Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2001;103:e90

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zatuchni, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zatuchni, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Circulation. 2001;103:e90.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

"Switched" Precordial Leads

Jacob Zatuchni, MD

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Pennsylvania Cardiology Associates, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Paul P. Elko

Global Product Manager, Electrocardiographs and Analysis Algorithms, G. E. Marquette Medical Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

To the Editor:

In the article on "switched" precordial leads by Hurst,1 an ECG is shown in which leads V1 and V3 have been switched. Hurst states that the V1 lead wire was erroneously plugged into the V3 receptacle, and the lead wire labeled V3 was erroneously plugged into the V1 receptacle.

It is important to note, however, that a V lead in Wilson terminology is a V lead, regardless of where the exploring electrode is placed [V lead=exploring electrode on chest minus central terminal (R+L+F)/3], where R indicates right arm, L indicates left arm, and F indicates left leg. Only the subscript (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6) specifies its location.

Therefore, if lead V3 is placed at the V1 position, the ECG should be that of V1. Obviously, it is not, and Hurst did not address this. The reason why it isn’t resides in the design and circuitry of the apparatus. Regardless of the label on the lead wire electrode, the data printed are always labeled according to the channel coming into the acquisition module. For example, if the electrode wire labeled V6 is plugged into the V1 socket, the data will be printed out as lead V1 but with complexes of lead V6.

Therefore, Hurst’s admonition that today’s equipment requires that leads be placed specifically as labeled should be emphasized, because the socket labeled V3 will always be the same in any of the usual chest locations, rather than indicative of the p potential underneath the exploring electrode.

References

  1. Hurst JW. "Switched" precordial leads. Circulation. 2000;101:2870–2871.[Free Full Text]

Response

J. Willis Hurst, MD

Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road, NE, Suite 301, Atlanta, GA 30322 \.

I agree with Zatuchni and Elko’s comments and appreciate their contribution to the solution of the problem.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zatuchni, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zatuchni, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing