Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:1492-1496

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazur, W.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazur, W.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, W. H., III
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cardiomyopathy
Hazardous Substances DB
*ETHANOL
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Echocardiography

(Circulation. 2001;103:1492.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Brief Rapid Communications

Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy After Nonsurgical Septal Reduction Therapy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

Wojciech Mazur, MD; Sherif F. Nagueh, MD; Nasser M. Lakkis, MD; Katherine J. Middleton, RCT; Donna Killip, RN; Robert Roberts, MD; William H. Spencer, III, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Correspondence and reprint requests to Sherif F. Nagueh, MD, Section of Cardiology, 6550 Fannin St, SM-1246, Houston, TX 77030-2717. E-mail sherifn{at}bcm.tmc.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the absence of increased external load. Recently, nonsurgical septal reduction therapy (NSRT) with intracoronary ethanol has been introduced to treat severely symptomatic patients with outflow tract obstruction. Its long-term effects on LV mass, however, are unknown.

Methods and Results—The LV size, function, and outflow tract gradient of 26 HOCM patients (53±15 years old) who underwent NSRT were assessed by echocardiography at baseline and 1 and 2 years after the procedure. LVH was evaluated by wall thickness of individual myocardial segments, planimetered myocardial area, and mass. The outflow gradient decreased from 36±6 mm Hg before NSRT to 0±3 mm Hg at 2 years (P<0.001), with patients experiencing symptomatic improvement (P<0.05). LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions increased significantly at both 1 and 2 years (P<0.001). All parameters of LVH showed evidence of regression. LV mass decreased (301±78 g at baseline, 223±5 g at 1 year, and 190±58 g at 2 years; P<0.01), with the 2-year reduction in mass related to infarct size and the acute reduction in outflow tract gradient (r=0.48, P<0.05 and r=0.63, P<0.01, respectively).

Conclusions—NSRT results in LV remodeling that is characterized by an increase in LV size and a decrease in the extent of LVH.


Key Words: hypertrophy • cardiomyopathy • remodeling


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a genetic disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including heart failure and sudden death.1 2 Risk factors for sudden death include the presence of certain genetic mutations and the extent of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).3 4 Symptomatic patients with outflow tract (OT) obstruction are usually medically treated; in the few patients with persistent symptoms, surgical myectomy offers satisfactory control.5 6 Recently, nonsurgical septal reduction therapy (NSRT) has gained popularity as an alternative to surgery.7 8 9 10 Clinical evaluation from several centers suggests that NSRT is a safe and effective procedure for the relief of symptoms and OT obstruction. Given the strong association between LVH and sudden death, we thought that a complete data set regarding the long-term effects of NSRT on LVH would be particularly important and consequently evaluated the extent of LVH at 1 and 2 years after NSRT.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Population
The Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol, and all patients provided written informed consent before participation. The first 26 consecutive patients with symptomatic HOCM and documented LVOT obstruction gradient (>=40 mm Hg at rest or >=60 mm Hg on dobutamine provocation: mean dose 15±3 µg · kg-1 · min-1) who underwent NSRT, as previously described,10 and completed a 2-year follow-up composed the study cohort. The group had a mean age of 53±15 years (9 of 26 women). All patients had a septal wall thickness >=1.5 cm with a >=1.3 ratio of septum to posterior wall thickness. All had dyspnea, 17 had angina, and 12 suffered from presyncope/syncope.

Patients completed an NYHA classification questionnaire as well as a Bruce protocol stress test at baseline and 1 and 2 years after the NSRT procedure. Creatine kinase (CK) levels were determined before and every 6 hours during the 24-hour period after NSRT.

Echocardiographic Studies
Echocardiograms were performed with an HP or Acuson ultrasound imaging system equipped with 2.5-, 3.5-, and 5-MHz transducers. Standard parasternal and apical views were obtained. Short-axis tomograms were acquired at 3 levels: mitral valve, papillary muscle, and apex.

Color-guided continuous-wave Doppler was applied in the apical views to determine the peak LVOT gradient, with care taken to avoid contamination with the mitral regurgitation jet.11 Studies were stored for later analysis.

Echocardiographic Analysis
Using a computerized reading station offline, a single observer blinded to the patients’ identity, clinical data, and study sequence performed all measurements at baseline and 1 and 2 years after NSRT.

LV minor and major dimensions at end diastole and end systole, wall thickness, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and ejection fraction (EF) were measured according to American Society of Echocardiography recommendations.12 Left atrial volume was derived with the multiple-disks method.13

LVH was assessed according to previously published criteria.12 14 First, the wall thickness of each of the following myocardial segments was measured at both the mitral valve and the papillary muscle levels in the short-axis view14 : anterior septum, anterior lateral, inferior lateral, and inferior septum. Subsequently, the total wall thickness score was calculated at both levels.14 Second, end-diastolic myocardial areas at the mitral, papillary muscle, and apical levels recorded in the parasternal short-axis views were planimetered. Third, LV mass and mass indexed to body surface area were calculated.12 The end-diastolic myocardial area at the papillary muscle level was used to derive mass.

Because NSRT results in an infarction limited to the anterior septum basal segment that does not extend to the papillary muscle level, this approach would tend to underestimate the overall extent of regression in LVH. A good correlation was present between total myocardial area and mass at baseline and at 1 and 2 years (r=0.8, 0.86, and 0.89, respectively, all P<0.01).

Reproducibility
For intraobserver variability (12 patients analyzed), the 95% interval of agreement was -5% to 7% for segmental wall thickness, -8% to 10% for total thickness score, -11% to 14% for myocardial area, and -12% to 14% for mass.

SPECT Myocardial Scintigraphy
Stress single photon emission CT (SPECT) imaging 6 weeks after NSRT was used to determine infarct size and was performed by previously reported methods,10 with images reconstructed and reoriented in standard views. Experienced nuclear cardiologists, blinded to all other data and using raw polar maps statistically compared with a corresponding normal data bank, determined the SPECT defect size.

Statistics
Repeated measures of ANOVA or ANOVA on ranks were applied to evaluate changes in clinical and echocardiographic parameters at the 3 time points. Bonferroni t or Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used for all paired comparisons. The relation between changes in mass, infarct size, and acute reduction in LVOT gradient was evaluated by simple linear regression analysis. The study had >80% power to detect a 20% change in LVH. Statistical significance was declared if P<=0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The study cohort exhibited symptomatic and hemodynamic improvements after NSRT (Table 1Down). Angina class improved: only 1 patient had angina at 1 year, and none at 2 years (both P<0.001). None of the 12 patients with presyncope/syncope had any such events after NSRT (P<0.001), and only 4 of the 26 patients were on ß-blockers 2 years after NSRT. Peak CK after NSRT averaged 2009 U/L (868 to 4230 U/L). Concomitantly with the ethanol-induced septal infarction, patients developed an anterior septal scar of 6±6.1% (by SPECT), and 7 developed permanent complete heart block (26.9%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Changes in Symptoms, Gradient, and Dimensions After NSRT

Changes in LV Size and EF
Although the long-axis dimension was unchanged, LV end-diastolic dimensions (anteroposterior and mediolateral) increased significantly after NSRT (Table 1Up). Likewise, the minor-axis end-systolic dimensions increased (P<0.01), leading to significant increases in EDV (Figure 1ADown) and end-systolic volumes (P<0.01). LVEF was relatively unchanged; however, EF at year 2 was statistically lower (P<0.05).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Individual data points of LVEDV (A), wall thickness score at mitral valve level (B), wall thickness score at papillary muscle level (C), and mass (D) at baseline and 1 and 2 years after NSRT.

Regression of LVH
Septal thickness at the infarction site decreased from 20 mm before to 12 mm at 1 year (P<0.01) and 10 mm at 2 years (P<0.01 versus baseline, P>0.05 versus 1 year), and all parameters of LVH showed evidence of regression. The anterior septum thickness (distal to infarction site), inferolateral wall, inferior septum, and anterolateral wall at both the mitral valve and papillary muscle levels were significantly less both 1 and 2 years after NSRT (Table 2Down). A number of segments became significantly thinner, and the total wall thickness score at both levels continued to decrease (Figure 1BUp and 1CUp) up to 2 years after NSRT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes in LVH After NSRT

Similarly, the myocardial area at the mitral, papillary muscle, and apical levels was significantly smaller after NSRT (P<0.01).

LV mass also continued to decrease through the 2-year follow-up (Figure 1DUp); likewise, mass corrected for body surface area decreased significantly (P<0.001). This latter change was greater in year 1 than in year 2 (median values 38 versus 11 g/m2; P<0.05). The incidence of complete heart block was distributed equally between patients having LVH regression >=20% or <20%.

Determinants of LVH Regression
Significant but weak correlations were present between the reduction in LV mass at 2 years and the infarct size as assessed by both CK (r=0.48, P=0.05) and SPECT imaging (r=0.4, P=0.05). This weak correlation was due to several large infarcts and big gradient reductions when we initially performed the procedure and to our later ability to reach successful hemodynamic results despite smaller infarcts by targeting ethanol delivery to the culprit septal segments using myocardial contrast echocardiography. The strongest relation was evident with the acute reduction of LVOT gradient at the time of the procedure (r=0.63, P=0.01; Figure 2Down).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relation of change at 2 years in LV mass to peak CK (left) and acute LVOT gradient reduction (right).

On multiple regression analysis, CK leak and the acute reduction in gradient accounted for 52% of the variance in LV mass reduction (r=0.72, R2=0.52, P<0.001).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
LVH assessed as wall thickness throughout the LV circumference was significantly reduced after NSRT in our study cohort, along with a preserved EF. These results are in keeping with an earlier study with M-mode looking at only the posterior wall basal segment that reported a decrease in wall thickness.15

Implications for the Pathogenesis of HOCM
LVH in HOCM is believed to be a compensatory process secondary to the decreased contractility induced by the mutation that leads to increased ventricular pressure and stress, which induces hypertrophy,16 which is further enhanced by obstruction.17 Results of the present study show the association of LVH regression with the elimination of obstruction, confirming the notion that hypertrophy may be a secondary phenomenon.

Implications for Treatment
In our study cohort, NSRT essentially eliminated the LVOT gradient and was associated with marked reduction in symptoms and improved exercise tolerance. These long-term beneficial results are similar to those achieved with surgery.5 6 NSRT also resulted in regression of LVH, which may be another beneficial effect, given that the frequency of sudden death in HOCM patients increases with increased LVH.4 Regression of LVH may also contribute to symptomatic improvement and is probably related to the fact that the increasing hypertrophy in patients with obstruction contributes to a decrease in LV compliance and impaired exercise tolerance. The resultant septal infarction of NSRT, however, may predispose patients to ventricular dysrhythmias and potentially offset the benefit of LVH regression. Clearly, more prospective data are needed, because the number of patients followed up, despite no occurrence of sudden death over 2 years, is too small to determine the impact of NSRT on ventricular dysrhythmias. Also, when counseling HOCM patients regarding this procedure, serious complications of NSRT noted by others and ourselves should be considered. Side effects observed in our later experience, but not in the present group, include left anterior descending coronary artery dissection (6 patients, 3.2%), death (3 patients, 1.6%), and sustained ventricular tachycardia (1 patient, 0.5%, not on ß-blockers).

Although complete heart block developed in 7 patients (27%), including 4 with CK >2500 U/L, after we modified our technique, the incidence of heart block in the subsequent 162 HOCM patients decreased to 8.6%. Our modifications included injecting ethanol at a slower rate (1 to 1.5 mL/min instead of bolus) and using intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography to help target ethanol to the culprit septal segments. This latter incidence (8.6%) of complete heart block after NSRT is close to the 5% to 7% rate reported after surgery.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by grants from the T.L.L. Temple Foundation, Lufkin, Tex, and the Dunn Foundation and The Methodist Hospital Foundation, Houston, Tex. Dr Nagueh is supported by a Scientist Development grant (0030235N) from the American Heart Association—National Center, Dallas, Tex. We thank Maria Frias and Debbie Graustein for their invaluable assistance.


*    Footnotes
 
Guest Editor for this article was Robert A. O’Rourke, MD, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

Received December 31, 2000; revision received January 18, 2001; accepted January 18, 2001.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Wigle ED, Rakowski H, Kimball BP, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clinical spectrum and treatment. Circulation. 1995;92:1680–1692.[Free Full Text]
  2. Spirito P, Seidman CE, McKenna WJ, et al. The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:775–785.[Free Full Text]
  3. Marian AJ, Roberts R. Recent advances in the molecular genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1995;92:1336–1347.[Free Full Text]
  4. Spirito P, Bellone P, Harris KM, et al. Magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1778–1785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Williams WG, Wigle ED, Rakowski H, et al. Results of surgery for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1987;76(suppl V):V-104–V-108.
  6. McCully RB, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ, et al. Extent of clinical improvement after surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1996;94:467–471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sigwart U. Non-surgical myocardial reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 1995;346:211–214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Knight C, Kurbaan AS, Seggewiss H, et al. Non-surgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: outcome in the first series of patients. Circulation. 1997;95:2075–2081.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Seggewiss H, Gleichmann U, Faber L, et al. Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: acute results and 3-month follow-up in 25 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:252–258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lakkis NM, Nagueh SF, Kleiman NS, et al. Echocardiography-guided ethanol septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1998;98:1750–1755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sasson Z, Yock P, Hatle LK, et al. Doppler echocardiographic determination of the pressure gradient in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:752–756.[Abstract]
  12. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford MH, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358–367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kircher B, Abbott JA, Pau S, et al. Left atrial volume determination by biplane two-dimensional echocardiography: validation by cine-computed tomography. Am Heart J. 1991;121:864–871.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Spirito P, Maron BJ. Relation between extent of left ventricular hypertrophy and age in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:820–823.[Abstract]
  15. Faber L, Meissner A, Ziemssen P, et al. Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: long term follow up of the first series of 25 patient. Heart. 2000;83:326–331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sadoshima J, Takahashi T, Jahn L, et al. Roles of mechano-sensitive ion channels, cytoskeleton, and contractile stretch in stretch induced immediate early gene expression and hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:9905–9909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Marian AJ. Pathogenesis of diverse clinical and pathological phenotypes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2000;355:58–60. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Sorajja, U. Valeti, R. A. Nishimura, S. R. Ommen, C. S. Rihal, B. J. Gersh, D. O. Hodge, H. V. Schaff, and D. R. Holmes Jr
Outcome of Alcohol Septal Ablation for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 131 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. W. Hansen and N. Merchant
MRI of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Part 2, Differential Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Posttreatment MRI Appearances
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1344 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
E. W. Daw, S. N. Chen, G. Czernuszewicz, R. Lombardi, Y. Lu, J. Ma, R. Roberts, S. Shete, and A. J. Marian
Genome-wide mapping of modifier chromosomal loci for human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2007; 16(20): 2463 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Fifer
Most Fully Informed Patients Choose Septal Ablation Over Septal Myectomy
Circulation, July 10, 2007; 116(2): 207 - 216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. S. Jassal, T. G. Neilan, M. A. Fifer, I. F. Palacios, P. A. Lowry, G. J. Vlahakes, M. H. Picard, and D. M. Yoerger
Sustained improvement in left ventricular diastolic function after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1805 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Dokainish and N. Lakkis
Alcohol relaxes the stiff heart
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1769 - 1770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Roberts and U. Sigwart
Current Concepts of the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, July 12, 2005; 112(2): 293 - 296.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. G. van Dockum, A. M. Beek, F. J. ten Cate, J. M. ten Berg, O. Bondarenko, M. J.W. Gotte, J. W.R. Twisk, M. B.M. Hofman, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum
Early Onset and Progression of Left Ventricular Remodeling After Alcohol Septal Ablation in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2503 - 2508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. J. Deb, H. V. Schaff, J. A. Dearani, R. A. Nishimura, and S. R. Ommen
Septal Myectomy Results in Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2118 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F H Gietzen, C J Leuner, L Obergassel, C Strunk-Mueller, and H Kuhn
Transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: feasibility, clinical benefit, and short term results in elderly patients
Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 638 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. M. Chang, N. M. Lakkis, J. Franklin, W. H. Spencer III, and S. F. Nagueh
Predictors of Outcome After Alcohol Septal Ablation Therapy in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, February 24, 2004; 109(7): 824 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. G. van Dockum, F. J. ten Cate, J. M. ten Berg, A. M. Beek, J. W. R. Twisk, J. Vos, M. B. M. Hofman, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum
Myocardial infarction after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: evaluation by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 7, 2004; 43(1): 27 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. J. Maron, W. J. McKenna, G. K. Danielson, L. J. Kappenberger, H. J. Kuhn, C. E. Seidman, P. M. Shah, W. H. Spencer III, P. Spirito, F. J. Ten Cate, et al.
American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 5, 2003; 42(9): 1687 - 1713.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Writing Committee Members, B. J. Maron, W. J. McKenna, G. K. Danielson, L. J. Kappenberger, H. J. Kuhn, C. E. Seidman, P. M. Shah, W. H. Spencer III, P. Spirito, et al.
American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2003; 24(21): 1965 - 1991.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. M. Chang, S. F. Nagueh, W. H. Spencer III, and N. M. Lakkis
Complete heart block: determinants and clinical impact in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing nonsurgical septal reduction therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 296 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
S. Steinbis
Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy and Septal Ablation
Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2003; 23(3): 47 - 50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. J.S. Coats, M. Henein, M. Flather, U. Sigwart, H. Seggewiss, D. Wang, M. Yousufuddin, and W. Shamim
Retraction: Shamim et Al. Nonsurgical reduction of the interventricular septum in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1326-33.
N. Engl. J. Med., March 6, 2003; 348(10): 951 - 951.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. Shamim, M. Yousufuddin, D. Wang, M. Henein, H. Seggewiss, M. Flather, A. J.S. Coats, and U. Sigwart
Nonsurgical Reduction of the Interventricular Septum in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., October 24, 2002; 347(17): 1326 - 1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Cecchi, I. Olivotto, R. Roberts, and U. Sigwart
New Concepts in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathies * Response
Circulation, June 11, 2002; 105 (23): e188 - e188.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. J. Maron
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review
JAMA, March 13, 2002; 287(10): 1308 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. F. Nagueh, S. R. Ommen, N. M. Lakkis, D. Killip, W. A. Zoghbi, H. V. Schaff, G. K. Danielson, M. A. Quinones, A. J. Tajik, and W. H. Spencer III
Comparison of ethanol septal reduction therapy with surgical myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1701 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Roberts and U. Sigwart
New Concepts in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathies, Part II
Circulation, October 30, 2001; 104(18): 2249 - 2252.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
U. Sigwart
Non-surgical myocardial reduction for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2001; 3(suppl_L): L38 - L42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Septal Ablation for HOCM Reduces LV Hypertrophy
Journal Watch Cardiology, May 18, 2001; 2001(518): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazur, W.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazur, W.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, W. H., III
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cardiomyopathy
Hazardous Substances DB
*ETHANOL
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial cardiomyopathy disease
Right arrow Echocardiography