(Circulation. 2000;102:e32.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Wihuri Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland
To the Editor:
The recent article by Takai et al1 suggests that human
chymase bound to heparin plays a functional role in
angiotensin II formation in the presence of natural
protease inhibitors such as
1-antitrypsin (AT). This
interpretation is based on one experiment (Figure 4) in which the
authors use a heparin column to mimic the
physiological situation in which chymase is bound
to heparin proteoglycans when secreted from a mast cell during the
process of degranulation. However, the experimental setup in Figure 4
raises some doubts about the validity of the obtained result and its in
vivo significance.
The authors do not mention whether the heparin column was preincubated
with
1-AT or chymostatin; immediate washing with PBS (3 times the
column volume) would rapidly and extensively remove the
inhibitors from the column. In particular, the large
molecular inhibitors, such as
1-AT (Mr=50 000), may be
equilibrated slower in the column compared with chymostatin (Mr=604),
and the Ki value for
1-AT to chymase is considerably lower than that
for chymostatin. Therefore,
1-AT may be easily washed out of the
column before interacting with the enzyme under the reported
experimental condition. After the washing step, a solution containing
the substrate (angiotensin I) but not the
inhibitors was applied on the column.
In our opinion, the authors should have performed the test in the
presence of inhibitors throughout the experiment. The
reaction of chymostatin with chymase results in the irreversible
inhibition of chymase through the formation of a stable 1:1 complex,
which has no hydrolytic activity. However, according to Schechter et
al,2 when the ratios of the natural inhibitors
1-antichymotrypsin and
1-AT to chymase concentration were
determined, stoichiometries of 4.5 and 5.0, respectively, were obtained
instead of unity. They concluded that both
1-antichymotrypsin and
1-AT are better substrates than chymase inhibitors.
Thus, to achieve a full inhibition of chymase, one would have to use an
inhibitor concentration >5 times molar excess, which would
preferably be present throughout the experiment.
The concentration of
1-AT (2 µmol/L) used by the authors is
50 times lower than that of chymostatin (100 µmol/L). In
addition, under normal physiological conditions,
the concentration of
1-AT (50 µmol/L)3 is also
25 times higher than the concentration of
1-AT (2 µmol/L)
used in this experiment. Taken together, these data seem to indicate
that further experimentation is required to unravel the
physiological function of heparin-bound chymase in
the presence of serpins.
References
Department of Pharmacology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
We appreciate and acknowledge what Kovanen et al pointed out about our
article. They discuss the difference between the results of our
experiment, which hypothesized heparin-bound chymase as the biological
state of chymase, and the nature of extracted chymase. We agree with
the report by Schechter et alR1 that was mentioned in the
letter. Certainly,
-antitrypsin is a very powerful chymase
inhibitor that has a higher affinity for chymase than
chymostatin. However, the inhibitory activity of
macromolecular inhibitors, such as secretory leukocyte
proteinase inhibitor, and not that of low molecular weight
inhibitors, including chymostatin, was affected by
heparin.R2 Chymase is bound to heparin in the organism, and
the purpose of our article was to study the sensitivity of certain
inhibitors on the complex. Consequently, the difference
between heparin-bound chymase and extracted chymase is important.
Previously, our experiment using both extracts and slices of human
vascular tissues demonstrated that the activity of extracted chymase
was inhibited by
-antitrypsin, whereas chymase activity in slices
was not inhibited by
-antitrypsin.R3 We think that
-antitrypsin in the reactive solution had difficulty entering into
the tissue slices. Our experiment indicated that
-antitrypsin was
unable to work on heparin-bound chymase in the heparin column to
inhibit the chymase activity. We think that this phenomenon is what
actually occurs in tissues.
The concentration of
-antitrypsin that was used in our experiment
was 2 µmol/L. The
-antitrypsin concentration in tissue is
lower than that in plasma, and
-antitrypsin at a concentration of
2 µmol/L completely inhibits the activity of extracted chymase.
Therefore, we do not think the concentration was too low.
When macromolecular substances are used as the substrate for chymase, the decomposition activity changes extensively depending on the presence or absence of heparin. Consequently, to elucidate the role played by chymase in the organism, it is important to study inhibitors and substrate specificity using heparin-bound chymase.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |