(Circulation. 2000;101:2586.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From Cardiac Medicine, The National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine (R.R.K., S.S., N.J.S.), London, England, and School of Neurosciences (M.J.C.), University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyneside, England.
Correspondence to Dr R.R. Kaprielian, Cardiac Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, England.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsSingle- and double-label immunoconfocal microscopy and parallel high-resolution immunogold fracture-label electron microscopy were used to localize dystrophin and vinculin in human left ventricular myocytes from normal (n=6) and failing hearts (idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, n=7, or ischemic heart disease, n=5). In control cardiomyocytes, dystrophin had a continuous distribution at the peripheral sarcolemma, with concentrated bands corresponding to the vinculin-rich costameres. Intracellular labeling extended along transverse (T) tubule membranes. Fracture-label confirmed this distribution, showing significantly greater label on plasma membrane fractures overlying I-bands (I-band 4.1±0.3 gold particles/µm; A-band 3.3±0.2 gold particles/µm: mean±SE, P=0.02). Hypertrophied myocytes from failing hearts showed maintenance of this surface distribution except in degenerating cells; there was a clear increase in intracellular dystrophin label reflecting T-tubule hypertrophy.
ConclusionsDystrophin partially colocalizes with costameric vinculin in normal and hypertrophied myocytes, a distribution lost in degenerating cells. This suggests a primarily mechanical role for dystrophin in maintenance of cell membrane integrity in normal and hypertrophied myocytes. The presence of dystrophin in the cardiac T-tubule membrane, in contrast to its known absence in skeletal muscle T-tubules, implies additional roles for dystrophin in membrane domain organization.
Key Words: proteins myocardium myocyte heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-dystroglycan, a
surface membrane receptor for the extracellular matrix component
laminin,2 suggesting that dystrophin-DAG provides a
structural link between the myocyte cytoskeleton and extracellular
matrix. Study of such protein-binding affinities and patterns of muscle
degeneration in patients with dystrophin/DAG mutations have opened new
perspectives on the pathophysiology of the muscle degeneration in these
diseases and in turn permitted progress toward the identification of
the subcellular functions of the individual affected proteins. Investigation into the cellular localization of dystrophin may provide further evidence for the precise functional role of this molecule. Dystrophin distribution in skeletal myocytes has been extensively studied with the use of immunolabeling techniques with light and transmission electron microscopy (EM). Early results suggested a continuous subsarcolemmal layer of dystrophin, with absence in the transverse (T) tubules3 4 5 6 ; subsequent studies, however, report dystrophin in a discontinuous cell surface network involving colocalization with the cytoskeletal-membranelinking protein vinculin at costameres.7 8 9 10 Costameres, which are found in both cardiac and skeletal myocytes, were first defined by the concentration of vinculin in a series of sarcolemmal riblike bands overlying the Z-bands11 and are now known to contain multiple proteins.12 Acting as anchor points between the myofibrils and the plasma membrane, they are implicated in the lateral transduction of contractile force from the myocyte to the extracellular matrix.13 Degeneration of skeletal muscle of patients with dystrophin mutations may occur because disruption of dystrophin at these points of mechanical stress14 results in mechanical fragility of myocyte membranes.15 In comparison to skeletal muscle, relatively few studies have focused on cardiac muscle,6 12 16 17 18 and little information is available on dystrophin distribution in human cardiomyocytes.4 In rat heart, dystrophin is localized as a continuous sheet at the sarcolemma and, unlike skeletal myocytes, is also found along T-tubules.12 17 19 The association of dystrophin with cardiomyocyte T-tubules,12 16 19 which are important in excitation-contraction coupling and do not serve in the transmission of contractile force, suggests that dystrophin may serve diverse roles in myocyte membranes. Indeed, mechanisms other than membrane fragility, such as defects in calcium handling, have also been proposed as a primary cause for myocyte degeneration in inherited muscular dystrophy.20
In the present study, we aimed to further elucidate the function of this protein complex by application of the complementary techniques of immunoconfocal microscopy and immunogold fracture-label EM21 to establish the cellular distribution of dystrophin in relation to force-transducing vinculin in normal and remodeled human cardiac myocytes.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human left ventricular samples were also collected from the
explanted hearts of patients undergoing orthotopic heart
transplantation at The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust
Hospitals. All patients were severely symptomatic (New York
Heart Association grade III/IV), with poor left ventricular
systolic function recorded on
echocardiography, multiple gated acquisition
scanning, and ventriculography. Patients either had normal
coronary arteries and were free of inherited myopathies
(idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, DCM (n=7), or
had severe coronary artery disease (ICM, n=5), with a history
of previous myocardial infarction (5 of 5) and/or coronary
artery bypass surgery (3 of 5). Patient demographic and clinical
details are shown in the Table
.
|
The pathological tissue was dissected in the operating theater immediately after explantation and was processed for immunoconfocal microscopy and for thin-section and fracture-label EM. The normal hearts had been in cardioplegic solution on ice for up to 3 hours before tissue was available. The left ventricular free wall was sampled from the normal hearts and from patients with DCM. The macroscopically homogenous nature of the left ventricles of these specimens made directed sampling less important. In the ICM hearts, large areas of full and partial thickness scarring were easily discernible. Tissue was taken, as far as possible, from the ventricular free wall distant from macroscopic scarring. If such tissue was not available, then specimens were taken from alternative ventricular segments away from infarcted territories. The study was approved by the local ethics committee; individual patient consent was obtained.
Antibodies
The following antibodies were used in the study. Dystrophin: (1)
mouse monoclonal antibody (Dr Louise Anderson, University of Newcastle
on Tyne) to the last 17 amino acids of the -COOH
terminal domain of the dystrophin molecule (Dy8/6C5) was diluted 1:1000
for immunofluorescence and used undiluted for
fracture-label; (2) rabbit polyclonal antibody (Dr Henry Klamut,
Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada) to the same sequence
(P1583) was diluted 1:100 for double immunolabeling. Vinculin antibody
was obtained from Sigma Immunochemicals (clone No. VIN-11 to 5) and
diluted 1:50. ß-Dystroglycan: mouse monoclonal antibody (43 Dag1/8D5)
produced against the last 16 amino acids of the C-terminal domain (1:50
dilution).22 The secondary antibodies
(immunofluorescence) were (1) goat anti-mouse Cy3
at 1:500 dilution, (2) goat anti-rabbit Cy3 at 1:500 dilution, and (3)
goat anti-mouse FITC at 1:25 dilution (all Chemicon International). For
fracture-label immunogold labeling, biotinylated goat anti-mouse
immunoglobulin (1:50) with 10-nm gold-streptavidin complexes (Amersham
Life Sciences) was used to label dystrophin, and goat anti-mouse 15-nm
gold complexes (British BioCell International) at 1:50 dilution were
used to label vinculin. All antibody dilutions and washes were
performed with 0.5% BSA in PBS containing 0.05% sodium azide. All
incubations were performed at room temperature.
Immunoconfocal Fluorescence Microscopy
Small blocks of tissue were rapidly frozen in liquid
nitrogencooled isopentane. Ten-micrometer-thick cryosections were
either initially fixed in freshly prepared 2%
paraformaldehyde for 5 minutes and subsequently blocked
in 0.5% BSA/PBS for 45 minutes or thawed directly in the blocking
solution. Primary antibody was applied (dystrophin 180 minutes;
vinculin and ß-dystroglycan overnight), followed by the appropriate
secondary antibody for 1 hour. Negative controls were performed by
omission of the primary antibody. Dystrophin/vinculin double labeling
was performed on unfixed cryopreserved tissue with a procedure modified
from that above. Sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal
anti-dystrophin antibody (P1583) overnight, washed, and treated with
mouse monoclonal anti-vinculin antibody for 5 hours. A mixed solution
of the secondary antibodies was applied for 60 minutes before mounting
as described above. Specificity of the labeling was confirmed with
appropriate controls. Sections were examined by confocal microscopy
with a Leica TCS 4D equipped with an argon/krypton laser and
appropriate filter blocks for either single- or dual-channel scanning.
All images were recorded within 24 hours.
Standard Thin-Section EM
Tissue fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in
0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, postfixed for 2 hours in
cacodylate-buffered 2% osmium tetroxide, was processed for standard
thin-section EM. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate
and lead citrate before examination.
Fracture-Label EM
A modification of the fracture-label
technique,21 which facilitates plasma membrane fracturing
in cardiac muscle, was used.19 Tissue was divided into
2-mm blocks, fixed for 5 or 15 minutes in freshly made 2%
paraformaldehyde in PBS, incubated overnight in 30%
glycerol/PBS for cryoprotection, and processed as described by
Stevenson et al.19
Quantitative Analysis of Dystrophin Immunogold
Label
The distribution of dystrophin gold label per unit length
of plasma membrane was analyzed in relation to the underlying
sarcomeres. Thin-section images of clearly identified fractures of the
surface membrane (P-half) showing well-preserved underlying sarcomeres
in longitudinal section were recorded at a final magnification of
x35 880. Because of the variable contractile state of the muscle,
individual sarcomere lengths were measured and each sarcomere was then
divided into a central region half of the length of the full sarcomere
(A-band) flanked by 2 equal lengths of membrane (I-band). The number of
gold particles per unit length for each defined A-band and I-band was
determined with the use of VIDS III image analysis software
(Analytical Measuring Systems). Data were expressed as mean±SD for
both groups and compared with the use of the Students t
test. Analysis was performed along the whole length of cleanly
fractured membrane to include lengths of high and low labeling.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Vinculin immunolabeling revealed sarcolemmal distribution in the
characteristic costameric pattern of regularly repeating riblike
structures perpendicular to the long axis of the cell, clear T-tubule
labeling, and strong labeling of the intercalated disks (Figure 2
). Double-labeled cells viewed
longitudinally at high resolution showed that the clear foci of
vinculin label at the sarcolemmal surface precisely matched the
punctate pattern observed for dystrophin, with the intervening
vinculin-negative membrane revealing lower though clearly detectable
levels of dystrophin (Figure 3
). In en
face membrane views, we observed colocalization of vinculin and
dystrophin over the transverse bands encircling the myocyte, again with
fainter dystrophin label occurring as fine longitudinal strands between
the dense bands. The T-tubular label for dystrophin coincided with that
of vinculin.
|
|
Immunogold Fracture-Label EM
Thin-section examination of fracture-labeled tissue was used
to clarify the distribution of both vinculin (Figure 4
) and dystrophin (Figure 5
) at the ultrastructural level. In
plasma membrane fractures, vinculin labeling was sparse and closely
associated with the Z-band/sarcolemmal junction (Figure 4
); in
contrast, dystrophin showed a wider distribution with more frequent
label (Figure 5
). There was a visual impression of a higher
concentration of dystrophin label over the I/Z-bands, with gold
particles occurring in clusters in these regions, compared with single
particles in membrane overlying A-bands. There was a much lower level
of label along the surfaces of fractures that entered the cytoplasm
(cross-fractures); in these cases, the gold particles were observed in
association with fractures exposing the T-tubules. Intercalated disks
lacked dystrophin but had prominent vinculin labeling.
|
|
Fracture-label replicas for dystrophin-labeled tissues, which allow
inspection of large expanses of membrane in plan view, showed prominent
label of surface membrane fractures with minimal label of
cross-fractures (Figure 6
). Extracellular
(connective tissue) fractures showed negligible label. The positions of
Z-bands of myofibrils subjacent to the surface membrane could be
identified as ridges; dystrophin labeling patterns confirmed the
findings of the thin-section examination, with gold particles found at
higher density in the regions close to Z-bands. Fracture-label controls
with omission of the primary antibody showed very low levels of
background labeling. Quantitative analysis of dystrophin
immunogold distribution (eg, Figure 5
) confirmed a statistically
significant higher density of gold label over the I/Z-band (4.1±3.4
gold particles/µm; standard error=0.26; n=172) than the A-band
(3.3±2.9 gold particles/µm; standard error=0.23; n=154).
|
Dystrophin in Human Heart Failure
Histological examination of tissue from human
end-stage failing hearts revealed myocyte hypertrophy with
varying degrees of interstitial fibrosis irrespective of
underlying cause. Occasional islands of fibrosis suggesting previous
subsegmental infarction were seen in ICM specimens. Myocyte
hypertrophy has been formally measured in an overlapping
group of patients in a separate study; we showed a predominant increase
in cell length in DCM and predominant increase in cell cross-sectional
area in ICM.23
In longitudinally sectioned tissue from both DCM (Figure 7A
) and ICM (Figure 7B
),
dystrophin was seen in a continuous surface membrane distribution with
a superimposed regular punctate pattern as described in control
tissues. Intracellular dystrophin distribution seen as linear
structures showed increased tortuosity and size (Figures 7
, C
and D) and unlike controls were frequently observed to run in a
longitudinal orientation (Figures 7A
and 8A
). Thin-section EM confirmed that these
structures represented T-tubules (Figure 8
): There
were clear increases in size and number of the T-tubules at EM
examination in both DCM and ICM hearts as compared with normal
controls, with prominence of longitudinally orientated elements (Figure 8
, B through D).
|
|
Cardiomyocytes adjacent to larger zones of scarring suggesting previous
localized infarction were studied separately from the noninfarcted
tissue. In contrast to the noninfarcted tissue, certain cells
demonstrated an abnormal distribution of sarcolemmal dystrophin, with
loss of the normal punctate pattern seen in longitudinal section
(Figure 9
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The costameric pattern of surface membrane dystrophin label observed
here in human cardiac muscle resembles that reported in skeletal muscle
by confocal microscopy.6 7 8 However, not all studies have
found this pattern either in skeletal or cardiac
muscle.3 4 5 This distribution was difficult to discern on
initial examination of the 10-µm sections with conventional
epifluorescence microscopy but was clearly seen with the
greater resolution of immunoconfocal microscopy. Furthermore, we found
that adjustment of the microscope to provide the thinnest optical
sections of
0.5-µm thickness optimized the images obtained. These
findings may partly explain the earlier reports of human
cardiomyocytes showing a continuous pattern of sarcolemmal
label. The distribution of dystrophin immunolabeling in the present
study is supported by the consistency of results achieved
with the use of 2 separate antibodies and varying tissue fixation and
extended by the findings of qualitative and quantitative fracture-label
EM. Tissue distribution of ß-dystroglycan as a marker of the DAG
complex was found to be identical to that of dystrophin, again
supporting specificity of labeling in the study.
Fracture label is particularly useful for the study of sarcolemma-associated proteins such as dystrophin because the fracturing process exposes hydrophobic internal membrane faces (membrane fractures) and crosses through cells, exposing the underlying cytoplasm (cross-fractures).21 The small absolute differences and high standard deviation in dystrophin label density observed in this study reflect the tendency for fractured hydrophobic surfaces to randomly reassociate into bilayer segments after exposure to aqueous media at the thawing stage.21 Where such bilayer segments occur, access of antibodies to any underlying epitopes are blocked, leaving the areas devoid of label.
Stevenson et al19 recently showed that dystrophin is not confined to costameres in rat cardiac muscle but rather has a continuous and uniform distribution at the cell surface. Our present finding of an increased concentration of dystrophin and ß-dystroglycan at costameres with a lower density over the A-band in human cardiac muscle suggests the existence of species differences in cardiac dystrophin distribution between large and small animals. Previous work has shown that skeletal muscle from the mdx mouse model24 -which, like the muscle of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, lacks dystrophin-sustains less severe degenerative changes.25 26 The higher stress to which human muscle is exposed because of the larger body mass may therefore be important for myocyte damage in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.8 In a similar way the human heart, being larger and generating a higher a higher wall shear stress according to Laplaces law, may display clustering of dystrophin over the costameric regions of the membrane (the points of highest shear force) as an adaptation to provide the necessary increased mechanical strength. The functional importance of such membrane localization to cell survival is underlined by preservation of the sarcolemmal pattern in hypertrophied myocytes subjected to higher mechanical stress in human heart failure, whereas other cytoskeletal proteins are known to show disrupted patterns.27
The differences in sarcolemmal colocalization of dystrophin with vinculin in our study and in previous reports in both striated19 and smooth muscle cells28 suggest that the function of dystrophin is not entirely associated with the transmission of force, as has been proposed for costameric proteins.13 Furthermore, a nonmechanical function of dystrophin is suggested by its association with the cardiac T-tubule, a structure not directly affected by membrane distortion during contraction.29 The importance of this association is underlined in the current study by preservation of submembrane dystrophin in the extended T-tubules of hypertrophied cells from failing hearts. T-tubular dystrophin previously has been postulated to be important in maintenance of tubular patency during myocyte contraction.12 However, the absence of dystrophin in the skeletal muscle counterpart (distinguished morphologically by a lack of a basement membrane and the presence of triadic junctional complexes) and the consequent differing mechanisms triggering contraction in these muscle cell types suggest an alternative hypothesis of selective association of dystrophin with distinct functional membrane domains. A role for dystrophin in membrane domain organization is also supported by the existence in skeletal muscle of sarcolemmal and T-tubular membrane subcompartments separable by density-gradient centrifugation with variable contents of dystrophin30 and the clustering of dystrophin in the troughs of the muscle end-plate at the neuromuscular junction.31 Accumulating evidence also implicates dystrophin in regulatory interactions with other membrane proteins.22 32
Our results suggest that distinct muscle type and species differences exist for the distribution of the dystrophin membrane cytoskeleton. In human myocardium, dystrophin is distributed at the sarcolemma, with concentration at the lateral costameres suggesting a mechanical role in surface membrane support. The localization of dystrophin in the cardiac T-tubule suggests a cellular function besides that of mechanical support and transmission of force. Further study of dystrophin distribution and molecular interactions is necessary to precisely define the function of this system in human cardiomyocytes in health and disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 27, 1999; revision received December 13, 1999; accepted December 22, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ohlendieck K. Towards an understanding of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex: linkage between the extracellular matrix and the membrane cytoskeleton in muscle fibers. Eur J Cell Biol. 1996;69:110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Zubrzycka-Gaarn EE, Bulman DE, Karpati G, et al. The Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene product is localised in sarcolemma of human skeletal muscle. Nature. 1988;333:466469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Arahata K, Ishiura T, Tsukahara T, et al. Immunostaining of skeletal and cardiac muscle surface membrane with antibody against Duchenne muscular dystrophy peptide. Nature. 1988;333:861863.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Cullen MJ, Walsh J, Nicholson LV, et al. Ultrastructural localisation of dystrophin in human muscle by using gold immunolabelling. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990;240:197210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Byers TJ, Kunkel LM, Watkins SC. The subcellular
distribution of dystrophin in mouse skeletal, cardiac and smooth
muscle. J Cell Biol. 1991;115:411421.
7.
Porter GA, Dmytrenko GM, Winkelmann JC, et al.
Dystrophin colocalises with ß spectrin in distinct
subsarcolemmal domains in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Cell
Biol. 1992;117:9971005.
8.
Masuda T, Fujimaki N, Ozawa E, et al. Confocal laser
microscopy of dystrophin localization in guinea pig skeletal muscle
fibers. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:543548.
9.
Straub V, Bittner RE, Léger JJ, et al. Direct
visualization of the dystrophin network on skeletal muscle fiber
membrane. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:11831191.
10. Minetti C, Beltrame F, Marcenaro G, et al. Dystrophin at the plasma membrane of human fibres shows a costameric localisation. Neuromuscul Disord. 1992;2:99109.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Pardo JV, Siliciano JD, Craig SW. A vinculin-containing
cortical lattice in skeletal muscle: transverse lattice elements
("costameres") mark sites of attachment between myofibril and
sarcolemma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80:10081012.
12. Kostin S, Scholz D, Shimada T, et al. The internal and external protein scaffold of the T-tubular system in cardiomyocytes. Cell Tissue Res. 1998;294:449460.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Danowski BA, Imanaka-Yoshida K, Sanger JM, et al.
Costameres are sites of force transmission to the substratum in adult
rat cardiomyocytes. J Cell Biol. 1992;118:14111420.
14.
Petrof BJ, Shrager JB, Stedman HH, et al. Dystrophin
protects the sarcolemma from stresses developed during muscle
contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:37103714.
15. Ozawa E, Hagiwara Y, Yoshida M. Creatine kinase, cell membrane and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999;190:143151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Klietsch R, Ervasti JM, Arnold W, et al.
Dystrophin-glycoprotein complex and laminin colocalize to
the sarcolemma and transverse tubules of cardiac muscle. Circ
Res. 1993;72:349360.
17.
Frank JS, Mottino G, Chen F, et al. Subcellular
distribution of dystrophin in isolated adult and neonatal cardiac
myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:C1707C1716.
18.
Meng HP, Leddy JJ, Frank J, et al. The association of
cardiac dystrophin with myofibrils/Z-disc regions in cardiac muscle
suggests a novel role in the contractile apparatus.
J Biol Chem. 1996;271:1236412371.
19.
Stevenson S, Rothery S, Cullen MJ, et al. Dystrophin is
not a specific component of the cardiac costamere. Circ Res. 1997;80:269280.
20. Carlson CG. The dystrophinopathies: an alternative to the structural hypothesis. Neurobiol Dis. 1998;5:315.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Severs NJ. Freeze-fracture cytochemistry: an explanatory survey of methods. In: Severs NJ, Shotton DM, eds. Rapid Freezing, Freeze Fracture, and Deep Etching. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss Inc; 1995:173208.
22. Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya O, Evarsti JM, Leveille CJ, et al. Primary structure of dystrophin-associated glycoproteins linking dystrophin to the extracellular matrix. Nature. 1992;355:696702.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kaprielian RR, Poole-Wilson PA, Severs NJ. Different mechanisms of ventricular dilatation in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart failure: a study of myocyte dimensions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(suppl A):374A.
24.
Sicinski P, Geng Y, Ryder-Cook AS, et al. The molecular
basis of muscular dystrophy on the mdx mouse: a point mutation.
Science. 1989;244:15781580.
25. Cullen MJ, Jaros E. Ultrastructure of the skeletal muscle in the X chromosome-linked dystrophic (mdx) mouse: comparison with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1988;77:6981.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Stedman HH, Sweeney HL, Shrager JB, et al. The mdx mouse diaphragm reproduces the degenerative changes of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature. 1991;352:536539.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Schaper J, Froede R, Hein ST, et al. Impairment of the
myocardial ultrastructure and changes of the cytoskeleton in dilated
cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1991;83:504514.
28.
North AJ, Galazkiewicz B, Byers TJ, et al.
Complementary distributions of vinculin and dystrophin define 2
distinct sarcolemma domains in smooth muscle. J Cell
Biol. 1993;120:11591167.
29.
Soellar C, Cannell MB. Examination of the transverse
tubular system in living cardiac rat myocytes by 2-photon microscopy
and digital image-processing techniques. Circ Res. 1999;84:266275.
30. Munoz P, Rosemblatt M, Testar X, et al. Isolation and characterization of distinct domains of sarcolemma and T-tubules from rat skeletal muscle. Biochem J. 1995;307:273280.
31. Love DR, Byth BC, Tinsley JM, et al. Dystrophin and dystrophin-related proteins: a review of protein and RNA studies. Neuromuscul Disord. 1993;3:521.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Chang WJ, Iannaccone ST, Lau KS, et al. Neuronal nitric
oxide synthase and dystrophin-deficient muscular dystrophy. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:91429147.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. R. Lyon, K. T. MacLeod, Y. Zhang, E. Garcia, G. K. Kanda, M. J. Lab, Y. E. Korchev, S. E. Harding, and J. Gorelik Loss of T-tubules and other changes to surface topography in ventricular myocytes from failing human and rat heart PNAS, April 21, 2009; 106(16): 6854 - 6859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Heinzel, V. Bito, L. Biesmans, M. Wu, E. Detre, F. von Wegner, P. Claus, S. Dymarkowski, F. Maes, J. Bogaert, et al. Remodeling of T-Tubules and Reduced Synchrony of Ca2+ Release in Myocytes From Chronically Ischemic Myocardium Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 338 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Haines, S. Seabrooke, and B. A. Stewart Dystroglycan and Protein O-Mannosyltransferases 1 and 2 Are Required to Maintain Integrity of Drosophila Larval Muscles Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2007; 18(12): 4721 - 4730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Abriel Roles and regulation of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5: Recent insights from experimental studies Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2007; 76(3): 381 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Duan Challenges and opportunities in dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy gene therapy Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(suppl_2): R253 - R261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gavillet, J.-S. Rougier, A. A. Domenighetti, R. Behar, C. Boixel, P. Ruchat, H.-A. Lehr, T. Pedrazzini, and H. Abriel Cardiac Sodium Channel Nav1.5 Is Regulated by a Multiprotein Complex Composed of Syntrophins and Dystrophin Circ. Res., August 18, 2006; 99(4): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Louch, H. K. Mork, J. Sexton, T. A. Stromme, P. Laake, I. Sjaastad, and O. M. Sejersted T-tubule disorganization and reduced synchrony of Ca2+ release in murine cardiomyocytes following myocardial infarction J. Physiol., July 15, 2006; 574(2): 519 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Aiello, M. C. Villa-Abrille, E. M. Escudero, E. L. Portiansky, N. G. Perez, M. C. Camilion de Hurtado, and H. E. Cingolani Myocardial hypertrophy of normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): H1229 - H1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hatem Does the loss of transverse tubules contribute to dyssynchronous Ca2+ release during heart failure? Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2004; 62(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Brette and C. Orchard T-Tubule Function in Mammalian Cardiac Myocytes Circ. Res., June 13, 2003; 92(11): 1182 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Miyagawa, Y. Sawa, S. Taketani, N. Kawaguchi, T. Nakamura, N. Matsuura, and H. Matsuda Myocardial Regeneration Therapy for Heart Failure: Hepatocyte Growth Factor Enhances the Effect of Cellular Cardiomyoplasty Circulation, May 28, 2002; 105(21): 2556 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Song, T. M. Vondriska, G.-W. Wang, J. B. Klein, X. Cao, J. Zhang, Y. J. Kang, S. D'Souza, and P. Ping Molecular conformation dictates signaling module formation: example of PKCepsilon and Src tyrosine kinase Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1166 - H1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |