(Circulation. 2000;102:419.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From Wessex Cardiothoracic Center, Southampton General Hospital, UK.
Correspondence to Dr John Morgan, Consultant Cardiologist and Electrophysiologist, Wessex Cardiothoracic Center, Mailpoint 46, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK SO16 6YD. E-mail jmm{at}cardiology.co.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsEleven arrhythmias were recorded in 6 patients. Noncontact mapping improved recognition of the anatomic and surgical substrate and identified exit sites from zones of slow conduction in all clinical arrhythmias. Radiofrequency linear lesions were targeted across these critical zones in 5 patients. One patient underwent surgical cryotherapy. Although immediate success was achieved in 3 of 5 patients with radiofrequency ablation, 2 patients had a recurrence after a mean of 6.4 months of follow-up. The patient who underwent cryoablation remains free of arrhythmias.
ConclusionsNoncontact mapping can identify arrhythmia circuits in the Fontan atrium and guide placement of ablation lesions. Arrhythmia recurrence is high, possibly because of inadequate lesion creation rather than inaccurate mapping and lesion targeting.
Key Words: mapping Fontan procedure ablation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One patient had incessant atrial tachycardia and 5 had documented paroxysms of symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias, either self-limiting or requiring repeated DC cardioversion. All patients had failed a median of 3 drug therapies. Assessment included detailed history and physical examination, ECG, 24-hour ambulatory monitoring, transthoracic echocardiography, and full cardiac catheterization. Mean right atrial diameter was 6.8 (±0.8) cm. Mean length of follow-up from first Fontan procedure was 13.5 (±3.9) years; mean follow-up from most recent Fontan procedure was 8.8 (±1.3) years. Only patient 6 had undergone a previous electrophysiological study.
Five patients were considered for surgical conversion to total
cavopulmonary connection (TCPC), indicated on
hemodynamic grounds (gradient across the
atriopulmonary connection, significantly elevated right atrial
pressures, limiting symptoms of heart failure, or protein-losing
enteropathy). Arrhythmia mapping was performed as a prelude to
possible surgical cryoablation at the time of TCPC conversion.
Radiofrequency ablation was attempted as a palliative measure while
surgical treatment was considered. Patient details and results of the
study are summarized in Tables 1
and 2![]()
.
|
|
|
Noncontact Mapping System
The noncontact mapping system (EnSite 3000, Endocardial
Solutions Inc) consists of a 9F multielectrode array (MEA) mapping
catheter, a custom-designed amplifier, and a Silicon Graphics
workstation. The methods of chamber geometry construction, inverse
solution reconstruction of endocardial potentials, and the validation
of noncontact mapping in the left ventricle and the right atrium have
previously been reported.14 15 16
Mapping Procedure
Patients were studied under general anesthesia, off
all antiarrhythmic medication. A bipolar catheter was positioned in the
high right atrium, and a 24-pole catheter (Orbiter, Bard) was
positioned around the atrial wall. When accessible, a quadripolar
catheter was positioned in the coronary sinus. A 7F, 4-mm-tip,
steerable ablation catheter (Stinger, Bard) was used to create chamber
geometry, record contact electrograms, and deliver radiofrequency
energy. Contact catheter data and 12-lead ECGs were recorded
simultaneously on the Duo Laboratory system (Bard). A
continuous heparin infusion was administered to keep the
activated clotting time >300 seconds.
The 64-electrode MEA was passed into the right atrium through a femoral
vein (Figure 1
). Approximate positions of
anatomic landmarks (atriotomy incisions, patches, baffles, and
anastomoses) were initially identified from operation notes,
angiography, and echocardiography. More precise
localization was then attempted. Atriotomy incisions were identified by
examining ablation catheter electrograms for double potentials during
tachycardia or sinus rhythm. Patches, baffles, and
atriopulmonary anastomoses were identified by absent or
low-amplitude electrograms, palpable ridges, and areas where a pacing
stimulus failed to capture at maximum output. The margins of these
identified areas together with any other identified inert or diseased
myocardium were labeled onto the right atrial geometry by
steering the locator signal to the ablation catheter tip. These areas
were then examined with virtual unipolar electrograms and during color
mapping, with a change from low to high amplitude confirming the border
between inert structures and viable myocardium.
|
Atrial arrhythmias were induced by means of a programmed extrastimulation protocol with or without isoproterenol infusion. Data were recorded during sinus rhythm and atrial tachyarrhythmias.
Identification of Reentrant Circuit Anatomy and Suitable
Ablation Sites
Activation maps and reconstructed unipolar electrograms were
examined in review mode at a range of high-pass filter settings (0.1 to
32 MHz) and a low-pass filter setting of 300 MHz to determine the
sequence of right atrial activation (Figures 2
, 3
, 4
, and 5
).
The isopotential color maps were referenced to the surface P wave.
Positioning of virtual electrograms over the color maps plus
correlation with bipolar contact electrograms at marked sites
representing the electrodes on the multipolar catheter
helped distinguish true depolarization from artifact, far-field
potentials, and repolarization. Higher filter settings were used to
eliminate repolarization artifact. During global activation, color
contrast and offset settings were high to show only depolarization of
significant areas of atrial myocardium. As activation was
taken back in time from the onset of atrial systole into late
diastole, the color offset and contrast settings were
brought down close to zero and electrogram amplitudes were increased to
look for low amplitude, presystolic, and late
diastolic activation. Careful manipulation of offset and
contrast settings allowed identification of the earliest site of
systolic activation. Lower filter setting were used to
determine earliest activation, particularly in virtual electrograms at
exit sites from a zone of slow conduction. An initial sharp, negative
deflection in the unipolar virtual electrograms (QS complex) suggested
a true exit site. Filter settings were applied after the acquisition of
raw data and thus could be changed at the press of a button during
review.
|
|
|
|
Once the earliest site of activation and diastolic pathway of slow conduction were determined, the position and margins of the planned linear lesion were labeled onto the geometry. Linear lesions were chosen that bridged the narrowest gap between the anatomic or surgical barriers that enclosed the earliest site of activation and the preceding zone of slow conduction.
In real-time mode, the ablation catheter was then steered to the identified areas by means of the locator signal. Contact electrograms were recorded, local activation times referenced to the surface P wave, and, when possible, pace mapping and entrainment were performed.
Linear Lesion Creation
Radiofrequency energy was delivered during
tachycardia by a 4-mm-electrode in a point-to-point
fashion. Temperatures were limited to 65°C and energy delivery to 70
W. Each radiofrequency lesion position was labeled on the geometry.
Arrhythmia termination was an indication that the chosen site
was appropriate. The line was continued if tachycardia
stopped before the distal margin of the lesion had been reached. Once
the line was completed, if tachycardia had terminated,
reinduction was attempted. If the arrhythmia was noninducible,
bidirectional pacing was attempted. If the arrhythmia was not
terminated or was reinduced, further mapping was performed and gaps in
the line where color broke through were targeted. If no obvious gap was
present, the entire line was reattempted.
The surgical cryotherapy lesions for patient 6 were created with the use of an 11-mm probe (Spembly Ltd). Tip temperature was reduced to -50°C for 90 seconds for each lesion. No further mapping was undertaken to assess linear lesion continuity and conduction block.
Patients were followed up with clinic visits at 1, 3, and 6 months and with regular 24-hour Holter monitoring.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mapping Procedure
The noncontact mapping balloon catheter was positioned without
difficulty in each case. There were no difficulties with balloon
stability or displacement. No part of the atrial chamber was >6 cm
from the balloon center. On one occasion when the area of interest
could not be mapped with sufficient accuracy and was beyond 4-cm
distance from the balloon center, the catheter was repositioned.
Exact boundaries between surgical barriers and myocardium were hard to determine in some instances. Atriotomy incisions were characterized by double potentials in only 2 patients. The remainder had absent or low-amplitude electrograms in the anterolateral atrial wall where the scar was presumed to be. Color map activation correlated well with bipolar contact electrograms. Techniques such as pace mapping and entrainment were difficult to perform and unreliable because of intermittent capture, poor catheter-tip stability, and unreliable P-wave morphology. Diseased, inert tissue, typical of the Fontan atrium, limited the number of electrograms that could be recorded from contact catheters.
There were no procedural complications. The noncontact mapping catheter did not cause obstruction to blood flow or perforation of the cardiac chamber. There were no thromboembolic episodes and no bleeding complications arising from anticoagulation.
Arrhythmia Characteristics
All arrhythmias were induced and terminated with
programmed extrastimuli. Mean tachycardia cycle length was
262 (±58) ms. All arrhythmias were sustained and
hemodynamically tolerated. Color mapping demonstrated
that in every case the arrhythmia mechanism was macroreentry
involving anatomic and surgical barriers forming protected areas of
slow conduction. Ten of the 11 induced arrhythmias had reentry
circuits that were confined to the right atrium. In 3 patients, the
zone of slow conduction was between the lower end of the atriotomy scar
and the inferior vena cava or tricuspid valve patch.
Patient 4 had a right atrial macroreentrant circuit similar to common
atrial flutter (Figure 5
). The patient with the conduit from the
right atrial appendage to the right ventricle had a circuit that
rotated around the conduit anastomosis with slow conduction between the
conduit and the inferior vena cava (IVC). The
arrhythmia induced in patient 3 was biatrial, with slow
conduction occurring across the interatrial baffle. The left atrial
portion of the circuit immediately adjacent to the baffle was
indirectly visualized as low-amplitude, far-field activity on the color
map.
The site of earliest activation was identified in all 11 arrhythmias. A zone of slow conduction could be mapped in its entirety in 4 of 11 arrhythmias and was only partially seen in 7 of 11 arrhythmias.
Radiofrequency Ablation
The mean number of applications was 32 (±21) at a median of 2
sites. Three of the 5 patients had a second or third site selected
after repeated attempts were ineffective at creating the initial line
of block. Poor catheter tip contact and stability were common during
radiofrequency energy applications. Radiofrequency application
terminated the clinical tachycardia in 3 of 5 patients. In
2 patients, this was during the one and only linear lesion created. The
other 2 patients required multiple lesions. After successful ablation
of the clinical arrhythmia, 2 patients had inducible
arrhythmias that were judged to be nonclinical.
Cryoablation
A continuous line from the IVC to the conduit and then to the
coronary sinus os was created with 8 cryotherapy lesions. After
5 months of follow-up, the patient has been arrhythmia
free.
Follow-Up
Immediate procedural success, defined by the inability to reinduce
the clinical tachycardia, was achieved in 3 of 5 patients
(excluding the surgical patient who did not have further
provocative testing). Two patients had inducible
arrhythmias that were deemed to be nonclinical. Mean follow-up
is 6.4 months. One patient remains in incessant tachycardia
and is being considered for surgical conversion to TCPC together with
cryoablation and pacemaker implantation. Two of 6 patients remain free
of symptoms, with no arrhythmias documented on 24-hour Holter
monitoring. Three patients continued to have repeated episodes of
tachycardia. In 1 patient, this has not been recorded
on an ECG. In the other 2 patients, ECG recordings confirmed
recurrence of their original clinical tachycardia.
The 3 patients with recurrent tachycardias have
subsequently undergone conversion surgery to TCPC, together with
surgical cryoablation and pacemaker implantation.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous published series represent a heterogeneous group of congenital heart conditions, with only a small proportion having undergone Fontan surgery. Initial studies targeted sites with early activation and fractionated electrograms.5 Focal rather than linear radiofrequency lesions were created. Subsequently, other series adopted a more anatomic approach.7 8 13 17 Regions of previous surgical intervention were sought with the use of operative reports and contact electrogram characteristics. Pacing techniques, such as entrainment, were then attempted. All these series indicate that Fontan patients respond less well to mapping and ablation than patients who have undergone other forms of congenital heart disease surgery. Long-term results are poor.
These studies may have failed because of the limitations of contact mapping with a small number of electrodes in an anatomically complex substrate. Electrogram recording requires good catheter contact, which may be difficult in large chambers. We noted that only a minority of electrodes on our multipolar catheters were in contact with electrically active myocardium. Conventional techniques are unable to locate and record catheter position and thus cannot allow reconstruction of a 3D picture of atrial anatomy. Noncontact mapping allows precise localization of the ablation catheter tip with reference to a 3D reconstruction of chamber geometry. Detection of anatomic and surgical margins is limited when using electrogram morphology and pacing techniques alone. We discovered fractionated electrograms in areas of myocardium that had not been subjected to surgical alteration and were not critical components of the reentrant circuit. In our patients, atriotomy scars were not always associated with double potentials and could manifest as low-amplitude, electrically inert areas with no distinct borders. Additionally, we found that pacing techniques were limited by intermittent capture and poor catheter tip stability.
Electroanatomic mapping of intra-atrial tachycardia after Fontan surgery with the CARTO system (Biosense Ltd) has addressed some of the limitations of conventional mapping.9 A 3D reconstruction of atrial geometry was created; however, mapping was still dependent on contact electrograms. A voltage map assisted in the identification of nonexcitable tissues. Concealed entrainment was not helpful because it is performed over a larger area of atrial tissue, necessitating an anatomic approach to ablation. Noncontact mapping provides a 3D reconstruction of atrial geometry, instant mapping of entire endocardial activation without the need for catheter contact, reconstruction of unipolar electrograms at any site on the endocardial surface, the ability to map multiple arrhythmias without rebuilding chamber geometry, and a locator signal that can be applied to any conventional catheter to determine its position. All of these features contributed to successful mapping of intra-arterial reentry tachycardia (IART) in our patients.
Despite the use of noncontact mapping to characterize atrial tachyarrhythmias and identify sites suitable for ablation, our intermediate follow-up results are similar to previous studies that used conventional techniques. We believe that noncontact mapping accurately documented the arrhythmia circuits because activation displayed as isopotential color maps correlated well with contact electrograms. The tachycardia circuit was initially broken with radiofrequency ablation in the majority of cases only to return at a later date, suggesting that the selected site was appropriate. Where pace mapping and entrainment could be performed, they confirmed that selected sites were critical to the reentry circuit. By using the locator signal, we were able to extend the linear lesions up to and beyond the anatomic boundaries. We believe that procedural failure was due to inadequate lesion creation. In the dilated Fontan atria, catheter tip stability was often poor and together with the characteristic hypertrophied and fibrotic atrial musculature may have prevented full-thickness lesions. Furthermore, the capacious right atria with slow, stagnant blood flow may have increased heat loss into the surrounding blood pool. Our patients, with very dilated, scarred atria and longer follow-up periods (6 to 10 years since their most recent surgery), when compared with other studies, offered a particularly challenging substrate. In 3 patients who have subsequently undergone surgical conversion to TCPC, examination of the endocardial surface revealed no macroscopic or histological evidence of radiofrequency lesions despite their having received numerous applications.
The high rate of arrhythmia recurrence after ablation indicates that additional technology is required to ensure adequate lesion depth and continuity in the thickened Fontan atrium. Large-tipped ablation catheters and irrigated-tip technology may provide that step. Intracardiac echocardiography may aid identification of surgical and anatomic structures. However, none of these techniques alter the arrhythmia substrate, and new arrhythmia circuits may emerge. For selected patients with exhausted right atria, a surgical approach involving conversion to TCPC accompanied by cryoablation offers patients both hemodynamic improvement and prevention of arrhythmias.18 Surgical ablation has the added advantage of direct visualization of cardiac structures and boundaries, ensuring that linear lesions extend to their anatomic margins. It may also assess whether lesions are transmural. Preoperative mapping is still helpful to determine cryolesion position, and noncontact mapping is the most appropriate technique.
Study Limitations
A concern regarding dilated chambers is the accuracy at sites
>4.0 cm from the balloon center.16 Although electrogram
morphology may become less accurate, the location of endocardial
potentials is not affected. Loss of accuracy is gradual, so that timing
differences between adjacent areas of myocardium are
minimal. In common with previous studies, identification of anatomic
landmarks may have been inaccurate despite the use of contact and
noncontact electrogram characteristics. When creating linear lesions,
we deliberately extended the line over our marked boundaries until we
were sure that we had crossed the margin.
The continuity of linear lesions was principally assessed by termination of the arrhythmia during radiofrequency application and noninducibility. We found bidirectional pacing not to be helpful. When pacing was attempted at sites adjacent to the linear lesion, noncontact mapping was inaccurate because pacing artifact often swamped subsequent activation. The complex anatomy prohibited pacing from distant sites. It has been demonstrated that noncontact mapping may successfully assess lesion integrity in common atrial flutter.19 More recent software has pace-blanking facilities, and we now believe that bidirectional pacing should be used to assess lesion continuity in complex arrhythmias. We did not perform bidirectional pacing with contact catheters to record activation times, which may have contributed to procedural failure and arrhythmia recurrence.
Conclusions
Complex arrhythmias require high-density, multisite
mapping techniques, such as noncontact mapping, which provide accurate
3D maps of arrhythmia circuits in structurally abnormal atria.
The mapping and radiofrequency ablation of atrial arrhythmias
in Fontan patients should be considered for those in whom surgical
ablation is unwarranted. Noncontact mapping is effective at determining
arrhythmia circuits, but advanced ablation technologies are
almost certainly required for adequate lesion formation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 18, 1999; revision received February 11, 2000; accepted February 25, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Durongpisitkul K, Porter CJ, Cetta F, et al.
Predictors of early- and late-onset supraventricular
tachyarrhythmias after Fontan operation.
Circulation. 1998;98:10991107.
3.
Fishberger SB, Wernovsky G, Gentles TL, et al. Factors
that influence the development of atrial flutter after the Fontan
operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:8086.
4. Mair DD, Hagler DJ, Julsrud PR, et al. Early and late results of the modified Fontan procedure for double-inlet left ventricle: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:17271732.[Abstract]
5. Balaji S, Johnson TB, Sade RM, et al. Management of atrial flutter after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:12091215.[Abstract]
6. Van Hare GF. Management of arrhythmias in congenital heart disease before and after corrective surgery. Cardiac Electrophysiology Monitor.. 1998;1:4248.
7. Baker BM, Lindsay BD, Bromberg BI, et al. Catheter ablation of clinical intraatrial reentrant tachycardias resulting from previous atrial surgery: localizing and transecting the critical isthmus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:411417.[Abstract]
8. Chinitz LA, Bernstein NE, OConnor B, et al. Mapping reentry around atriotomy scars using double potentials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:19781983.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Dorostkar PC, Cheng J, Scheinman MM. Electroanatomical mapping and ablation of the substrate supporting intraatrial reentrant tachycardia after palliation for complex congenital heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:18101819.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Kalman JM, Van Hare GF, Olgin JE, et al. Ablation of
"incisional" reentrant atrial tachycardia complicating
surgery for congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1996;93:502512.
11. Lesh MD, Van Hare GF, Fitzpatrick AP, et al. Curing reentrant atrial arrhythmias. J Electrocardiol. 1993;26:194203.
12.
Lesh MD, Van Hare GF, Epstein LM, et al. Radiofrequency
catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias.
Circulation. 1994;89:10741089.
13. Triedman JK, Bergau DM, Saul JP, et al. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for control of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:10321038.[Abstract]
14.
Schilling RJ, Peters NS, Davies DW.
Simultaneous endocardial mapping in the human left
ventricle using a noncontact catheter: comparison of contact and
reconstructed electrograms during sinus rhythm. Circulation. 1998;98:887898.
15.
Schilling RJ, Peters NS, Davies DW. Mapping and
ablation of ventricular tachycardia with the
aid of a non-contact mapping system. Heart. 1999;81:570575.
16.
Kadish A, Hauck J, Pederson B, et al. Mapping of atrial
activation with a non-contact, multielectrode catheter in dogs.
Circulation. 1999;99:19061913.
17. Lesh MD, Kalman JM, Saxon LA, et al. Electrophysiology of "incisional" reentrant atrial tachycardia complicating surgery for congenital heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.. 1997;20:21072111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Deal BJ, Mavroudis C, Backer CL, et al. Impact of arrhythmia circuit cryoablation during Fontan conversion for refractory atrial tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:563568.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Schumacher B, Jung W, Lewalter T, et al. Verification of linear lesions using a noncontact multielectrode array catheter versus conventional contact mapping techniques. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:791798.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Deanfield, R. Yates, F. J. Meijboom, and B. J.M. Mulder CHAPTER 10 Congenital Heart Disease in Children and Adults ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Kanter The Fontan Right Atrium--In Context Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1698 - 1700. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Kilicaslan, A. Verma, H. Yamaji, N. F. Marrouche, O. Wazni, J. E. Cummings, S. Hao, M. W. Andrews, S. Beheiry, A. Abdul-Karim, et al. The need for atrial flutter ablation following pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with and without previous cardiac surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 690 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Tai, T.-Y. Liu, P.-C. Lee, Y.-J. Lin, M.-S. Chang, and S.-A. Chen Non-contact mapping to guide radiofrequency ablation of atypical right atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Verma, N. F. Marrouche, N. Seshadri, R. A. Schweikert, M. Bhargava, J. D. Burkhardt, F. Kilicaslan, J. Cummings, W. Saliba, and A. Natale Importance of ablating all potential right atrial flutter circuits in postcardiac surgery patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 409 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.M. Sheikh, A.T.M. Tang, K. Roman, K. Baig, R. Mehta, J. Morgan, B. Keeton, J. Gnanapragasam, J.V. Vettukattil, A.P. Salmon, et al. The failing Fontan circulation: Successful conversion of atriopulmonary connections J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Weipert, C. Noebauer, C. Schreiber, M. Kostolny, B. Zrenner, A. Wacker, J. Hess, and R. Lange Occurrence and management of atrial arrhythmia after long-term Fontan circulation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 457 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kaulitz, G. Ziemer, T. Paul, M. Peuster, H. Bertram, and G. Hausdorf Fontan-type procedures: residual lesions and late interventions Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 778 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Deal, C. Mavroudis, C. L. Backer, S. H. Buck, and C. Johnsrude Comparison of Anatomic Isthmus Block With the Modified Right Atrial Maze Procedure for Late Atrial Tachycardia in Fontan Patients Circulation, July 30, 2002; 106(5): 575 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Triedman, M. E. Alexander, B. A. Love, K. K. Collins, C. I. Berul, L. M. Bevilacqua, and E. P. Walsh Influence of patient factors and ablative technologies on outcomes of radiofrequency ablation of intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2002; 39(11): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Kress, D. Krum, V. Chekanov, J. Hare, N. Michaud, M. Akhtar, and J. Sra Validation of a left atrial lesion pattern for intraoperative ablation of atrial fibrillation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1160 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tritto, R. de Ponti, M. Zardini, G. Spadacini, and J. A. Salerno-Uriarte Bystander cavo-tricuspid isthmus activation during post-incisional intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 91 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mavroudis, C. L. Backer, B. J. Deal, C. Johnsrude, and J. Strasburger Total cavopulmonary conversion and maze procedure for patients with failure of the Fontan operation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2001; 122(5): 863 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Akar, L. C. Kok, D. E. Haines, J. P. DiMarco, and J. P. Mounsey Coexistence of type I atrial flutter and intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia in patients with surgically corrected congenital heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 377 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hindricks and H. Kottkamp Simultaneous Noncontact Mapping of Left Atrium in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, July 17, 2001; 104(3): 297 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Paul, B. Windhagen-Mahnert, T. Kriebel, H. Bertram, R. Kaulitz, T. Korte, M. Niehaus, and J. Tebbenjohanns Atrial Reentrant Tachycardia After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease : Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using a Novel, Noncontact Mapping System Circulation, May 8, 2001; 103(18): 2266 - 2271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |