the 3 cardiac cycles, with
these 6 measurements averaged. During hyperemia, 6 measurements
of arterial diameter were averaged during maximum dilation
between 50 and 70 seconds after cuff deflation. We calculated blood
flow by multiplying the velocity-time integral of the Doppler flow
signal by the heart rate and the cross-sectional area of the
vessel.
Reproducibility of Study Parameters
In a recently published study21 of 28 healthy
postmenopausal women who underwent studies while not taking any hormone
or other therapies on 3 occasions, each separated by 12 weeks, we
computed coefficients of variation for study parameters as
the square root of the pooled within-subject variance divided by the
mean of the averages over all subjects for each parameter:
flow-mediated brachial artery dilation 0.623; nitrogen oxides 0.365;
E-selectin 0.226;, ICAM-1 0.159; and VCAM-1 0.178.
Statistical Analysis
Measurements are expressed as mean±SD. The 2-sided paired
Students t test was used to compare changes in vascular
responses and laboratory values between
L-arginine and placebo treatments, with
P<0.05 an indicator of statistical significance. The
primary study comparison predefined in advance of data collection was
flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery with
L-arginine treatment compared with placebo. All
other comparisons were regarded as secondary, and no adjustments to
probability value for multiple comparisons were performed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4.2% between
L-arginine and placebo treatment with a 2-sided
paired t test at
=0.05 and 80% power.
|
Effects of L-Arginine on Markers of
Inflammation
There was no effect of L-arginine on serum levels of
the cell adhesion molecules E-selectin (47.8±15.2 versus 47.2±14.4
ng/mL, P=0.601), P-selectin (98.2±30.5 versus 94.6±28.8
ng/mL, P=0.193), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1;
250±57 versus 249±57 ng/mL, P=0.86), and vascular cell
adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1; 567±124 versus 574±135 ng/mL,
P=0.26) compared with placebo. Other markers of inflammation
were likewise unaltered by L-arginine therapy:
interleukin-6 (4.41 versus 4.76 pg/mL, P=0.588), C-reactive
protein (0.40±0.34 versus 0.36±0.27 mg/dL, P=0.579),
tissue factor antigen (232.6±135.6 versus 252.9±175.9 pg/mL,
P=0.228), and plasminogen activator
inhibitor-1 antigen (27.2±16.6 versus 30.7±18.6 ng/mL,
P=0.194). There was no effect of
L-arginine on the expression of cell adhesion
molecules on circulating inflammatory cells (Table 2
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is possible that an effect of oral L-arginine on these markers of NO bioactivity might have been detected in study participants had we stopped aspirin and vasoactive and lipid-lowering medications during the study. However, we chose this study design because we felt that discontinuation of appropriate medical therapy for 3 months was medically unwise in these patients (10 patients had inducible ischemia by treadmill exercise testing) and that demonstration of a positive effect of L-arginine on NO bioactivity and vascular homeostasis in patients on medical therapy previously shown to reduce cardiovascular risk would be of greater clinical relevance in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.
It is possible that had a more hypercholesterolemic population of patients with coronary disease been recruited for our study, an effect of L-arginine on NO bioactivity would have been detected. In this regard, chronic administration of L-arginine to hypercholesterolemic rabbits and humans improved endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation.13 22 Oral administration of L-arginine to hypercholesterolemic rabbits reduced vascular release of superoxide and ions and restored NO production and endothelial function,23 in addition to reducing monocyte adherence to vascular surfaces,24 consistent with an anti-inflammatory effect of this therapy. However, current guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program dictate aggressive cholesterol reduction in patients with coronary artery disease, which is supported by reductions in morbidity and mortality reported in 3 secondary prevention trials using statin therapy.25 26 27 In the present study, most patients were taking statin lipid-lowering therapy, with an average LDL cholesterol level of 115 mg/dL for the group. Thus, the robust flow-mediated dilation seen in our patients may reflect relatively normalized endothelium-dependent vasodilator responsiveness previously demonstrated with statin lipid-lowering therapy.28 29 30 31
In addition to the confounding effects of medical therapy, a potential explanation for failure to demonstrate vascular effects of L-arginine in the present study is that the dose used (9 g/d) was insufficient. However, higher doses have been associated with side effects of nausea, stomach cramps, and diarrhea.13 Indeed, in the present study, 2 patients dropped out of the study during the L-arginine treatment phase because of nausea and stomach cramps. Furthermore, in a study of hypercholesterolemic subjects,13 administration of L-arginine 21 g/d for 1 month caused the same relative increase in serum L-arginine levels as was seen in our study group treated with 9 g/d for the same duration of administration. Another potential limitation of our study is that levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) were not measured in the plasma of our participants. Elevated levels of this competitive inhibitor of NO synthase have been reported in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis.32 Thus, it is possible that had levels of ADMA been found to be low in our patients, improvement in endothelial function with L-arginine would not have been expected. Nevertheless, given the current interest in L-arginine as a therapeutic supplement to prevent atherosclerosis, the present study suggests that L-arginine may not benefit the general population of patients with coronary artery disease on appropriate medical management.
In conclusion, we did not find evidence that L-arginine, when administered for 1 month to patients with coronary artery disease on appropriate medical management, augments endothelial NO bioavailability or reduces markers of inflammation associated with coronary artery disease. Thus, L-arginine may not be of general benefit to patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease on appropriate medical management in the protection from progression or clinical expression of atherosclerosis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 13, 1999; revision received November 18, 1999; accepted December 10, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Boger The Pharmacodynamics of L-Arginine J. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 137(6): 1650S - 1655S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang and X.-F. Ming Recent advances in understanding endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Clin. Med. Res., March 1, 2006; 4(1): 53 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Rabelink and T. F. Luscher Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase: Host Defense Enzyme of the Endothelium? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(2): 267 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Schulman, L. C. Becker, D. A. Kass, H. C. Champion, M. L. Terrin, S. Forman, K. V. Ernst, M. D. Kelemen, S. N. Townsend, A. Capriotti, et al. L-Arginine Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Vascular Interaction With Age in Myocardial Infarction (VINTAGE MI) Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, January 4, 2006; 295(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Herman and S. Moncada Therapeutic potential of nitric oxide donors in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1945 - 1955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H.K. Vogel, S. F. Bolling, R. B. Costello, E. M. Guarneri, M. W. Krucoff, J. C. Longhurst, B. Olshansky, K. R. Pelletier, C. M. Tracy, R. A. Vogel, et al. Integrating Complementary Medicine Into Cardiovascular Medicine: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Writing Committee to Develop an Expert Consensus Document on Complementary and Integrative Medicine) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 184 - 221. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Loscalzo L-Arginine and Atherothrombosis J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2798S - 2800S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Gornik and M. A. Creager Arginine and Endothelial and Vascular Health J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2880S - 2887S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Cooke, K. Sydow, J. Chen, and P. Huang A Peculiar Result and a Fanciful Hypothesis Regarding L-Arginine * Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 1128 - 1128. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M Bode-Boger, J. Muke, A. Surdacki, G. Brabant, R. H Boger, and J. C Frolich Oral L-arginine improves endothelial function in healthy individuals older than 70 years Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2003; 8(2): 77 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. de Nigris, L. O. Lerman, S. W. Ignarro, G. Sica, A. Lerman, W. Palinski, L. J. Ignarro, and C. Napoli From the Cover: Beneficial effects of antioxidants and L-arginine on oxidation-sensitive gene expression and endothelial NO synthase activity at sites of disturbed shear stress PNAS, February 4, 2003; 100(3): 1420 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Piatti, G. Fragasso, L. D. Monti, E. Setola, P. Lucotti, I. Fermo, R. Paroni, E. Galluccio, G. Pozza, S. Chierchia, et al. Acute Intravenous l-Arginine Infusion Decreases Endothelin-1 Levels and Improves Endothelial Function in Patients With Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Arteriograms: Correlation With Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Levels Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Loscalzo L-Arginine in Atherosclerosis: Consequences of Methylation Stress in a Complex Catabolism? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 3 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Sorensen, P. Collins, P. J.L. Ong, C. M. Webb, C. S. Hayward, E. A. Asbury, P. D. Gatehouse, A. G. Elkington, G. Z. Yang, A. Kubba, et al. Long-Term Use of Contraceptive Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Young Women Impairs Arterial Endothelial Function Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(13): 1646 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tousoulis, C. Antoniades, C. Tentolouris, G. Goumas, C. Stefanadis, and P. Toutouzas L-Arginine in cardiovascular disease: dream or reality? Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2002; 7(3): 203 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Maxwell, M. P. Zapien, G. L. Pearce, G. MacCallum, and P. H. Stone Randomized trial of a medical food for the dietary management of chronic, stable angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Cannon III Oral L-arginine (and other active ingredients) for ischemic heart disease? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 46 - 48. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Kuvin, A. R. Patel, K. A. Sliney, N. G. Pandian, W. M. Rand, J. E. Udelson, and R. H. Karas Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1843 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Walker, E. McGing, I. Fisher, R. H. Boger, S. M. Bode-Boger, G. Jackson, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is independent of the plasma L-arginine/ADMA ratio in men with stable angina: Lack of effect of oral l-arginine on endothelial function, oxidative stress and exercise performance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 499 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A Brown and F. B Hu Dietary modulation of endothelial function: implications for cardiovascular disease Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2001; 73(4): 673 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gielen, G. Schuler, and R. Hambrecht Exercise Training in Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Vasomotion Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103 (1): e1 - e6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wu and C. J. Meininger Arginine Nutrition and Cardiovascular Function J. Nutr., November 1, 2000; 130(11): 2626 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Loscalzo What We Know and Don't Know About L-Arginine and NO Circulation, May 9, 2000; 101(18): 2126 - 2129. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||