(Circulation. 2001;103:2382.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, and Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.
Correspondence to Stephen F. Vatner, MD, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, MSB-I576, 185 S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail svatner{at}humed.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThe monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were chronically instrumented. Baseline total peripheral resistance (TPR) was not different between the 2 groups. As expected, TPR rose less (P<0.05) with PE (5 µg/kg) in old monkeys (34±3%) than in young monkeys (57±6%); TPR also rose less with Ang II. Surprisingly, TPR rose more (P<0.05) with endothelin-1 (ET-1, 25 ng · kg-1 · min-1) in old monkeys (36±6%) than in young monkeys (10±2%). An ETB receptor agonist, sarafotoxin (S6c, 30 ng · kg-1 · min-1) was administered in the presence of an ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (1 mg/kg). Under these conditions, TPR increased more (P<0.05) in old monkeys (59±10%) than in young monkeys (31±4%). In the presence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition with NW-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (60 mg/kg), vasoconstriction induced by S6c no longer differed with age, because it was enhanced in young monkeys (P<0.05) (68±9% versus 31±4%) but not in old monkeys (58±6% versus 59±10%). Thus, after NOS inhibition, vasoconstrictor responses to ET were no longer enhanced in old monkeys.
ConclusionsPeripheral vasoconstriction (PE and Ang II) is reduced in old monkeys, as expected. Paradoxically, vasoconstriction induced by ET-1 was actually enhanced in old monkeys, which appears to be a result of impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation, which with ET-1 should involve the ETB receptor.
Key Words: aging endothelin receptors nitric oxide synthase vasoconstriction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A monkey aging model has the advantage of being phylogenetically closer to humans but exhibits fewer of the complicating effects of the diseases associated with aging, eg, diabetes and atherosclerosis.28 A recent study in this model from our laboratory indicated that with advancing age, vascular responsiveness to endothelium-dependent vasodilation was reduced in the absence of changes in baseline function.28 Therefore, it would be particularly interesting to determine the effects of ET-1 in this aging monkey model, in which endothelial vasodilation is known to be impaired.
Accordingly, the first goal of the present investigation
was to determine whether peripheral vascular responses to
vasoconstrictors, eg, phenylephrine and Ang II, and ET-1
are altered in conscious aging monkeys. To address this goal,
peripheral vascular responses (total peripheral
resistance, TPR) to ET-1 were compared with those to
phenylephrine and Ang II. The effects of ET-1, as noted
above, are more complex. Therefore, it is conceivable that a change in
vasoconstriction with ET-1 could be due to either a change in smooth
muscle vasoconstrictor activity or endothelial
vasodilator activity. To address this goal, vascular responses to an
ETB receptor agonist, sarafotoxin S6c (S6c),
were examined in the presence of an ETA receptor
antagonist, BQ-123. ETA blockade was
administered to allow full expression of ETB
activity. Furthermore, to address the question of whether
ETB receptor function was NO-dependent, the
vascular responses to S6c were also examined in the presence of NO
synthase inhibition with
N
-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester (L-NAME).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemodynamic measurements were made with the monkeys fully awake, with a tether system to transmit the electronic signals and catheter pressures to the recording electronics.28 29 All monkeys were active and eating well in the tether. All hemodynamic measurements were recorded on a digital multiple recorder (PC216Ax, Sony Precision Technology Inc) and on a multiple-channel thermal strip chart (Astro-Med Inc). The fluid-filled catheter in the aorta was connected to a pressure transducer (Datex Ohmeda) for the measurement of arterial pressure. Left ventricular (LV) pressure and a first derivative of LV pressure (dP/dt) were measured with the solid- state pressure gauge. The Transonic flow probe was calibrated in vitro with timed saline collections in a gravity flow system. Zero aortic flow was assumed to occur during mid and late diastole. Cardiac index was calculated as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Body surface area was calculated as 71.84x(body weight)0.425x(height)0.725.30 TPR was calculated as the quotient of mean arterial pressure and cardiac index.
Protocol
Bolus injections of phenylephrine (1, 2,
5, and 10 µg/kg) and Ang II (0.01, 0.02, and 0.05 µg/kg) were
administered through the tether via the left atrial catheter, and
measurements of phasic and mean arterial pressure, LV
pressure, LV dP/dt, and cardiac output were recorded continuously
in the conscious monkeys. A steady state for
hemodynamic analysis was reached within the
first half minute. ET-1 could not be administered in a bolus because a
steady state could not be achieved. Accordingly, ET-1 (Peptide
Institute Inc) was administered as 3-minute graded infusions of 25, 50,
and 100 ng · kg-1 ·
min-1. The selective
ETB receptor agonist S6c (Sigma Chemical Co) was
administered in the presence of an ETA
antagonist, BQ-123 (1 mg/kg), as 5-minute graded
infusions of 5, 15, and 30
ng · kg-1 ·
min-1. After 30 to 45 minutes of recovery
after S6c infusion, the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (60
mg/kg) (Sigma) was administered, and after hemodynamics
were stabilized (20 to 30 minutes), S6c infusion was
repeated.
Blood Samples
Blood samples were obtained for determination of
plasma concentrations of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine,
fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, and
triglycerides by use of the tether system in the morning
before feeding. These levels were measured by standard laboratory
analyses.
Statistics
All data were reported as mean±SEM. The comparison
between the groups with young and old monkeys was made by unpaired
t test for grouped data. The
dose-response curves were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated
measurements. Values of peak response to each drug administration were
compared with baseline by the paired
t test. A value of
P<0.05 was taken as the
minimal level of
significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline Hemodynamics
There were no significant differences in heart rate
(young, 165±7 versus old, 154±8 bpm), mean arterial
pressure (young, 80±2 versus old, 79±3 mm Hg), LV dP/dt (young,
2882±208 versus old, 3000±203 mm Hg/s), cardiac index (young,
1.64±0.06 versus old, 1.59±0.14
L · min-1 · m-2),
and TPR (young, 49±3 versus old, 51±3
mm Hg · L-1 ·
min-1 · m-2)
between young and old monkeys.
Responses to Phenylephrine, Ang II,
and ET-1
Increases in TPR to phenylephrine and Ang
II were significantly (P<0.05)
depressed in old monkeys compared with young monkeys
(Figure 1
). For example, 10 µg/kg of
phenylephrine increased TPR by 97±8% in young monkeys
versus 47±6% in old monkeys, and 0.05 µg/kg of Ang II increased TPR
by 87±13% in young monkeys versus 57±3% in old monkeys. The dose
relationship of TPR to ET-1, however, was paradoxically reversed
(P<0.05) in old monkeys
compared with young monkeys
(Figure 1
). For example, 25
ng · kg-1 · min-1
of ET-1 increased TPR less
(P<0.05) in young monkeys
(10±2%) versus old monkeys (36±6%).
|
Response to an ETB
Receptor Agonist (S6c) in the Presence of an ETA
Receptor Antagonist (BQ-123) Without NO Synthase
Inhibition
The ETA receptor
antagonist BQ-123 decreased baseline TPR by 10±3.7% in
young monkeys (P=0.05 versus
baseline) but did not change TPR in old monkeys (-0.5±2.1%,
P=0.058 versus young monkeys)
(Figure 2A
). In the presence of the BQ-123, the increases in
TPR to the ETB receptor agonist S6c were
significantly (P<0.05)
increased in old monkeys compared with young monkeys
(Table
,
Figure 3A
).
|
|
|
Response to an ETB
Receptor Agonist (S6c) in the Presence of ETA
Receptor Antagonist (BQ-123) With NO Synthase
Inhibition
NO synthase inhibition with L-NAME increased baseline
TPR more (P<0.05) in young
monkeys (126±6%) than in old monkeys (99±9%) in the presence of
BQ-123
(Figure 2B
). After L-NAME, there were no differences in the
increases in TPR to S6c in old and young monkeys, because S6c increased
TPR significantly more in young monkeys compared with the response in
the absence of L-NAME
(Figure 3A
and 3B
). In old monkeys, in contrast,
vasoconstrictor responses to S6c were not enhanced after L-NAME
(Figure 3A
and 3B
,
Table
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 years. The old monkeys (20 years old) in the
present study are thought to be age-equivalent to humans 60 to 70
years old, ie, old but not senescent, and the young monkeys (7 years
old) are thought to be age-equivalent to humans 20 to 25 years old, ie,
adults, not juveniles. It is generally thought that peripheral vasoconstrictor responses are depressed in older animals,1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 which might also be predicted for ET-1 if this were simply due to changes in smooth muscle tone. The effects of aging on the vasoconstrictor responses to ET-1, however, are more controversial. Depressed vascular responses to ET-1,9 10 11 12 13 14 19 31 no change,14 15 16 32 or increased responses9 17 18 19 32 have been demonstrated. In part, these differences can be attributed to responses in different vascular beds27 or to differences among species.27 Some of the effects may also be attributed to the denominator, ie, the age of the young animal. Importantly, the controls (young animals) in the present study were 7-year-old adults, ie, not juveniles. In many previous studies, juveniles were actually used as the young animals.9 17 18 19 Clearly, there can be differences between juveniles and adults as well as differences between adults and aged animals. These potential differences only reconcile some of the previous results. Accordingly, the underlying hypothesis of this investigation was that some of these differences could be attributed to the effects of aging on endothelial vascular control.33 Because ET-1 exerts different effects on endothelium versus smooth muscle, it follows that the resultant effects of ET-1 administration in older subjects would be affected differentially to the extent that aging impaired endothelial versus smooth muscle control. This is particularly important for this investigation, because we have recently demonstrated impaired endothelial vasodilation in this model of aging.28
The present results demonstrate depressed
peripheral vasoconstriction to activation of
1-adrenergic receptors and Ang II receptors.
Surprisingly, vasoconstrictor responses to ET-1 were enhanced in the
old monkeys. Importantly, baseline hemodynamics in the
old monkeys were not different from those in young monkeys.
The next question addressed was the mechanism for the paradoxical responses of ET-1mediated vasoconstriction in the old monkeys, which has not yet been elucidated. The responses to ET-1 are mediated by at least 2 receptor subtypes, the ETA and ETB receptors. Stimulation of ETA receptors located on smooth muscle cells mediates vasoconstriction via activation of phospholipase C.20 24 In addition, vasoconstriction is also mediated by the ETB receptor, which is located in smooth muscle.25 Conversely, ETB receptors located on endothelium mediate vasodilation through the release of endothelium-derived relaxing factors, such as NO and prostacyclin.20 21 22 23 ET-1 is generally regarded as a potent vasoconstrictor, but the vascular response to ET-1 must be based on a balance of vasoconstrictor and vasodilator influences. Thus, enhanced vasoconstrictor responses to ET-1 in old monkeys could be due to enhanced vasoconstriction mediated by either ETA receptors or ETB receptors, which are located on smooth muscle cells, or to depressed vasodilation mediated by endothelial ETB receptors. Because peripheral endothelial dysfunction was observed in old monkeys,28 we hypothesized that the paradoxically enhanced vasoconstrictor response to ET-1 in old monkeys was related to dysfunction of ETB receptors located on endothelium. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effects of an ETB receptor agonist in the presence of ETA receptor blockade. ETA blockade was used to allow full expression of ETB effects.
The ETB agonist S6c increased TPR more in old monkeys than in young monkeys. In the presence of NO inhibition with L-NAME, however, vasoconstriction induced by S6c was enhanced in young monkeys but did not change in old monkeys, resulting in abolition of the differential response of endothelin-induced vasoconstriction in old and young monkeys. These findings suggest that ETB receptorderived NO production was impaired in old monkeys. This is consistent with the concept of impaired NO-mediated endothelin-dependent vasodilator activity, which has been observed in old monkeys.28 Responses to an NO donor, sodium nitroprusside, were intact, however, indicating that responses to NO are not impaired.
Because vasoconstrictor responses mediated by the ETB receptor were not enhanced with aging, as evidenced by the data demonstrating similarities between young and old monkeys when the NO synthase pathway was inhibited with L-NAME, depressed endothelial ETB receptor function rather than enhanced smooth muscle ETB receptor function explains the findings in this investigation.
In addition, the ETA receptor
antagonist BQ-123 decreased TPR in young monkeys
(P=0.05) but did not change TPR
in old monkeys. Therefore, it is likely that ETA
receptor function is depressed in old monkeys rather than enhanced
(Figure 2A
). This also suggests a greater role for endothelin
in regulating peripheral resistance in young monkeys. We
did not measure blood endothelin levels in these animals. It has been
demonstrated, however, that plasma ET-1 level increases with
age,14 which may induce
desensitization and could result in a more important role for
endothelin in regulating peripheral resistance in young
monkeys.
Seo and Lüscher19 investigated the effects of aging on ET receptor subtypes in normotensive rats and hypertensive rats. In isolated renal arteries from normotensive rats, they demonstrated that the sensitivity to ET-1 was lower in old rats than in adult rats (but the maximal response to ET-1 was enhanced in old rats), and ETB receptor stimulation induced little vasoconstriction in both adult and old rats. Furthermore, they showed that the release of NO by endothelial ETB receptor stimulation increases with age. This difference from our results may be due to differences in species and vessels studied,27 to the methods (in vivo versus in vitro), or, as noted above, to differences in the age of the controls ("young" animals), where previous studies compared juveniles with aged animals.9 17 18 19
Recently, an important role of ETB receptors in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease has been suggested.34 35 36 37 Although it is still controversial whether selective ETA receptor antagonists or nonselective ETA/ETB receptor antagonists are more effective as vasodilators, beneficial vasodilator effects of nonselective ETA/ETB receptor antagonists have been demonstrated in patients with essential hypertension compared with the effect of selective ETA receptor antagonist.38 Conversely, in healthy subjects, the vasodilator effects of selective ETA receptor antagonists seem to be greater than those of nonselective antagonists.26 This discrepancy may be, in part, due to impaired ETB receptormediated vasodilation in relation to endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension but not in healthy subjects, which is consistent with the concept put forth in the present investigation. Furthermore, important roles of the ETB receptor subtype in patients with LV systolic dysfunction,34 in the progression of atherosclerosis,35 and in the pathogenesis of neointima formation36 37 have been demonstrated. Aging, in relation to enhanced responses to ETB receptormediated vasoconstriction, may complicate the role of endothelin in these pathological conditions.
In summary, paradoxically enhanced vascular responses to ET-1 have been demonstrated in old monkeys without associated cardiovascular diseases compared with young monkeys. The enhanced responses could be explained by impaired endothelial vasodilator function mediated by ETB receptors, which may be a more important mechanism to explain the enhanced vasoconstriction to ET-1 in old monkeys than depressed smooth muscle vasoconstrictor activity with aging. These findings should be considered when ET receptor agonists and antagonists are administered to older patients with cardiovascular disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 7, 2000; revision received December 31, 2000; accepted January 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenoceptor reserve.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;245:10161020.2. Tuttle RS. Age-related changes in the sensitivity of rat aortic strips to norepinephrine and associated chemical and structural alterations. J Gerontol. 1966;21:510516.
3.
Hyland L, Warnock
P, Docherty JR. Age-related alterations in
1- and ß-adrenoceptors
mediated responsiveness of rat aorta.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch
Pharmacol. 1987;335:5053.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
McAdams RP,
Waterfall JF. The effect of age on the sensitivity of pre- and
postsynaptic
-adrenoceptors to agonists and antagonists
in the rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch
Pharmacol. 1986;334:430435.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Cohen ML, Berkowitz BA. Vascular contraction: effect of age and extracellular calcium. Blood Vessels. 1976;13:139154.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Docherty JR. The
effects of ageing on vascular
-adrenoceptors in pithed rat and rat
aorta. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988;146:15.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Nielsen H, Hasenkam
JM, Pilegaard HK, et al. Age-dependent changes in
-adrenoceptor-mediated contractility of isolated
human resistance arteries. Am J
Physiol. 1992;263:H1190H1196.
8.
Supiano MA,
Hogikyan RV, Stoltz AM, et al. Regulation of venous
-adrenergic
responses in older humans. Am J
Physiol. 1991;260:E599E607.
9. Weinheimer G, Dooley DJ, Cazzonelli M, et al. Aging and endothelin-1 induced vascular contractions. Experientia. 1990;46:10081009.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Dohi Y, Luscher TF. Aging differentially affects direct and indirect actions of endothelin-1 in perfused mesenteric arteries of the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1990;100:889893.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Filippelli A, Palla A, Lampa E, et al. Aging and in vitro vascular responses to endothelin-1 in several rat strains. Pharmacol Res. 1993;28:193202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Ishihata A, Katano Y, Morinobu S, et al. Influence of aging on the contractile response to endothelin of rat thoracic aorta. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;200:199201.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Pasanisi F, Hamilton CA, Wadsworth R, et al. Phosphoinositide metabolism and aging in aorta from SHR and WKY rats: effects of endothelin-1 and noradrenaline. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1994;16:119133.
14.
Barton M,
Cosentino F, Brandes RP, et al. Anatomic heterogeneity
of vascular aging: role of nitric oxide and endothelin.
Hypertension. 1997;30:817824.
15. Cargnelli G, Rossi G, Bova S, et al. In vitro vascular reactivity to endothelin: a comparison between young and old normotensive and hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1990;A12:14371451.
16.
Kung CF, Luscher
TF. Different mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction
with aging and hypertension in rat aorta.
Hypertension. 1995;25:194200.
17.
Tank JE, Vora JP,
Houghton DC, et al. Altered renal vascular responses in the aging rat
kidney. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:F942F948.
18.
Tschudi MR,
Luscher TF. Age and hypertension differently affect coronary
contractions to endothelin-1, serotonin, and
angiotensins.
Circulation. 1995;91:24152422.
19.
Seo B, Luscher
TF. ETA and ETB receptors
mediate contraction to endothelin-1 in renal artery of aging SHR:
effects of FR139317 and bosentan.
Hypertension. 1995;25:501506.
20. Sakurai T, Yanagisawa M, Takuwa Y, et al. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature. 1990;348:732735.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hirata Y, Emori T, Eguchi S, et al. Endothelin receptor subtype B mediates synthesis of nitric oxide by cultured bovine endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:13671373.
22.
Dohi Y, Luscher
TF. Endothelin in hypertensive resistance arteries: intraluminal and
extraluminal dysfunction.
Hypertension. 1991;18:543549.
23.
de Nucci G,
Thomas R, DOrleans-Juste P, et al. Pressor effects of circulating
endothelin are limited by its removal in the pulmonary
circulation and by the release of prostacyclin and
endothelium-derived relaxing factor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1988;85:97979800.
24.
Masaki T, Kimura
S, Yanagisawa M, et al. Molecular and cellular mechanism of endothelin
regulation: implications for vascular function.
Circulation. 1991;84:14571468.
25.
Haynes WG,
Strachan FE, Webb DJ. Endothelin ETA and
ETB receptors cause vasoconstriction of human
resistance and capacitance vessels in vivo.
Circulation. 1995;92:357363.
26.
Verhaar MC,
Strachan FE, Newby DE, et al. Endothelin-A receptor
antagonist-mediated vasodilatation is attenuated by
inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis and by endothelin-B receptor
blockade. Circulation. 1998;97:752756.
27. Davenport AP, Maguire JJ. Is endothelin-induced vasoconstriction mediated only by ETA receptors in humans? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994;15:911.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Asai K, Kudej RK,
Shen Y-T, et al. Peripheral vascular
endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis in old
monkeys. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol. 2000;20:14931499.
29.
Sato N, Kiuchi K,
Shen Y-T, et al. Adrenergic responsiveness is reduced, while baseline
cardiac function is preserved in old adult conscious monkeys.
Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H1664H1671.
30. Dubois D, Dubois EF. A height-weight formula to estimate the surface area of man. Proc Soc Exp Biol. 1916;13:7778.
31. Donoso MV, Fournier A, Peschke H, et al. Aging differentially modifies arterial sensitivity to endothelin-1 and 5-hydroxytryptamine: studies in dog coronary arteries and rat arterial mesenteric bed. Peptides. 1994;15:14891495.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Moreau P,
dUscio LV, Luscher TF. Structure and reactivity of small arteries in
aging. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;37:247253.
33. Docherty JR. Cardiovascular responses in ageing: a review. Pharmacol Rev. 1990;42:103125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Cowburn PJ,
Cleland JGF, McArthur JD, et al. Endothelin B receptors are
functionally important in mediating vasoconstriction in the systemic
circulation in patients with left ventricular
systolic dysfunction. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:932938.
35. Iwasa S, Fan J, Shimokama T, et al. Increased immunoreactivity of endothelin-1 and endothelin B receptor in human atherosclerotic lesions: a possible role in atherogenesis. Atherosclerosis. 1999;146:93100.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Azuma H, Hamasaki
H, Niimi Y, et al. Role of endothelin-1 in neointima
formation after endothelial removal in rabbit carotid
arteries. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H2259H2267.
37. Douglas SA, Vickery-Clark LM, Louden C, et al. Selective ETA receptor antagonism with BQ-123 is insufficient to inhibit angioplasty induced neointima formation in the rat. Cardiovasc Res. 1995;29:641646.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Cardillo C,
Kilcoyne CM, Waclawiw M, et al. Role of endothelin in the increased
vascular tone of patients with essential hypertension.
Hypertension. 1999;33:753758.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. H. J. Thijssen, G. A. Rongen, P. Smits, and M. T. E. Hopman Physical (in)activity and endothelium-derived constricting factors: overlooked adaptations J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 319 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. J. Thijssen, G. A. Rongen, A. van Dijk, P. Smits, and M. T. E. Hopman Enhanced endothelin-1-mediated leg vascular tone in healthy older subjects J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 852 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Qiu, C. Depre, K. Ghosh, R. G. Resuello, F. F. Natividad, F. Rossi, A. Peppas, Y.-T. Shen, D. E. Vatner, and S. F. Vatner Mechanism of Gender-Specific Differences in Aortic Stiffness With Aging in Nonhuman Primates Circulation, August 7, 2007; 116(6): 669 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Donato, L. A. Lesniewski, and M. D. Delp The effects of aging and exercise training on endothelin-1 vasoconstrictor responses in rat skeletal muscle arterioles Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2005; 66(2): 393 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Takagi, K. Asai, S. F. Vatner, R. K. Kudej, F. Rossi, A. Peppas, I. Takagi, R. R. G. Resuello, F. Natividad, Y.-T. Shen, et al. Gender differences on the effects of aging on cardiac and peripheral adrenergic stimulation in old conscious monkeys Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H527 - H534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.M. Vanhoutte Ageing and endothelial dysfunction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., February 1, 2002; 4(suppl_A): A8 - A17. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |