(Circulation. 2001;103:1440.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center (T.W., R.P., C.R.B.), and Third Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (S.K., T.K.).
Correspondence to Claude R. Benedict, MD, DPhil, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin, MSB 6.039, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail c.benedic{at}heart.med.uth.tmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe examined both the effects of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a donor of reactive oxygen species, as major components of moxLDL and their interactions with 5HT on VSMC proliferation. Growth-arrested VSMCs were incubated with different concentrations of moxLDL, LPC, H2O2, or LPC with H2O2 in the absence or presence of 5HT. DNA synthesis in VSMCs was examined by [3H]thymidine incorporation. MoxLDL, LPC, H2O2, and 5HT stimulated DNA synthesis in a dose-dependent manner. MoxLDL had a maximal stimulatory effect at a concentration of 5 µg/mL (211%), LPC at 15 µmol/L (156%), H2O2 at 5 µmol/L (179%), and 5HT at 50 µmol/L (205%). Added together, moxLDL (50 ng/mL) and 5HT (50 µmol/L) synergistically increased DNA synthesis (443%). Coincubation of LPC (1 µmol/L) with H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) and 5HT (5 µmol/L) resulted in a synergistic increase in DNA synthesis (439%), which was nearly equal to that of moxLDL with 5HT (443%). The combined effects of LPC, H2O2, and 5HT on DNA synthesis were completely reversed by the combined use of an antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine (400 µmol/L) or butylated hydroxytoluene (20 µmol/L), with a 5HT2 receptor antagonist, LY281067 (10 µg/mL).
ConclusionsOur results suggest that both LPC and reactive oxygen species may contribute to the mitogenic effect of moxLDL on VSMCs and its synergistic effect with 5HT.
Key Words: antioxidants atherosclerosis lipoproteins muscle, smooth platelet-derived factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we examined both the effects of LPC and H2O2, a donor of ROS, as major chemical components of moxLDL and their interactions with 5HT on VSMC proliferation. We tested the effect of defatted BSA and catalase on moxLDL-induced DNA synthesis to show that LPC and ROS are responsible for the mitogenic effect of moxLDL. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and/or LY281067, a 5HT2 receptor antagonist, on DNA synthesis induced by LPC, H2O2, and 5HT.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LDL Oxidation
Human LDL was oxidized with
CuSO4 at a final concentration of 5 µmol/L at
37°C, and the thiobarbituric acidreactive substances (TBARS)
content was determined every 30 minutes by removing an aliquot as
described previously.9 All
the samples were tested for their electrophoretic mobility by 1%
agarose gel electrophoresis. The point at which there is no change in
the electrophoretic mobility but an increase in TBARS content was
selected as moxLDL. The LDL was oxidized at 37°C for 30 hours before
EDTA was added to obtain oxLDL. Lipoprotein concentrations are
expressed as protein concentrations. Even at a concentration of 10
mg/mL, native LDL (nLDL) showed no development of TBARS, whereas moxLDL
showed a slight increase in TBARS formation (2 to 4 nmol/mg protein),
with no change in the electrophoretic mobility. In contrast, oxLDL
showed a significant increase in TBARS formation (35 nmol/mg protein)
and an increase in the electrophoretic mobility.
Cell Culture
VSMCs were isolated from the thoracic aortas of male
New Zealand White rabbits (body weight
3 kg, n=95) by the explant
method and were cultured in a humidified atmosphere (5%
CO2/95% air) at
37°C.8 9 After 3
to 4 weeks, the tissue blocks were removed and the migrated VSMCs were
cultured, followed by a subculture with
trypsinization.
DNA Synthesis
DNA synthesis was examined by measurement of
[3H]thymidine incorporation into the
cellular DNA.8 9
VSMCs in passage 1 or 2 were seeded in 35-mm-diameter tissue culture
plates and grown to semiconfluence in DMEM containing 10% FBS. Then,
the medium was replaced with 2 mL DMEM containing 0.1% FBS and
incubated for
72 hours for growth arrest. After that, the medium was
replaced with DMEM containing 500 µg/mL BSA, 10 µg/mL
insulin, 20 µg/mL transferrin, 25 ng/mL selenium, and 100 µmol/L
pargyline (serum-free medium). After this, experiments were divided
into 3 groups. In group 1, VSMCs were incubated with the indicated
concentrations of nLDL, moxLDL, oxLDL, PC, LPC,
H2O2, or LPC with
H2O2. After 24 hours of
incubation, indicated concentrations of 5HT were added, and the cells
were incubated for another 24 hours. In group 2, VSMCs were incubated
with different concentrations of LPC,
H2O2, or LPC with
H2O2 in the presence of
NAC or BHT for 48 hours. In group 3, VSMCs were incubated with LPC,
H2O2, or LPC with
H2O2 in the presence of
NAC or BHT. After 24 hours of incubation, 5HT was added, and the cells
were incubated for another 24 hours. LY281067 was added 4 hours before
the addition of 5HT. For all experiments, VSMCs were exposed to
[3H]thymidine at a concentration of 1
µCi/plate for the last 5 hours of the 48-hour incubation period.
[3H]Thymidine incorporation into VSMC DNA
was quantified in a liquid scintillation counter. All the experiments
were performed in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated a
minimum of 3 times.
Cell Number
Growth-arrested VSMCs were incubated with indicated
concentrations of LPC,
H2O2, or LPC with
H2O2 in serum-free
medium. After 24 hours of incubation, 5HT was added, and the cells were
incubated for another 24
hours.9 Cell number was
measured with a Coulter counter. Counting was done in triplicate in
each of the 5 plates, and each experiment was repeated at least 3
times.
Statistical Analysis
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. The data were
compared by 2-tailed unpaired Students
t test between 2 groups and by
1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test when >2 groups were involved.
A value of P<0.05 was
considered to be statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effect of LPC or
H2O2 With 5HT on VSMC
DNA Synthesis
The interaction of LPC or
H2O2 with 5HT on
[3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA is
shown in
Figure 2A
and 2B
. 5HT at 5 or 50 µmol/L induced DNA
synthesis 1.8- or 2.1-fold higher than the control value, respectively
(P<0.0001). When LPC at
concentrations <15 µmol/L was added together with either
concentration of 5HT, a synergistic rather than an additive effect was
observed on DNA synthesis. The synergistic interaction between LPC and
5HT was prominent when nonmitogenic concentrations of LPC were
incubated with either concentration of 5HT. For example, when VSMCs
were incubated with 1 µmol/L LPC alone, LPC did not have any
significant mitogenic effect. When VSMCs were incubated with 1 µmol/L
LPC and 5 µmol/L 5HT, however, there was a significant increase in
[3H]thymidine incorporation to 339±12%
(P<0.0001), compared with
183±2% with 5 µmol/L 5HT alone. Like LPC, the synergistic
interaction between H2O2
and 5HT was more significant when nonmitogenic concentrations of
H2O2 were incubated with
either concentration of 5HT. When VSMCs were incubated with 0.5
µmol/L H2O2 and 5
µmol/L 5HT, the amount of [3H]thymidine
incorporation increased significantly to 304±13%
(P<0.0001), compared with
182±3% with 5 µmol/L 5HT alone.
|
Effect of LPC and
H2O2 With 5HT on VSMC DNA
Synthesis
The interaction between subthreshold concentrations of
LPC and H2O2 and 5
µmol/L 5HT on DNA synthesis is shown in
Figure 3
. When VSMCs were incubated with nonmitogenic
concentrations of LPC (1 µmol/L) and
H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L),
there was a significant increase in
[3H]thymidine incorporation to 262±8%
(P<0.0001), suggesting a
synergistic interaction between LPC and
H2O2. When 5 µmol/L 5HT
was added to this combination of LPC (1 µmol/L) and
H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L),
there was a further increase in the amount of
[3H]thymidine incorporation (439±13%,
P<0.0001). Similar synergistic
interaction could be observed with all the concentrations tested. This
stimulatory effect cannot be explained by simple additive effects of
LPC, H2O2, and
5HT.
|
Interaction of LPC and
H2O2 or Different Forms
of LDL With 5HT on VSMC DNA Synthesis
The interaction of different forms of LDL or LPC and
H2O2 with 5HT on DNA
synthesis is shown in
Figure 4
. When tested alone for their effect on
[3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA,
oxLDL, moxLDL (both 50 ng/mL), or LPC with
H2O2 (1 and 0.5 µmol/L,
respectively) significantly stimulated
[3H]thymidine incorporation (129±10% or
134±15%, both P<0.05;
262±8%, P<0.0001) compared
with nLDL, PC, LPC, or
H2O2. When the same
experiment was repeated in the presence of 50 µmol/L 5HT, the amount
of [3H]thymidine incorporation into the
VSMCs increased significantly. Interestingly, the amount of
[3H]thymidine incorporation into the VSMCs
was nearly equal when VSMCs were stimulated with moxLDL and 5HT or with
LPC, H2O2, and 5HT
(443±12% versus 438±12%,
P=NS).
|
Effect of LPC,
H2O2, and 5HT on VSMC
Number
To determine whether the induction of DNA synthesis by
LPC, H2O2, and 5HT
resulted in an increase in cell number, VSMC number was also examined
(Figure 5
). Because a significant synergistic interaction
between LPC and H2O2 was
observed at lower concentration of LPC and
H2O2, we determined the
cell number at 1 µmol/L LPC and/or 0.5 µmol/L
H2O2. LPC and
H2O2 were without any
effect; however, in combinations with 5HT (5 µmol/L), the cell number
increased (both P<0.05). When
LPC (1 µmol/L) and H2O2
(0.5 µmol/L) were added together, a significant increase in cell
number was observed (P<0.01).
In particular, coincubation of LPC (1 µmol/L) with
H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) and
5HT (5 µmol/L) resulted in the greatest increase in cell number
(P<0.01).
|
Effect of Antioxidants and LY281067 on VSMC DNA
Synthesis
To find out whether antioxidants block the mitogenic
effect of LPC and H2O2
and their synergistic interaction, VSMCs were preincubated with the
antioxidant NAC (400 µmol/L) or BHT (20 µmol/L) along with LPC (1
µmol/L), H2O2 (0.5
µmol/L), or LPC (1 µmol/L) with
H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L). When
VSMCs were incubated with antioxidants, they completely blocked the
mitogenic effects of LPC and
H2O2 and their
synergistic interaction
(Figure 6
). We evaluated the combined effects of the
5HT2 receptor antagonist LY281067 (10
µg/mL) and NAC or BHT on VSMC proliferation induced by LPC (1
µmol/L), H2O2 (0.5
µmol/L), or LPC (1 µmol/L) with
H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) in
combination with 5HT (5 µmol/L). When VSMCs were incubated with
antioxidants and LPC and/or
H2O2 with 5HT,
antioxidants blocked the mitogenic effect of LPC and/or
H2O2 and their
synergistic interaction with 5HT without affecting the mitogenic effect
of 5HT
(Figure 7
). Similarly, when VSMCs were incubated with
LY281067 and LPC and/or
H2O2 with 5HT, LY281067
blocked the mitogenic effect of 5HT and synergistic interaction with
LPC and/or H2O2 without
affecting the mitogenic effect of LPC and/or
H2O2. When VSMCs were
incubated with both antioxidants and LY281067 and then stimulated with
LPC and/or H2O2 with 5HT,
the mitogenic effects and the synergistic interaction of all the 3
mitogens were blocked.
|
|
Effect of Defatted BSA and Catalase on MoxLDL-
and 5HT-Induced VSMC DNA Synthesis
To ensure that LPC and
H2O2 are the components
responsible for the mitogenic effect of moxLDL and its synergistic
interaction with 5HT, LPC, moxLDL, and oxLDL were pretreated with
defatted BSA for 24 hours and then used in the experiments
(Figure 8
). Preincubation of LPC, moxLDL, and oxLDL with
defatted BSA completely reversed the mitogenic effect of LPC and oxLDL
and partially (
70%) reversed the mitogenic effect of moxLDL on
VSMCs and also resulted in a significant decrease in their interaction
with 5HT in inducing DNA synthesis (365±14% to 260±8%,
P<0.0001; 274±12% to
213±9%, P<0.001,
respectively). When added to
H2O2-, moxLDL-, or
oxLDL-treated VSMCs, catalase (10 U/mL) completely blocked the
mitogenic effect of H2O2
and partially (
80%) that of moxLDL but did not have any significant
effect on the mitogenic effect of oxLDL. Addition of catalase to
moxLDL- and 5HT-treated VSMCs resulted in a significant decrease in the
interaction of moxLDL with 5HT in inducing DNA synthesis (365±14% to
249±13%,
P<0.0001).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
and LPC.10 11
Thus, the source of ROS in the present study can be either moxLDL- or
LPC-stimulated NAD(P)H oxidase. Numerous studies have described the biological activity and atherogenicity of LPC and ROS. Consistent with previous observations,12 13 LPC and ROS were found to be toxic to cells at high concentrations, whereas lower concentrations induced DNA synthesis and cell growth. Similar effects have been observed with moxLDL, which over a narrow concentration range can cause both proliferative and cytotoxic effects.9 14 Several investigators have reported that G proteinmediated signal transduction is impaired by high levels of LPC.15 A low concentration of LPC has been shown to stimulate smooth muscle growth factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor,5 6 which may be responsible for VSMC migration and proliferation. Others have reported, however, that LPC itself is a mitogen for VSMCs under serum-free conditions.3 5 16
LPC and H2O2 induce extracellular signalregulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 activation, c-fos and c-jun mRNA expression, and subsequent enhancement of activator protein-1binding activity in VSMCs.4 6 17 18 It was recently reported that both LPC and H2O2 stimulate redox-sensitive c-jun N-terminal kinases and ERK5.17 19 Banes et al20 showed that 5HT also activates ERK1/2. Therefore, the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway by 5HT and redox-sensitive pathways by LPC and H2O2 may explain the synergistic interaction in our studies. Watanabe et al21 and Cox et al22 showed that H2O2, LPC, and oxLDL act synergistically with 5HT in vasoconstriction, which may also support our findings.
Our previous studies have shown that the mitogenic effect of 5HT on VSMCs is mediated predominantly by 5HT2 receptors.8 9 5HT acting via the 5HT2 receptor subtype induced a 5-fold increase in the mobilization of intracellular calcium and a 10-fold increase in c-fos mRNA in VSMCs.23 In the present study, the 5HT2 receptor antagonist LY281067 reversed only the mitogenic effect of 5HT but not those of LPC and H2O2 on VSMCs.
This study suggests that PC, the major component of nLDL,17 does not have a significant mitogenic effect on VSMCs and that this effect is not enhanced by 5HT. LPC and ROS, the major components of moxLDL, act synergistically in inducing DNA synthesis. The increase in DNA synthesis induced by the combined use of LPC (1 µmol/L) and H2O2 (0.5 µmol/L) (262±8% of the control) is similar to that of moxLDL (5 µg/mL) (211±25%), which suggests that the mitogenic effect of moxLDL may be due to the combined effects of LPC and ROS, which are present in moxLDL. The oxLDL was less mitogenic than moxLDL because the major component of oxLDL is LPC. Under physiological conditions that include the presence of various antioxidants in the plasma, complete oxidation of LDL may not be feasible, but these conditions are more likely to result in partial oxidation of LDL with production of moxLDL, which is the most atherogenic of the 3 forms of LDL. Thus, moxLDL interacting with other vasoactive substances and growth factors present in the vasculature may play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis and restenosis after restenosis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 28, 2000; revision received September 27, 2000; accepted October 3, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Fukui, H. Ose, G. Hasegawa, T. Yoshikawa, and N. Nakamura Association Between Urinary Albumin Excretion and Plasma 5-Hydroxyindole-3-Acetic Acid Concentration in Men With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2649 - 2651. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Damirin, H. Tomura, M. Komachi, J.-P. Liu, C. Mogi, M. Tobo, J.-Q. Wang, T. Kimura, A. Kuwabara, Y. Yamazaki, et al. Role of lipoprotein-associated lysophospholipids in migratory activity of coronary artery smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2513 - H2522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rius, J. Martinez-Gonzalez, J. Crespo, and L. Badimon Involvement of Neuron-Derived Orphan Receptor-1 (NOR-1) in LDL-Induced Mitogenic Stimulus in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: Role of CREB Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2004; 24(4): 697 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. GOUNI-BERTHOLD and A. SACHINIDIS Does the coronary risk factor low density lipoprotein alter growth and signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells? FASEB J, October 1, 2002; 16(12): 1477 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Watanabe, R. Pakala, T. Katagiri, and C. R. Benedict Synergistic Effect of Urotensin II With Mildly Oxidized LDL on DNA Synthesis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Circulation, July 3, 2001; 104(1): 16 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |