Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;102:1264-1269

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mori, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beilin, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mori, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beilin, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrition
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2000;102:1264.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Differential Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid on Vascular Reactivity of the Forearm Microcirculation in Hyperlipidemic, Overweight Men

Trevor A. Mori, PhD; Gerald F. Watts, PhD, MD; Valerie Burke, MD; Elisabet Hilme, MD; Ian B. Puddey, MD; Lawrence J. Beilin, MD

From the Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, and The West Australian Heart Research Institute, Perth, Australia.

Correspondence to Dr Trevor A Mori, University Department of Medicine, Box X2213 GPO, Perth, Western Australia 6847, Australia. E-mail tmori{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Recent evidence supports differential effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the 2 major {omega}3 fatty acids of marine origin, on blood pressure in humans and vascular reactivity in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats. We investigated possible differences in the effects of purified EPA or DHA on forearm vascular reactivity in overweight hyperlipidemic men that might contribute to the blood pressure–lowering effects of fish oils.

Methods and Results—With a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of parallel design, 59 overweight, mildly hyperlipidemic men were randomized to receive 4 g/d purified EPA, DHA, or olive oil (placebo) capsules while continuing their usual diets for 6 weeks. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with venous occlusion, strain-gauge plethysmography during the sequential intra-arterial administration of acetylcholine (7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min), sodium nitroprusside (1.5, 3, and 10 µg/min), norepinephrine (10, 20, and 40 ng/min), a single-dose infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (1 mg/min), and coinfusion of acetylcholine (7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min) and L-NMMA. Forty of the 56 subjects who completed the study underwent FBF measurements. Plasma phospholipid EPA levels increased significantly (P<0.0001) after supplementation with EPA, and DHA composition increased with DHA supplementation (P<0.0001). Relative to placebo, DHA, but not EPA, supplementation significantly improved FBF in response to acetylcholine infusion (P=0.040) and coinfusion of acetylcholine with L-NMMA (P=0.040). Infusion of L-NMMA alone showed no group differences. DHA significantly enhanced dilatory responses to sodium nitroprusside (P<0.0001) and attenuated constrictor responses to norepinephrine (P=0.017).

Conclusions—Relative to placebo, DHA, but not EPA, enhances vasodilator mechanisms and attenuates constrictor responses in the forearm microcirculation. Improvements in endothelium-independent mechanisms appear to be predominant and may contribute to the selective blood pressure–lowering effect observed with DHA compared with EPA in humans.


Key Words: fish oils • vasculature • blood pressure • nitric oxide • microcirculation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental, clinical, and some epidemiological observations suggest that fish oils protect against cardiovascular disease.1 Mechanisms include improvements in vascular function secondary to the favorable effects of fish oils on blood pressure (BP),2 3 lipid4 and prostanoid1 metabolism, and thrombosis.5 Vascular function improves after {omega}3 fatty acid supplementation in experimental models of endothelial dysfunction,6 7 8 9 in normal healthy subjects,10 11 12 13 in hypercholesterolemic patients,14 and in type 2 diabetics.15

The principal {omega}3 fatty acids in fish oils are eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Although studies in rats have demonstrated differential effects of EPA and DHA on vascular function,16 17 their effects on vascular and endothelial functions in humans have not been investigated. There is indirect evidence in humans, based on the urinary excretion of NO metabolites, that DHA may enhance endothelial function compared with EPA.18

We have reported that in overweight subjects with mild dyslipidemia, DHA significantly decreased arterial BP and heart rate compared with EPA19 and was accompanied by significant increases in LDL particle size and HDL2 cholesterol (HDL2-C). Hypertension, small LDL particle size, and low HDL-C level are associated with endothelial dysfunction in humans.20 We proposed that relative to placebo, DHA would lead to greater improvements than EPA on forearm vasoactive responses in overweight subjects with dyslipidemia. Endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular function was studied with measurements of vasoreactivity to intra-arterial infusions of acetylcholine, releasing NO endogenously to produce vasodilation; to sodium nitroprusside, acting as a direct NO donor; and to norepinephrine, causing vasoconstriction by activating {alpha}-adrenergic receptors on smooth muscle cells.21


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
Subject characteristics have been described elsewhere.19 Briefly, mildly hyperlipidemic but otherwise healthy, nonsmoking men aged 20 to 65 years were recruited from the general community through media advertisements. Entry criteria included cholesterol level of >=6 mmol/L or triglyceride level of >=1.8 mmol/L (or both), body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 30 kg/m2, and no recent (within 3 months) symptomatic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, or liver or renal disease (plasma creatinine >130 µmol/L). Subjects were not on regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy, antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, or other drugs that affect lipid metabolism. They had a usual weekly consumption of not more than 1 meal with fish and <210 mL of ethanol. Fifty-nine of 136 subjects who were screened satisfied the entry criteria. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Royal Perth Hospital, and all subjects gave written consent.

Dietary Education and Intervention
Baseline measurements were collected for a 3-week period, during which subjects continued their usual diet and alcohol intake. They were matched for age and BMI and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: EPA-ethyl ester ({approx}96%), DHA-ethyl ester ({approx}92%), or olive oil ({approx}75% oleic acid ethyl ester) at 4 g/d for 6 weeks. Volunteers were asked to maintain their usual diets, alcohol intake, and physical activity and to not alter their lifestyle during the intervention.

Subjects completed 3-day diet records at baseline and at the end of the intervention.19 Dietary and alcohol intake, physical activity, and use of medications were monitored every second week with the use of 7-day retrospective diaries.

Clinical Protocol for the Measurement of Forearm Vascular Reactivity
Studies were conducted in a vascular laboratory (ambient temperature 20° to 25°C), in the morning with subjects supine and having fasted for 12 hours. Subjects were studied twice: once before and once after the intervention. Resting BP was measured at baseline and at the end of the protocol with an automated recorder (Dinamap 845; Critikon). Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography with mercury-in-Silastic strain gauges calibrated electronically (Hokanson EC 4 Plethysmograph; E.C. Hokanson, Inc).21 During measurements, subjects had their left arm supported on the extensor aspect of the elbow joint on foam blocks in the same position on each occasion. The wrist cuff was inflated to 180 mm Hg for 1 minute to occlude blood flow to the hands. The upper arm cuff was inflated to 40 mm Hg to occlude venous return for 10 seconds and then deflated for 7 seconds for 4 cycles at a time, with FBF returning to baseline between cycles. Rapid cuff inflation was achieved with an air source coupled to 2 rapid cuff inflators (Hokanson E 20 Rapid Cuff Inflator; E.C. Hokanson, Inc). Measurements were recorded on a Macintosh computer with the MacLab 3.3 program. Drugs or 0.9% saline was infused into the brachial artery of the left arm via a 20-gauge radial artery plastic cannula (Arrow) inserted under local anesthetic (2% procaine HCl).

Baseline measurements of FBF were recorded during a 15-minute infusion of 0.9% saline at 1 mL/min. This was followed by cumulative dosage infusions of acetylcholine (7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min), sodium nitroprusside (1.5, 3, and 10 µg/min), and norepinephrine (10, 20, and 40 ng/min). Drugs, diluted in 0.9% saline, were infused at 1 mL/min for 4 minutes with an infusion pump (Ivac 770 Syringe Pumps). FBF from each dose of infusion was measured during the fourth minute. Each drug infusion was interspersed with infusion of 0.9% saline at 1 mL/min for 15 minutes until blood flow returned to baseline. The specificity of the responses to NO was tested with a single dose of L-NMMA (1 mg/mL) infused at 1 mL/min for 8 minutes. This was followed by 4 minute co-infusions of L-NMMA and cumulative doses of acetylcholine (7.5,15 and 30 µg/min).

Calculations
Vascular responses were determined from the slope of each plethysmographic recording and expressed as mL blood flow · 100 mL-1 · min-1, where 100 mL-1 refers to forearm volume, as described by Whitney.21 The mean of the final 3 FBF measurements during the fourth minute of each drug infusion and the eighth minute of the L-NMMA infusion was then calculated. All traces were blindly analyzed by the same investigator.

Biochemical Analyses and Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids
Venous blood was collected with the subject in a semirecumbent position after a 12-hour fast: twice at baseline and twice at the end of the intervention. Serum for lipid, lipoprotein, and insulin levels was stored at -80°C and analyzed in a single assay to minimize interassay variation.22 Serum glucose level was measured with an automated immunoassay analyzer. Plasma phospholipid fatty acids were analyzed by gas liquid chromatography.22

Statistical Analysis
Diet records were analyzed with Diet/1 Version 4 (Xyris) based on the Australian Food Composition Database (NUTTAB 1995A).23 Responses to each drug were summarized with calculation of slopes of the regression lines that related dose and percentage response from baseline for each individual.24 Estimated slopes were used in subsequent analysis to examine the effect of treatment group on change in slope for each drug infusion before and after intervention. The study had a 70% power to detect a 0.30 mL · 100 mL-1 · µg-1 difference in the slope, based on FBF responses to infusion of acetylcholine. Data were analyzed with SPSS (SPSS Inc) with general linear models (GLM) adjusted for baseline values. P<0.05 was considered significant with Bonferroni’s adjustment for multiple comparisons. Vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine were not normally distributed, and analysis was made with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Values are mean±SEM.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Fifty-six of the 59 subjects who entered the study completed the 6-week intervention.19 Withdrawals were primarily due to inability to maintain the schedule of laboratory visits or to comply with the capsules. One subject withdrew due to gastrointestinal symptoms. Drug infusion studies were performed before and after intervention in 40 subjects who agreed to undertake the procedure. Baseline characteristics of the 3 groups are shown in the TableDown; there were no significant differences between the groups for any of the variables at baseline.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects by Treatment Group

Weight did not change significantly during the intervention.19 Adherence to the diets was assessed with diet records, capsule counts, and changes in plasma phospholipid fatty acids.19 Total energy and major macronutrient intake were not significantly different between groups at baseline and did not change during the intervention.19

Forearm Vascular Reactivity
FBF in response to saline infusions before each of the cumulative dosage infusions of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, norepinephrine, and L-NMMA at baseline and after the intervention was not significantly different between groups; there were no significant differences within each group between baseline and postintervention responses to the saline infusions.

During preintervention, FBF showed no significant differences between groups in the slopes of the lines in response to infusions of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, norepinephrine, L-NMMA, or L-NMMA coinfusions with acetylcholine, after adjustment for blood flow during the baseline saline infusion.

Acetylcholine and L-NMMA–Plus–Acetylcholine Infusions
The change in FBF in response to acetylcholine differed significantly between groups (P=0.047) (Figure 1Down). Relative to the olive oil group, DHA supplementation increased vasodilatory responses by 0.39 mL · 100 mL-1 · µg-1 (P=0.040), whereas EPA had no effect (P=0.244).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Percentage change in olive oil, EPA, and DHA groups in FBF relative to 0.9% saline infusion (baseline) in vasodilatory responses to cumulative dosage of acetylcholine (7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min) (P=0.047, with ANOVA, for change in slope from before intervention to after intervention between groups). Treatment effects: EPA (P=0.244) and DHA (P=0.040) relative to olive oil. Olive oil group (n=14), EPA group (n=13), and DHA group (n=13). {circ}, Preintervention. •, Postintervention.

Before the intervention, the infusion of L-NMMA significantly reduced FBF relative to saline in the olive oil (-27%, P<0.0001), EPA (-23%, P<0.0001), and DHA (-24%, P=0.002) groups. After intervention, L-NMMA reduced FBF by 23% (P=0.008) in the olive oil group, 27% (P=0.002) in the EPA group, and 24% (P=0.003) in the DHA group. There were no significant differences in the response to L-NMMA between before and after interventions within treatment groups.

After intervention, the coinfusion of L-NMMA with acetylcholine attenuated FBF compared with the effects of acetylcholine alone (P=0.054), and the response differed significantly between groups (P=0.043) (Figure 2Down). Relative to olive oil, EPA supplementation had no significant effect (P=0.347), whereas DHA significantly enhanced dilatory responses by 0.29 mL · 100 mL-1 · µg-1 (P=0.040).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Percentage change in olive oil, EPA, and DHA groups in FBF relative to 0.9% saline infusion (baseline) in vasodilatory responses to coinfusions of L-NMMA and cumulative dosage of acetylcholine (7.5, 15, and 30 µg/min) (P=0.043, with ANOVA, for change in slope from before intervention to after intervention between groups). Treatment effects: EPA (P=0.347) and DHA (P=0.040) relative to olive oil. Arrow indicates time of administration of L-NMMA. Olive oil group (n=14), EPA group (n=13) and DHA group (n=13). {circ}, Preintervention. •, Postintervention.

Sodium Nitroprusside Infusions
Forearm vasodilatory responses to sodium nitroprusside were significantly altered by the treatments (P=0.001) (Figure 3Down). DHA supplementation improved dilatory responses by 0.27 mL · 100 mL-1 · µg-1 (P<0.0001), but EPA did not change responses significantly (P=0.228), relative to the olive oil group.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Percentage change in olive oil, EPA, and DHA groups in FBF relative to 0.9% saline infusion (baseline) in vasodilatory responses to sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (1.5, 3, and 10 µg/min) (P=0.001, with ANOVA, for change in slope from before intervention to after intervention between groups). Treatment effects: EPA (P=0.228) and DHA (P<0.0001) relative to olive oil. Olive oil group (n=14), EPA group (n=13), and DHA group (n=13). {circ}, Preintervention. •, Postintervention.

Norepinephrine Infusions
There was significant attenuation (P=0.039) of the constrictor responses to DHA (0.28 mL · 100 mL-1 · µg-1, P=0.017), but not EPA (P=0.125), relative to the olive oil group (Figure 4Down).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Percentage change in olive oil, EPA, and DHA groups in FBF relative to 0.9% saline infusion (baseline) in vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine (10, 20, and 40 ng/min) (P=0.039, with ANOVA, for change in slope from before intervention to after intervention between groups). Treatment effects: EPA (P=0.125) and DHA (P=0.017) relative to olive oil. Olive oil group (n=14), EPA group (n=13), and DHA group (n=13). {circ}, Preintervention. •, Postintervention.

Serum Lipids, LDL Particle Size, and Glucose and Insulin Levels
None of these variables changed significantly with olive oil supplementation. Neither EPA nor DHA supplementation affected serum total cholesterol. After adjustment for baseline values, fasting triglycerides fell by 18.4% with EPA (0.34±0.18 mmol/L, P=0.068) and by 20% with DHA (0.53±0.18 mmol/L, P=0.006), relative to the olive oil group. Serum LDL-C increased by 8% with DHA (0.26±0.10 mmol/L, P=0.013) but not with EPA. In the EPA group, a small decrease in HDL-C (0.06±0.03 mmol/L, P=0.064) resulted from a reduction in HDL3-C (0.05±0.03 mmol/L, P=0.084). Although HDL-C was not significantly altered after DHA supplementation, HDL2-C increased 29% (0.07±0.03 mmol/L, P=0.014). Relative to the olive oil group, DHA, but not EPA, increased LDL particle size (0.26±0.10 nm, P=0.013) after adjustment for baseline values.

There was no change in fasting glucose concentration with either EPA or DHA relative to the olive oil group, after adjustment for baseline values. Both EPA and DHA increased fasting insulin (1.70±0.94 pmol/L, P=0.078 [18%], and 2.53±0.93 pmol/L, P=0.010 [27%], respectively), relative to olive oil.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The highly purified preparations used in the present study clearly distinguished between the effects of EPA and DHA, the 2 major {omega}3 fatty acids in fish and most fish oil preparations. The novel finding is that relative to placebo, DHA, but not EPA, improves vasodilator responses to endogenous and exogenous NO donors and attenuates vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine in the forearm microcirculation of overweight subjects with hyperlipidemia. Mechanisms appear to be predominantly endothelium independent, based on enhanced vasodilatory responses after the coinfusion of acetylcholine with L-NMMA and the infusion of nitroprusside, both of which are endothelium independent. Our results, however, do not preclude some endothelial component in the dilatory responses associated with DHA. These findings may account for the lower BP observed after DHA supplementation.19 The favorable effects seen with DHA were paralleled by changes in plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels.

{omega}3 Fatty acids affect endothelial function, vascular reactivity, and BP.2 3 6 7 Fish oils have antihypertensive effects,2 3 25 which are possibly attributable to DHA and not EPA.19 These effects may be related to {omega}3 fatty acid–induced changes in vasoreactivity, which is consistent with our findings that fish oils fed to hypertensive rats increased endothelial relaxation in response to acetylcholine in aortic rings8 and decreased pressor reactivity of perfused mesenteric resistance vessels.9 Increased endothelial relaxation related at least in part to suppression of thromboxane A2 or cyclic endoperoxides, as well as enhanced endothelial NO synthesis.8 In humans, fish oils reduced forearm vascular reactivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine,10 11 12 effects that were antagonized by the oral administration of indomethacin, suggesting the involvement of cyclooxygenase-derived prostanoids.13 Indomethacin alone did not affect responses.13

Fish oils have little effect on the vasodilation induced by acetylcholine or reactive hyperemia in forearm resistance arteries of healthy subjects.13 However, {omega}3 fatty acids restore impaired responses to endothelium-dependent vasodilators in patients with coronary artery disease,26 as well as in animal models characterized by endothelial damage.8 27 28 Chin and Dart14 demonstrated that dietary fish oils enhanced vasodilatory responses to acetylcholine in hypercholesterolemic subjects without affecting total cholesterol.

Fish oils improved forearm vasodilator responses to acetylcholine, but not to glyceryltrinitrate, in type 2 diabetics, suggesting that {omega}3 fatty acids may protect against vasospasm and thrombosis by enhancing NO release and suppressing thromboxane formation.15 Further evidence that fish oils may affect the production or release of NO comes from studies that showed enhanced responses to endothelium-dependent vasodilators such as bradykinin, serotonin, ADP, and thrombin in rings of coronary arteries taken from pigs fed cod liver oil.29 Responses were unaltered by indomethacin or nitroprusside, confirming that the augmentation was independent of vasodilator prostaglandins and changes in smooth muscle cells.

Despite the plethora of studies concerning {omega}3 fatty acids, to date there is no information on the relative effects of pure EPA or DHA on endothelial or vascular smooth muscle function in humans. Engler et al16 reported that in aortic rings from spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar-Kyoto rats, EPA and DHA induced endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation, respectively. McLennan et al17 demonstrated that DHA was also more effective than EPA at inhibition of thromboxane-like vasoconstrictor responses in the aortas from spontaneously hypertensive rats. The authors postulated that DHA may prevent thromboxane-induced contraction and perhaps restore the vasoconstrictor/vasodilator balance after impairment of the normal NO-related processes. Whether DHA inhibits thromboxane synthetase or thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptor function remains unresolved. Hashimoto et al30 have shown that rats fed DHA intragastrically had reduced plasma norepinephrine levels. Increased adenyl purines such as ATP, released both spontaneously and in response to norepinephrine from segments of caudal artery, were significantly inversely associated with BP. ATP causes vasodilation by stimulating the release of NO from endothelial cells,31 via a direct action on vascular smooth muscle cells,32 and by hyperpolarizing smooth muscle cells.33 DHA was postulated to alter membrane fatty acid composition and accelerate ATP release from vascular endothelial cells, which, in conjunction with reduced plasma norepinephrine, may be responsible for the fall in BP.30

The favorable effects seen on vasoreactivity with DHA are likely to be mediated by multiple mechanisms, predominantly endothelial-independent mechanisms. These may be attributable to direct and indirect effects of DHA on the arterial wall. The selective incorporation of DHA into endothelial membranes could increase membrane fluidity, calcium influx, and endogenous synthesis and NO release. However, the lack of a significant difference in the basal blood flow response to L-NMMA argues against a specific effect of DHA on basal synthesis and NO release. A direct effect on receptor-stimulated NO release may account for the improved response to acetylcholine. However, the results of the coinfusion of acetylcholine plus L-NMMA indicate that DHA may enhance the release of vasodilator prostanoids or endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, consistent with experimental evidence.27 The enhanced vasodilator response to sodium nitroprusside may be due to increased biotransformation to NO or increased reactivity of smooth muscle cells to vasorelaxation consequent to decreased calcium influx, as reported elsewhere with fish oils.7 These mechanisms, as well as the increased release of a vasodilator cyclooxygenase metabolite, may also account for the decreased vasoconstriction to norepinephrine.

The reduction in VLDL seen with fish oils may mediate improvement in endothelial function,7 14 but because plasma triglyceride changes were similar in EPA- and DHA-treated patients, VLDL changes cannot account for the effects of DHA. Small, dense LDL is more susceptible to oxidative modification than large LDL, and in modified form, it impairs the function of NO synthase and converts NO to peroxynitrite.34 Increased LDL size in patients who take DHA could explain the improved vasoreactivity. Because HDL has antioxidant properties and may directly improve endothelial function,34 the increase in HDL2-C may also have contributed to favorable effects with DHA. Insulin releases NO from endothelial cells35 and attenuates vasoconstriction due to adrenergic stimuli,36 but changes in insulin sensitivity are an unlikely explanation, because the plasma insulin-to-glucose ratio did not differ significantly between EPA and DHA.

The induction of NO synthase in vascular smooth muscle cells is inhibited by mitogens such as platelet-derived growth factor.37 DHA may increase basal production of NO in smooth muscle cells as a consequence of decreased release of PDGF from platelets.38 Regardless of the mechanisms responsible for the vascular benefits seen with DHA in the present study, it remains to be established why these do not operate with the administration of EPA. A more selective appraisal of the mechanisms of the effect of DHA could be achieved with {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor and angiotensin II receptor antagonists or prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors.

We saw no significant correlations between FBF and serum lipid, glucose, and insulin levels or BP in within-group analyses. The lack of correlation between vasodilator and vasoconstrictor responses and BP changes with DHA suggests independent mechanisms. However, vascular responses could be secondary to improvements in BP with DHA, involving an undefined mechanism. DHA, but not EPA, reduced heart rate,19 raising the possibility of a significant cardiac contribution to the fall in BP. The effects of fish oils in increasing aortic compliance and leading to BP reduction might also be expected in animal studies.8

The present study has demonstrated that in overweight, mildly hyperlipidemic men, DHA, but not EPA, enhances vasodilator responses relative to olive oil in the microcirculation of the forearm to both endogenous and exogenous NO donors via predominantly endothelial-independent mechanisms and attenuates constrictor responses to norepinephrine. These vasoactive effects may in part contribute to the BP-lowering actions of DHA. These observations are relevant to the food industry with respect to the incorporation of {omega}3 fatty acids into foodstuffs and animal feeds and, hence, the human food chain.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a program grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. We acknowledge the assistance of Danny Bao, Lynette McCahon, Esther Balde, and Nardia Ward and the nursing assistance of Jessie Prestage, Anne-Marie Wlazlowski, and Liz Mortley. LDL particle size was determined by Dr David O’Neal and Prof James Best from the Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia. Capsules were provided by the Fish Oil Test Materials Program and the US National Institutes of Health, Department of Commerce.

Received December 31, 1999; revision received March 27, 2000; accepted April 13, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Simopoulos AP, Kifer RR, Martin RE, Barlow SM, eds. Health effects of {omega}3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in seafoods. World Rev Nutr Diet. 1991;66:1–592.

2. Appel LJ, Miller ER III, Seidler AJ, et al. Does supplementation of diet with ‘fish oil’ reduce blood pressure? Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1429–1438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Morris MC, Sacks F, Rosner B. Does fish oil lower blood pressure? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Circulation. 1993;88:523–533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Harris WS. n-3 Fatty acids and lipoproteins: comparison of results from human and animal studies. Lipids. 1996;31:243–252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Mori TA, Beilin LJ, Burke V, et al. Interactions between dietary fat, fish and fish oils, on platelet function in men at risk of cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:279–286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Chin JP. Marine oils and cardiovascular reactivity. Prostagland Leuk Essent Fatty Acids. 1994;50:211–222.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Chin JP, Dart AM. How do fish oils affect vascular function? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995;22:71–81.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Yin K, Chu ZM, Beilin LJ. Blood pressure and vascular reactivity changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats fed fish oil. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;102:991–997.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Chu ZM, Yin K, Beilin LJ. Fish oil feeding selectively attenuates contractile responses to norepinephrine and electrical stimulation in the perfused mesenteric resistance vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1992;19:177–181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Lorenz R, Spengler U, Fischer S, et al. Platelet function, thromboxane formation and blood pressure control during supplementation of the Western diet with cod liver oil. Circulation. 1983;67:504–511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Yoshimura T, Matsui K, Ito M, et al. Effects of highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid on plasma beta thromboglobulin level and vascular reactivity to angiotensin II. Artery. 1987;14:295–303.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Chin JPF, Gust AP, Nestel PJ, et al. Fish oils dose-dependently inhibit vasoconstriction of forearm resistance vessels in humans. Hypertension. 1993;21:22–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Chin JPF, Gust AP, Dart AM. Indomethacin inhibits the effects of dietary supplementation with fish oils on vasoconstriction of human forearm resistance vessels in vivo. J Hypertens. 1993;11:1229–1134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Chin JPF, Dart AM. Therapeutic restoration of endothelial function in hypercholesterolaemic subjects: effect of fish oils. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1994;21:749–755.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, et al. Dietary fish oil augments nitric oxide production or release in patients with type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1993;36:33–38.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Engler MB, Engler MM, Ursell PC. Vasorelaxant properties of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in aortas from spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1994;1:75–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. McLennan P, Howe P, Abeywardena M, et al. The cardiovascular protective role of docosahexaenoic acid. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;300:83–89.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Harris WS, Rambjor GS, Windsor SL, et al. n-3 Fatty acids and urinary excretion of nitric oxide metabolites in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:459–464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Mori TA, Bao DQ, Burke V, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid but not eicosapentaenoic acid lowers ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in humans. Hypertension. 1999;34:253–260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Briner VA, Luscher TF. Role of vascular endothelial abnormalities in clinical medicine: atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, and endotoxemia. Adv Int Med. 1994;39:1–22.

21. Whitney RJ. The measurement of volume changes in human limbs. J Physiol. 1953;121:1–27.

22. Mori TA, Bao DQ, Burke V, et al. Dietary fish as a major component of a weight reducing diet: impact on serum lipids, glucose and insulin metabolism in overweight hypertensive subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:817–825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Lewis J, Holt R. NUTTAB 91–92. Nutrient Tables for Use in Australia. Canberra, Australia: National Food Authority, Australian Government Publishing Service; 1991.

24. Matthews JNS, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, et al. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990;300:230–235.

25. Bao DQ, Mori TA, Burke V, et al. Effects of dietary fish and weight reduction on ambulatory blood pressure in overweight hypertensives. Hypertension. 1998;32:710–717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Fleischhauer FJ, Yan W-D, Fischell TA. Fish oil improves endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in heart transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:982–989.[Abstract]

27. Yin K, Chu ZM, Beilin LJ. Study of mechanisms of glucocorticoid hypertension in rats: endothelial related changes and their amelioration by dietary fish oils. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;106:435–442.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Shimokawa H, Vanhoutte PM. Dietary cod-liver oil improves endothelium-dependent response in hypercholesterolemic and atherosclerotic porcine arteries. Circulation. 1988;78:1421–1430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Shimokawa H, Lam JYT, Chesebro JH, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with cod-liver oil on endothelium-dependent response in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1987;76:898–905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Hashimoto M, Shinozuka K, Gamoh S, et al. The hypotensive effect of docosahexaenoic acid is associated with the enhanced release of ATP from the caudal artery of aged rats. J Nutr. 1999;129:70–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. De Mey JG, Vanhoutte PM. Role of the intima in cholinergic and purinergic relaxation of isolated canine femoral arteries. J Physiol. 1981;316:347–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Burnstock G. Local control of blood pressure by purines. Blood Vessels. 1987;24:156–160.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Nishiye E, Chen GF, Hirose T, et al. Mechanical and electrical properties of smooth muscle cells and their regulations by endothelium-derived factors in the guinea pig coronary artery. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1990;54:391–405.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. O’Brien SF, Watts GF, Playford DA, et al. Low-density lipoprotein size, high-density lipoprotein concentration, and endothelial dysfunction in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabet Med. 1997;14:974–978.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Scherrer U, Randin D, Vollenweider P, et al. Nitric oxide release accounts for insulin’s vascular effects in humans. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:2511–2515.

36. Walker AB, Savage MW, Dores J, et al. Insulin-induced attenuation of norepinephrine-mediated vasoconstriction in resistance arteries from Wistar rats is nitric oxide dependent. Clin Sci. 1997;92:147–152.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Schini VB, Durante W, Elizondo E, et al. The induction of nitric oxide synthase activity is inhibited by TGF-ß1, PDGFAB and PDGFBB in vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;216:379–383.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Fox PL, DiCorleto PE. Fish oils inhibit endothelial cell production of platelet-derived growth factor-like protein. Science. 1988;241:453–456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. W. Fetterman Jr. and M. M. Zdanowicz
Therapeutic potential of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in disease
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2009; 66(13): 1169 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S A Wright, F M O'Prey, M T McHenry, W J Leahey, A B Devine, E M Duffy, D G Johnston, M B Finch, A L Bell, and G E McVeigh
A randomised interventional trial of {omega}-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids on endothelial function and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2008; 67(6): 841 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. M. Diaz Encarnacion, G. M. Warner, C. E. Gray, J. Cheng, H. K. H. Keryakos, K. A. Nath, and J. P. Grande
Signaling pathways modulated by fish oil in salt-sensitive hypertension
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): F1323 - F1335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. L. Hall, K. A. Sanders, T. A. B. Sanders, and P. J. Chowienczyk
A High-Fat Meal Enriched with Eicosapentaenoic Acid Reduces Postprandial Arterial Stiffness Measured by Digital Volume Pulse Analysis in Healthy Men
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 287 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
S. J Hamilton, G. T Chew, and G. F Watts
Therapeutic regulation of endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 89 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. M Hill, J. D Buckley, K. J Murphy, and P. R. Howe
Combining fish-oil supplements with regular aerobic exercise improves body composition and cardiovascular disease risk factors
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1267 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. E. Theobald, A. H. Goodall, N. Sattar, D. C. S. Talbot, P. J. Chowienczyk, and T. A. B. Sanders
Low-Dose Docosahexaenoic Acid Lowers Diastolic Blood Pressure in Middle-Aged Men and Women
J. Nutr., April 1, 2007; 137(4): 973 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. Shimojo, S. Jesmin, S. Zaedi, S. Maeda, M. Soma, K. Aonuma, I. Yamaguchi, and T. Miyauchi
Eicosapentaenoic acid prevents endothelin-1-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro through the suppression of TGF-beta1 and phosphorylated JNK
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H835 - H845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. L Breslow
n-3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): S1477 - 1482S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. D. Monahan, T. E. Wilson, and C. A. Ray
Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation Augments Sympathetic Nerve Activity Responses to Physiological Stressors in Humans
Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 732 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. I. O'Connor, L. M. Lawrence, A. C. St. Lawrence, K. M. Janicki, L. K. Warren, and S. Hayes
The effect of dietary fish oil supplementation on exercising horses
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 2978 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Ros, I. Nunez, A. Perez-Heras, M. Serra, R. Gilabert, E. Casals, and R. Deulofeu
A Walnut Diet Improves Endothelial Function in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Circulation, April 6, 2004; 109(13): 1609 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Chen, D. Li, G. J Roberts, T. Saldeen, and J. L Mehta
Eicosapentanoic acid inhibits hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced injury by attenuating upregulation of MMP-1 in adult rat myocytes
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2003; 59(1): 7 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J S Forsyth, P Willatts, C Agostoni, J Bissenden, P Casaer, and G Boehm
Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infant formula and blood pressure in later childhood: follow up of a randomised controlled trial
BMJ, May 3, 2003; 326(7396): 953 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. M. Engler, M. B. Engler, D. M. Pierson, L. B. Molteni, and A. Molteni
Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid on Vascular Pathology and Reactivity in Hypertension
Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2003; 228(3): 299 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. M. Kris-Etherton, W. S. Harris, L. J. Appel, and for the Nutrition Committee
Fish Consumption, Fish Oil, Omega-3 Fatty Acids, and Cardiovascular Disease
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2003; 23(2): e20 - 30.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. J. Woodman, T. A. Mori, V. Burke, I. B. Puddey, G. F. Watts, J. D. Best, and L. J. Beilin
Docosahexaenoic Acid But Not Eicosapentaenoic Acid Increases LDL Particle Size in Treated Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2003; 26(1): 253 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Kris-Etherton, W. S. Harris, L. J. Appel, and for the Nutrition Committee
Fish Consumption, Fish Oil, Omega-3 Fatty Acids, and Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, November 19, 2002; 106(21): 2747 - 2757.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. J Woodman, T. A Mori, V. Burke, I. B Puddey, G. F Watts, and L. J Beilin
Effects of purified eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids on glycemic control, blood pressure, and serum lipids in type 2 diabetic patients with treated hypertension
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2002; 76(5): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Ye, D. Zhang, C. Oltman, K. Dellsperger, H.-C. Lee, and M. VanRollins
Cytochrome P-450 Epoxygenase Metabolites of Docosahexaenoate Potently Dilate Coronary Arterioles by Activating Large-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2002; 303(2): 768 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. G. Fegan, K. M. Macleod, J. E. Tooke, and A. C. Shore
n-3 NEFA: vascular implications
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 185 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mori, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beilin, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mori, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beilin, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrition
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide