(Circulation. 2001;103:1375.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
From the National Heart and Lung Institute Division, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK.
Correspondence to Peter H. Sugden, DPhil, NHLI Division (Cardiac Medicine), Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse St, London SW3 6LY, UK. E-mail p.sugden{at}ic.ac.uk
Key Words: Editorials hypertrophy myocytes signal transduction
The study of ventricular hypertrophy has recently been a fruitful research area. From studies principally in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes in primary culture but now increasingly in transgenic mice, the molecular mechanisms involved in this important pathophysiological adaptation are becoming clearer.1 In culture, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is characterized by numerous transcriptional and morphological changes, including increased expression of atrial and B-type natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively), increased ß-myosin heavy chain (ß-MHC) expression, and increased sarcomere deposition.1 Similar changes are evident in hypertrophied hearts in vivo, where increased sarcomere deposition in particular allows cardiomyocytes to accommodate demands for elevated contractile power.
Wall Strain and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
In vivo, pathological or experimental left ventricular hemodynamic overload induces patterns of hypertrophy that can be broadly divided into concentric or eccentric. In concentric (pressure-overload) hypertrophy, peak-systolic and end-diastolic pressures are increased, but meridional ventricular wall stress is normal throughout the cardiac cycle, the additional wall stress being counterbalanced by wall thickening in the absence of chamber enlargement. In eccentric (volume-overload) hypertrophy, chamber volume is enlarged, and wall thickness is increased approximately in proportion to the increase in chamber diameter. End-diastolic pressure and wall stress are increased, but peak systolic pressure and wall stress are normal.
The orientation of cardiomyocytes in heart is primarily circumferential. Thus, cardiomyocytes from pressure- or volume-overloaded hearts differ in their relative dimensions. Cross-sectional area is proportionally expanded over length in pressure overload, whereas length is proportionally increased in volume overload. Sarcomere deposition parallel to the long axes of cells is greater in pressure overload than in volume overload, in which deposition of sarcomeres in series predominates. Changes in gene and protein expression in vivo may not be identical in the 2 paradigms. One study showed that although increases in prepro-ANP mRNA are comparable, increases in ß-MHC mRNA occur only in pressure overload2 (although others, using protein expression, have detected increases in ß-MHC in both situations3 ).
Cardiomyocyte culture models have provided little
information about mechanisms underlying development of these distinct
cellular morphologies or the signaling pathways responsible for the
differences. The
-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine, which acts
through G proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs), induces hypertrophy
reminiscent of a pressure-overloaded cardiomyocyte, whereas the
cytokine-related agonist cardiotrophin-1 produces a
volume-overloaded
morphology.4 To gain
information about the differing responses to pressure overload and
volume overload, Yamamoto et
al,5 in this issue of
Circulation, use cultured
cardiomyocytes to focus on differences in intracellular signaling and
gene expression induced by strain imposed specifically at the systolic
and diastolic phases of the contractile cycle.
Signal Transduction in Cardiac Hypertrophy
Reversible protein phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation play a central role in signal transduction in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Multiple signaling pathways probably mediate hypertrophy (particularly in vivo), with 2 important groups of regulatory proteins having been identified: the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs)1 and Ca2+/calmodulin-activated protein kinases/phosphatases.1 6 7 The latter include Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaM kinases) and calcineurin, but Yamamoto et al5 focused only on MAPK signaling. MAPKs are final members of 3-component protein kinase cascades in which a MAPK kinase kinase (MKKK) phosphorylates and activates a MAPK kinase (MKK), which finally phosphorylates and activates a MAPK.8 After their activation, MAPKs phosphorylate other signaling proteins (notably transcription factors and other protein kinases) to change their biological activities. Through these phosphorylations, MAPKs regulate cell growth and survival and other biological processes.
The simplest subclassification of MAPKs into 3 subfamilies
[extracellular-signalregulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun N-terminal
kinases (JNKs), and p38-MAPKs] is based on the primary sequence of
their phosphorylation motifs. p42/p44-MAPKs (ERK2 and ERK1,
respectively) were the first to be identified and remain the best
characterized, being strongly stimulated by growth-promoting stimuli in
all cells. In cardiomyocytes, they are powerfully activated by
hypertrophic agonists that couple to GPCRs of the
Gq-coupled
subclass.1 These include
phenylephrine, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and angiotensin II (Ang II). The
linkage between GqPCR activation and stimulation
of the p42/p44-MAPK cascade is unclear. It probably involves the
phospholipase Cß/protein kinase C pathway and activation of the
21-kDa GTPase Ras.1 This last
step leads to activation of the Raf MKKKs, thence to MEK1/2 (the MKKKs
and MKKs of the p42/p44-MAPK cascade) and
p42/p44-MAPK.1 8
Three other ERK subfamily members have been identified, the poorly
characterized ERK3, ERK5 [or "big" (
100-kDa) MAPK, BMK1], and
the recently identified ERK7. PD98059 and U0126 inhibit activation of
p42/p44-MAPK (and BMK1) by inhibiting at the MKKK/MKK levels and have
proved useful in identifying ERK-dependent responses.
JNKs and p38-MAPKs are more strongly activated by cytotoxic
cellular stresses (reactive oxygen species, hyperosmotic stress,
anisomycin, ischemia/reperfusion) than by ET-1 or phenylephrine in
cardiomyocytes or isolated
hearts.9 In humans, mRNAs
transcribed from 3 JNK genes
are alternatively spliced, producing 10 JNK isoforms with molecular
masses of either
46 or
54 kDa. p38-MAPKs (
, ß,
, and
isoforms) are encoded by 4 genes, with the
- and ß-isoforms each
being alternatively spliced. SB203580 (<1 µmol/mL) directly and
reversibly inhibits activated p38-MAPK
/ß2 (but does not inhibit
p38-MAPK
/
) and is useful in implicating p38-MAPK
/ß2 in
biological processes. Although this is still controversial, all 3 MAPK
subfamilies have been associated with hypertrophic
signaling,1 although a view
exists that JNKs and p38-MAPK
may be detrimental to cardiomyocyte
survival.1 I have emphasized
the primacy of p42/p44-MAPK activation in compensated hypertrophy, with
JNKs and p38-MAPKs possibly more involved in development/maintenance of
decompensated states. Recent work in transgenic mice supports
this.10
Mechanical Strain and Signal Transduction
Although the terms "stress" and "strain" are used interchangeably, they have different physical meanings. Stress is a force that induces strain, which is the change in shape or the deformation produced. Static or intermittent stress/strain of cultured cardiomyocytes on deformable Silastic membranes induces many of the transcriptional and signaling responses of hypertrophy (including activation of MAPKs).1 11 Such findings may be relevant to mechanotransduction (the coupling of mechanical forces on cells to biological responses) in hemodynamic overload in vivo. Yamamoto et al5 refined the mechanical deformational model to examine differences in intracellular signaling and gene expression induced by spatially isotropic (ie, uniform) biaxial strain imposed at the systolic (see pressure overload in vivo) or diastolic (see volume overload) phase of the contractile cycle in electrically paced cardiomyocytes. Control experiments involved strain/no pacing or pacing/no strain. (Note that these strained/unpaced cardiomyocytes still contract spontaneously but at a lower frequency than paced cells. Contraction is therefore out of phase with strain.)
Using antibodies specific for phosphorylated (activated)
MAPKs, Yamamoto et al5 showed
that systolic strain increased p42/p44-MAPK phosphorylation by up to
10-fold. This increase was significantly greater than those elicited by
strain/no pacing or pacing/no strain (
2- to 3-fold). The increase in
p42/p44-MAPK phosphorylation with diastolic strain was intermediate,
being at most
6-fold. Likewise, differential phosphorylation of
MEK1/2 was demonstrable. PD98059 completely inhibited systolic
straininduced phosphorylation of p42/p44-MAPK. Although p38-MAPKs and
JNKs were also phosphorylated (maximally
3- and
6-fold,
respectively) with systolic or diastolic strain, there were no
detectable differences in the extent of phosphorylation between the 2
conditions. p38-MAPKs (but not JNKs) were also phosphorylated in
strained/unpaced or paced/unstrained cardiomyocytes. These results
imply that the p42/p44-MAPK cascade (but not the JNK or p38-MAPK
cascade) responds differentially to cardiac cycle phasespecific
strains.
BNP mRNA was rapidly induced by systolic strain (
6-fold)
and diastolic strain (
3-fold), although only the former was
significantly greater than in strained/unpaced or paced/unstrained
cardiomyocytes.5 Systolic
strain was more effective in inducing mRNA encoding the extracellular
matrix protein tenascin C. Although this was not quantified, the
authors suggest that BNP mRNA induction by systolic strain was
essentially completely inhibited by PD98059. In contrast, SB203580
appeared to be less effective, although the absence of accurate
quantification of blots to take into account the 18S rRNA loading
control makes this difficult to assess unambiguously. Finally, systolic
strain for 1 hour was more effective in increasing leucine
incorporation into protein over the subsequent 24 hours than other
treatments, although these also significantly stimulated leucine
incorporation. Because leucine incorporation was measured over a
prolonged period, such incorporation will reflect both the total
protein pool (equilibrium labeling) and the initial rate of protein
synthesis. Its physical significance (total protein versus initial
rate) is therefore difficult to assess. PD98059 (present throughout the
incubation) inhibited leucine incorporation by
60%, suggesting that
activation of p42/p44-MAPKs may be responsible. Inhibition (
30%) by
SB203580 was not statistically significant. Because of the possible
role of tonic p42/p44-MAPK activity in cell survival, prolonged
exposure of cells to PD98059 may reduce viability. Indeed, PD98059
alone increases TUNEL-positivity and DNA laddering in
cardiomyocytes.12
Experiments involving prolonged use of PD98059 should thus be
interpreted cautiously.
The overall conclusions of Yamamoto et al5 are that systolic strain is more effective than diastolic strain in activating the p42/p44-MAPK cascade and in stimulating expression of BNP and protein synthesis. This may be due to the sensitivity of cardiomyocytes to strain energy. Cell stiffness is greater during systole than diastole, and hence, systolic strain may deliver more strain energy. Such considerations, however, still do not identify the molecular events responsible for the differential responses.
Mechanotransduction-Sensing Mechanisms
Although the sensor mechanisms for strain are unclear,
they must be differentially affected by cardiac cycle phasespecific
strain to account for the findings of Yamamoto et
al.5 Information here is
sparse. In studies of static strain, use of receptor antagonists
suggests the autocrine/paracrine involvement of Ang II or ET-1 and
MAPKs.11 13
Whenever strain is mentioned, the nebulous entity of the
mechanosensitive ion channel is
invoked.14 These are
cation-selective channels (but are not particularly selective for
individual biological cations), which are often sensitive to inhibition
by Gd3+ or streptomycin. Hypertrophic
changes in statically strained cardiomyocytes, however, are not
sensitive to
Gd3+.11
Strain stimulates release of the prostanoid precursor
arachidonate,11 possibly
through MAPK-mediated activation of phospholipase
A2. Prostaglandin F2
is reportedly hypertrophic in
cardiomyocytes,1 but signal
transduction here may involve JNKs rather than
p42/p44-MAPKs.15
Extracellular matrix (integrin-) based signaling could be
involved,11 and signaling
through Ca2+ (which could promote
hypertrophy through CaM kinases or
calcineurin6 7 )
cannot be excluded.
Reactive oxygen species are increasingly recognized to be
signaling molecules in their own right (especially at low
concentrations), and they certainly activate MAPKs in
cardiomyocytes.16 They
inhibit protein synthesis, however, and are demonstrably apoptotic at
higher
concentrations.17 18
The earlier experiments of Yamamoto and
colleagues19 suggested that
biaxial strain produces reactive oxygen species, which are responsible
for induction of tenascin C mRNA through the transcription factor
NF-
B. In contrast, induction of BNP mRNA is sensitive to Ang II
AT1 receptor
antagonists.19 Conversely,
others have shown that BNP expression in strained cardiomyocytes is
regulated by p38-MAPKs and
NF-
B.20 Whether any of
the changes induced by phasic strain are inhibited by antioxidants,
calmodulin-directed inhibitors, or receptor and integrin antagonists
should be examined. Whether systolic and diastolic strains produce
morphologically distinct responses in cardiomyocytes needs to be
established before data are extrapolated too widely. If prolonged
strain is necessary for such changes to be apparent, this experiment
may not be trivial, because cardiomyocytes are unlikely to remain
attached to the
substrate.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
References
in cultured
neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Circ
Res. 1998;83:167178.
B-dependent mechanism. J
Clin Invest. 1999;104:16031612.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A Frias, S. Somers, C. Gerber-Wicht, L. H Opie, S. Lecour, and U. Lang The PGE2-Stat3 interaction in doxorubicin-induced myocardial apoptosis Cardiovasc Res, July 9, 2008; (2008) cvn171v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. D. Gonzalez, J. C. Osorio, C. Manlhiot, D. Gruber, S. Homma, and S. Mital Hypertrophy signaling during peripartum cardiac remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3008 - H3013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sekiguchi, X. Li, M. Coker, M. Flesch, P. M Barger, N. Sivasubramanian, and D. L Mann Cross-regulation between the renin-angiotensin system and inflammatory mediators in cardiac hypertrophy and failure Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2004; 63(3): 433 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Modesti, S. Vanni, I. Bertolozzi, I. Cecioni, C. Lumachi, A. M. Perna, M. Boddi, and G. F. Gensini Different Growth Factor Activation in the Right and Left Ventricles in Experimental Volume Overload Hypertension, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 101 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Baba, J. Stypmann, F. Grabellus, P. Kirchhof, A. Sokoll, M. Schafers, A. Takeda, M. J. Wilhelm, H. H. Scheld, N. Takeda, et al. Dynamic regulation of MEK/Erks and Akt/GSK-3{beta} in human end-stage heart failure after left ventricular mechanical support: myocardial mechanotransduction-sensitivity as a possible molecular mechanism Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2003; 59(2): 390 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |