| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2000;101:2788.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsPhase A patients were randomized 4:1 to receive an abciximab bolus with infusion alone (n=63) or with 5 U, 7.5 U, 10 U, 5 U+2.5 U, or 5 U+5 U of reteplase (total n=241). Phase B tested the best phase A strategy (abciximab plus 5 U+5 U reteplase, expressed as abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U; n=115) against 10 U+10 U reteplase alone (n=109). The primary end point was Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow at 60 to 90 minutes. In phase A, 62% of the abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U group had TIMI grade 3 flow versus 27% of the abciximab-only patients (P=0.001). In phase B, 54% of the abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U group had grade 3 flow versus 47% of the reteplase-only patients (P=0.32). Grade 3 flow rates were 61% for a 60 U/kg heparin bolus and abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U, 51% for a 40 U/kg heparin bolus and abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U (P=0.22), and 47% for reteplase alone (P=0.05 versus the 60 U/kg heparin group). Major bleeding rates in phase A were 3.3% for abciximab alone and 5.3% for abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U; rates in phase B were 9.8% for abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U and 3.7% for reteplase alone. Major bleeding was similar with standard- or low-dose heparin (6.3% versus 10.5%, P=0.30).
ConclusionsIn this phase II trial, adding reteplase to abciximab treatment of acute MI versus reteplase alone enhanced the incidence of early complete reperfusion after the initiation of therapy in the emergency department.
Key Words: myocardial infarction trials reperfusion fibrinolysis platelets
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reteplase, a modified fibrin-specific plasminogen activator, has undergone extensive clinical study.5 Although mortality and intracranial hemorrhage rates have been similar for reteplase and alteplase, reteplase has shown a higher reperfusion rate.6 Other pharmacological effects also differ, including greater fibrinogen depletion after standard-dose reteplase versus alteplase treatment (but less depletion than after streptokinase treatment).7 We performed a 2-phase trial of low-dose reteplase with standard-dose abciximab, aspirin, and heparin in acute MI and explored the effects on reperfusion, bleeding, and clinical outcomes. Phase A compared reduced doses of reteplase plus abciximab versus abciximab alone; phase B compared the best combination strategy from phase A with reteplase alone (dose confirmation).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Population
The inclusion/exclusion criteria were those of the TIMI-14
trial,4 but there was no upper age limit in SPEED, and
patients could arrive
12 hours after chest-pain onset. We also
excluded patients with atrioventricular block, need for
temporary transvenous pacemaker for conduction disturbance,
severe sinus bradycardia, puncture of a noncompressible vessel in the
past 24 hours, cardiac catheterization in the past 3
days, prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation, known or
suspected vasculitis, prior heparin-induced thrombocytopenia,
participation in studies of any experimental therapy in the past week,
conditions that could prove hazardous if enrolled, other serious
illness (eg, cancer or severe liver disease), weight >120 kg, and
<100 000/µL platelets at randomization.
Treatment Strategies
In phase A, patients were randomized in a 4:1 ratio to receive a
bolus dose of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg) and a 12-hour infusion (0.125
µg · kg-1 ·
min-1) with either a bolus dose(s) of reteplase
(5 U, 7.5 U, 10 U, 5 U+2.5 U, or 5 U+5 U) or no reteplase. The decision
to proceed to higher reteplase doses was made after the Operations
Committee reviewed the safety and efficacy data. In phase B, the best
abciximab-reteplase regimen from phase A (abciximab plus 5 U+5 U
reteplase, expressed as abciximab-reteplase 5+5U; similar expressions
are used to indicate other treatments) was compared directly with
reteplase alone (reteplase 10+10 U).
The abciximab bolus was given as soon as possible after randomization, followed by abciximab infusion. The reteplase bolus was given within 5 minutes after the abciximab bolus. If patients were randomized to a second reteplase bolus, it was given 30 minutes after the first. Patients began treatment in emergency departments and were transferred immediately to catheterization laboratories for angiography.
All patients received aspirin (150 to 325 mg PO or 250 to 500 mg IV) on
diagnosis of MI and then oral aspirin at 80 to 325 mg daily for
30
days. Other medications were given at the investigators discretion.
Low molecular weight heparins, dextran, and other platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were not given
with study drugs.
For phase A, intravenous heparin (60 U/kg) was given
shortly after a bolus dose(s) of the study drug. Additional
weight-adjusted bolus doses or a continuous infusion of heparin was
given during angiography (and intervention) to maintain an
activated clotting time
200 seconds. It was recommended that
heparin be stopped at the end of the procedure to permit early sheath
removal, but if continued (at the investigators discretion), the dose
was titrated to maintain an activated partial thromboplastin
time of 50 to 70 seconds. When the results of the TIMI-14 trial became
known, the initial bolus dose of heparin in the phase B
abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U group was reduced from 60 to 40 U/kg (maximum
4000 U). All patients in the reteplase-only group received a 70 U/kg
bolus (maximum 5000 U).
Angiography and Intervention
Angiography of the infarct-related artery (IRA) was performed
within 60 to 90 minutes after the initiation of reperfusion therapy.
Two orthogonal views were obtained, and then intervention was performed
at the investigators discretion. The time window for the angiogram
designated "60 to 90 minutes" was
55 minutes and
110 minutes
after reperfusion therapy began. All approved interventional techniques
and devices, including stents, were permitted.
Angiographic Core Laboratory
Films were reviewed independently by blinded core laboratory
personnel. Variables collected from all films included location of
stenosis, TIMI flow grade,8 and percent diameter
stenosis. The corrected TIMI frame count in the IRA was also
obtained from all available films.9 A score of 100 was
imputed for occluded vessels (TIMI grade 0 to 1 flow). Procedural
success was defined as residual stenosis <50% and TIMI grade
3 flow.
End Points and Definitions
The primary end point was TIMI flow grade8
in the IRA, by core laboratory assessment, 60 to 90 minutes after
treatment began. Secondary end points included the following: corrected
TIMI frame count at 60 to 90 minutes; the composite of death,
reinfarction, or urgent (ischemia-driven) repeat
revascularization at 30 days; the composite of
death or reinfarction at 30 days; stroke (any type) at 30 days; other
bleeding complications until discharge or at 14 days (whichever
occurred first), including severity (see below) and the modified
Landefeld index10 ; and thrombocytopenia (<100 000
platelets/µL and
25% decrease from baseline) until discharge
or at 14 days.
Clinical end points of reinfarction, ischemia-driven
revascularization, pump failure, and stroke were
defined as described previously.11 12 13 14 Major bleeding was
(1) intracranial, retroperitoneal, or intraocular or (2) clinically
overt with a hemoglobin decrease >5 g/dL (or a hematocrit decrease
15%). Minor bleeding was other clinically overt bleeding not meeting
the criteria for major bleeding.
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables are summarized as percentages;
continuous variables, as medians (with 25th and 75th percentiles).
There were 3 patient cohorts: the intention-to-treat cohort, the
safety-evaluable cohort, and the angiography-evaluable cohort. The
intention-to-treat analyses included all randomized patients
except 2, who withdrew consent to participate; the safety-evaluable
cohort included all randomized patients given the study drug; and the
angiography-evaluable cohort included patients from the
safety-evaluable cohort who also, if randomized to combination therapy,
received both drugs within 15 minutes.
The
2 test was used to compare discrete
variables, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for
continuous variables. Cumulative data for abciximab-only treatment
and for abciximab-reteplase treatment are shown for phase A; results
for each dose group did not change markedly over time.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The time from first study-drug bolus to 60- to 90-minute angiography
was 62 (60, 70 [25th and 75th percentiles, respectively]) minutes and
did not differ among groups (Table 2
).
Most patients (88%) underwent angiography at 55 to 80 minutes, with no
significant differences between groups; only 12% underwent angiography
at 80 to 110 minutes. The IRA, distributed similarly among groups, was
most often the right coronary artery. Most patients underwent
intervention at initial angiography; of these, 77% received a stent.
Intervention was successful in 87% of the patients in all dose groups,
with no significant differences. Patients undergoing intervention
received 42.9 (28.4, 67.1) U/kg heparin during the procedure.
|
Core laboratory data were available for 437 of the 444 patients
undergoing angiography at 55 to 110 minutes (98.4%). The incidence of
TIMI grade 3 flow was lowest in the abciximab-only group (27%,
Figure
and Table 3
) and highest in the abciximab-reteplase
5+5 U group (62%, P=0.001). The median corrected TIMI frame
count was lowest among patients given reteplase 5+5 U and highest in
the abciximab-only group (P<0.001, Table 3
). No dose
response was seen with individual bolus doses of 5 U versus 10 U
reteplase, but the incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow increased from 46%
to 62% when 10 U was given as two 5 U bolus doses (30 minutes apart)
instead of 1 bolus (P=0.13). TIMI frame counts tended to be
lower among the split-dose reteplase groups than among the single-bolus
groups (P=0.35 and P=0.17 versus the 7.5 U and 10
U single-bolus groups, respectively). More patients in the reteplase
5+2.5 U group (38%) and the reteplase 5+5 U group (36%) had a
"normal" (<30) TIMI frame count versus the abciximab-only group
(16%, P=0.02).
|
|
In phase B, 54% of the patients given abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U had
TIMI grade 3 flow versus 47% of those given reteplase alone
(P=0.39). Patients from both phases given
abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U and standard-dose heparin (n=90) showed a
trend toward greater reperfusion versus patients given
abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U and low-dose heparin (n=70) (61% versus
51%, Figure
), which was not statistically significant. Of the
phase B patients given reteplase alone, 47% had TIMI grade 3 flow
(P=0.05 versus the standard-dose heparin group).
Overall, 11.4% of patients underwent transfusion by day 14 or
discharge (Table 4
); major bleeding
occurred in 3.3% of the abciximab-only group and in 9.2% of the
abciximab-reteplase groups combined. Adding reteplase to abciximab was
associated with a trend toward increased major bleeding
(P=0.11), but it did not significantly increase the rate of
transfusions (P=0.67) or minor bleeding (P=0.95).
Patients given reteplase with abciximab had higher bleeding index
values in phase A (median 2.7 versus 2.3 for abciximab alone,
P=0.03) but not phase B (median 2.7 versus 2.6 for reteplase
alone, P=0.67). Major bleeding was similar between patients
in both phases given abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U with standard-dose
versus low-dose heparin (6.3% versus 10.5%, P=0.30).
Thrombocytopenia occurred slightly more often among patients given
abciximab-reteplase versus those given abciximab alone
(P=0.12), but the rate of platelet transfusion was
similar among groups (Table 4
). Only 5 patients developed severe
thrombocytopenia (<50 000/µL); all had severe bleeding, and 3
received blood and/or platelet transfusions.
|
Overall, clinical event rates were low, with an overall mortality rate
of 3.8%. Rates of ischemic complications (reinfarction and
ischemia-driven revascularization) did not
differ between the groups (Table 5
). The
composite outcomes of death or reinfarction and death, reinfarction, or
ischemia-driven revascularization also did
not differ substantially among groups.
|
Three had intracranial hemorrhage; of these, 2 died. One 62-year-old woman had no neurological deficit, but computed tomography showed a small intracranial hemorrhage 4 days after receiving abciximab-reteplase 5 U. She was discharged without sequelae. One 66-year-old woman given abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U developed left-sided hemiparesis 4 hours after successful PTCA. Computed tomography showed intracranial hemorrhage and recent cerebral infarction; she died 24 hours later. The third patient was a 65-year-old man given reteplase 10+10 U. Computed tomography showed left-sided intraparenchymal hemorrhage with brain stem compression, which was fatal. The overall rate of intracranial hemorrhage in patients given abciximab-reteplase 5+5 U with 60 U/kg heparin was 1.1% (1 of 90 patients).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings extend the TIMI-14 trial observations in several ways. We found the highest TIMI grade 3 rates at 60 minutes with half-dose reteplase (5+5 U) and standard-dose abciximab. Similarly, in TIMI-14, the 60-minute TIMI grade 3 rate with half-dose alteplase (50 mg) and standard-dose abciximab was 72% versus 43% with alteplase alone.4 The importance of sustaining the fibrinolytic effect was apparent in both trials. When 10 U of reteplase was split into 2 bolus doses, TIMI grade 3 flow rates improved from 46% to 62% in phase A of our trial. In the TIMI-14 trial, when alteplase was given as a bolus and infused for 1 hour instead of given as 1 bolus, the TIMI grade 3 flow rate at 1 hour increased from 45% to 63%. Thus, reteplase combined with abciximab may behave more like alteplase than like streptokinase in improving reperfusion rates.
In the TIMI-14 trial, reduced-dose heparin (30 U/kg bolus) was associated with slightly less TIMI grade 3 flow at 90 minutes (69% versus 77%).4 Similarly, in our trial, the use of 40 U/kg heparin was associated with slightly less TIMI grade 3 flow at 1 hour (51% versus 61%). In neither trial did this small difference achieve statistical significance. This finding is not unique to studies of abciximab. Such a pattern (reduced efficacy of a fibrinolytic with lower-dose heparin) also occurred with eptifibatide/alteplase in a randomized trial.3 Clearly, heparin dosing is particularly important when low-dose recombinant plasminogen activators are used with abciximab. Thus, the GUSTO-IV acute MI trial, which will randomize 16 600 patients to reteplase with or without abciximab, will use standard heparin dosing (60 U/kg).
This trial used angiography at a median 62 minutes to assess the
effectiveness of reperfusion therapies. A 60-minute angiogram may
provide data qualitatively as important as that from a 90-minute
angiogram,2 but TIMI grade 3 flow rates are
8% to 9%
higher at 90 minutes. The present guidelines mandate that primary
PTCA should begin within 1 hour of arrival to be the preferred
reperfusion strategy; waiting 90 minutes to perform angiography may be
inappropriate. In the GUSTO-IIb substudy of primary PTCA for acute MI,
the incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow after PTCA (median time to balloon
inflation, 1.3 hours after randomization) was 73%, with
analysis by the same core laboratory.18 Thus, the
target for reperfusion therapies should be to achieve early TIMI grade
3 flow rates comparable to those achieved with primary PTCA (78% to
95%).19 The present study also confirms the TIMI
grade 3 flow rate of 51% at 60 minutes for reteplase from the
Reteplase vs Alteplase Patency Investigation During myocardial
infarction (RAPID II) trial.6
Bleeding complications in this trial were similar to those seen in other angiographic trials of reperfusion therapy.3 4 19 Combined plasminogen activation and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition had only a minor effect on overall bleeding as judged by a bleeding index. The true rate of intracranial hemorrhage with abciximab and reteplase combined remains unknown. This also will be assessed in the GUSTO-IV acute MI trial.
Adding reteplase to abciximab treatment of acute MI can increase the incidence of complete reperfusion as early as 1 hour after therapy begins. Reperfusion rates with this combination appear sensitive to the amount of heparin given concomitantly. The combination of full-dose abciximab, reteplase 5+5 U bolus doses, and 60 U/kg heparin provides a 61% incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow at 60 minutes, which is superior to standard reteplase alone (47%) and historical controls. This therapy offers an opportunity to improve the outcome after acute MI by providing earlier more complete reperfusion.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Participants in SPEED are listed in the Appendix. On behalf of the Operations Committee, Dr Ohman assumes overall responsibility for this article. ![]()
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Operations Committee: E. Barnathan, R.M. Califf, K.L. Lee, A.M. Lincoff, E.M. Ohman, J. Scherer, R. Scott, M.H. Sketch Jr, E.J. Topol, and H.F. Weisman.
Clinical and Data Coordinating Center: Duke Clinical Research Institute: W. Cantor, B. Evans, J. Harris, J. Kirby, J. Miller, D. Minshall, R.M. Oliverio, A.L. Stebbins, L. Webb, and J. Wittlief.
Executive Coordinating Center: Cleveland Clinic Foundation: E.J. Topol and A.M. Lincoff.
Angiographic Core Laboratory: Cleveland Clinic Foundation: D.J. Moliterno and T. Ivanc.
Sponsor: Lilly-Centocor: E. Barnathan, L. Damaraju, K. Hadley, L. Kukulewicz, J. Scherer, R. Scott, R. Schwarz, M. Waller, and H. Weisman.
US Sites: Cleveland Clinic Foundation: A.M. Lincoff; Pinnacle Health Hospital: W.B. Bachinsky; Erlanger Medical Center: C. Bell; Lee Memorial Hospital: J.F. Butler; Providence Hospital: S.W. David; Mease Hospital Dunedin: K. Gibbs; Good Samaritan Hospital and Health Center: M. Sakhaii; North Memorial Medical Center: G. Hanovich; University of Pennsylvania Health System: H. Herrmann; Vanderbilt University Medical Center: W. Hillegass; Christ Hospital, Jewish Hospital Kenwood, and University Hospital: D.J. Kereiakes; Fairfax Hospital: J. Kiernan; Baptist Memorial Hospital: F.A. McGrew; Lutheran Medical Center: J.S. Miklin; Alexandria Hospital: L. Miller; Duke University Medical Center: M.H. Sketch Jr; Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center: A. Riba; St. John Hospital and Medical Center: T.L. Schreiber; Hermann Hospital: R.W. Smalling; John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital: J.D. Talley; Lancaster General Hospital and St. Joseph Hospital: S. Worley; University of Michigan Medical Center: E.R. Bates; Peninsula Regional Medical Center: S. Hearne; Emory University Hospital and Crawford Long Hospital: D.C. Morris; St. Lukes and St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Centers: M.F. Priest; St. Johns Hospital and Health Center: P. Pelikan; Memorial Hospital: A.A. Seals; St. Vincent Hospital: J.E. Smith; Easton Hospital: D. Mascarenhas; St. Louis University Hospital: R.G. Bach; Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center: N. Laufer; Scripps Mercy Hospital: P.S. Phillips; Central Baptist Hospital: R. McClure; Mother Frances Hospital: F.I. Navetta; and MeritCare Medical Center: V. Bhoopalam.
International Sites: Flinders Medical Centre: P.E. Aylward; Policlinico San Matteo: D. Ardissino; Hospital Clinic I: A. Betriu; Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordi: G. Morocutti; St. Vincent Hospital: D.W.M. Muller; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires: L. Grinfeld, A. Cagide; Universiteit Heidelberg: C. Bode; Krankenhaus Neukoelln: F. Forycki; Royal Melbourne Hospital: J. Lefkovits; Hopital Bichat: G. Steg; Hospital Universitario San Carlos: C. Macaya; Universiteit-Klinikum Benjamin Franklin: H.P. Schultheiss; and Inselspital: F. Eberli.
Received August 18, 1999; revision received January 3, 2000; accepted January 25, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. G. Goodman, V. Menon, C. P. Cannon, G. Steg, E. M. Ohman, and R. A. Harrington Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 708S - 775S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Ellis, M. Tendera, M. A. de Belder, A. J. van Boven, P. Widimsky, L. Janssens, H.R. Andersen, A. Betriu, S. Savonitto, J. Adamus, et al. Facilitated PCI in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., May 22, 2008; 358(21): 2205 - 2217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J B Jones and A Docherty Non-invasive treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2007; 83(986): 725 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dobrzycki, P. Kralisz, K. Nowak, P. Prokopczuk, W. Kochman, J. Korecki, B. Poniatowski, J. Zuk, E. Sitniewska, H. Bachorzewska-Gajewska, et al. Transfer with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. on-site thrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a randomized open-label study for patients admitted to community hospitals Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2438 - 2448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maioli, F. Bellandi, M. Leoncini, A. Toso, and R. P. Dabizzi Randomized Early Versus Late Abciximab in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Coronary Intervention (RELAx-AMI Trial) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1517 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Dzau, E. M. Antman, H. R. Black, D. L. Hayes, J. E. Manson, J. Plutzky, J. J. Popma, and W. Stevenson The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum Validated: Clinical Evidence of Improved Patient Outcomes: Part II: Clinical Trial Evidence (Acute Coronary Syndromes Through Renal Disease) and Future Directions Circulation, December 19, 2006; 114(25): 2871 - 2891. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Ting, E. H. Yang, and C. S. Rihal Narrative review: reperfusion strategies for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med, October 17, 2006; 145(8): 610 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Eikelboom, D. J. Quinlan, S. R. Mehta, A. G. Turpie, I. B. Menown, and S. Yusuf Unfractionated and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Adjuncts to Thrombolysis in Aspirin-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3855 - 3867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, C. L. Grines, T. P. Wharton Jr, E. C. Keeley, and C. L. Grines The Case for Community Hospital Angioplasty Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22): 3509 - 3534. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, G. W. Stone, D. Antoniucci, J. E. Tcheng, F.-J. Neumann, F. Van de Werf, E. M. Antman, and E. J. Topol Abciximab as Adjunctive Therapy to Reperfusion in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials JAMA, April 13, 2005; 293(14): 1759 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis Concurrent Antiplatelet and Fibrinolytic Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., March 24, 2005; 352(12): 1248 - 1250. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gyongyosi, H. Domanovits, W. Benzer, M. Haugk, B. Heinisch, G. Sodeck, R. Hodl, G. Gaul, G. Bonner, J. Wojta, et al. Use of abciximab prior to primary angioplasty in STEMI results in early recanalization of the infarct-related artery and improved myocardial tissue reperfusion - results of the Austrian multi-centre randomized ReoPro-BRIDGING Study Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2125 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Menon, R. A. Harrington, J. S. Hochman, C. P. Cannon, S. D. Goodman, R. G. Wilcox, H. J. Schunemann, and E. M. Ohman Thrombolysis and Adjunctive Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 549S - 575S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goto, N. Tamura, and H. Ishida Ability of anti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents to dissolve platelet thrombi formed on a collagen surface under blood flow conditions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 316 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Simon and M. Sakuma Platelet disaggregation: Putting time on your side in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 324 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Montalescot, H R Andersen, D Antoniucci, A Betriu, M J de Boer, L Grip, F J Neumann, and M T Rothman Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): e37 - e37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman and F. Van de Werf Pharmacoinvasive Therapy: The Future of Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2480 - 2486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Straub, U. Junghans, V. Jovanovic, H. J. Wittsack, R. J. Seitz, and M. Siebler Systemic Thrombolysis With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Tirofiban in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 705 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, K. Schlotterbeck, F. Dotzer, J. Dirschinger, C. Schmitt, S. G. Nekolla, M. Seyfarth, S. Martinoff, C. Markwardt, et al. Early Administration of Reteplase Plus Abciximab vs Abciximab Alone in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Referred for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, February 25, 2004; 291(8): 947 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Gurm, A. M. Lincoff, D. Lee, W. H. W. Tang, G. Jia, J. E. Booth, R. M. Califf, E. M. Ohman, F. Van de Werf, P. W. Armstrong, et al. Outcome of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in diabetics treated with fibrinolytic or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: Lessons from the GUSTO V trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 542 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Roe, C. L. Green, R. P. Giugliano, C. M. Gibson, K. Baran, M. Greenberg, S. T. Palmeri, S. Crater, K. Trollinger, K. Hannan, et al. Improved speed and stability of st-segment recovery with reduced-dose tenecteplase and eptifibatide compared with full-dose tenecteplase for acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 549 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Qureshi, A. M. Siddiqui, S. H. Kim, R. A. Hanel, A. R. Xavier, J. F. Kirmani, M. F. K. Suri, A. S. Boulos, and L. N. Hopkins Reocclusion of Recanalized Arteries during Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 322 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T K Nordt and C Bode Thrombolysis: newer thrombolytic agents and their role in clinical medicine Heart, November 1, 2003; 89(11): 1358 - 1362. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Califf Supplement on Acute Coronary Syndromes: Introduction Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(90161): III-1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W.A. Verheugt Combining glycoprotein blockers with fibrinolysis: a bold stroke? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2003; 24(20): 1801 - 1803. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Savonitto, P.W. Armstrong, A.M. Lincoff, G. Jia, C.A. Sila, J. Booth, P. Terrosu, C. Cavallini, H.D. White, D. Ardissino, et al. Risk of intracranial haemorrhage with combined fibrinolytic and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Dichotomous response as a function of age in the GUSTO V trial Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2003; 24(20): 1807 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Eisenberg and S. Jamal Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||