Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:403-407

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molderings, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Göthert, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molderings, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Göthert, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology

(Circulation. 2000;101:403.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

N-Type Calcium Channels Control Sympathetic Neurotransmission in Human Heart Atrium

G. J. Molderings, MD; J. Likungu, MD; M. Göthert, MD

From the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Bonn (G.J.M., M.G.) and the Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery (J.L.), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Correspondence to G.J. Molderings, MD, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Bonn, Reuterstraße 2B, D-53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail molderings{at}uni-bonn.de


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Because knowledge about the type of calcium channels involved in action potential–induced norepinephrine release from the human peripheral sympathetic nervous system is sparse, we investigated which types of calcium channels are functionally important in the sympathetic nerves of human cardiac tissue.

Methods and Results—In superfused segments of human right atrial appendages, the type of calcium channels that control [3H]norepinephrine release evoked by transmural electrical stimulation was determined. [3H]norepinephrine release was almost abolished by 0.2 µmol/L {omega}-conotoxin GVIA (a selective blocker of N-type channels) but was not modified by 0.1 µmol/L {omega}-agatoxin IVA (a selective blocker of P- and Q-type channels). Mibefradil (a T-type and N-type calcium channel blocker) at concentrations of 0.3 to 3 µmol/L reduced the evoked tritium overflow in a frequency- and calcium-dependent manner, whereas 0.1 to 10 µmol/L amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil (selective blockers of L-type channels) were ineffective.

Conclusions—Norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerves is triggered by Ca2+ influx via N-type but not L- and P/Q-type calcium channels. The inhibitory effect of mibefradil on norepinephrine release at clinically relevant concentrations is probably due to its blocking action on N-type Ca2+ channels. This property of mibefradil is unique among the calcium channel blockers that have been or still are therapeutically applied and may considerably contribute to its slight negative chronotropic effect in vivo.


Key Words: atrium • calcium channels • norepinephrine • mibefradil


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The depolarization-induced norepinephrine release from central and peripheral norepinephrine neurons occurs by exocytosis triggered by an influx of extracellular calcium via voltage-dependent calcium channels. The latter are activated when the surface membrane is depolarized by an action potential. At present, 6 classes of voltage-dependent transmembrane calcium channels have been identified on the basis of functional properties such as voltage- and time-dependent kinetics, single-channel conductance, pharmacology, and cellular distribution (for review, see Reference 11 ): long-lasting conductance or L-type channels (inhibited by verapamil, diltiazem, and dihydropyridines); neural or N-type channels (blocked by {omega}-conotoxin GVIA); transient or T-type channels (blocked by mibefradil with moderate selectivity over N-type channels2 3 ); P- and Q-type channels (blocked by {omega}-agatoxin IVA); and R-type channels (blocked by Ni2+). N-, P-, Q-, and R-type calcium channels have been identified in central neurons. L- and T-type calcium channels are abundant in the periphery, particularly in the cardiovascular system.

In the peripheral sympathetic nervous system of humans, little is known about the type of calcium channels involved in depolarization-induced norepinephrine release. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine which types of calcium channels are functionally important in the sympathetic nerve terminals of human cardiac tissue. This question was also addressed in the context of the possibility that the favorable bradycardic influence of the novel calcium channel blocker mibefradil4 5 might be due to an inhibition of norepinephrine release by inhibiting calcium influx into the cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals.6 The purpose of the present experiments with mibefradil was to provide evidence for the suggestion that mibefradil inhibits norepinephrine release by blocking calcium channels in the postganglionic sympathetic axon terminals.

Preliminary accounts on the present data have been given at the 9th International Symposium on Vascular Neuroeffector Mechanisms.7


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Segments of macroscopically normal human right atrial appendages were obtained from normotensive 30- to 75-year-old male or female patients undergoing open-heart surgery. After the atrial appendages were removed (via a routine procedure for cannulation of the right atria), they were immediately transferred into fresh, cold physiological salt solution (for composition, see below) and stored at 4°C until the beginning of the experiment. The patients were not treated with adrenoceptor agonists or antagonists or with drugs that influence the storage or release of norepinephrine. After premedication with pethidine and promethazine, the patients were anesthetized (both induction and maintenance) with flunitrazepam and fentanyl. During maintenance of anesthesia, they were ventilated with mixtures of oxygen and air. Pancuronium was administered for neuromuscular blockade. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

The experiments on strips ({approx}3x15 mm) of the atrial appendages began, as a rule, within 20 hours (or sooner, in a few cases) after removal; preliminary experiments, started 2 or 20 hours after removal, had revealed that norepinephrine release and its drug-induced modification did not differ. The strips were incubated for 60 minutes in 1.5 mL of physiological salt solution (37°C) containing (-)-[ring-2,5,6-3H]-norepinephrine 0.2 µmol/L (specific activity 42 Ci/mmol). Subsequently, they were mounted vertically in an organ bath (tension adjusted to 2.0 g) between 2 parallel platinum electrodes and superfused with [3H]norepinephrine-free physiological salt solution (37°C) at a rate of 2 mL/min. The composition of the solution was (in mmol/L): NaCl 118, NaH2PO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25, KCl 4.7, CaCl2 1.6 (unless stated otherwise; in a few experiments, 3.2 or 4.8 mmol/L), MgSO4 1.2, glucose 11.0, ascorbic acid 0.3, Na2 EDTA 0.03 (aerated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). Throughout superfusion, this solution contained desipramine 0.6 µmol/L and corticosterone 40 µmol/L for blockade of the neuronal and extraneuronal uptake of norepinephrine, respectively.

The superfusate was collected in 4-minute fractions. Five (or in a few experiments, 3 or 4) periods of transmural electrical stimulation (0.66, 2 [standard stimulation parameter], 6, or 10 Hz; 360 rectangular impulses of 200 mA and 0.3 ms) were applied to each strip after 94 (S1; conditioning stimulus), 126 (S2), 158 (S3), 190 (S4), and 222 (S5) minutes of superfusion. At the end of superfusion, the strips were solubilized with Soluene (Packard), and the radioactivity in the superfusate samples and tissues was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Separate control experiments were performed for each series of experiments with the drugs.

Tritium efflux was calculated as the fraction of tritium present in the strip at the onset of the respective collection period. Basal tritium efflux was determined in the superfusate collection periods immediately before S2, S3, S4, or S5 (ie, t2, t3, t4, and t5). Stimulation-evoked tritium overflow was calculated by subtraction of the basal efflux from the total efflux during the 16 minutes subsequent to the onset of stimulation; basal efflux decreased linearly from the collection period before to that 16 to 20 minutes after onset of stimulation. Evoked tritium overflow was calculated as a percentage of tissue tritium at the onset of stimulation, and the ratios of the overflow evoked by S3, S4, or S5 over that evoked by S2 (overflow evoked by S2 through S5 was less variable than that evoked by S1) were determined.

Results are given as mean±SEM of data obtained in tissue strips from n different hearts (where n is the number of experiments). Student’s t tests for unpaired data were used for comparison of the mean values. As an estimate of drug potency, IC25 values (negative logarithm of the concentrations producing 25% inhibition of evoked tritium overflow; for terminology, see Reference 88 ) were determined by interpolation from the nearest points of the concentration-response curves.

Drugs used were (-)-[ring-2,5,6-3H]-norepinephrine (specific activity 42 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear); desipramine hydrochloride (Ciba-Geigy); corticosterone, {omega}-conotoxin GVIA, {omega}-agatoxin IVA, diltiazem, verapamil, and amlodipine (Sigma); and mibefradil dihydrochloride (a gift of Hoffmann-La Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany). Drugs were dissolved in saline or water with 1 exception: corticosterone was dissolved in 1,2-propandiol, and the stock solution was further diluted with saline. All experiments with verapamil and amlodipine were performed under exclusion of light.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Basal Efflux and Electrically Evoked Tritium Overflow in Control Experiments
When no test drug was administered before, during, and after S1 through S5, basal tritium efflux during t2 from segments of atrial appendages preincubated with [3H]norepinephrine was 4.55±0.54 nCi/min (in a representative series of control experiments; n=8; 2 Hz, 1.6 mmol/L calcium), which corresponds to a fractional rate of efflux of 0.00054±0.00002 min-1. Basal efflux decreased with time, as reflected by tn/t2 ratios that declined from t3/t2 (0.94±0.02) to t5/t2 (0.87±0.02). Neither changes in Ca2+ concentration nor application of the test drugs in the concentration range tested modified basal tritium efflux.

In control experiments in the absence of the test drugs, transmural electrical stimulation elicited an increase in tritium overflow above basal efflux (TableDown). At all frequencies of stimulation and calcium concentrations, the evoked overflow decreased from S2 to S5, as reflected by Sn/S2 ratios that declined from S3/S2 to S5/S2 (TableDown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Control Values for Stimulation-Evoked Tritium Overflow

Effects of Calcium Channel Antagonists
{omega}-Conotoxin GVIA 0.2 µmol/L nearly abolished the electrically evoked (2 Hz, 3 minutes, 360 impulses) [3H] overflow (Figure 1Down), whereas {omega}-agatoxin IVA 0.1 µmol/L was without effect (Figure 1Down). The L-type calcium channel blockers amlodipine, diltiazem (Figure 2Down), and verapamil (Figure 3ADown) failed to modify the evoked [3H] overflow. Verapamil also did not change the electrically evoked [3H] overflow at the increased stimulation frequencies of 6 and 10 Hz (360 impulses; Figure 3ADown).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of {omega}-conotoxin GVIA and {omega}-agatoxin IVA on electrically evoked (2 Hz) tritium overflow from segments of human atrial appendages. Ordinate: ratios S3/S2 expressed as percentages of those in the corresponding drug-free control experiments. Drugs were present from 12 minutes before until 20 minutes after onset of S3. Mean±SEM of 3 to 6 experiments. ***P<0.001 (compared with corresponding control experiments).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of amlodipine and diltiazem on electrically evoked tritium overflow from superfused segments of human atrial appendages preincubated with [3H]norepinephrine. Five periods of transmural electrical stimulation (2 Hz, 360 impulses; S1-S5) were applied. Amlodipine ({blacktriangledown}) and diltiazem ({square}) were present at increasing concentrations from 12 minutes before until 20 minutes after onset of S3, S4, and S5. Ordinate: ratios Sn/S2 expressed as percentages of those in corresponding drug-free control experiments. Mean±SEM of 7 to 9 experiments.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of verapamil (A) and mibefradil (B) on electrically evoked tritium overflow from superfused segments of human atrial appendages preincubated with [3H]norepinephrine at different frequencies of stimulation. Five periods of transmural electrical stimulation (S1 through S5, 360 impulses) were applied. Verapamil and mibefradil were present at increasing concentrations from 12 minutes before until 20 minutes after onset of S3, S4, and S5. •, 0.66 Hz; {circ}, 2 Hz; {blacksquare}, 6 Hz; and {blacktriangledown}, 10 Hz. Ordinates: ratios Sn/S2 expressed as percentages of those in corresponding drug-free control experiments. Mean±SEM of 5 to 10 experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.02, ***P<0.001 (compared with corresponding control experiments); +P<0.05, +++P<0.001 (compared with corresponding drug concentration in experiments performed at 2 Hz). In the case of experiments with individual verapamil concentrations, data obtained at various stimulation frequencies did not significantly differ from each other.

Under the standard experimental conditions (2 Hz, 360 impulses; 1.6 mmol/L Ca2+), the T- and N-type calcium channel blocker mibefradil concentration-dependently inhibited the electrically evoked [3H] overflow with a pIC25 value of 6.64 (Figure 4Down, open circles). The concentration-response curve of mibefradil was shifted right when the Ca2+ concentration was increased to 3.2 mmol/L (Figure 4Down, closed circles; pIC25 5.95). An additional increase in Ca2+ concentration to 4.8 mmol/L did not induce a further rightward shift of the concentration-response curve compared with that at 3.2 mmol/L (Figure 4Down, closed squares; pIC25 6.09). A rightward shift of the concentration-response curve for mibefradil was also observed when the preparations were stimulated electrically for 1 minute with an increased frequency of 6 Hz (360 impulses; Figure 3BUp, closed squares; pIC25 6.00). In contrast, lowering of the stimulation frequency to 0.66 Hz (9 minutes, 360 impulses) tended to shift the concentration-response curve for mibefradil to the left (Figure 3BUp, closed circles; pIC25 6.71).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of mibefradil on electrically evoked tritium overflow from superfused segments of human atrial appendages preincubated with [3H]norepinephrine at 3 different calcium concentrations in superfusion solution. Five periods of transmural electrical stimulation (2 Hz, 360 impulses; S1 through S5) were applied. Mibefradil was present at increasing concentrations from 12 minutes before until 20 minutes after onset of S3, S4, and S5. {circ}, 1.6 mmol/L calcium; •, 3.2 mmol/L calcium; and {blacksquare}, 4.8 mmol/L calcium. Ordinate: ratios Sn/S2 expressed as percentages of those in corresponding drug-free control experiments. Mean±SEM of 6 to 11 experiments. **P<0.02, ***P<0.001 (compared with corresponding control experiments); +P<0.05 (compared with corresponding drug concentration in experiments performed at 1.6 mmol/L calcium concentration in superfusion solution).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The aim of the present study was to characterize the calcium channels that are involved in the control of sympathetic transmission in human heart atrium and to extend our findings previously obtained in the same preparation with mibefradil.6 The electrically evoked tritium overflow reflects quasi-physiological, Ca2+-dependent release of labeled and unlabeled norepinephrine from the postganglionic sympathetic axon terminals.9 This view is supported by our previous findings10 in human atrial appendages that the electrically evoked tritium overflow is abolished by tetrodotoxin, as well as in the absence of Ca2+ in the superfusion fluid. On the basis of these considerations, the evoked tritium overflow may be denoted as norepinephrine release.

N-type calcium channels have been shown to be predominant in controlling neurotransmitter release in sympathetically innervated preparations from animal species in vitro11 12 13 (for brief review, see Reference 77 ) and in vivo.14 15 In agreement with those findings, norepinephrine release from the sympathetic nerves of the human heart was prevented by the highly selective N-type channel blocker {omega}-conotoxin GVIA (present study). In contrast, the P- and Q-type calcium channel blocker {omega}-agatoxin IVA was without influence on the electrically evoked norepinephrine release. Hence, the ability of {omega}-conotoxin GVIA to almost abolish the evoked norepinephrine release, whereas {omega}-agatoxin IVA was without effect, indicates that Ca2+ influx into the human cardiac sympathetic axon terminals occurs via N-type Ca2+ channels, whereas P- and Q-type channels are not involved.16

Mibefradil mimicked the inhibitory effect of {omega}-conotoxin GVIA on norepinephrine release. This inhibitory effect of mibefradil was dependent on the extracellular Ca2+ concentration. An increase in extracellular Ca2+ concentration from 1.8 to 3.6 mmol/L, leading to an elevated intraneuronal Ca2+ availability for stimulus-release coupling by an increased influx,17 reduced the potency of mibefradil in inhibiting evoked norepinephrine release. This finding is compatible with a quasi-competitive type of inhibition, ie, at a certain state of blockade of a given number of calcium channels, more Ca2+ ions can permeate the channel if the extracellular Ca2+ concentration is increased; conversely, a higher concentration of a calcium channel blocker is necessary at increased extracellular Ca2+ concentration to produce a certain degree of inhibition of Ca2+ influx. This interpretation is not ruled out by the finding that a further increase in Ca2+ concentration above 3.2 mmol/L to 4.8 mmol/L did not produce an additional reduction in the inhibitory potency of mibefradil: beyond a saturation level of extracellular Ca2+ concentration at which the maximum amount of Ca2+ already penetrates the channel at a given level of blockade (in the present experiments, this level appeared to be {approx}3.2 mmol/L Ca2+), an increase in extracellular Ca2+ concentration will not lead to an additional increase in intraneuronal Ca2+ availability for stimulus-release coupling. Moreover, to maintain the level of channel blockade, it will not be necessary to increase the amount of the calcium channel blocker. Similarly, an increase in stimulation frequency, which also leads to an increase in intraneuronal Ca2+ concentration (see References 9 and 189 18 ), also reduced the potency of mibefradil to inhibit evoked norepinephrine release, whereas a decrease in stimulation frequency tended to increase its potency. Because mibefradil can potently block neuronal N-type calcium channels in addition to T-type channels,2 3 the ability of mibefradil to mimic the effect of {omega}-conotoxin GVIA in human atrial appendages strongly suggests that the inhibitory effect of mibefradil on norepinephrine release from the cardiac sympathetic nerves is due to blockade of N-type Ca2+ channels.

Verapamil, diltiazem, and the dihydropyridine derivatives amlodipine and, as shown previously, nifedipine,6 which block the L-type calcium channel, did not inhibit the evoked norepinephrine release in human atrial appendages at concentrations up to 1 and 10 µmol/L, respectively. These results obtained at the standard stimulation frequency of 2 Hz suggest that L-type channels are not involved in Ca2+ influx into human cardiac sympathetic nerves during depolarization. Whether or not verapamil, diltiazem, and the dihydropyridines are capable of interacting with presynaptic calcium channels at clinically relevant concentrations is still a matter of debate. High-affinity binding of dihydropyridines to nervous tissue has been demonstrated, and it has been proposed that these binding sites are L-type calcium channels.19 However, in functional studies in which an inhibition of evoked norepinephrine release was observed by dihydropyridines and verapamil, it only occurred either at high stimulation frequencies (>=10 Hz) or at drug concentrations >=1 µmol/L.19 20 21 22 23 In the present study, even 1 µmol/L verapamil failed to inhibit evoked norepinephrine release at stimulation frequencies of up to 10 Hz. Because the upper limit of the clinically relevant plasma concentration of the L-type calcium channel blockers is {approx}0.1 µmol/L,24 it is rather unlikely that an inhibition of norepinephrine release will occur with these drugs in vivo at therapeutic doses. However, combined L- and N-type calcium channel blockers would be suitable to inhibit norepinephrine release. Such drugs may be assumed to be clinically beneficial, because they would counteract the reflex tachycardia in response to blood pressure reduction.

Taken together, in human heart, norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerves is triggered by Ca2+ influx via N-type but not L-type calcium channels. The inhibitory effect of clinically relevant concentrations of mibefradil (which has been applied therapeutically until recently) on norepinephrine release is probably due to its blocking effect on N-type calcium channels. This unique property of mibefradil may contribute to the slight negative chronotropic effect of the drug in vivo. In the Mortality Assessment in Congestive Heart Failure (MACH)-1 trial, mibefradil did not result in clinical benefits in patients with cardiac failure and showed a trend toward an increased mortality; this may be assumed to be due to an interaction with T-type calcium channels in the conduction system and/or to drug interactions.25 In the meantime, mibefradil has been withdrawn from the market because of its complex pharmacokinetic interactions. Nevertheless, it might serve as a leading compound to design future calcium channel antagonists devoid of its unfavorable pharmacokinetic interactions but sharing its beneficial properties. In particular, drugs that block both the vascular L-type and N-type calcium channels and that do not substantially pass the blood/brain barrier should lead to vasodilation without direct negative inotropism, and they should not induce sympathetic reflex activation but may cause mild bradycardia. Such drugs may represent progress in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension and coronary heart disease.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The technical assistance of D. Funccius and M. Hartwig is gratefully acknowledged.

Received June 16, 1999; revision received August 18, 1999; accepted August 26, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Nooney JM, Lambert RC, Feltz A. Identifying neuronal non-L Ca2+ channels: more than stamp collection? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997;18:363–371.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Mishra SK, Hermsmeyer K. Selective inhibition of T-type Ca2+ channels by Ro 40–5967. Circ Res. 1994;75:144–148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Bezprozvanny I, Tsien RW. Voltage-dependent blockade of diverse types of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes by the Ca2+ channel antagonist mibefradil (Ro 40–5967). Mol Pharmacol. 1995;48:540–549.[Abstract]

4. Clozel J-P, Osterrieder W, Kleinbloesem CH, Welker HA, Schläppi B, Tudor R, Hefti F, Schmitt R, Eggers H. Ro 40–5967: a new nondihydropyridine calcium antagonist. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 1991;9:4–17.

5. Bakx ALM, van der Wall EE, Braun S, Emanuelsson H, Bruschke AVG, Kobrin I. Effects of the new calcium antagonist mibefradil (Ro 40–5967) on exercise duration in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris: a multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Am Heart J. 1995;130:748–757.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Göthert M, Molderings GJ. Mibefradil- and {omega}-conotoxin GVIA-induced inhibition of noradrenaline release from the sympathetic nerves of the human heart. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1997;356:860–863.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Molderings GJ, Göthert M. Effect of calcium channel blockers on noradrenaline release in the cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;83(suppl I):84–86.

8. Jenkinson DH, Barnard EA, Hoyer D, Humphrey PPA, Leff P, Shankley NP. International union of pharmacology committee on receptor nomenclature and drug classification, IX: recommendations on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1995;47:255–266.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Starke K, Göthert M, Kilbinger H. Modulation of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic autoreceptors. Physiol Rev. 1989;69:864–989.[Free Full Text]

10. Molderings GJ, Frölich D, Likungu J, Göthert M. Inhibition of noradrenaline release via presynaptic 5-HT1D{alpha} receptors in human atrium. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1996;353:272–280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Mohy El-Din M, Malik KU. Differential effect of {omega}-conotoxin on release of the adrenergic transmitter and the vasoconstrictor response to noradrenaline in the rat isolated kidney. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;94:355–362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Clasbrummel B, Osswald H, Illes P. Inhibition of noradrenaline release by {omega}-conotoxin GVIA in the rat tail artery. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;96:101–110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. De Luca A, Li CG, Rand MJ, Reid JJ, Thaina P, Wong-Dusting HK. Effects of {omega}-conotoxin GVIA on autonomic neuroeffector transmission in various tissues. Br J Pharmacol. 1990;101:437–447.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Pruneau D, Angus JA. Apparant vascular to cardiac sympatholytic selectivity of {omega}-conotoxin GVIA in the pithed rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;184:127–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Wright CE, Angus JA. Prolonged cardiovascular effects of the N-type Ca2+ channel antagonist {omega}-conotoxin GVIA in conscious rabbits. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997;30:392–399.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Olivera BM, Miljanich GP, Ramachandran J, Adams ME. Calcium channel diversity and neurotransmitter release: the {omega}-conotoxins and {omega}-agatoxins. Ann Rev Biochem. 1994;63:823–867.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Göthert M, Nawroth P, Neumeyer H. Inhibitory effects of verapamil, prenylamine and D600 on Ca2+-dependent noradrenaline release from the sympathetic nerves of isolated rabbit hearts. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1979;310:11–19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Starke K. Regulation of noradrenaline release by presynaptic receptor systems. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1977;77:1–124.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Perney T, Hirning LD, Leeman SE, Miller RJ. Multiple calcium channels mediate neurotransmitter release from peripheral neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:6656–6659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Starke K, Schümann HJ. Wirkung von Nifedipine auf die Funktion der sympathischen Nerven des Herzens. Arzneimittelforschung. 1973;23:193–197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Callanan KM, Keenan AK. Differential effects of D600, nifedipine and dantrolene sodium on excitation-secretion coupling and presynaptic ß-adrenoceptor response in rat atria. Br J Pharmacol. 1984;83:841–847.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Jayakody RL, Kappagoda CT, Senaratne MPJ. Effect of calcium antagonists on adrenergic mechanisms in canine saphenous veins. J Physiol. 1986;372:25–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Tsuda K, Kuchii M, Nishio I, Mauyama Y. Effects of calcium antagonists on norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings in rat mesenteric vasculature. Jpn Heart J. 1986;27:395–402.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Cremers B, Flesch M, Südkamp M, Böhm M. Effects of the novel T-type calcium channel antagonist mibefradil on human myocardial contractility in comparison with nifedipine and verapamil. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997;29:692–696.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Mahon N, McKenna WJ. Calcium channel blockers in cardiac failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998;41:191–206.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Murakami, T. Ohba, F. Xu, E. Satoh, I. Miyoshi, T. Suzuki, Y. Takahashi, E. Takahashi, H. Watanabe, K. Ono, et al.
Modified Sympathetic Nerve System Activity with Overexpression of the Voltage-dependent Calcium Channel {beta}3 Subunit
J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2008; 283(36): 24554 - 24560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Kawada, T. Yamazaki, T. Akiyama, K. Uemura, A. Kamiya, T. Shishido, H. Mori, and M. Sugimachi
Effects of Ca2+ channel antagonists on nerve stimulation-induced and ischemia-induced myocardial interstitial acetylcholine release in cats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2187 - H2191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. A. Anderson, K. A. Feathergill, D. P. Waller, and L. J. D. Zaneveld
SAMMA Induces Premature Human Acrosomal Loss by Ca2+ Signaling Dysregulation
J Androl, July 1, 2006; 27(4): 568 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. Boehm and H. Kubista
Fine Tuning of Sympathetic Transmitter Release via Ionotropic and Metabotropic Presynaptic Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2002; 54(1): 43 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Ozawa, K. Hayashi, T. Nagahama, K. Fujiwara, and T. Saruta
Effect of T-Type Selective Calcium Antagonist on Renal Microcirculation: Studies in the Isolated Perfused Hydronephrotic Kidney
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 343 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molderings, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Göthert, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molderings, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Göthert, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell signalling/signal transduction
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology