(Circulation. 2001;103:1479.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cardiovascular Drugs |
From the Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Correspondence to Prof Dr A. Greinacher, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Institut für Immunologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Klinikum/Sauerbruchstrasse, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: recombinant hirudin platelets thrombosis cardiovascular diseases heparin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HIT typically manifests 5 to 10 days after the start of heparin therapy.4 HIT antibodies bind to heparin platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes,5 thereby activating platelets,6 7 8 generating platelet microparticles,9 and altering endothelial cells,10 11 12 leading to enhanced thrombin generation and paradoxical development of new thrombi.
Two prospective studies led to the first approval of a recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin), lepirudin, as an alternative for further parenteral anticoagulation of HIT patients in the European Union and United States.13 14 This review provides an overview of pharmacology and relevant clinical data of lepirudin, with a focus on HIT and acute coronary syndromes; key studies on another nearly identical r-hirudin, desirudin (Revasc) are also reported, because experiences gathered with desirudin are certainly helpful in the application of lepirudin.
| Pharmacology of Lepirudin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In healthy subjects, plasma pharmacokinetics follow a
2-compartment model, with a terminal plasma elimination half-life
(t1/2ß) of 0.8 to 1.7 hours after injection of
bolus lepirudin doses of 0.01 to 0.5 mg/kg IV and 1.1 to 2.0 hours for
continuous intravenous infusions over 6
hours.17 With subcutaneous
administration, bioavailability is nearly 100%. After injection of
0.75 mg/kg SC, a peak lepirudin concentration of
0.7 µg/mL occurs
in 3 to 4
hours.18
Renal clearance and degradation account for
90% of the
systemic clearance. The t1/2ß of lepirudin
lengthens with deterioration of renal
function19 20 to
up to 150 hours.
| Clinical Studies in HIT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laboratory confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of HIT led to a delay in the start of treatment with lepirudin. Even though the pretreatment periods accounted for only 8.5% (2.6 days, HAT-1) and 6% (1.9 days, HAT-2) of the duration of each study, more than one third of all new thromboembolic complications and limb amputations occurred during this time period.
When these studies were conducted, a placebo-control study design was considered unethical, and no other active treatment was approved for further anticoagulation in HIT; therefore, results of lepirudin treatment were compared with those of a historical control group (n=120). The incidence of the combined end point (new thromboembolic complications, limb amputation, death) at day 35 was 52.1% in the historical control group, 25.4% in HAT-1 (P=0.014; adjusted risk ratio, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.290 to 0.892), and 31.9% in HAT-2 (P=0.15; adjusted risk ratio, 0.709; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.14). It must be taken into consideration, however, that the use of a historical control population is a major limitation when these treatment effects are estimated.
In both studies, there were more bleeding events in the lepirudin-treated group compared with historical control subjects, primarily in perioperative settings and at sites of catheter insertion (39.1% [HAT-1], 44.6% [HAT-2], and 27.2% [control group]). However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of bleedings requiring transfusion (9.9% [HAT-1], 12.9% [HAT-2], and 9.1% [control group]). Other treatment options in HIT are summarized elsewhere.21 22
| Clinical Use of Lepirudin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Generally, treatment with lepirudin can be monitored with the aPTT, which should be determined before treatment, 4 hours after the start of intravenous lepirudin treatment, 4 hours after every dosage change, and then at least once daily. In case of underdosage, the infusion rate should be increased by 20%; in overdosage, the infusion should be stopped for 2 hours and restarted at a dose reduced by 50% if the aPTT is within the therapeutic range.13
According to the manufacturer, in patients with serum
creatinine values >1.5 mg/dL, the bolus should be reduced to 0.2
mg/kg. Infusion rates should be reduced by 50% if serum creatinine
values are 1.6 to 2.0 mg/dL, by 70% for values of 2.1 to 3.0 mg/dL,
and by 85% for values of 3.1 to 6.0 mg/dL. Patients with serum
creatinine >6.0 mg/dL either should receive a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg on
alternate days only, and only if the aPTT ratio is <1.5, or may be
treated with an infusion starting at 0.005
mg · kg-1 · h-1
IV. When a switch is made to oral anticoagulation, the lepirudin dose
may be lowered to reach an aPTT ratio of
1.5 and discontinued when
the international normalized ratio exceeds
2.0.13 14 30
Potential problems with the use of the aPTT are its considerable variability between patients31 and a nonlinear correlation with lepirudin plasma levels. Especially at higher concentrations,32 33 the ecarin clotting time (ECT) shows a more linear correlation to lepirudin plasma levels.33 Prospective comparative studies between the 2 monitoring methods are lacking.
The activated clotting time was found to correlate poorly
with hirudin plasma levels (
0.07 µg/mL) during cardiopulmonary
bypass.33
Hemorrhage
In all reported clinical studies, minor bleedings were
more frequent in lepirudin-treated patients than in control patients.
Incidences of bleeding complications were strongly related to duration
of treatment, underlying disease, and comedication, particularly
thrombolysis. For different syndromes treated with the same lepirudin
dose (0.4 mg/kg IV bolus followed by
0.15-mg · kg-1 · h-1
IV infusion), bleeding risk was therefore different. Major hemorrhage
occurred in HIT in
12% of patients treated with lepirudin
(historical control,
9%),13 14 in
myocardial infarction (MI) plus acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) plus
thrombolysis in
8% (heparin
2%),34 and in unstable
angina (UA) plus ASA in 1.2% of patients (heparin,
0.7%).25
Neutralization of r-Hirudin
No specific antidote is available to neutralize
r-hirudin. Small studies in human volunteers demonstrated a reversing
effect of
Desmopressin.35 36
Hirudin-induced bleeding diathesis was reversed by prothrombin
complex,37 hemofiltration,
hollow-fiber filters (cutoff, 50 000 Da), and high- and low-flux
polysulfondialysers.20
Drug Interactions
Lepirudin and desirudin have been assessed together
with ASA, tissue plasminogen activator, and streptokinase (SK) in
patients with acute coronary syndromes. Although several thrombolysis
studies had to be stopped prematurely because of an unacceptably high
rate of cerebral hemorrhage with higher hirudin doses (0.4 mg/kg bolus
plus 0.15
mg · kg-1 · h-1
IV infusion34 or 0.6 mg/kg
bolus plus 0.2
mg · kg-1 · h-1
IV
infusion),38 39
the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Arteries
(GUSTO II) study suggested clinical benefit of hirudin for the
SK-treated patients,40 and
the Hirulog versus heparin in patients receiving streptokinase
(HERO-I) trial showed higher patency with bivalirudin and SK
compared with heparin and
SK.41
ASA shows an additive effect on bleeding time in individuals treated with hirudin.42 It is unknown how hirudin interacts in vivo with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, ADP receptor antagonists,43 UFH, or low-molecular-weight heparin. In vitro experiments indicate that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors also inhibit thrombin generation on the platelet surface,44 45 suggesting that combined use could increase bleeding risk.
Induction of Antibodies
Lepirudin has immunogenic
properties.46 Of 198 HIT
patients treated for
5 days with lepirudin, 45% developed
anti-hirudin antibodies. In 2% to 3% of them, the antibodies seemed
to have an enhancing effect, because hirudin dose had to be decreased
by >60% to maintain the aPTT within the target range, probably by a
decreased renal clearance of the lepirudin-immunoglobulin
complexes.47
Lepirudin in Coronary Artery Disease
Hirudin but not heparin significantly reduced platelet
deposition and eliminated mural thrombosis in a deep carotid injury
animal model.48 In humans,
hirudins have been shown to be effective in acute coronary syndromes
without ST elevation (UA), PTCA, and MI. The therapeutic window of
hirudins, however, is very narrow.
Acute Coronary Syndromes Without ST
Elevation
Lepirudin has been evaluated in patients with UA as an
adjunct to ASA in 3 trials: the Antiplatelet Trials (APT) pilot
study,49 Organization to
Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS-I), and OASIS-II. In
OASIS-I,50 patients with
acute chest pain suspected to be due to acute coronary syndrome without
ST elevation were randomized to receive 1 of 2 lepirudin doses or UFH
for 72 hours
(Table 2
). At 7 days, fewer subjects in the group treated
with lepirudin (0.4 mg/kg bolus plus 0.15
mg · kg-1 · h-1)
experienced the primary outcome (combined incidence of cardiovascular
death, new MI, refractory angina; relative risk [RR], 0.46; 95% CI,
0.21 to 1.02; P=0.047). In the
double-blind OASIS-II
trial,25 the primary end
point of cardiovascular death or new MI at day 7 showed a trend in
favor of lepirudin-treated patients
(Table 2
). Fewer interventions (CABG, PTCA, intra-aortic
balloon pump, thrombolytic therapy) were needed in lepirudin-treated
patients
(Table 2
).
|
A meta-analysis of the combined data of the 2 OASIS studies at 7 days showed that compared with UFH, lepirudin provided a 19% RR reduction (95% CI, 2 to 33; P=0.039) in cardiovascular death or MI; a 20% RR reduction (95% CI, 6 to 32; P=0.005) in cardiovascular death, MI, or refractory angina; a 17% RR reduction (95% CI, 5 to 28; P=0.009) in need for interventions during the first 7 days; and a 14% RR reduction (95% CI, 1 to 26; P=0.04) in death or MI at 35 days. In OASIS-II , there was an increase of 0.5% in major bleedings in lepirudin-treated patients (0.7% versus 1.2%; RR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.63; P=0.01) but no difference in life-threatening bleedings (0.4% versus 0.4%).
Similar trends were observed in the GUSTO IIb trial comparing desirudin (0.1 mg/kg bolus plus 0.1 mg · kg-1 · h-1 infusion) with UFH. The rate of death and MI at 30 days was lower in the desirudin group (9.8% versus 8.9%; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.00; P=0.058) without reaching statistical significance, whereas the risk of moderate bleeding was slightly higher (8.8% versus 7.7%; P=0.03).51
Acute MI
Lepirudin has been assessed in patients with acute MI
as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy with alteplase or SK and ASA in 5
studies (Hirudin for the Improvement of Thrombolysis
[HIT]-I,52
HIT-II,53
HIT-III,34
HIT-IV,27 and
HIT-SK54 ). In essence,
lepirudin, as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy and ASA, is at least
as effective as UFH with respect to early and sustained patency rates
and clinical outcome. However, the drug was associated with an
unacceptably high risk of severe hemorrhages when used at the highest
dosage (0.4 mg/kg plus 0.15
mg · kg-1 · h-1).34 54
Similar data have been obtained with desirudin (0.6 mg/kg plus 0.2
mg · kg-1 · h-1).38 39
The safety problem can be solved at the cost of reduced efficacy by use
of a substantially reduced hirudin dosage. In the HIT-IV study
(n=1208), a subcutaneous regimen of lepirudin (0.2 mg/kg plus 0.5 mg/kg
SC BID for 5 to 7 days) was compared with UFH in conjunction with SK.
The clinical outcome was similar in both groups with respect to
bleeding events and efficacy end points; complete resolution of
ST-segment elevation at 90 minutes was 28% versus 22%
(P=0.05) and at 180 minutes was
52% versus 48% (P=0.18).
Similarly, compared with UFH, desirudin at a reduced dose (0.1 mg/kg
bolus followed by 0.1
mg · kg-1 · h-1)
showed equal effects as an adjunctive therapy to tissue plasminogen
activator and SK in MI patients, with similar rates of major
bleeding.55
PTCA
A multicenter, open pilot
trial56 comparing the
effects of 2 lepirudin dose regimens with UFH in patients undergoing
coronary angioplasty for UA (n=61; for doses, see
Table 1
) suggested a dose-dependent reduction in troponin T
levels after the procedure. Desirudin (40 mg bolus plus 0.2
mg · kg-1 · h-1
for 24 hours, followed by 40 mg SC BID or placebo for 72 hours,
compared with UFH for 24 hours) reduced early cardiac events in a
prospective, randomized trial of 1141 patients undergoing PTCA but had
no apparent benefit with longer-term
follow-up.26
| Other Indications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dialysis
In a crossover study (n=11), lepirudin (0.15 mg/kg) and
heparin (5000 to 10 000 IU) were similarly effective with respect to
urea, uric acid, and
creatinine.23
On the basis of a dose-escalation study, a bolus of 0.08 mg/kg lepirudin before regular hemodialysis is recommended.20 Nowak et al19 reported on a patient dialyzed >50 times with hirudin (r-hirudin HV1) with dosages of 0.16 and 0.145 mg/kg. In patients with HIT and acute renal failure, a reduced dosage is often sufficient for safe hemodialysis or hemofiltration (0.005 mg · kg-1 · h-1; unpublished observation). Recovering diuresis, however, can lead to the need for drastically increased lepirudin doses.
CABG Surgery
In humans undergoing cardiac pulmonary bypass surgery
with lepirudin, close monitoring by use of the ECT is essential.
Pötzsch and Madlener24
developed an algorithm suggesting a precardiac pulmonary bypass bolus
of 0.25 mg/kg, with 0.2 mg/kg added to the priming solution. Plasma
levels at the start of cardiac pulmonary bypass surgery should be >2.5
µg/mL. During the surgery, 0.5 mg/min should be infused continuously
and adjusted with the use of ECT measurements every 15 minutes. The
infusion should be stopped 15 minutes before the end of cardiac
pulmonary bypass surgery. Patients with impaired renal function may
require hemofiltration to reduce lepirudin plasma
levels.24 The use of
lepirudin in cardiac pulmonary bypass surgery is currently restricted
to patients with HIT.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most important adverse effects of lepirudin treatment are hemorrhages and the induction of anti-hirudin antibodies. Definition of the optimal method of lepirudin monitoring and availability of an antidote for hirudin would probably increase drug safety. Anti-hirudin antibodies paradoxically enhance the pharmacological effect of lepirudin in a subset of patients but otherwise seem to be clinically irrelevant.
Other thrombin antagonists, such as argatroban or PEG-hirudin, are currently undergoing clinical trials and will probably add to the scope of clinical uses that this class of drugs has.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Apostolidou, M. F. Sweeney, E. Missov, L. D. Joyce, R. John, and R. C. Prielipp Acute Left Atrial Thrombus After Recombinant Factor VIIa Administration During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in a Patient with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 404 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. de Maistre, Y. Gruel, and D. Lasne Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: [Le diagnostic et le traitement de la thrombopenie induite par l'heparine]. Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6_suppl): S123 - S134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Martchenke, M. F. D. Pate, M. Cruz, and S. Phromsivarak What is the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in children? Crit. Care Nurse, February 1, 2004; 24(1): 66 - 67. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A Arpino and R. K Hallisey Effect of Renal Function on the Pharmacodynamics of Argatroban Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2004; 38(1): 25 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A Nutescu and A. K Wittkowsky Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for Anticoagulation Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2004; 38(1): 99 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2121 - 2131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Greinacher, N. Lubenow, and P. Eichler Anaphylactic and Anaphylactoid Reactions Associated With Lepirudin in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Circulation, October 28, 2003; 108(17): 2062 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Colognato, J. R. Slupsky, M. Jendrach, L. Burysek, T. Syrovets, and T. Simmet Differential expression and regulation of protease-activated receptors in human peripheral monocytes and monocyte-derived antigen-presenting cells Blood, October 1, 2003; 102(7): 2645 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bates and J. I. Weitz Emerging Anticoagulant Drugs Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2003; 23(9): 1491 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 638 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Bijsterveld, A. H. Moons, S. M. Boekholdt, B. E. van Aken, H. Fennema, R. J.G. Peters, J. C.M. Meijers, H. R. Buller, and M. Levi Ability of Recombinant Factor VIIa to Reverse the Anticoagulant Effect of the Pentasaccharide Fondaparinux in Healthy Volunteers Circulation, November 12, 2002; 106(20): 2550 - 2554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lubenow, R. Kempf, A. Eichner, P. Eichler, L. E. Carlsson, and A. Greinacher Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia* : Temporal Pattern of Thrombocytopenia in Relation to Initial Use or Reexposure to Heparin Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 37 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Bush, P. H. Lin, and A. B. Lumsden Image of the Month Arch Surg, February 1, 2002; 137(2): 221 - 222. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mehta and B. J. Meyer r-Hirudin for percutaneous coronary interventions--time to reconsider? Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2002; 23(2): 95 - 97. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E Newby and K. A A Fox Unstable angina: the first 48 hours and later in-hospital management Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 69 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Associa |